Unpacking jPOS ISO8583
I am having this error when I am generating transaction with Magnetic stripe card. Could you suggest what is the problem here?
<receive>
<iso-exception>
org.jpos.iso.IFB_LLLCHAR: Problem unpacking field 54 (java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 86) unpacking field=54, consumed=86
org.jpos.iso.ISOException: org.jpos.iso.IFB_LLLCHAR: Problem unpacking field 54 (java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 86) unpacking field=54, consumed=86
at org.jpos.iso.ISOBasePackager.unpack(ISOBasePackager.java:340)
at org.jpos.iso.ISOMsg.unpack(ISOMsg.java:468)
at org.jpos.iso.BaseChannel.unpack(BaseChannel.java:965)
at org.jpos.iso.BaseChannel.receive(BaseChannel.java:735)
at org.jpos.iso.ISOServer$Session.run(ISOServer.java:344)
at org.jpos.util.ThreadPool$PooledThread.run(ThreadPool.java:76)
</iso-exception>
--- header ---
0000 00 00 00 00 00 .....
--- data ---
0000 02 00 70 38 04 80 20 80 3F 04 16 94 96 10 03 32 ..p8.. .?......2
0010 13 38 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 88 00 00 00 00 30 11 ..8............0.
0020 11 27 11 28 00 21 00 37 94 96 10 03 32 13 38 00 .'.(.!.7....2.8.
0030 D2 00 89 EC 49 D2 C2 B5 6B 2A 00 39 35 30 30 30 ....I...k*.95000
0040 30 32 30 34 39 36 F0 D2 EB A5 2B 2F AE 2E 00 06 020496....+/....
0050 30 30 30 30 35 30 000050
iso8583 jpos openiso8583.net iso8583-1993
add a comment |
I am having this error when I am generating transaction with Magnetic stripe card. Could you suggest what is the problem here?
<receive>
<iso-exception>
org.jpos.iso.IFB_LLLCHAR: Problem unpacking field 54 (java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 86) unpacking field=54, consumed=86
org.jpos.iso.ISOException: org.jpos.iso.IFB_LLLCHAR: Problem unpacking field 54 (java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 86) unpacking field=54, consumed=86
at org.jpos.iso.ISOBasePackager.unpack(ISOBasePackager.java:340)
at org.jpos.iso.ISOMsg.unpack(ISOMsg.java:468)
at org.jpos.iso.BaseChannel.unpack(BaseChannel.java:965)
at org.jpos.iso.BaseChannel.receive(BaseChannel.java:735)
at org.jpos.iso.ISOServer$Session.run(ISOServer.java:344)
at org.jpos.util.ThreadPool$PooledThread.run(ThreadPool.java:76)
</iso-exception>
--- header ---
0000 00 00 00 00 00 .....
--- data ---
0000 02 00 70 38 04 80 20 80 3F 04 16 94 96 10 03 32 ..p8.. .?......2
0010 13 38 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 88 00 00 00 00 30 11 ..8............0.
0020 11 27 11 28 00 21 00 37 94 96 10 03 32 13 38 00 .'.(.!.7....2.8.
0030 D2 00 89 EC 49 D2 C2 B5 6B 2A 00 39 35 30 30 30 ....I...k*.95000
0040 30 32 30 34 39 36 F0 D2 EB A5 2B 2F AE 2E 00 06 020496....+/....
0050 30 30 30 30 35 30 000050
iso8583 jpos openiso8583.net iso8583-1993
1
it seems the packager is not fully matching what you are receiving, the data ends before the message can be parsed, we need more data from you, please update the question adding at least the packager used, until field 35 (track2) all seems fine, what looks odd is the presence of field 51. Please also add a logger to your packager so that we (and tyourself) can see what the packager is reading field by field.
– Andrés Alcarraz
Nov 28 '18 at 11:02
1
Hi Andres, Thank you for answer. Actually I have found out problem here. We have not been fully aware of BITMAP structure at first field. There are 64 bits with and if there are not 64 i.e 62 bits with starting 1, that means 1st and 2nd fields are not presented. Bitmap never starts with 0 so as long as it starts with 1 we need to add incomplete sequence prior to that with zeros.
– Stn Bat
Dec 5 '18 at 0:46
add a comment |
I am having this error when I am generating transaction with Magnetic stripe card. Could you suggest what is the problem here?
<receive>
<iso-exception>
org.jpos.iso.IFB_LLLCHAR: Problem unpacking field 54 (java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 86) unpacking field=54, consumed=86
org.jpos.iso.ISOException: org.jpos.iso.IFB_LLLCHAR: Problem unpacking field 54 (java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 86) unpacking field=54, consumed=86
at org.jpos.iso.ISOBasePackager.unpack(ISOBasePackager.java:340)
at org.jpos.iso.ISOMsg.unpack(ISOMsg.java:468)
at org.jpos.iso.BaseChannel.unpack(BaseChannel.java:965)
at org.jpos.iso.BaseChannel.receive(BaseChannel.java:735)
at org.jpos.iso.ISOServer$Session.run(ISOServer.java:344)
at org.jpos.util.ThreadPool$PooledThread.run(ThreadPool.java:76)
</iso-exception>
--- header ---
0000 00 00 00 00 00 .....
--- data ---
0000 02 00 70 38 04 80 20 80 3F 04 16 94 96 10 03 32 ..p8.. .?......2
0010 13 38 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 88 00 00 00 00 30 11 ..8............0.
0020 11 27 11 28 00 21 00 37 94 96 10 03 32 13 38 00 .'.(.!.7....2.8.
0030 D2 00 89 EC 49 D2 C2 B5 6B 2A 00 39 35 30 30 30 ....I...k*.95000
0040 30 32 30 34 39 36 F0 D2 EB A5 2B 2F AE 2E 00 06 020496....+/....
0050 30 30 30 30 35 30 000050
iso8583 jpos openiso8583.net iso8583-1993
I am having this error when I am generating transaction with Magnetic stripe card. Could you suggest what is the problem here?
<receive>
<iso-exception>
org.jpos.iso.IFB_LLLCHAR: Problem unpacking field 54 (java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 86) unpacking field=54, consumed=86
org.jpos.iso.ISOException: org.jpos.iso.IFB_LLLCHAR: Problem unpacking field 54 (java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 86) unpacking field=54, consumed=86
at org.jpos.iso.ISOBasePackager.unpack(ISOBasePackager.java:340)
at org.jpos.iso.ISOMsg.unpack(ISOMsg.java:468)
at org.jpos.iso.BaseChannel.unpack(BaseChannel.java:965)
at org.jpos.iso.BaseChannel.receive(BaseChannel.java:735)
at org.jpos.iso.ISOServer$Session.run(ISOServer.java:344)
at org.jpos.util.ThreadPool$PooledThread.run(ThreadPool.java:76)
</iso-exception>
--- header ---
0000 00 00 00 00 00 .....
--- data ---
0000 02 00 70 38 04 80 20 80 3F 04 16 94 96 10 03 32 ..p8.. .?......2
0010 13 38 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 88 00 00 00 00 30 11 ..8............0.
0020 11 27 11 28 00 21 00 37 94 96 10 03 32 13 38 00 .'.(.!.7....2.8.
0030 D2 00 89 EC 49 D2 C2 B5 6B 2A 00 39 35 30 30 30 ....I...k*.95000
0040 30 32 30 34 39 36 F0 D2 EB A5 2B 2F AE 2E 00 06 020496....+/....
0050 30 30 30 30 35 30 000050
iso8583 jpos openiso8583.net iso8583-1993
iso8583 jpos openiso8583.net iso8583-1993
edited Nov 28 '18 at 11:59
Andrés Alcarraz
503316
503316
asked Nov 28 '18 at 3:51
Stn BatStn Bat
111
111
1
it seems the packager is not fully matching what you are receiving, the data ends before the message can be parsed, we need more data from you, please update the question adding at least the packager used, until field 35 (track2) all seems fine, what looks odd is the presence of field 51. Please also add a logger to your packager so that we (and tyourself) can see what the packager is reading field by field.
– Andrés Alcarraz
Nov 28 '18 at 11:02
1
Hi Andres, Thank you for answer. Actually I have found out problem here. We have not been fully aware of BITMAP structure at first field. There are 64 bits with and if there are not 64 i.e 62 bits with starting 1, that means 1st and 2nd fields are not presented. Bitmap never starts with 0 so as long as it starts with 1 we need to add incomplete sequence prior to that with zeros.
– Stn Bat
Dec 5 '18 at 0:46
add a comment |
1
it seems the packager is not fully matching what you are receiving, the data ends before the message can be parsed, we need more data from you, please update the question adding at least the packager used, until field 35 (track2) all seems fine, what looks odd is the presence of field 51. Please also add a logger to your packager so that we (and tyourself) can see what the packager is reading field by field.
– Andrés Alcarraz
Nov 28 '18 at 11:02
1
Hi Andres, Thank you for answer. Actually I have found out problem here. We have not been fully aware of BITMAP structure at first field. There are 64 bits with and if there are not 64 i.e 62 bits with starting 1, that means 1st and 2nd fields are not presented. Bitmap never starts with 0 so as long as it starts with 1 we need to add incomplete sequence prior to that with zeros.
– Stn Bat
Dec 5 '18 at 0:46
1
1
it seems the packager is not fully matching what you are receiving, the data ends before the message can be parsed, we need more data from you, please update the question adding at least the packager used, until field 35 (track2) all seems fine, what looks odd is the presence of field 51. Please also add a logger to your packager so that we (and tyourself) can see what the packager is reading field by field.
– Andrés Alcarraz
Nov 28 '18 at 11:02
it seems the packager is not fully matching what you are receiving, the data ends before the message can be parsed, we need more data from you, please update the question adding at least the packager used, until field 35 (track2) all seems fine, what looks odd is the presence of field 51. Please also add a logger to your packager so that we (and tyourself) can see what the packager is reading field by field.
– Andrés Alcarraz
Nov 28 '18 at 11:02
1
1
Hi Andres, Thank you for answer. Actually I have found out problem here. We have not been fully aware of BITMAP structure at first field. There are 64 bits with and if there are not 64 i.e 62 bits with starting 1, that means 1st and 2nd fields are not presented. Bitmap never starts with 0 so as long as it starts with 1 we need to add incomplete sequence prior to that with zeros.
– Stn Bat
Dec 5 '18 at 0:46
Hi Andres, Thank you for answer. Actually I have found out problem here. We have not been fully aware of BITMAP structure at first field. There are 64 bits with and if there are not 64 i.e 62 bits with starting 1, that means 1st and 2nd fields are not presented. Bitmap never starts with 0 so as long as it starts with 1 we need to add incomplete sequence prior to that with zeros.
– Stn Bat
Dec 5 '18 at 0:46
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53511845%2funpacking-jpos-iso8583%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53511845%2funpacking-jpos-iso8583%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
it seems the packager is not fully matching what you are receiving, the data ends before the message can be parsed, we need more data from you, please update the question adding at least the packager used, until field 35 (track2) all seems fine, what looks odd is the presence of field 51. Please also add a logger to your packager so that we (and tyourself) can see what the packager is reading field by field.
– Andrés Alcarraz
Nov 28 '18 at 11:02
1
Hi Andres, Thank you for answer. Actually I have found out problem here. We have not been fully aware of BITMAP structure at first field. There are 64 bits with and if there are not 64 i.e 62 bits with starting 1, that means 1st and 2nd fields are not presented. Bitmap never starts with 0 so as long as it starts with 1 we need to add incomplete sequence prior to that with zeros.
– Stn Bat
Dec 5 '18 at 0:46