Do sorcerers' Subtle Spells require a skill check to be unseen?












9












$begingroup$


I have a guest player who is secretly an evil "plant" inside the party causing trouble. He's a sorcerer who wants to use Subtle Spell metamagic to stop the party from delving into his master's old lair, and he has a custom ring item that works as a hands-free arcane focus. He and I agreed that he'd give me signals about what to cast and where, and I'd roll the damage and keep track of the lost sorcerer points.



So the party is sneaking past a sleeping giant and the sorcerer signals fireball on the party to wake the giant. After the battle, the cleric says her passive Perception (which is pretty high, admittedly) should have let her see where the fireball originated from, pointing out that fireball says:




A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range




Now, I assume the pointing finger is part of the somatic components of fireball and thus not necessary with the Subtle Spell metamagic. And for spells that obviously originate from the caster like cone attacks, it wouldn't be particularly possible to hide the location of the caster. But fireball's streak effect doesn't seem to be a mechanic of the spell, more just flavor text.



I addressed the problem in-game by rolling a Sleight of Hand check against the cleric's passive Perception using the sorcerer's stats and managed to keep it hidden and "it happened so fast you saw it came from behind you but nothing else", but is that the right solution?



But the more I think about it, the more complicated it seems. Does it follow the stealth rules where any attack, even long distance arrows, immediately gives away the position of the attacker? Would a subtle psychic scream (XGtE, p. 163) be traceable to the caster despite having no visible ties to the caster?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Related: Is there “flavor text” in D&D 5e spells? and How loud/obvious is a wizard casting a spell?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    1 hour ago
















9












$begingroup$


I have a guest player who is secretly an evil "plant" inside the party causing trouble. He's a sorcerer who wants to use Subtle Spell metamagic to stop the party from delving into his master's old lair, and he has a custom ring item that works as a hands-free arcane focus. He and I agreed that he'd give me signals about what to cast and where, and I'd roll the damage and keep track of the lost sorcerer points.



So the party is sneaking past a sleeping giant and the sorcerer signals fireball on the party to wake the giant. After the battle, the cleric says her passive Perception (which is pretty high, admittedly) should have let her see where the fireball originated from, pointing out that fireball says:




A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range




Now, I assume the pointing finger is part of the somatic components of fireball and thus not necessary with the Subtle Spell metamagic. And for spells that obviously originate from the caster like cone attacks, it wouldn't be particularly possible to hide the location of the caster. But fireball's streak effect doesn't seem to be a mechanic of the spell, more just flavor text.



I addressed the problem in-game by rolling a Sleight of Hand check against the cleric's passive Perception using the sorcerer's stats and managed to keep it hidden and "it happened so fast you saw it came from behind you but nothing else", but is that the right solution?



But the more I think about it, the more complicated it seems. Does it follow the stealth rules where any attack, even long distance arrows, immediately gives away the position of the attacker? Would a subtle psychic scream (XGtE, p. 163) be traceable to the caster despite having no visible ties to the caster?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Related: Is there “flavor text” in D&D 5e spells? and How loud/obvious is a wizard casting a spell?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    1 hour ago














9












9








9


1



$begingroup$


I have a guest player who is secretly an evil "plant" inside the party causing trouble. He's a sorcerer who wants to use Subtle Spell metamagic to stop the party from delving into his master's old lair, and he has a custom ring item that works as a hands-free arcane focus. He and I agreed that he'd give me signals about what to cast and where, and I'd roll the damage and keep track of the lost sorcerer points.



So the party is sneaking past a sleeping giant and the sorcerer signals fireball on the party to wake the giant. After the battle, the cleric says her passive Perception (which is pretty high, admittedly) should have let her see where the fireball originated from, pointing out that fireball says:




A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range




Now, I assume the pointing finger is part of the somatic components of fireball and thus not necessary with the Subtle Spell metamagic. And for spells that obviously originate from the caster like cone attacks, it wouldn't be particularly possible to hide the location of the caster. But fireball's streak effect doesn't seem to be a mechanic of the spell, more just flavor text.



I addressed the problem in-game by rolling a Sleight of Hand check against the cleric's passive Perception using the sorcerer's stats and managed to keep it hidden and "it happened so fast you saw it came from behind you but nothing else", but is that the right solution?



But the more I think about it, the more complicated it seems. Does it follow the stealth rules where any attack, even long distance arrows, immediately gives away the position of the attacker? Would a subtle psychic scream (XGtE, p. 163) be traceable to the caster despite having no visible ties to the caster?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have a guest player who is secretly an evil "plant" inside the party causing trouble. He's a sorcerer who wants to use Subtle Spell metamagic to stop the party from delving into his master's old lair, and he has a custom ring item that works as a hands-free arcane focus. He and I agreed that he'd give me signals about what to cast and where, and I'd roll the damage and keep track of the lost sorcerer points.



So the party is sneaking past a sleeping giant and the sorcerer signals fireball on the party to wake the giant. After the battle, the cleric says her passive Perception (which is pretty high, admittedly) should have let her see where the fireball originated from, pointing out that fireball says:




A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range




Now, I assume the pointing finger is part of the somatic components of fireball and thus not necessary with the Subtle Spell metamagic. And for spells that obviously originate from the caster like cone attacks, it wouldn't be particularly possible to hide the location of the caster. But fireball's streak effect doesn't seem to be a mechanic of the spell, more just flavor text.



I addressed the problem in-game by rolling a Sleight of Hand check against the cleric's passive Perception using the sorcerer's stats and managed to keep it hidden and "it happened so fast you saw it came from behind you but nothing else", but is that the right solution?



But the more I think about it, the more complicated it seems. Does it follow the stealth rules where any attack, even long distance arrows, immediately gives away the position of the attacker? Would a subtle psychic scream (XGtE, p. 163) be traceable to the caster despite having no visible ties to the caster?







dnd-5e spells magic sorcerer stealth






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









V2Blast

25.7k488158




25.7k488158










asked 5 hours ago









Miles BedingerMiles Bedinger

3,924638




3,924638












  • $begingroup$
    Related: Is there “flavor text” in D&D 5e spells? and How loud/obvious is a wizard casting a spell?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    1 hour ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Related: Is there “flavor text” in D&D 5e spells? and How loud/obvious is a wizard casting a spell?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
Related: Is there “flavor text” in D&D 5e spells? and How loud/obvious is a wizard casting a spell?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Related: Is there “flavor text” in D&D 5e spells? and How loud/obvious is a wizard casting a spell?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

Unclear, but it doesn't disguise fireball by default



It is worth noting that the spell description is in addition and, more importantly, separate from material, verbal, and somatic components.



For example, the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium states, in regards to suggestion,




Verbal components are mystic words (PH, 203), not normal speech. The spell’s suggestion is an intelligible utterance that is separate from the verbal component. The command spell is the simplest example of this principle. The utterance of the verbal component is separate from, and precedes, any verbal utterance that would bring about the spell’s effect.




I use this evidence to conclude that in the case of fireball, the bright streak from your pointed feature is a required portion of the spell's effect, outside of the verbal and somatic components that the metamagic removes.



Casting a spell attack, notably, does automatically reveal you



On PHB 195, under Unseen Attackers and Targets:




If you are hidden - both unseen and unheard - when you make an attack, you give away your location when the attack hits or misses.




The section does not specify for spells with a save DC (or other effects), so the default would be that it doesn't reveal you.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    Subtle Spell only covers somatic components, not other spell effects



    By the wording of Subtle Spell:




    When you cast a spell, you can spend 1 sorcery point to cast it without any somatic or verbal components.




    If we look at the basic rules on Somatic Spellcasting Components, we're given:




    Spellcasting gestures might include a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. If a spell requires a somatic component, the caster must have free use of at least one hand to perform these gestures.




    Somatic components are specific hand gesture requirements necessarily for all somatic spells. This is separate from gestures specified within the spell itself, which are more akin to being part of the effect of the spell. Subtle Spell means you don't need to do the intricate hand signs or verbal parts to cast it, but once cast the effect takes place, which includes "A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range".



    How perceivable/traceable this is, however, is up to the DM and the situation. I'd rule similar to how you did in the example you gave since even if you rule the hand does nothing, the bright flashing streak isn't a somatic component, and it has to come from somewhere.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "122"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144051%2fdo-sorcerers-subtle-spells-require-a-skill-check-to-be-unseen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      8












      $begingroup$

      Unclear, but it doesn't disguise fireball by default



      It is worth noting that the spell description is in addition and, more importantly, separate from material, verbal, and somatic components.



      For example, the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium states, in regards to suggestion,




      Verbal components are mystic words (PH, 203), not normal speech. The spell’s suggestion is an intelligible utterance that is separate from the verbal component. The command spell is the simplest example of this principle. The utterance of the verbal component is separate from, and precedes, any verbal utterance that would bring about the spell’s effect.




      I use this evidence to conclude that in the case of fireball, the bright streak from your pointed feature is a required portion of the spell's effect, outside of the verbal and somatic components that the metamagic removes.



      Casting a spell attack, notably, does automatically reveal you



      On PHB 195, under Unseen Attackers and Targets:




      If you are hidden - both unseen and unheard - when you make an attack, you give away your location when the attack hits or misses.




      The section does not specify for spells with a save DC (or other effects), so the default would be that it doesn't reveal you.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        8












        $begingroup$

        Unclear, but it doesn't disguise fireball by default



        It is worth noting that the spell description is in addition and, more importantly, separate from material, verbal, and somatic components.



        For example, the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium states, in regards to suggestion,




        Verbal components are mystic words (PH, 203), not normal speech. The spell’s suggestion is an intelligible utterance that is separate from the verbal component. The command spell is the simplest example of this principle. The utterance of the verbal component is separate from, and precedes, any verbal utterance that would bring about the spell’s effect.




        I use this evidence to conclude that in the case of fireball, the bright streak from your pointed feature is a required portion of the spell's effect, outside of the verbal and somatic components that the metamagic removes.



        Casting a spell attack, notably, does automatically reveal you



        On PHB 195, under Unseen Attackers and Targets:




        If you are hidden - both unseen and unheard - when you make an attack, you give away your location when the attack hits or misses.




        The section does not specify for spells with a save DC (or other effects), so the default would be that it doesn't reveal you.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          Unclear, but it doesn't disguise fireball by default



          It is worth noting that the spell description is in addition and, more importantly, separate from material, verbal, and somatic components.



          For example, the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium states, in regards to suggestion,




          Verbal components are mystic words (PH, 203), not normal speech. The spell’s suggestion is an intelligible utterance that is separate from the verbal component. The command spell is the simplest example of this principle. The utterance of the verbal component is separate from, and precedes, any verbal utterance that would bring about the spell’s effect.




          I use this evidence to conclude that in the case of fireball, the bright streak from your pointed feature is a required portion of the spell's effect, outside of the verbal and somatic components that the metamagic removes.



          Casting a spell attack, notably, does automatically reveal you



          On PHB 195, under Unseen Attackers and Targets:




          If you are hidden - both unseen and unheard - when you make an attack, you give away your location when the attack hits or misses.




          The section does not specify for spells with a save DC (or other effects), so the default would be that it doesn't reveal you.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Unclear, but it doesn't disguise fireball by default



          It is worth noting that the spell description is in addition and, more importantly, separate from material, verbal, and somatic components.



          For example, the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium states, in regards to suggestion,




          Verbal components are mystic words (PH, 203), not normal speech. The spell’s suggestion is an intelligible utterance that is separate from the verbal component. The command spell is the simplest example of this principle. The utterance of the verbal component is separate from, and precedes, any verbal utterance that would bring about the spell’s effect.




          I use this evidence to conclude that in the case of fireball, the bright streak from your pointed feature is a required portion of the spell's effect, outside of the verbal and somatic components that the metamagic removes.



          Casting a spell attack, notably, does automatically reveal you



          On PHB 195, under Unseen Attackers and Targets:




          If you are hidden - both unseen and unheard - when you make an attack, you give away your location when the attack hits or misses.




          The section does not specify for spells with a save DC (or other effects), so the default would be that it doesn't reveal you.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 5 hours ago









          Blake SteelBlake Steel

          4,0981948




          4,0981948

























              3












              $begingroup$

              Subtle Spell only covers somatic components, not other spell effects



              By the wording of Subtle Spell:




              When you cast a spell, you can spend 1 sorcery point to cast it without any somatic or verbal components.




              If we look at the basic rules on Somatic Spellcasting Components, we're given:




              Spellcasting gestures might include a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. If a spell requires a somatic component, the caster must have free use of at least one hand to perform these gestures.




              Somatic components are specific hand gesture requirements necessarily for all somatic spells. This is separate from gestures specified within the spell itself, which are more akin to being part of the effect of the spell. Subtle Spell means you don't need to do the intricate hand signs or verbal parts to cast it, but once cast the effect takes place, which includes "A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range".



              How perceivable/traceable this is, however, is up to the DM and the situation. I'd rule similar to how you did in the example you gave since even if you rule the hand does nothing, the bright flashing streak isn't a somatic component, and it has to come from somewhere.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                Subtle Spell only covers somatic components, not other spell effects



                By the wording of Subtle Spell:




                When you cast a spell, you can spend 1 sorcery point to cast it without any somatic or verbal components.




                If we look at the basic rules on Somatic Spellcasting Components, we're given:




                Spellcasting gestures might include a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. If a spell requires a somatic component, the caster must have free use of at least one hand to perform these gestures.




                Somatic components are specific hand gesture requirements necessarily for all somatic spells. This is separate from gestures specified within the spell itself, which are more akin to being part of the effect of the spell. Subtle Spell means you don't need to do the intricate hand signs or verbal parts to cast it, but once cast the effect takes place, which includes "A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range".



                How perceivable/traceable this is, however, is up to the DM and the situation. I'd rule similar to how you did in the example you gave since even if you rule the hand does nothing, the bright flashing streak isn't a somatic component, and it has to come from somewhere.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  Subtle Spell only covers somatic components, not other spell effects



                  By the wording of Subtle Spell:




                  When you cast a spell, you can spend 1 sorcery point to cast it without any somatic or verbal components.




                  If we look at the basic rules on Somatic Spellcasting Components, we're given:




                  Spellcasting gestures might include a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. If a spell requires a somatic component, the caster must have free use of at least one hand to perform these gestures.




                  Somatic components are specific hand gesture requirements necessarily for all somatic spells. This is separate from gestures specified within the spell itself, which are more akin to being part of the effect of the spell. Subtle Spell means you don't need to do the intricate hand signs or verbal parts to cast it, but once cast the effect takes place, which includes "A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range".



                  How perceivable/traceable this is, however, is up to the DM and the situation. I'd rule similar to how you did in the example you gave since even if you rule the hand does nothing, the bright flashing streak isn't a somatic component, and it has to come from somewhere.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Subtle Spell only covers somatic components, not other spell effects



                  By the wording of Subtle Spell:




                  When you cast a spell, you can spend 1 sorcery point to cast it without any somatic or verbal components.




                  If we look at the basic rules on Somatic Spellcasting Components, we're given:




                  Spellcasting gestures might include a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. If a spell requires a somatic component, the caster must have free use of at least one hand to perform these gestures.




                  Somatic components are specific hand gesture requirements necessarily for all somatic spells. This is separate from gestures specified within the spell itself, which are more akin to being part of the effect of the spell. Subtle Spell means you don't need to do the intricate hand signs or verbal parts to cast it, but once cast the effect takes place, which includes "A bright streak flashes from your pointing finger to a point you choose within range".



                  How perceivable/traceable this is, however, is up to the DM and the situation. I'd rule similar to how you did in the example you gave since even if you rule the hand does nothing, the bright flashing streak isn't a somatic component, and it has to come from somewhere.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 5 hours ago

























                  answered 5 hours ago









                  Mwr247Mwr247

                  2,5341323




                  2,5341323






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144051%2fdo-sorcerers-subtle-spells-require-a-skill-check-to-be-unseen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

                      count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

                      A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks