Message transfered on Computational Science - Solving advection equation - periodic conditions - using roll...
Message transfered on Computational Science :
cf https://scicomp.stackexchange.com/questions/30635/solving-advection-equation-periodic-conditions-using-roll-python-function
I have to solve numerically the advection equation with periodic boundaries conditions : u(t,0) = u(t,L) with L the length of system to solve.
I start also with u(0,x) = uexacte(0,x) = sin(2*pi*x/L)
Here the main part of the code with loop time (we use here FTCS scheme
) :
V=1
L=1
# analytical solution --------------------------
def uexacte(t,x):
return sin(2*pi*(x-V*t)/L)
# 1. Centre FTCS (Forward Time Centered Space)
cfl = 0.25
nx = 10
tend = 1
#
dx = L/(nx-1.)
dt = cfl*dx/V
nt = int(tend/dt)+1
print "CFL=%5.2f tend=%4.1f --> %i iterations en temps"%(cfl,tend,nt)
# Arrays
x = linspace(0,L,nx)
# Bounadry condition
u0 = uexacte(0,x)
# Starting solution
t=0.0 ; u=copy(u0)
# Time loop
for i in range(1,nt):
# FTCS
#u[1:nx-1] = u[1:nx-1] - cfl/2*(u[2:nx] - u[0:nx-2])
# Using roll
u = u + - cfl/2*(roll(u,-1)- roll(u,1))
# Update time
t = t+dt
I don't understand the solution given by teacher who uses the python function roll
in this way :
# Using roll
u = u - cfl/2*(roll(u,-1)- roll(u,1))
One says that with the using of roll
, we are sure to respect the periodic boundary conditions but I don't understand why ?
Indeed, my first approach was to do :
u[0] = u[nx-1]
u[1:nx-1] = u[1:nx-1] - cfl/2*(u[2:nx] - u[0:nx-2])
but this doesn't work and I don't know how to implement this periodic conditions in this way (without using roll
function).
If someone could explain this matter and the trick with roll function
, this would be nice to tell it.
UPDATE 1 :
I tried with classical approach (simple recurrence formula ) like this :
# Time loop
for i in range(1,nt):
# FTCS
u[1:nx-1] = u[1:nx-1] - cfl/2*(u[2:nx] - u[0:nx-2])
# Try to impose periodic boundary conditions but without success
u[0] = u[0] - cfl/2*(u[0] - u[nx-1])
# Update time
t = t+dt
Indeed, the result is bad (values for each side are not the same). I could impose the theorical values at each step but in practise, we don't know always the analytical solution.
What is the trick to impose this periodic boundary condition on the numerical solution at each step of time ?
python boundary periodicity
add a comment |
Message transfered on Computational Science :
cf https://scicomp.stackexchange.com/questions/30635/solving-advection-equation-periodic-conditions-using-roll-python-function
I have to solve numerically the advection equation with periodic boundaries conditions : u(t,0) = u(t,L) with L the length of system to solve.
I start also with u(0,x) = uexacte(0,x) = sin(2*pi*x/L)
Here the main part of the code with loop time (we use here FTCS scheme
) :
V=1
L=1
# analytical solution --------------------------
def uexacte(t,x):
return sin(2*pi*(x-V*t)/L)
# 1. Centre FTCS (Forward Time Centered Space)
cfl = 0.25
nx = 10
tend = 1
#
dx = L/(nx-1.)
dt = cfl*dx/V
nt = int(tend/dt)+1
print "CFL=%5.2f tend=%4.1f --> %i iterations en temps"%(cfl,tend,nt)
# Arrays
x = linspace(0,L,nx)
# Bounadry condition
u0 = uexacte(0,x)
# Starting solution
t=0.0 ; u=copy(u0)
# Time loop
for i in range(1,nt):
# FTCS
#u[1:nx-1] = u[1:nx-1] - cfl/2*(u[2:nx] - u[0:nx-2])
# Using roll
u = u + - cfl/2*(roll(u,-1)- roll(u,1))
# Update time
t = t+dt
I don't understand the solution given by teacher who uses the python function roll
in this way :
# Using roll
u = u - cfl/2*(roll(u,-1)- roll(u,1))
One says that with the using of roll
, we are sure to respect the periodic boundary conditions but I don't understand why ?
Indeed, my first approach was to do :
u[0] = u[nx-1]
u[1:nx-1] = u[1:nx-1] - cfl/2*(u[2:nx] - u[0:nx-2])
but this doesn't work and I don't know how to implement this periodic conditions in this way (without using roll
function).
If someone could explain this matter and the trick with roll function
, this would be nice to tell it.
UPDATE 1 :
I tried with classical approach (simple recurrence formula ) like this :
# Time loop
for i in range(1,nt):
# FTCS
u[1:nx-1] = u[1:nx-1] - cfl/2*(u[2:nx] - u[0:nx-2])
# Try to impose periodic boundary conditions but without success
u[0] = u[0] - cfl/2*(u[0] - u[nx-1])
# Update time
t = t+dt
Indeed, the result is bad (values for each side are not the same). I could impose the theorical values at each step but in practise, we don't know always the analytical solution.
What is the trick to impose this periodic boundary condition on the numerical solution at each step of time ?
python boundary periodicity
add a comment |
Message transfered on Computational Science :
cf https://scicomp.stackexchange.com/questions/30635/solving-advection-equation-periodic-conditions-using-roll-python-function
I have to solve numerically the advection equation with periodic boundaries conditions : u(t,0) = u(t,L) with L the length of system to solve.
I start also with u(0,x) = uexacte(0,x) = sin(2*pi*x/L)
Here the main part of the code with loop time (we use here FTCS scheme
) :
V=1
L=1
# analytical solution --------------------------
def uexacte(t,x):
return sin(2*pi*(x-V*t)/L)
# 1. Centre FTCS (Forward Time Centered Space)
cfl = 0.25
nx = 10
tend = 1
#
dx = L/(nx-1.)
dt = cfl*dx/V
nt = int(tend/dt)+1
print "CFL=%5.2f tend=%4.1f --> %i iterations en temps"%(cfl,tend,nt)
# Arrays
x = linspace(0,L,nx)
# Bounadry condition
u0 = uexacte(0,x)
# Starting solution
t=0.0 ; u=copy(u0)
# Time loop
for i in range(1,nt):
# FTCS
#u[1:nx-1] = u[1:nx-1] - cfl/2*(u[2:nx] - u[0:nx-2])
# Using roll
u = u + - cfl/2*(roll(u,-1)- roll(u,1))
# Update time
t = t+dt
I don't understand the solution given by teacher who uses the python function roll
in this way :
# Using roll
u = u - cfl/2*(roll(u,-1)- roll(u,1))
One says that with the using of roll
, we are sure to respect the periodic boundary conditions but I don't understand why ?
Indeed, my first approach was to do :
u[0] = u[nx-1]
u[1:nx-1] = u[1:nx-1] - cfl/2*(u[2:nx] - u[0:nx-2])
but this doesn't work and I don't know how to implement this periodic conditions in this way (without using roll
function).
If someone could explain this matter and the trick with roll function
, this would be nice to tell it.
UPDATE 1 :
I tried with classical approach (simple recurrence formula ) like this :
# Time loop
for i in range(1,nt):
# FTCS
u[1:nx-1] = u[1:nx-1] - cfl/2*(u[2:nx] - u[0:nx-2])
# Try to impose periodic boundary conditions but without success
u[0] = u[0] - cfl/2*(u[0] - u[nx-1])
# Update time
t = t+dt
Indeed, the result is bad (values for each side are not the same). I could impose the theorical values at each step but in practise, we don't know always the analytical solution.
What is the trick to impose this periodic boundary condition on the numerical solution at each step of time ?
python boundary periodicity
Message transfered on Computational Science :
cf https://scicomp.stackexchange.com/questions/30635/solving-advection-equation-periodic-conditions-using-roll-python-function
I have to solve numerically the advection equation with periodic boundaries conditions : u(t,0) = u(t,L) with L the length of system to solve.
I start also with u(0,x) = uexacte(0,x) = sin(2*pi*x/L)
Here the main part of the code with loop time (we use here FTCS scheme
) :
V=1
L=1
# analytical solution --------------------------
def uexacte(t,x):
return sin(2*pi*(x-V*t)/L)
# 1. Centre FTCS (Forward Time Centered Space)
cfl = 0.25
nx = 10
tend = 1
#
dx = L/(nx-1.)
dt = cfl*dx/V
nt = int(tend/dt)+1
print "CFL=%5.2f tend=%4.1f --> %i iterations en temps"%(cfl,tend,nt)
# Arrays
x = linspace(0,L,nx)
# Bounadry condition
u0 = uexacte(0,x)
# Starting solution
t=0.0 ; u=copy(u0)
# Time loop
for i in range(1,nt):
# FTCS
#u[1:nx-1] = u[1:nx-1] - cfl/2*(u[2:nx] - u[0:nx-2])
# Using roll
u = u + - cfl/2*(roll(u,-1)- roll(u,1))
# Update time
t = t+dt
I don't understand the solution given by teacher who uses the python function roll
in this way :
# Using roll
u = u - cfl/2*(roll(u,-1)- roll(u,1))
One says that with the using of roll
, we are sure to respect the periodic boundary conditions but I don't understand why ?
Indeed, my first approach was to do :
u[0] = u[nx-1]
u[1:nx-1] = u[1:nx-1] - cfl/2*(u[2:nx] - u[0:nx-2])
but this doesn't work and I don't know how to implement this periodic conditions in this way (without using roll
function).
If someone could explain this matter and the trick with roll function
, this would be nice to tell it.
UPDATE 1 :
I tried with classical approach (simple recurrence formula ) like this :
# Time loop
for i in range(1,nt):
# FTCS
u[1:nx-1] = u[1:nx-1] - cfl/2*(u[2:nx] - u[0:nx-2])
# Try to impose periodic boundary conditions but without success
u[0] = u[0] - cfl/2*(u[0] - u[nx-1])
# Update time
t = t+dt
Indeed, the result is bad (values for each side are not the same). I could impose the theorical values at each step but in practise, we don't know always the analytical solution.
What is the trick to impose this periodic boundary condition on the numerical solution at each step of time ?
python boundary periodicity
python boundary periodicity
edited Dec 3 '18 at 10:45
youpilat13
asked Nov 27 '18 at 16:30
youpilat13youpilat13
8221441
8221441
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53504098%2fmessage-transfered-on-computational-science-solving-advection-equation-perio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53504098%2fmessage-transfered-on-computational-science-solving-advection-equation-perio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown