Prove that the sum and the absolute difference of 2 Bernoulli(0.5) random variables are not independent
$begingroup$
Let $X$ and $Y$ be independent $Bernoulli(0.5)$ random variables. Let $W = X + Y$ and $T = |X - Y|$. Show that $W$ and $T$ are not independent.
I know that I have to show that $P(W, T)$ is not equal to $P(W)P(T)$, but finding the joint distribution is hard. Please help.
probability self-study independence bernoulli-distribution
asked Nov 27 '18 at 22:25
MSEMSE
1018
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ and $Y$ be independent $Bernoulli(0.5)$ random variables. Let $W = X + Y$ and $T = |X - Y|$. Show that $W$ and $T$ are not independent.
I know that I have to show that $P(W, T)$ is not equal to $P(W)P(T)$, but finding the joint distribution is hard. Please help.
probability self-study independence bernoulli-distribution
asked Nov 27 '18 at 22:25
MSEMSE
1018
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Re: "finding the joint distribution is hard:" have you made a table? Label the rows with values of $X$, the columns with values of $Y$, and in the cells put the values of $T,$ $W,$ and the associated probabilities. Collect your results into a new table with rows labeled with $T$ and columns labeled with $W:$ put the total probabilities into the entries. That depicts the entire joint distribution of $(T,W).$ You can then draw your conclusion with a visual inspection. No operation is any more difficult than computing $1/2times 1/2.$
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
Nov 27 '18 at 23:19
1
$begingroup$
I get it now. I was looking for an elegant, mathematical expression for the joint distribution, but I now realize that I can just enumerate the sample space and the probabilities easily. Thanks, @whuber.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ and $Y$ be independent $Bernoulli(0.5)$ random variables. Let $W = X + Y$ and $T = |X - Y|$. Show that $W$ and $T$ are not independent.
I know that I have to show that $P(W, T)$ is not equal to $P(W)P(T)$, but finding the joint distribution is hard. Please help.
probability self-study independence bernoulli-distribution
asked Nov 27 '18 at 22:25
MSEMSE
1018
$endgroup$
Let $X$ and $Y$ be independent $Bernoulli(0.5)$ random variables. Let $W = X + Y$ and $T = |X - Y|$. Show that $W$ and $T$ are not independent.
I know that I have to show that $P(W, T)$ is not equal to $P(W)P(T)$, but finding the joint distribution is hard. Please help.
probability self-study independence bernoulli-distribution
probability self-study independence bernoulli-distribution
asked Nov 27 '18 at 22:25
MSEMSE
1018
asked Nov 27 '18 at 22:25
MSEMSE
1018
asked Nov 27 '18 at 22:25
MSEMSE
1018
asked Nov 27 '18 at 22:25
MSEMSE
1018
asked Nov 27 '18 at 22:25
MSEMSE
1018
1018
$begingroup$
Re: "finding the joint distribution is hard:" have you made a table? Label the rows with values of $X$, the columns with values of $Y$, and in the cells put the values of $T,$ $W,$ and the associated probabilities. Collect your results into a new table with rows labeled with $T$ and columns labeled with $W:$ put the total probabilities into the entries. That depicts the entire joint distribution of $(T,W).$ You can then draw your conclusion with a visual inspection. No operation is any more difficult than computing $1/2times 1/2.$
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
Nov 27 '18 at 23:19
1
$begingroup$
I get it now. I was looking for an elegant, mathematical expression for the joint distribution, but I now realize that I can just enumerate the sample space and the probabilities easily. Thanks, @whuber.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Re: "finding the joint distribution is hard:" have you made a table? Label the rows with values of $X$, the columns with values of $Y$, and in the cells put the values of $T,$ $W,$ and the associated probabilities. Collect your results into a new table with rows labeled with $T$ and columns labeled with $W:$ put the total probabilities into the entries. That depicts the entire joint distribution of $(T,W).$ You can then draw your conclusion with a visual inspection. No operation is any more difficult than computing $1/2times 1/2.$
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
Nov 27 '18 at 23:19
1
$begingroup$
I get it now. I was looking for an elegant, mathematical expression for the joint distribution, but I now realize that I can just enumerate the sample space and the probabilities easily. Thanks, @whuber.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:35
$begingroup$
Re: "finding the joint distribution is hard:" have you made a table? Label the rows with values of $X$, the columns with values of $Y$, and in the cells put the values of $T,$ $W,$ and the associated probabilities. Collect your results into a new table with rows labeled with $T$ and columns labeled with $W:$ put the total probabilities into the entries. That depicts the entire joint distribution of $(T,W).$ You can then draw your conclusion with a visual inspection. No operation is any more difficult than computing $1/2times 1/2.$
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
Nov 27 '18 at 23:19
$begingroup$
Re: "finding the joint distribution is hard:" have you made a table? Label the rows with values of $X$, the columns with values of $Y$, and in the cells put the values of $T,$ $W,$ and the associated probabilities. Collect your results into a new table with rows labeled with $T$ and columns labeled with $W:$ put the total probabilities into the entries. That depicts the entire joint distribution of $(T,W).$ You can then draw your conclusion with a visual inspection. No operation is any more difficult than computing $1/2times 1/2.$
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
Nov 27 '18 at 23:19
1
1
$begingroup$
I get it now. I was looking for an elegant, mathematical expression for the joint distribution, but I now realize that I can just enumerate the sample space and the probabilities easily. Thanks, @whuber.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:35
$begingroup$
I get it now. I was looking for an elegant, mathematical expression for the joint distribution, but I now realize that I can just enumerate the sample space and the probabilities easily. Thanks, @whuber.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:35
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The product of the marginal distributions is defined on ${0,1,2} times {0,1}$. You can plug in any of the $6$ possible pairs, and get a nonzero number out.
However, the joint density is defined on a smaller space:
$$
{0,0} cup {1,1} cup {2, 0}.
$$
To disprove independence, take any $(w,t)$ pair not in the above, and plug it in to $P(W,T)$ and $P(W)P(T)$. You will see that, for that particular pair:
$$
P(W,T) = 0 neq P(W)P(T).
$$
Alternatively, because you're dealing with a small space, you can just go ahead and compute every probability and just check every possible pair.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:48
TaylorTaylor
12.3k21945
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When T = 0, W = 0 or 2; when T = 1 then W = 1. So T and W are not independent.
See Independence of $X+Y$ and $X-Y$
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:28
user158565user158565
5,4421518
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I want to mark your solution as correct, too! Thanks, @user158565.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f379103%2fprove-that-the-sum-and-the-absolute-difference-of-2-bernoulli0-5-random-variab%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The product of the marginal distributions is defined on ${0,1,2} times {0,1}$. You can plug in any of the $6$ possible pairs, and get a nonzero number out.
However, the joint density is defined on a smaller space:
$$
{0,0} cup {1,1} cup {2, 0}.
$$
To disprove independence, take any $(w,t)$ pair not in the above, and plug it in to $P(W,T)$ and $P(W)P(T)$. You will see that, for that particular pair:
$$
P(W,T) = 0 neq P(W)P(T).
$$
Alternatively, because you're dealing with a small space, you can just go ahead and compute every probability and just check every possible pair.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:48
TaylorTaylor
12.3k21945
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The product of the marginal distributions is defined on ${0,1,2} times {0,1}$. You can plug in any of the $6$ possible pairs, and get a nonzero number out.
However, the joint density is defined on a smaller space:
$$
{0,0} cup {1,1} cup {2, 0}.
$$
To disprove independence, take any $(w,t)$ pair not in the above, and plug it in to $P(W,T)$ and $P(W)P(T)$. You will see that, for that particular pair:
$$
P(W,T) = 0 neq P(W)P(T).
$$
Alternatively, because you're dealing with a small space, you can just go ahead and compute every probability and just check every possible pair.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:48
TaylorTaylor
12.3k21945
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The product of the marginal distributions is defined on ${0,1,2} times {0,1}$. You can plug in any of the $6$ possible pairs, and get a nonzero number out.
However, the joint density is defined on a smaller space:
$$
{0,0} cup {1,1} cup {2, 0}.
$$
To disprove independence, take any $(w,t)$ pair not in the above, and plug it in to $P(W,T)$ and $P(W)P(T)$. You will see that, for that particular pair:
$$
P(W,T) = 0 neq P(W)P(T).
$$
Alternatively, because you're dealing with a small space, you can just go ahead and compute every probability and just check every possible pair.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:48
TaylorTaylor
12.3k21945
$endgroup$
The product of the marginal distributions is defined on ${0,1,2} times {0,1}$. You can plug in any of the $6$ possible pairs, and get a nonzero number out.
However, the joint density is defined on a smaller space:
$$
{0,0} cup {1,1} cup {2, 0}.
$$
To disprove independence, take any $(w,t)$ pair not in the above, and plug it in to $P(W,T)$ and $P(W)P(T)$. You will see that, for that particular pair:
$$
P(W,T) = 0 neq P(W)P(T).
$$
Alternatively, because you're dealing with a small space, you can just go ahead and compute every probability and just check every possible pair.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:48
TaylorTaylor
12.3k21945
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:48
TaylorTaylor
12.3k21945
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:48
TaylorTaylor
12.3k21945
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:48
TaylorTaylor
12.3k21945
12.3k21945
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When T = 0, W = 0 or 2; when T = 1 then W = 1. So T and W are not independent.
See Independence of $X+Y$ and $X-Y$
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:28
user158565user158565
5,4421518
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I want to mark your solution as correct, too! Thanks, @user158565.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When T = 0, W = 0 or 2; when T = 1 then W = 1. So T and W are not independent.
See Independence of $X+Y$ and $X-Y$
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:28
user158565user158565
5,4421518
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I want to mark your solution as correct, too! Thanks, @user158565.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When T = 0, W = 0 or 2; when T = 1 then W = 1. So T and W are not independent.
See Independence of $X+Y$ and $X-Y$
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:28
user158565user158565
5,4421518
$endgroup$
When T = 0, W = 0 or 2; when T = 1 then W = 1. So T and W are not independent.
See Independence of $X+Y$ and $X-Y$
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:28
user158565user158565
5,4421518
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:28
user158565user158565
5,4421518
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:28
user158565user158565
5,4421518
answered Nov 27 '18 at 22:28
user158565user158565
5,4421518
5,4421518
$begingroup$
I want to mark your solution as correct, too! Thanks, @user158565.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to mark your solution as correct, too! Thanks, @user158565.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39
$begingroup$
I want to mark your solution as correct, too! Thanks, @user158565.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39
$begingroup$
I want to mark your solution as correct, too! Thanks, @user158565.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:39
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f379103%2fprove-that-the-sum-and-the-absolute-difference-of-2-bernoulli0-5-random-variab%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Re: "finding the joint distribution is hard:" have you made a table? Label the rows with values of $X$, the columns with values of $Y$, and in the cells put the values of $T,$ $W,$ and the associated probabilities. Collect your results into a new table with rows labeled with $T$ and columns labeled with $W:$ put the total probabilities into the entries. That depicts the entire joint distribution of $(T,W).$ You can then draw your conclusion with a visual inspection. No operation is any more difficult than computing $1/2times 1/2.$
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
Nov 27 '18 at 23:19
1
$begingroup$
I get it now. I was looking for an elegant, mathematical expression for the joint distribution, but I now realize that I can just enumerate the sample space and the probabilities easily. Thanks, @whuber.
$endgroup$
– MSE
Nov 28 '18 at 0:35