Whether ultisnips support fuzzy match in deoplete
I know that ultisnips support make its snippets as a source of completion with deoplete plugin. I remember the source definition is under a neocomplete directory. However, I find it currently defined to match with match_head. I tried to change it to match_fuzzy, but the behaviour is still match_head.
So I want to ask whether ultisnips support to be matched with fuzzy style? If it support, then when typing code it will be more easy to find snippets.
vim-plugin fuzzy-search ultisnips
asked Nov 26 '18 at 12:02
AudisonAudison
11417
add a comment |
I know that ultisnips support make its snippets as a source of completion with deoplete plugin. I remember the source definition is under a neocomplete directory. However, I find it currently defined to match with match_head. I tried to change it to match_fuzzy, but the behaviour is still match_head.
So I want to ask whether ultisnips support to be matched with fuzzy style? If it support, then when typing code it will be more easy to find snippets.
vim-plugin fuzzy-search ultisnips
asked Nov 26 '18 at 12:02
AudisonAudison
11417
add a comment |
I know that ultisnips support make its snippets as a source of completion with deoplete plugin. I remember the source definition is under a neocomplete directory. However, I find it currently defined to match with match_head. I tried to change it to match_fuzzy, but the behaviour is still match_head.
So I want to ask whether ultisnips support to be matched with fuzzy style? If it support, then when typing code it will be more easy to find snippets.
vim-plugin fuzzy-search ultisnips
asked Nov 26 '18 at 12:02
AudisonAudison
11417
I know that ultisnips support make its snippets as a source of completion with deoplete plugin. I remember the source definition is under a neocomplete directory. However, I find it currently defined to match with match_head. I tried to change it to match_fuzzy, but the behaviour is still match_head.
So I want to ask whether ultisnips support to be matched with fuzzy style? If it support, then when typing code it will be more easy to find snippets.
vim-plugin fuzzy-search ultisnips
vim-plugin fuzzy-search ultisnips
asked Nov 26 '18 at 12:02
AudisonAudison
11417
asked Nov 26 '18 at 12:02
AudisonAudison
11417
edited Nov 26 '18 at 15:15
Audison
asked Nov 26 '18 at 12:02
AudisonAudison
11417
asked Nov 26 '18 at 12:02
AudisonAudison
11417
asked Nov 26 '18 at 12:02
AudisonAudison
11417
11417
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53480709%2fwhether-ultisnips-support-fuzzy-match-in-deoplete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53480709%2fwhether-ultisnips-support-fuzzy-match-in-deoplete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
