React Typescript stateless component, SFC vs StatelessComponent












0















I can use either of the following to create react stateless component using typescript.
But what is the difference between these two?



type SFC<P = {}> = FunctionComponent<P>;

type StatelessComponent<P = {}> = FunctionComponent<P>;









share|improve this question





























    0















    I can use either of the following to create react stateless component using typescript.
    But what is the difference between these two?



    type SFC<P = {}> = FunctionComponent<P>;

    type StatelessComponent<P = {}> = FunctionComponent<P>;









    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      I can use either of the following to create react stateless component using typescript.
      But what is the difference between these two?



      type SFC<P = {}> = FunctionComponent<P>;

      type StatelessComponent<P = {}> = FunctionComponent<P>;









      share|improve this question
















      I can use either of the following to create react stateless component using typescript.
      But what is the difference between these two?



      type SFC<P = {}> = FunctionComponent<P>;

      type StatelessComponent<P = {}> = FunctionComponent<P>;






      reactjs typescript






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 28 '18 at 3:31









      zerkms

      190k49345436




      190k49345436










      asked Nov 28 '18 at 3:18









      user10246522user10246522

      1




      1
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Digging into the types definitions file for React, we can see SFC is simply an equivalent type for a StatelessComponent.



          Its personal preference which syntax you prefer.



          @types/react/index.d.ts



          type SFC<P = {}> = StatelessComponent<P>;





          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53511590%2freact-typescript-stateless-component-sfc-vs-statelesscomponent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            Digging into the types definitions file for React, we can see SFC is simply an equivalent type for a StatelessComponent.



            Its personal preference which syntax you prefer.



            @types/react/index.d.ts



            type SFC<P = {}> = StatelessComponent<P>;





            share|improve this answer




























              0














              Digging into the types definitions file for React, we can see SFC is simply an equivalent type for a StatelessComponent.



              Its personal preference which syntax you prefer.



              @types/react/index.d.ts



              type SFC<P = {}> = StatelessComponent<P>;





              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0







                Digging into the types definitions file for React, we can see SFC is simply an equivalent type for a StatelessComponent.



                Its personal preference which syntax you prefer.



                @types/react/index.d.ts



                type SFC<P = {}> = StatelessComponent<P>;





                share|improve this answer













                Digging into the types definitions file for React, we can see SFC is simply an equivalent type for a StatelessComponent.



                Its personal preference which syntax you prefer.



                @types/react/index.d.ts



                type SFC<P = {}> = StatelessComponent<P>;






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 28 '18 at 3:28









                Shawn AndrewsShawn Andrews

                965618




                965618
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53511590%2freact-typescript-stateless-component-sfc-vs-statelesscomponent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

                    count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

                    A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks