Create Reduced Ordered Binary Decision Diagram (ROBDD) from truth table












2















Is there a software package (preferable an application, not library) that creates Reduced Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (ROBDDs) from a given truth table (in some text format)?










share|improve this question



























    2















    Is there a software package (preferable an application, not library) that creates Reduced Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (ROBDDs) from a given truth table (in some text format)?










    share|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2


      2






      Is there a software package (preferable an application, not library) that creates Reduced Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (ROBDDs) from a given truth table (in some text format)?










      share|improve this question














      Is there a software package (preferable an application, not library) that creates Reduced Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (ROBDDs) from a given truth table (in some text format)?







      logic solver truthtable binary-decision-diagram






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 25 '13 at 8:07









      tomashtomash

      370317




      370317
























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          You can also try this: http://formal.cs.utah.edu:8080/pbl/BDD.php



          It is the best tool for BDDs I used so far.






          share|improve this answer































            1














            With any BDD library you can do what you want. Of course, you must write a piece of code by yourself.



            If you are looking for a lightweight tool, I often use an applet like this to have a quick look at the BDD of a function:



            http://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/applets/java-bdd/






            share|improve this answer
























            • The provided page is not exactly what I wanted. I would like to provide a truth table and calculate ROBDD for it (that is, a Reduced OBDD), which is the smallest BDD-based representation of a given function. The page does not allow anything of that.

              – tomash
              Mar 27 '13 at 11:26













            • Well, it draw a ROBDD from a function given as an expression (not a truth table, indeed). The output is a ROBDD although the title says only BDD. Or you are looking for the best variables order?

              – Lorenzo
              Mar 27 '13 at 13:53



















            1














            BDDs are a memory constrained data structure because of the heavy reliance on detecting duplicate sub-truthtables. Most BDD packages you'll find aren't exactly a good fit for large, general truth tables, instead optimized for very sparse or highly repetitive expressions.



            With the standard BDD packages, you work with expressions operating on variables. So you'd have to iterate over your truth table, constructing something like a product-of-sums expression for 1s in the table. Along the way, most libraries will dynamically reorder the variables to fit memory constraints, causing another huge slowdown. After around 24 variables, even with very sparse truth tables, these libraries will start to thrash on modern systems.



            If you're only looking for the final BDD nodes given a truth table with its variable ordering already implicitly defined, you can skip a lot of the complexity with external libraries and horrible runtimes, just using some Unix text processing tools.



            A good resource on BDDs, Knuth's TAOCP v4.1b, shows the equivalence of BDD nodes and their "beads," sub-truthtables that are non-square strings. I'm going to address a simpler version, ZDDs which have similar structures called "zeads": positive part sub-truthtables that are not completely zero. To generalize back to BDDs, replace sed+grep in the pipeline with a program filtering square strings instead of keeping positive part non-zero strings.



            To print all the zeads of a truthtable (given as a one-line file of ascii '1's and '0's, newline at end), run the following command after setting the number of variables and filename:



            MAX=8; FILENAME="8_vars_truthtable.txt"; for (( ITER=0; ITER<=${MAX}; ITER++ )) ; do INTERVAL=$((2 ** ${ITER})); fold -w ${INTERVAL} ${FILENAME} | sed -n '1~2!p' | grep -v "^0*$" | sort -u ; done


            This has many benefits over BDD packages:




            • Simple with essentially no extraneous dependencies.

            • External sorting means no thrashing unlike in-memory hash tables.

            • Easily parallelizeable & scalable if you understand line buffering and disk caching when forking in the for loop.

            • If writing to intermediate files sorting will parallelize too.


            I use it regularly for truthtables up to 32 variables large, which are impossible to realistically come up with using BDD libraries. It doesn't tax the memory system at all, barely using a few MBs. But if you have a ton of RAM available, a decent OS like Linux will gladly use it all for caching disk to make it even faster.






            share|improve this answer

























              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              });
              });
              }, "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f15610219%2fcreate-reduced-ordered-binary-decision-diagram-robdd-from-truth-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5














              You can also try this: http://formal.cs.utah.edu:8080/pbl/BDD.php



              It is the best tool for BDDs I used so far.






              share|improve this answer




























                5














                You can also try this: http://formal.cs.utah.edu:8080/pbl/BDD.php



                It is the best tool for BDDs I used so far.






                share|improve this answer


























                  5












                  5








                  5







                  You can also try this: http://formal.cs.utah.edu:8080/pbl/BDD.php



                  It is the best tool for BDDs I used so far.






                  share|improve this answer













                  You can also try this: http://formal.cs.utah.edu:8080/pbl/BDD.php



                  It is the best tool for BDDs I used so far.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jun 10 '13 at 14:48









                  remustataremustata

                  6124




                  6124

























                      1














                      With any BDD library you can do what you want. Of course, you must write a piece of code by yourself.



                      If you are looking for a lightweight tool, I often use an applet like this to have a quick look at the BDD of a function:



                      http://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/applets/java-bdd/






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • The provided page is not exactly what I wanted. I would like to provide a truth table and calculate ROBDD for it (that is, a Reduced OBDD), which is the smallest BDD-based representation of a given function. The page does not allow anything of that.

                        – tomash
                        Mar 27 '13 at 11:26













                      • Well, it draw a ROBDD from a function given as an expression (not a truth table, indeed). The output is a ROBDD although the title says only BDD. Or you are looking for the best variables order?

                        – Lorenzo
                        Mar 27 '13 at 13:53
















                      1














                      With any BDD library you can do what you want. Of course, you must write a piece of code by yourself.



                      If you are looking for a lightweight tool, I often use an applet like this to have a quick look at the BDD of a function:



                      http://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/applets/java-bdd/






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • The provided page is not exactly what I wanted. I would like to provide a truth table and calculate ROBDD for it (that is, a Reduced OBDD), which is the smallest BDD-based representation of a given function. The page does not allow anything of that.

                        – tomash
                        Mar 27 '13 at 11:26













                      • Well, it draw a ROBDD from a function given as an expression (not a truth table, indeed). The output is a ROBDD although the title says only BDD. Or you are looking for the best variables order?

                        – Lorenzo
                        Mar 27 '13 at 13:53














                      1












                      1








                      1







                      With any BDD library you can do what you want. Of course, you must write a piece of code by yourself.



                      If you are looking for a lightweight tool, I often use an applet like this to have a quick look at the BDD of a function:



                      http://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/applets/java-bdd/






                      share|improve this answer













                      With any BDD library you can do what you want. Of course, you must write a piece of code by yourself.



                      If you are looking for a lightweight tool, I often use an applet like this to have a quick look at the BDD of a function:



                      http://tams-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/applets/java-bdd/







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Mar 25 '13 at 13:27









                      LorenzoLorenzo

                      5641020




                      5641020













                      • The provided page is not exactly what I wanted. I would like to provide a truth table and calculate ROBDD for it (that is, a Reduced OBDD), which is the smallest BDD-based representation of a given function. The page does not allow anything of that.

                        – tomash
                        Mar 27 '13 at 11:26













                      • Well, it draw a ROBDD from a function given as an expression (not a truth table, indeed). The output is a ROBDD although the title says only BDD. Or you are looking for the best variables order?

                        – Lorenzo
                        Mar 27 '13 at 13:53



















                      • The provided page is not exactly what I wanted. I would like to provide a truth table and calculate ROBDD for it (that is, a Reduced OBDD), which is the smallest BDD-based representation of a given function. The page does not allow anything of that.

                        – tomash
                        Mar 27 '13 at 11:26













                      • Well, it draw a ROBDD from a function given as an expression (not a truth table, indeed). The output is a ROBDD although the title says only BDD. Or you are looking for the best variables order?

                        – Lorenzo
                        Mar 27 '13 at 13:53

















                      The provided page is not exactly what I wanted. I would like to provide a truth table and calculate ROBDD for it (that is, a Reduced OBDD), which is the smallest BDD-based representation of a given function. The page does not allow anything of that.

                      – tomash
                      Mar 27 '13 at 11:26







                      The provided page is not exactly what I wanted. I would like to provide a truth table and calculate ROBDD for it (that is, a Reduced OBDD), which is the smallest BDD-based representation of a given function. The page does not allow anything of that.

                      – tomash
                      Mar 27 '13 at 11:26















                      Well, it draw a ROBDD from a function given as an expression (not a truth table, indeed). The output is a ROBDD although the title says only BDD. Or you are looking for the best variables order?

                      – Lorenzo
                      Mar 27 '13 at 13:53





                      Well, it draw a ROBDD from a function given as an expression (not a truth table, indeed). The output is a ROBDD although the title says only BDD. Or you are looking for the best variables order?

                      – Lorenzo
                      Mar 27 '13 at 13:53











                      1














                      BDDs are a memory constrained data structure because of the heavy reliance on detecting duplicate sub-truthtables. Most BDD packages you'll find aren't exactly a good fit for large, general truth tables, instead optimized for very sparse or highly repetitive expressions.



                      With the standard BDD packages, you work with expressions operating on variables. So you'd have to iterate over your truth table, constructing something like a product-of-sums expression for 1s in the table. Along the way, most libraries will dynamically reorder the variables to fit memory constraints, causing another huge slowdown. After around 24 variables, even with very sparse truth tables, these libraries will start to thrash on modern systems.



                      If you're only looking for the final BDD nodes given a truth table with its variable ordering already implicitly defined, you can skip a lot of the complexity with external libraries and horrible runtimes, just using some Unix text processing tools.



                      A good resource on BDDs, Knuth's TAOCP v4.1b, shows the equivalence of BDD nodes and their "beads," sub-truthtables that are non-square strings. I'm going to address a simpler version, ZDDs which have similar structures called "zeads": positive part sub-truthtables that are not completely zero. To generalize back to BDDs, replace sed+grep in the pipeline with a program filtering square strings instead of keeping positive part non-zero strings.



                      To print all the zeads of a truthtable (given as a one-line file of ascii '1's and '0's, newline at end), run the following command after setting the number of variables and filename:



                      MAX=8; FILENAME="8_vars_truthtable.txt"; for (( ITER=0; ITER<=${MAX}; ITER++ )) ; do INTERVAL=$((2 ** ${ITER})); fold -w ${INTERVAL} ${FILENAME} | sed -n '1~2!p' | grep -v "^0*$" | sort -u ; done


                      This has many benefits over BDD packages:




                      • Simple with essentially no extraneous dependencies.

                      • External sorting means no thrashing unlike in-memory hash tables.

                      • Easily parallelizeable & scalable if you understand line buffering and disk caching when forking in the for loop.

                      • If writing to intermediate files sorting will parallelize too.


                      I use it regularly for truthtables up to 32 variables large, which are impossible to realistically come up with using BDD libraries. It doesn't tax the memory system at all, barely using a few MBs. But if you have a ton of RAM available, a decent OS like Linux will gladly use it all for caching disk to make it even faster.






                      share|improve this answer






























                        1














                        BDDs are a memory constrained data structure because of the heavy reliance on detecting duplicate sub-truthtables. Most BDD packages you'll find aren't exactly a good fit for large, general truth tables, instead optimized for very sparse or highly repetitive expressions.



                        With the standard BDD packages, you work with expressions operating on variables. So you'd have to iterate over your truth table, constructing something like a product-of-sums expression for 1s in the table. Along the way, most libraries will dynamically reorder the variables to fit memory constraints, causing another huge slowdown. After around 24 variables, even with very sparse truth tables, these libraries will start to thrash on modern systems.



                        If you're only looking for the final BDD nodes given a truth table with its variable ordering already implicitly defined, you can skip a lot of the complexity with external libraries and horrible runtimes, just using some Unix text processing tools.



                        A good resource on BDDs, Knuth's TAOCP v4.1b, shows the equivalence of BDD nodes and their "beads," sub-truthtables that are non-square strings. I'm going to address a simpler version, ZDDs which have similar structures called "zeads": positive part sub-truthtables that are not completely zero. To generalize back to BDDs, replace sed+grep in the pipeline with a program filtering square strings instead of keeping positive part non-zero strings.



                        To print all the zeads of a truthtable (given as a one-line file of ascii '1's and '0's, newline at end), run the following command after setting the number of variables and filename:



                        MAX=8; FILENAME="8_vars_truthtable.txt"; for (( ITER=0; ITER<=${MAX}; ITER++ )) ; do INTERVAL=$((2 ** ${ITER})); fold -w ${INTERVAL} ${FILENAME} | sed -n '1~2!p' | grep -v "^0*$" | sort -u ; done


                        This has many benefits over BDD packages:




                        • Simple with essentially no extraneous dependencies.

                        • External sorting means no thrashing unlike in-memory hash tables.

                        • Easily parallelizeable & scalable if you understand line buffering and disk caching when forking in the for loop.

                        • If writing to intermediate files sorting will parallelize too.


                        I use it regularly for truthtables up to 32 variables large, which are impossible to realistically come up with using BDD libraries. It doesn't tax the memory system at all, barely using a few MBs. But if you have a ton of RAM available, a decent OS like Linux will gladly use it all for caching disk to make it even faster.






                        share|improve this answer




























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          BDDs are a memory constrained data structure because of the heavy reliance on detecting duplicate sub-truthtables. Most BDD packages you'll find aren't exactly a good fit for large, general truth tables, instead optimized for very sparse or highly repetitive expressions.



                          With the standard BDD packages, you work with expressions operating on variables. So you'd have to iterate over your truth table, constructing something like a product-of-sums expression for 1s in the table. Along the way, most libraries will dynamically reorder the variables to fit memory constraints, causing another huge slowdown. After around 24 variables, even with very sparse truth tables, these libraries will start to thrash on modern systems.



                          If you're only looking for the final BDD nodes given a truth table with its variable ordering already implicitly defined, you can skip a lot of the complexity with external libraries and horrible runtimes, just using some Unix text processing tools.



                          A good resource on BDDs, Knuth's TAOCP v4.1b, shows the equivalence of BDD nodes and their "beads," sub-truthtables that are non-square strings. I'm going to address a simpler version, ZDDs which have similar structures called "zeads": positive part sub-truthtables that are not completely zero. To generalize back to BDDs, replace sed+grep in the pipeline with a program filtering square strings instead of keeping positive part non-zero strings.



                          To print all the zeads of a truthtable (given as a one-line file of ascii '1's and '0's, newline at end), run the following command after setting the number of variables and filename:



                          MAX=8; FILENAME="8_vars_truthtable.txt"; for (( ITER=0; ITER<=${MAX}; ITER++ )) ; do INTERVAL=$((2 ** ${ITER})); fold -w ${INTERVAL} ${FILENAME} | sed -n '1~2!p' | grep -v "^0*$" | sort -u ; done


                          This has many benefits over BDD packages:




                          • Simple with essentially no extraneous dependencies.

                          • External sorting means no thrashing unlike in-memory hash tables.

                          • Easily parallelizeable & scalable if you understand line buffering and disk caching when forking in the for loop.

                          • If writing to intermediate files sorting will parallelize too.


                          I use it regularly for truthtables up to 32 variables large, which are impossible to realistically come up with using BDD libraries. It doesn't tax the memory system at all, barely using a few MBs. But if you have a ton of RAM available, a decent OS like Linux will gladly use it all for caching disk to make it even faster.






                          share|improve this answer















                          BDDs are a memory constrained data structure because of the heavy reliance on detecting duplicate sub-truthtables. Most BDD packages you'll find aren't exactly a good fit for large, general truth tables, instead optimized for very sparse or highly repetitive expressions.



                          With the standard BDD packages, you work with expressions operating on variables. So you'd have to iterate over your truth table, constructing something like a product-of-sums expression for 1s in the table. Along the way, most libraries will dynamically reorder the variables to fit memory constraints, causing another huge slowdown. After around 24 variables, even with very sparse truth tables, these libraries will start to thrash on modern systems.



                          If you're only looking for the final BDD nodes given a truth table with its variable ordering already implicitly defined, you can skip a lot of the complexity with external libraries and horrible runtimes, just using some Unix text processing tools.



                          A good resource on BDDs, Knuth's TAOCP v4.1b, shows the equivalence of BDD nodes and their "beads," sub-truthtables that are non-square strings. I'm going to address a simpler version, ZDDs which have similar structures called "zeads": positive part sub-truthtables that are not completely zero. To generalize back to BDDs, replace sed+grep in the pipeline with a program filtering square strings instead of keeping positive part non-zero strings.



                          To print all the zeads of a truthtable (given as a one-line file of ascii '1's and '0's, newline at end), run the following command after setting the number of variables and filename:



                          MAX=8; FILENAME="8_vars_truthtable.txt"; for (( ITER=0; ITER<=${MAX}; ITER++ )) ; do INTERVAL=$((2 ** ${ITER})); fold -w ${INTERVAL} ${FILENAME} | sed -n '1~2!p' | grep -v "^0*$" | sort -u ; done


                          This has many benefits over BDD packages:




                          • Simple with essentially no extraneous dependencies.

                          • External sorting means no thrashing unlike in-memory hash tables.

                          • Easily parallelizeable & scalable if you understand line buffering and disk caching when forking in the for loop.

                          • If writing to intermediate files sorting will parallelize too.


                          I use it regularly for truthtables up to 32 variables large, which are impossible to realistically come up with using BDD libraries. It doesn't tax the memory system at all, barely using a few MBs. But if you have a ton of RAM available, a decent OS like Linux will gladly use it all for caching disk to make it even faster.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited Nov 28 '18 at 3:29









                          Samuel Liew

                          45.3k32116155




                          45.3k32116155










                          answered Feb 11 '15 at 13:42







                          user2875414





































                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f15610219%2fcreate-reduced-ordered-binary-decision-diagram-robdd-from-truth-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

                              count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

                              A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks