How shall I modify my trigger so that I can get the total_employees according to their departments?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







0















tables are given below.



CREATE TABLE `departments` (
department_id INT(2) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
department_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
total_employees INT(4),
PRIMARY KEY (department_id),
UNIQUE (department_name));

CREATE TABLE `employees` (
employee_id INT(4) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
employee_email VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
employee_first_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
employee_last_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
department_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (employee_id),
UNIQUE (employee_email),
FOREIGN KEY (department_name)
REFERENCES departments (department_name)
ON DELETE CASCADE);


this is the trigger, I want it to be showing the sum of total employees in each department.



delimiter $$
create trigger department_wise_total_employee_counting
after insert on employees
for each row begin update departments set total_employees=total_employees+1
where department_id=department_id; end$$ delimiter ;

INSERT INTO `departments`
VALUES
(1,'HRM',0),(2,'Accounting',0);
INSERT INTO `employees`
VALUES
(1,'bh@gmail.com','A','B','HRM'),
(2,'ak@gmail.com','C','D','HRM'),
(3,'mr@gmail.com','E','F','HRM'),
(4,'pr@gmail.com','G','H','Accounting');


On running the following query :



select * from departments;


I'm getting this output, which just gives the total employee count rather than the total for each department.
enter image description here



I am trying to get total_employees=3 for HRM and total_employees=1 for Accounting.
Would appreciate any sort of suggestions.










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    use mysql view instead of trigger

    – Tamil Selvan C
    Nov 29 '18 at 6:00











  • @TamilSelvanC would be great if you could demonstrate your idea a bit.

    – Bappi_SB
    Nov 29 '18 at 6:07






  • 1





    You shouldn't store stuff you can easily calculate - also you would need a delete trigger if someone leaves and an update trigger if employee changes department.

    – P.Salmon
    Nov 29 '18 at 7:29













  • In an insert trigger I would expect to see reference to NEW. values.where department_id=department_id should probably be where department_id=NEW.department_id

    – P.Salmon
    Nov 29 '18 at 7:32


















0















tables are given below.



CREATE TABLE `departments` (
department_id INT(2) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
department_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
total_employees INT(4),
PRIMARY KEY (department_id),
UNIQUE (department_name));

CREATE TABLE `employees` (
employee_id INT(4) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
employee_email VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
employee_first_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
employee_last_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
department_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (employee_id),
UNIQUE (employee_email),
FOREIGN KEY (department_name)
REFERENCES departments (department_name)
ON DELETE CASCADE);


this is the trigger, I want it to be showing the sum of total employees in each department.



delimiter $$
create trigger department_wise_total_employee_counting
after insert on employees
for each row begin update departments set total_employees=total_employees+1
where department_id=department_id; end$$ delimiter ;

INSERT INTO `departments`
VALUES
(1,'HRM',0),(2,'Accounting',0);
INSERT INTO `employees`
VALUES
(1,'bh@gmail.com','A','B','HRM'),
(2,'ak@gmail.com','C','D','HRM'),
(3,'mr@gmail.com','E','F','HRM'),
(4,'pr@gmail.com','G','H','Accounting');


On running the following query :



select * from departments;


I'm getting this output, which just gives the total employee count rather than the total for each department.
enter image description here



I am trying to get total_employees=3 for HRM and total_employees=1 for Accounting.
Would appreciate any sort of suggestions.










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    use mysql view instead of trigger

    – Tamil Selvan C
    Nov 29 '18 at 6:00











  • @TamilSelvanC would be great if you could demonstrate your idea a bit.

    – Bappi_SB
    Nov 29 '18 at 6:07






  • 1





    You shouldn't store stuff you can easily calculate - also you would need a delete trigger if someone leaves and an update trigger if employee changes department.

    – P.Salmon
    Nov 29 '18 at 7:29













  • In an insert trigger I would expect to see reference to NEW. values.where department_id=department_id should probably be where department_id=NEW.department_id

    – P.Salmon
    Nov 29 '18 at 7:32














0












0








0


1






tables are given below.



CREATE TABLE `departments` (
department_id INT(2) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
department_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
total_employees INT(4),
PRIMARY KEY (department_id),
UNIQUE (department_name));

CREATE TABLE `employees` (
employee_id INT(4) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
employee_email VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
employee_first_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
employee_last_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
department_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (employee_id),
UNIQUE (employee_email),
FOREIGN KEY (department_name)
REFERENCES departments (department_name)
ON DELETE CASCADE);


this is the trigger, I want it to be showing the sum of total employees in each department.



delimiter $$
create trigger department_wise_total_employee_counting
after insert on employees
for each row begin update departments set total_employees=total_employees+1
where department_id=department_id; end$$ delimiter ;

INSERT INTO `departments`
VALUES
(1,'HRM',0),(2,'Accounting',0);
INSERT INTO `employees`
VALUES
(1,'bh@gmail.com','A','B','HRM'),
(2,'ak@gmail.com','C','D','HRM'),
(3,'mr@gmail.com','E','F','HRM'),
(4,'pr@gmail.com','G','H','Accounting');


On running the following query :



select * from departments;


I'm getting this output, which just gives the total employee count rather than the total for each department.
enter image description here



I am trying to get total_employees=3 for HRM and total_employees=1 for Accounting.
Would appreciate any sort of suggestions.










share|improve this question
















tables are given below.



CREATE TABLE `departments` (
department_id INT(2) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
department_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
total_employees INT(4),
PRIMARY KEY (department_id),
UNIQUE (department_name));

CREATE TABLE `employees` (
employee_id INT(4) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
employee_email VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
employee_first_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
employee_last_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
department_name VARCHAR(30) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (employee_id),
UNIQUE (employee_email),
FOREIGN KEY (department_name)
REFERENCES departments (department_name)
ON DELETE CASCADE);


this is the trigger, I want it to be showing the sum of total employees in each department.



delimiter $$
create trigger department_wise_total_employee_counting
after insert on employees
for each row begin update departments set total_employees=total_employees+1
where department_id=department_id; end$$ delimiter ;

INSERT INTO `departments`
VALUES
(1,'HRM',0),(2,'Accounting',0);
INSERT INTO `employees`
VALUES
(1,'bh@gmail.com','A','B','HRM'),
(2,'ak@gmail.com','C','D','HRM'),
(3,'mr@gmail.com','E','F','HRM'),
(4,'pr@gmail.com','G','H','Accounting');


On running the following query :



select * from departments;


I'm getting this output, which just gives the total employee count rather than the total for each department.
enter image description here



I am trying to get total_employees=3 for HRM and total_employees=1 for Accounting.
Would appreciate any sort of suggestions.







mysql database-trigger






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 29 '18 at 5:45









Iain Duncan

1,321817




1,321817










asked Nov 29 '18 at 5:36









Bappi_SBBappi_SB

407




407








  • 2





    use mysql view instead of trigger

    – Tamil Selvan C
    Nov 29 '18 at 6:00











  • @TamilSelvanC would be great if you could demonstrate your idea a bit.

    – Bappi_SB
    Nov 29 '18 at 6:07






  • 1





    You shouldn't store stuff you can easily calculate - also you would need a delete trigger if someone leaves and an update trigger if employee changes department.

    – P.Salmon
    Nov 29 '18 at 7:29













  • In an insert trigger I would expect to see reference to NEW. values.where department_id=department_id should probably be where department_id=NEW.department_id

    – P.Salmon
    Nov 29 '18 at 7:32














  • 2





    use mysql view instead of trigger

    – Tamil Selvan C
    Nov 29 '18 at 6:00











  • @TamilSelvanC would be great if you could demonstrate your idea a bit.

    – Bappi_SB
    Nov 29 '18 at 6:07






  • 1





    You shouldn't store stuff you can easily calculate - also you would need a delete trigger if someone leaves and an update trigger if employee changes department.

    – P.Salmon
    Nov 29 '18 at 7:29













  • In an insert trigger I would expect to see reference to NEW. values.where department_id=department_id should probably be where department_id=NEW.department_id

    – P.Salmon
    Nov 29 '18 at 7:32








2




2





use mysql view instead of trigger

– Tamil Selvan C
Nov 29 '18 at 6:00





use mysql view instead of trigger

– Tamil Selvan C
Nov 29 '18 at 6:00













@TamilSelvanC would be great if you could demonstrate your idea a bit.

– Bappi_SB
Nov 29 '18 at 6:07





@TamilSelvanC would be great if you could demonstrate your idea a bit.

– Bappi_SB
Nov 29 '18 at 6:07




1




1





You shouldn't store stuff you can easily calculate - also you would need a delete trigger if someone leaves and an update trigger if employee changes department.

– P.Salmon
Nov 29 '18 at 7:29







You shouldn't store stuff you can easily calculate - also you would need a delete trigger if someone leaves and an update trigger if employee changes department.

– P.Salmon
Nov 29 '18 at 7:29















In an insert trigger I would expect to see reference to NEW. values.where department_id=department_id should probably be where department_id=NEW.department_id

– P.Salmon
Nov 29 '18 at 7:32





In an insert trigger I would expect to see reference to NEW. values.where department_id=department_id should probably be where department_id=NEW.department_id

– P.Salmon
Nov 29 '18 at 7:32












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














As was pointed out by @P.Salmon, in general you shouldn't store data you can easily calculate. For this application, a VIEW (as suggested by @TamilSelvanC) is a good solution. For example:



CREATE VIEW departments_view AS
SELECT d.department_id, d.department_name, COUNT(e.employee_id) AS total_employees
FROM departments d
LEFT JOIN employees e ON e.department_name = d.department_name
GROUP BY d.department_id;
SELECT * FROM departments_view


Output:



department_id   department_name     total_employees
1 HRM 3
2 Accounting 1
3 Engineering 0


Demo on dbfiddle






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks a bunch, exact solution that I've been looking for. Hats off.

    – Bappi_SB
    Nov 29 '18 at 8:08











  • No worries. Glad I could help.

    – Nick
    Nov 29 '18 at 8:11











  • But it gives default value as 1, when number of employees in a department is 0. how can I get rid of this? would appreciate any sort of suggestions.

    – Bappi_SB
    Dec 4 '18 at 10:58











  • @Bappi_SB sorry about that - I hadn't considered that possibility in my demo. I've updated the query and the demo to give the correct answer when there are no employees in a department

    – Nick
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:27











  • Thanks a bunch Sir.

    – Bappi_SB
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:32












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53532486%2fhow-shall-i-modify-my-trigger-so-that-i-can-get-the-total-employees-according-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














As was pointed out by @P.Salmon, in general you shouldn't store data you can easily calculate. For this application, a VIEW (as suggested by @TamilSelvanC) is a good solution. For example:



CREATE VIEW departments_view AS
SELECT d.department_id, d.department_name, COUNT(e.employee_id) AS total_employees
FROM departments d
LEFT JOIN employees e ON e.department_name = d.department_name
GROUP BY d.department_id;
SELECT * FROM departments_view


Output:



department_id   department_name     total_employees
1 HRM 3
2 Accounting 1
3 Engineering 0


Demo on dbfiddle






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks a bunch, exact solution that I've been looking for. Hats off.

    – Bappi_SB
    Nov 29 '18 at 8:08











  • No worries. Glad I could help.

    – Nick
    Nov 29 '18 at 8:11











  • But it gives default value as 1, when number of employees in a department is 0. how can I get rid of this? would appreciate any sort of suggestions.

    – Bappi_SB
    Dec 4 '18 at 10:58











  • @Bappi_SB sorry about that - I hadn't considered that possibility in my demo. I've updated the query and the demo to give the correct answer when there are no employees in a department

    – Nick
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:27











  • Thanks a bunch Sir.

    – Bappi_SB
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:32
















2














As was pointed out by @P.Salmon, in general you shouldn't store data you can easily calculate. For this application, a VIEW (as suggested by @TamilSelvanC) is a good solution. For example:



CREATE VIEW departments_view AS
SELECT d.department_id, d.department_name, COUNT(e.employee_id) AS total_employees
FROM departments d
LEFT JOIN employees e ON e.department_name = d.department_name
GROUP BY d.department_id;
SELECT * FROM departments_view


Output:



department_id   department_name     total_employees
1 HRM 3
2 Accounting 1
3 Engineering 0


Demo on dbfiddle






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks a bunch, exact solution that I've been looking for. Hats off.

    – Bappi_SB
    Nov 29 '18 at 8:08











  • No worries. Glad I could help.

    – Nick
    Nov 29 '18 at 8:11











  • But it gives default value as 1, when number of employees in a department is 0. how can I get rid of this? would appreciate any sort of suggestions.

    – Bappi_SB
    Dec 4 '18 at 10:58











  • @Bappi_SB sorry about that - I hadn't considered that possibility in my demo. I've updated the query and the demo to give the correct answer when there are no employees in a department

    – Nick
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:27











  • Thanks a bunch Sir.

    – Bappi_SB
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:32














2












2








2







As was pointed out by @P.Salmon, in general you shouldn't store data you can easily calculate. For this application, a VIEW (as suggested by @TamilSelvanC) is a good solution. For example:



CREATE VIEW departments_view AS
SELECT d.department_id, d.department_name, COUNT(e.employee_id) AS total_employees
FROM departments d
LEFT JOIN employees e ON e.department_name = d.department_name
GROUP BY d.department_id;
SELECT * FROM departments_view


Output:



department_id   department_name     total_employees
1 HRM 3
2 Accounting 1
3 Engineering 0


Demo on dbfiddle






share|improve this answer















As was pointed out by @P.Salmon, in general you shouldn't store data you can easily calculate. For this application, a VIEW (as suggested by @TamilSelvanC) is a good solution. For example:



CREATE VIEW departments_view AS
SELECT d.department_id, d.department_name, COUNT(e.employee_id) AS total_employees
FROM departments d
LEFT JOIN employees e ON e.department_name = d.department_name
GROUP BY d.department_id;
SELECT * FROM departments_view


Output:



department_id   department_name     total_employees
1 HRM 3
2 Accounting 1
3 Engineering 0


Demo on dbfiddle







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 4 '18 at 11:26

























answered Nov 29 '18 at 7:41









NickNick

38.7k132443




38.7k132443













  • Thanks a bunch, exact solution that I've been looking for. Hats off.

    – Bappi_SB
    Nov 29 '18 at 8:08











  • No worries. Glad I could help.

    – Nick
    Nov 29 '18 at 8:11











  • But it gives default value as 1, when number of employees in a department is 0. how can I get rid of this? would appreciate any sort of suggestions.

    – Bappi_SB
    Dec 4 '18 at 10:58











  • @Bappi_SB sorry about that - I hadn't considered that possibility in my demo. I've updated the query and the demo to give the correct answer when there are no employees in a department

    – Nick
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:27











  • Thanks a bunch Sir.

    – Bappi_SB
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:32



















  • Thanks a bunch, exact solution that I've been looking for. Hats off.

    – Bappi_SB
    Nov 29 '18 at 8:08











  • No worries. Glad I could help.

    – Nick
    Nov 29 '18 at 8:11











  • But it gives default value as 1, when number of employees in a department is 0. how can I get rid of this? would appreciate any sort of suggestions.

    – Bappi_SB
    Dec 4 '18 at 10:58











  • @Bappi_SB sorry about that - I hadn't considered that possibility in my demo. I've updated the query and the demo to give the correct answer when there are no employees in a department

    – Nick
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:27











  • Thanks a bunch Sir.

    – Bappi_SB
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:32

















Thanks a bunch, exact solution that I've been looking for. Hats off.

– Bappi_SB
Nov 29 '18 at 8:08





Thanks a bunch, exact solution that I've been looking for. Hats off.

– Bappi_SB
Nov 29 '18 at 8:08













No worries. Glad I could help.

– Nick
Nov 29 '18 at 8:11





No worries. Glad I could help.

– Nick
Nov 29 '18 at 8:11













But it gives default value as 1, when number of employees in a department is 0. how can I get rid of this? would appreciate any sort of suggestions.

– Bappi_SB
Dec 4 '18 at 10:58





But it gives default value as 1, when number of employees in a department is 0. how can I get rid of this? would appreciate any sort of suggestions.

– Bappi_SB
Dec 4 '18 at 10:58













@Bappi_SB sorry about that - I hadn't considered that possibility in my demo. I've updated the query and the demo to give the correct answer when there are no employees in a department

– Nick
Dec 4 '18 at 11:27





@Bappi_SB sorry about that - I hadn't considered that possibility in my demo. I've updated the query and the demo to give the correct answer when there are no employees in a department

– Nick
Dec 4 '18 at 11:27













Thanks a bunch Sir.

– Bappi_SB
Dec 4 '18 at 11:32





Thanks a bunch Sir.

– Bappi_SB
Dec 4 '18 at 11:32




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53532486%2fhow-shall-i-modify-my-trigger-so-that-i-can-get-the-total-employees-according-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)