Retrieving and reacting to route params in FactoryProvider
I want to use a FactoryProvider that gets chooses a service implementation based on current URI.
Furthermore, one of the implementations needs to react to Route Parameters (as defined by route/:parameter
).
As shown below, I subscribe to changes of Unfortunately, I can't access the parameters that way. A component that is instantiated in the primary router outlet can access them, but the FactoryProvider can't.
Is there anything I might have missed?
module code (abbreviated for improved readability)
@NgModule({
declarations: ,
imports: ,
exports: ,
providers: [XServiceProvider],
entryComponents: })
Factory Provider
export const XServiceProvider = {
provide: XService,
useFactory: XServiceFactory,
deps: [Http, HttpService, ConfigurationService, DatePipe, Router, ActivatedRoute]
};
const XServiceFactory = (http: Http,
httpService: HttpService,
configuration: ConfigurationService,
datePipe: DatePipe,
router: Router,
activatedRoute: ActivatedRoute) => {
const useAlternateImpplementation= router.url.startsWith('/mg/');
if (useAlternateImpplementation === true) {
const service = new XyService(http, httpService, configuration, datePipe);
for (const child of activatedRoute.root.children) {
if (child.outlet === PRIMARY_OUTLET) {
child.url.subscribe(params => {
service.setParam(params[parameter]);
});
}
}
return service;
}
return new XService(http, httpService, configuration, datePipe);
};
angular angular-routing
add a comment |
I want to use a FactoryProvider that gets chooses a service implementation based on current URI.
Furthermore, one of the implementations needs to react to Route Parameters (as defined by route/:parameter
).
As shown below, I subscribe to changes of Unfortunately, I can't access the parameters that way. A component that is instantiated in the primary router outlet can access them, but the FactoryProvider can't.
Is there anything I might have missed?
module code (abbreviated for improved readability)
@NgModule({
declarations: ,
imports: ,
exports: ,
providers: [XServiceProvider],
entryComponents: })
Factory Provider
export const XServiceProvider = {
provide: XService,
useFactory: XServiceFactory,
deps: [Http, HttpService, ConfigurationService, DatePipe, Router, ActivatedRoute]
};
const XServiceFactory = (http: Http,
httpService: HttpService,
configuration: ConfigurationService,
datePipe: DatePipe,
router: Router,
activatedRoute: ActivatedRoute) => {
const useAlternateImpplementation= router.url.startsWith('/mg/');
if (useAlternateImpplementation === true) {
const service = new XyService(http, httpService, configuration, datePipe);
for (const child of activatedRoute.root.children) {
if (child.outlet === PRIMARY_OUTLET) {
child.url.subscribe(params => {
service.setParam(params[parameter]);
});
}
}
return service;
}
return new XService(http, httpService, configuration, datePipe);
};
angular angular-routing
add a comment |
I want to use a FactoryProvider that gets chooses a service implementation based on current URI.
Furthermore, one of the implementations needs to react to Route Parameters (as defined by route/:parameter
).
As shown below, I subscribe to changes of Unfortunately, I can't access the parameters that way. A component that is instantiated in the primary router outlet can access them, but the FactoryProvider can't.
Is there anything I might have missed?
module code (abbreviated for improved readability)
@NgModule({
declarations: ,
imports: ,
exports: ,
providers: [XServiceProvider],
entryComponents: })
Factory Provider
export const XServiceProvider = {
provide: XService,
useFactory: XServiceFactory,
deps: [Http, HttpService, ConfigurationService, DatePipe, Router, ActivatedRoute]
};
const XServiceFactory = (http: Http,
httpService: HttpService,
configuration: ConfigurationService,
datePipe: DatePipe,
router: Router,
activatedRoute: ActivatedRoute) => {
const useAlternateImpplementation= router.url.startsWith('/mg/');
if (useAlternateImpplementation === true) {
const service = new XyService(http, httpService, configuration, datePipe);
for (const child of activatedRoute.root.children) {
if (child.outlet === PRIMARY_OUTLET) {
child.url.subscribe(params => {
service.setParam(params[parameter]);
});
}
}
return service;
}
return new XService(http, httpService, configuration, datePipe);
};
angular angular-routing
I want to use a FactoryProvider that gets chooses a service implementation based on current URI.
Furthermore, one of the implementations needs to react to Route Parameters (as defined by route/:parameter
).
As shown below, I subscribe to changes of Unfortunately, I can't access the parameters that way. A component that is instantiated in the primary router outlet can access them, but the FactoryProvider can't.
Is there anything I might have missed?
module code (abbreviated for improved readability)
@NgModule({
declarations: ,
imports: ,
exports: ,
providers: [XServiceProvider],
entryComponents: })
Factory Provider
export const XServiceProvider = {
provide: XService,
useFactory: XServiceFactory,
deps: [Http, HttpService, ConfigurationService, DatePipe, Router, ActivatedRoute]
};
const XServiceFactory = (http: Http,
httpService: HttpService,
configuration: ConfigurationService,
datePipe: DatePipe,
router: Router,
activatedRoute: ActivatedRoute) => {
const useAlternateImpplementation= router.url.startsWith('/mg/');
if (useAlternateImpplementation === true) {
const service = new XyService(http, httpService, configuration, datePipe);
for (const child of activatedRoute.root.children) {
if (child.outlet === PRIMARY_OUTLET) {
child.url.subscribe(params => {
service.setParam(params[parameter]);
});
}
}
return service;
}
return new XService(http, httpService, configuration, datePipe);
};
angular angular-routing
angular angular-routing
edited Nov 28 '18 at 8:24
Yashwardhan Pauranik
2,03111528
2,03111528
asked Nov 27 '18 at 14:35
Sebastian EdelmeierSebastian Edelmeier
2,80222852
2,80222852
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Solved the issue by changing the dependency injection scope from Singleton to Transient.
Here's how:
- remove the provider definition from the module
- add it to the components that actually require it
Code sample:
@NgModule({
declarations: ,
exports: ,
providers: [ /* remove here! */ ]
})
//...
@Component({
selector: '...',
templateUrl: '...',
styleUrls: ['...'],
providers: [XServiceProvider] /* add here */
})
//...
Here's (probably) why:
- Services that are declared as module-wide providers are created once per application creation. Thus, you cannot load the app, use service implementation one, change context, use implementation two.
- Declaring the providers per component changes this pattern. The components are instantiated and destroyed, based on routing. That said, another route can now lead to another implementation.
I was inspired by a blog post to try this.
Still, I have no idea how to access route params beyond the scope of components that a rendered to the primary outlet.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53502033%2fretrieving-and-reacting-to-route-params-in-factoryprovider%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Solved the issue by changing the dependency injection scope from Singleton to Transient.
Here's how:
- remove the provider definition from the module
- add it to the components that actually require it
Code sample:
@NgModule({
declarations: ,
exports: ,
providers: [ /* remove here! */ ]
})
//...
@Component({
selector: '...',
templateUrl: '...',
styleUrls: ['...'],
providers: [XServiceProvider] /* add here */
})
//...
Here's (probably) why:
- Services that are declared as module-wide providers are created once per application creation. Thus, you cannot load the app, use service implementation one, change context, use implementation two.
- Declaring the providers per component changes this pattern. The components are instantiated and destroyed, based on routing. That said, another route can now lead to another implementation.
I was inspired by a blog post to try this.
Still, I have no idea how to access route params beyond the scope of components that a rendered to the primary outlet.
add a comment |
Solved the issue by changing the dependency injection scope from Singleton to Transient.
Here's how:
- remove the provider definition from the module
- add it to the components that actually require it
Code sample:
@NgModule({
declarations: ,
exports: ,
providers: [ /* remove here! */ ]
})
//...
@Component({
selector: '...',
templateUrl: '...',
styleUrls: ['...'],
providers: [XServiceProvider] /* add here */
})
//...
Here's (probably) why:
- Services that are declared as module-wide providers are created once per application creation. Thus, you cannot load the app, use service implementation one, change context, use implementation two.
- Declaring the providers per component changes this pattern. The components are instantiated and destroyed, based on routing. That said, another route can now lead to another implementation.
I was inspired by a blog post to try this.
Still, I have no idea how to access route params beyond the scope of components that a rendered to the primary outlet.
add a comment |
Solved the issue by changing the dependency injection scope from Singleton to Transient.
Here's how:
- remove the provider definition from the module
- add it to the components that actually require it
Code sample:
@NgModule({
declarations: ,
exports: ,
providers: [ /* remove here! */ ]
})
//...
@Component({
selector: '...',
templateUrl: '...',
styleUrls: ['...'],
providers: [XServiceProvider] /* add here */
})
//...
Here's (probably) why:
- Services that are declared as module-wide providers are created once per application creation. Thus, you cannot load the app, use service implementation one, change context, use implementation two.
- Declaring the providers per component changes this pattern. The components are instantiated and destroyed, based on routing. That said, another route can now lead to another implementation.
I was inspired by a blog post to try this.
Still, I have no idea how to access route params beyond the scope of components that a rendered to the primary outlet.
Solved the issue by changing the dependency injection scope from Singleton to Transient.
Here's how:
- remove the provider definition from the module
- add it to the components that actually require it
Code sample:
@NgModule({
declarations: ,
exports: ,
providers: [ /* remove here! */ ]
})
//...
@Component({
selector: '...',
templateUrl: '...',
styleUrls: ['...'],
providers: [XServiceProvider] /* add here */
})
//...
Here's (probably) why:
- Services that are declared as module-wide providers are created once per application creation. Thus, you cannot load the app, use service implementation one, change context, use implementation two.
- Declaring the providers per component changes this pattern. The components are instantiated and destroyed, based on routing. That said, another route can now lead to another implementation.
I was inspired by a blog post to try this.
Still, I have no idea how to access route params beyond the scope of components that a rendered to the primary outlet.
edited Dec 3 '18 at 12:36
answered Dec 3 '18 at 11:00
Sebastian EdelmeierSebastian Edelmeier
2,80222852
2,80222852
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53502033%2fretrieving-and-reacting-to-route-params-in-factoryprovider%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown