How and when did 'being fired' come to mean losing one's job?












3















I searched this site and also searched etymology online and could find nothing about this question.



The Ngram AmE shows that the phrase 'fired from job' began in the early 1920s for AmE and the Ngram BrE indicates that BrE only begins to have results from the late 1960s.



In BrE, the phrase 'being sacked' (Ngram BrE) is more popular and is more understandable as one would carry a sack home with any personal possessions, much as today people are seen with the ubiquitous cardboard box.



Where does the expression come from and why did it suddenly appear in the 1920s in the USA ?



Note: The Ngrams probably do not mean a lot, as there must be overlap with other meanings of 'being sacked' and merely querying 'being fired' would be useless.



===================================================================



Edit After Comment : The Ngram for 'given the sack' in BrE. Some correaltion with 'being fired' in AmE.



Further Edit : The OED does not (that I can find) refer to losing a job but there is a considerable entry for 'fire' with regard to the discharge of a weapon so I am beginning to see that 'fire' from a job means to 'discharge' someone and the analogy is to weaponry.










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    The same metaphorical development of the verb fire (first: lighting fire; then: using fire to ward off or repel; then: shooting off a projectile with fire; then: ‘shooting off’ a person from their job) is also found in the Nordic languages, where it’s definitely attested well before the 1920s, though I don’t know how long before. (Also, is sacked really more understandable? The explanation you give never occurred to me before – I’d always sort of half-imagined someone being stuffed into a sack, which somehow meant losing their job…)

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    2 hours ago











  • @JanusBahsJacquet, AFAIK, Brits also use sacked in the form "given the sack" which would make a much clearer connection to the origin OP attributed to it.

    – The Photon
    2 hours ago











  • I thought 'being sacked' involved being put into a sack and left on the side of the road.

    – Mitch
    55 mins ago
















3















I searched this site and also searched etymology online and could find nothing about this question.



The Ngram AmE shows that the phrase 'fired from job' began in the early 1920s for AmE and the Ngram BrE indicates that BrE only begins to have results from the late 1960s.



In BrE, the phrase 'being sacked' (Ngram BrE) is more popular and is more understandable as one would carry a sack home with any personal possessions, much as today people are seen with the ubiquitous cardboard box.



Where does the expression come from and why did it suddenly appear in the 1920s in the USA ?



Note: The Ngrams probably do not mean a lot, as there must be overlap with other meanings of 'being sacked' and merely querying 'being fired' would be useless.



===================================================================



Edit After Comment : The Ngram for 'given the sack' in BrE. Some correaltion with 'being fired' in AmE.



Further Edit : The OED does not (that I can find) refer to losing a job but there is a considerable entry for 'fire' with regard to the discharge of a weapon so I am beginning to see that 'fire' from a job means to 'discharge' someone and the analogy is to weaponry.










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    The same metaphorical development of the verb fire (first: lighting fire; then: using fire to ward off or repel; then: shooting off a projectile with fire; then: ‘shooting off’ a person from their job) is also found in the Nordic languages, where it’s definitely attested well before the 1920s, though I don’t know how long before. (Also, is sacked really more understandable? The explanation you give never occurred to me before – I’d always sort of half-imagined someone being stuffed into a sack, which somehow meant losing their job…)

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    2 hours ago











  • @JanusBahsJacquet, AFAIK, Brits also use sacked in the form "given the sack" which would make a much clearer connection to the origin OP attributed to it.

    – The Photon
    2 hours ago











  • I thought 'being sacked' involved being put into a sack and left on the side of the road.

    – Mitch
    55 mins ago














3












3








3








I searched this site and also searched etymology online and could find nothing about this question.



The Ngram AmE shows that the phrase 'fired from job' began in the early 1920s for AmE and the Ngram BrE indicates that BrE only begins to have results from the late 1960s.



In BrE, the phrase 'being sacked' (Ngram BrE) is more popular and is more understandable as one would carry a sack home with any personal possessions, much as today people are seen with the ubiquitous cardboard box.



Where does the expression come from and why did it suddenly appear in the 1920s in the USA ?



Note: The Ngrams probably do not mean a lot, as there must be overlap with other meanings of 'being sacked' and merely querying 'being fired' would be useless.



===================================================================



Edit After Comment : The Ngram for 'given the sack' in BrE. Some correaltion with 'being fired' in AmE.



Further Edit : The OED does not (that I can find) refer to losing a job but there is a considerable entry for 'fire' with regard to the discharge of a weapon so I am beginning to see that 'fire' from a job means to 'discharge' someone and the analogy is to weaponry.










share|improve this question
















I searched this site and also searched etymology online and could find nothing about this question.



The Ngram AmE shows that the phrase 'fired from job' began in the early 1920s for AmE and the Ngram BrE indicates that BrE only begins to have results from the late 1960s.



In BrE, the phrase 'being sacked' (Ngram BrE) is more popular and is more understandable as one would carry a sack home with any personal possessions, much as today people are seen with the ubiquitous cardboard box.



Where does the expression come from and why did it suddenly appear in the 1920s in the USA ?



Note: The Ngrams probably do not mean a lot, as there must be overlap with other meanings of 'being sacked' and merely querying 'being fired' would be useless.



===================================================================



Edit After Comment : The Ngram for 'given the sack' in BrE. Some correaltion with 'being fired' in AmE.



Further Edit : The OED does not (that I can find) refer to losing a job but there is a considerable entry for 'fire' with regard to the discharge of a weapon so I am beginning to see that 'fire' from a job means to 'discharge' someone and the analogy is to weaponry.







etymology american-english






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago







Nigel J

















asked 3 hours ago









Nigel JNigel J

17k94482




17k94482








  • 2





    The same metaphorical development of the verb fire (first: lighting fire; then: using fire to ward off or repel; then: shooting off a projectile with fire; then: ‘shooting off’ a person from their job) is also found in the Nordic languages, where it’s definitely attested well before the 1920s, though I don’t know how long before. (Also, is sacked really more understandable? The explanation you give never occurred to me before – I’d always sort of half-imagined someone being stuffed into a sack, which somehow meant losing their job…)

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    2 hours ago











  • @JanusBahsJacquet, AFAIK, Brits also use sacked in the form "given the sack" which would make a much clearer connection to the origin OP attributed to it.

    – The Photon
    2 hours ago











  • I thought 'being sacked' involved being put into a sack and left on the side of the road.

    – Mitch
    55 mins ago














  • 2





    The same metaphorical development of the verb fire (first: lighting fire; then: using fire to ward off or repel; then: shooting off a projectile with fire; then: ‘shooting off’ a person from their job) is also found in the Nordic languages, where it’s definitely attested well before the 1920s, though I don’t know how long before. (Also, is sacked really more understandable? The explanation you give never occurred to me before – I’d always sort of half-imagined someone being stuffed into a sack, which somehow meant losing their job…)

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    2 hours ago











  • @JanusBahsJacquet, AFAIK, Brits also use sacked in the form "given the sack" which would make a much clearer connection to the origin OP attributed to it.

    – The Photon
    2 hours ago











  • I thought 'being sacked' involved being put into a sack and left on the side of the road.

    – Mitch
    55 mins ago








2




2





The same metaphorical development of the verb fire (first: lighting fire; then: using fire to ward off or repel; then: shooting off a projectile with fire; then: ‘shooting off’ a person from their job) is also found in the Nordic languages, where it’s definitely attested well before the 1920s, though I don’t know how long before. (Also, is sacked really more understandable? The explanation you give never occurred to me before – I’d always sort of half-imagined someone being stuffed into a sack, which somehow meant losing their job…)

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
2 hours ago





The same metaphorical development of the verb fire (first: lighting fire; then: using fire to ward off or repel; then: shooting off a projectile with fire; then: ‘shooting off’ a person from their job) is also found in the Nordic languages, where it’s definitely attested well before the 1920s, though I don’t know how long before. (Also, is sacked really more understandable? The explanation you give never occurred to me before – I’d always sort of half-imagined someone being stuffed into a sack, which somehow meant losing their job…)

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
2 hours ago













@JanusBahsJacquet, AFAIK, Brits also use sacked in the form "given the sack" which would make a much clearer connection to the origin OP attributed to it.

– The Photon
2 hours ago





@JanusBahsJacquet, AFAIK, Brits also use sacked in the form "given the sack" which would make a much clearer connection to the origin OP attributed to it.

– The Photon
2 hours ago













I thought 'being sacked' involved being put into a sack and left on the side of the road.

– Mitch
55 mins ago





I thought 'being sacked' involved being put into a sack and left on the side of the road.

– Mitch
55 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














There’s a slightly earlier sense of “fired” meaning “eject or dismiss” that just dates to 1877 according to the OED:




She was advised to ‘hire a hall’, and the chairman was asked to ‘fire her out’.
Annals of the Great Strikes in the United States




The OED’s earliest citation in the no-more-job sense is from the 1879 Cincinnati Enquirer (reprinted here):




Professional Slang... Fired, Banged, Shot Out—When a performer is discharged he is one of the above.




The OED connects this to firing a gun: just like a bullet, whoever gets fired is outta there real fast.






share|improve this answer

































    2














    to fire in the sense of being fired: Etymonline.com




    The sense of "sack, dismiss from employment" is recorded by 1885 (with
    out; 1887 alone) in American English. This probably is a play on the
    two meanings of discharge (v.): "to dismiss from a position," and "to
    fire a gun," influenced by the earlier general sense "throw (someone)
    out" of some place (1871).




    and from the OED





    • fire 1879

    • transitive orig. U.S. slang. To dismiss (a person) from a job or position; to sack.







    share|improve this answer

































      1














      This source, Right Attitudes, admits that its explanation for being fired may be a legend.




      ...legend has it that the phrase originated in the 1910s at the
      National Cash Register (NCR) Company.




      The founder of NCR, John Henry Patterson, was "quirky". The article states that he was "a food and fitness fanatic and had his employees weighed every six months." This quirkiness makes the following explanation of the origin of being fired marginally more plausible.



      The article cites two cases of Patterson dismissing an employee -- one of whom was Thomas Watson Sr., who went on to found IBM -- and then ordering his desk taken outside and set afire.! Thus, although it was the employee's desk that was fired, the phrase was used of the employee.



      The article states its source as:




      Keynote address by Mark Hurd, then-president and COO of Teradata at
      Kellogg School of Management’s Digital Frontier Conference on 17- and
      18-Jan-2003. Teradata was previously a division of NCR Corporation,
      the company Patterson founded.







      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "97"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485121%2fhow-and-when-did-being-fired-come-to-mean-losing-ones-job%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3














        There’s a slightly earlier sense of “fired” meaning “eject or dismiss” that just dates to 1877 according to the OED:




        She was advised to ‘hire a hall’, and the chairman was asked to ‘fire her out’.
        Annals of the Great Strikes in the United States




        The OED’s earliest citation in the no-more-job sense is from the 1879 Cincinnati Enquirer (reprinted here):




        Professional Slang... Fired, Banged, Shot Out—When a performer is discharged he is one of the above.




        The OED connects this to firing a gun: just like a bullet, whoever gets fired is outta there real fast.






        share|improve this answer






























          3














          There’s a slightly earlier sense of “fired” meaning “eject or dismiss” that just dates to 1877 according to the OED:




          She was advised to ‘hire a hall’, and the chairman was asked to ‘fire her out’.
          Annals of the Great Strikes in the United States




          The OED’s earliest citation in the no-more-job sense is from the 1879 Cincinnati Enquirer (reprinted here):




          Professional Slang... Fired, Banged, Shot Out—When a performer is discharged he is one of the above.




          The OED connects this to firing a gun: just like a bullet, whoever gets fired is outta there real fast.






          share|improve this answer




























            3












            3








            3







            There’s a slightly earlier sense of “fired” meaning “eject or dismiss” that just dates to 1877 according to the OED:




            She was advised to ‘hire a hall’, and the chairman was asked to ‘fire her out’.
            Annals of the Great Strikes in the United States




            The OED’s earliest citation in the no-more-job sense is from the 1879 Cincinnati Enquirer (reprinted here):




            Professional Slang... Fired, Banged, Shot Out—When a performer is discharged he is one of the above.




            The OED connects this to firing a gun: just like a bullet, whoever gets fired is outta there real fast.






            share|improve this answer















            There’s a slightly earlier sense of “fired” meaning “eject or dismiss” that just dates to 1877 according to the OED:




            She was advised to ‘hire a hall’, and the chairman was asked to ‘fire her out’.
            Annals of the Great Strikes in the United States




            The OED’s earliest citation in the no-more-job sense is from the 1879 Cincinnati Enquirer (reprinted here):




            Professional Slang... Fired, Banged, Shot Out—When a performer is discharged he is one of the above.




            The OED connects this to firing a gun: just like a bullet, whoever gets fired is outta there real fast.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 40 mins ago

























            answered 1 hour ago









            LaurelLaurel

            32.7k663115




            32.7k663115

























                2














                to fire in the sense of being fired: Etymonline.com




                The sense of "sack, dismiss from employment" is recorded by 1885 (with
                out; 1887 alone) in American English. This probably is a play on the
                two meanings of discharge (v.): "to dismiss from a position," and "to
                fire a gun," influenced by the earlier general sense "throw (someone)
                out" of some place (1871).




                and from the OED





                • fire 1879

                • transitive orig. U.S. slang. To dismiss (a person) from a job or position; to sack.







                share|improve this answer






























                  2














                  to fire in the sense of being fired: Etymonline.com




                  The sense of "sack, dismiss from employment" is recorded by 1885 (with
                  out; 1887 alone) in American English. This probably is a play on the
                  two meanings of discharge (v.): "to dismiss from a position," and "to
                  fire a gun," influenced by the earlier general sense "throw (someone)
                  out" of some place (1871).




                  and from the OED





                  • fire 1879

                  • transitive orig. U.S. slang. To dismiss (a person) from a job or position; to sack.







                  share|improve this answer




























                    2












                    2








                    2







                    to fire in the sense of being fired: Etymonline.com




                    The sense of "sack, dismiss from employment" is recorded by 1885 (with
                    out; 1887 alone) in American English. This probably is a play on the
                    two meanings of discharge (v.): "to dismiss from a position," and "to
                    fire a gun," influenced by the earlier general sense "throw (someone)
                    out" of some place (1871).




                    and from the OED





                    • fire 1879

                    • transitive orig. U.S. slang. To dismiss (a person) from a job or position; to sack.







                    share|improve this answer















                    to fire in the sense of being fired: Etymonline.com




                    The sense of "sack, dismiss from employment" is recorded by 1885 (with
                    out; 1887 alone) in American English. This probably is a play on the
                    two meanings of discharge (v.): "to dismiss from a position," and "to
                    fire a gun," influenced by the earlier general sense "throw (someone)
                    out" of some place (1871).




                    and from the OED





                    • fire 1879

                    • transitive orig. U.S. slang. To dismiss (a person) from a job or position; to sack.








                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 1 hour ago

























                    answered 1 hour ago









                    lbflbf

                    20.8k22573




                    20.8k22573























                        1














                        This source, Right Attitudes, admits that its explanation for being fired may be a legend.




                        ...legend has it that the phrase originated in the 1910s at the
                        National Cash Register (NCR) Company.




                        The founder of NCR, John Henry Patterson, was "quirky". The article states that he was "a food and fitness fanatic and had his employees weighed every six months." This quirkiness makes the following explanation of the origin of being fired marginally more plausible.



                        The article cites two cases of Patterson dismissing an employee -- one of whom was Thomas Watson Sr., who went on to found IBM -- and then ordering his desk taken outside and set afire.! Thus, although it was the employee's desk that was fired, the phrase was used of the employee.



                        The article states its source as:




                        Keynote address by Mark Hurd, then-president and COO of Teradata at
                        Kellogg School of Management’s Digital Frontier Conference on 17- and
                        18-Jan-2003. Teradata was previously a division of NCR Corporation,
                        the company Patterson founded.







                        share|improve this answer




























                          1














                          This source, Right Attitudes, admits that its explanation for being fired may be a legend.




                          ...legend has it that the phrase originated in the 1910s at the
                          National Cash Register (NCR) Company.




                          The founder of NCR, John Henry Patterson, was "quirky". The article states that he was "a food and fitness fanatic and had his employees weighed every six months." This quirkiness makes the following explanation of the origin of being fired marginally more plausible.



                          The article cites two cases of Patterson dismissing an employee -- one of whom was Thomas Watson Sr., who went on to found IBM -- and then ordering his desk taken outside and set afire.! Thus, although it was the employee's desk that was fired, the phrase was used of the employee.



                          The article states its source as:




                          Keynote address by Mark Hurd, then-president and COO of Teradata at
                          Kellogg School of Management’s Digital Frontier Conference on 17- and
                          18-Jan-2003. Teradata was previously a division of NCR Corporation,
                          the company Patterson founded.







                          share|improve this answer


























                            1












                            1








                            1







                            This source, Right Attitudes, admits that its explanation for being fired may be a legend.




                            ...legend has it that the phrase originated in the 1910s at the
                            National Cash Register (NCR) Company.




                            The founder of NCR, John Henry Patterson, was "quirky". The article states that he was "a food and fitness fanatic and had his employees weighed every six months." This quirkiness makes the following explanation of the origin of being fired marginally more plausible.



                            The article cites two cases of Patterson dismissing an employee -- one of whom was Thomas Watson Sr., who went on to found IBM -- and then ordering his desk taken outside and set afire.! Thus, although it was the employee's desk that was fired, the phrase was used of the employee.



                            The article states its source as:




                            Keynote address by Mark Hurd, then-president and COO of Teradata at
                            Kellogg School of Management’s Digital Frontier Conference on 17- and
                            18-Jan-2003. Teradata was previously a division of NCR Corporation,
                            the company Patterson founded.







                            share|improve this answer













                            This source, Right Attitudes, admits that its explanation for being fired may be a legend.




                            ...legend has it that the phrase originated in the 1910s at the
                            National Cash Register (NCR) Company.




                            The founder of NCR, John Henry Patterson, was "quirky". The article states that he was "a food and fitness fanatic and had his employees weighed every six months." This quirkiness makes the following explanation of the origin of being fired marginally more plausible.



                            The article cites two cases of Patterson dismissing an employee -- one of whom was Thomas Watson Sr., who went on to found IBM -- and then ordering his desk taken outside and set afire.! Thus, although it was the employee's desk that was fired, the phrase was used of the employee.



                            The article states its source as:




                            Keynote address by Mark Hurd, then-president and COO of Teradata at
                            Kellogg School of Management’s Digital Frontier Conference on 17- and
                            18-Jan-2003. Teradata was previously a division of NCR Corporation,
                            the company Patterson founded.








                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 1 hour ago









                            ab2ab2

                            24k95995




                            24k95995






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485121%2fhow-and-when-did-being-fired-come-to-mean-losing-ones-job%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

                                count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

                                A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks