JS Closure Compiler, @param syntax for array destructuring?












3















I'm unable to find the correct syntax for @param annotations for array destructuring. E.g.:



let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;


I tried imitating the object destructuring syntax:



// object destructuring works

/** @param {{one: number, two: number}} o */

let destructObject = ({one, two}) => one + two;



// array destructuring does not works

/** @param {[one: number, two: number]} a */

let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;


But that's not valid syntax. I've also tried /** @param {Array<number>} a */, but then it expects a single parameter named a, not one and two.



Does anyone know the correct syntax to use for array destructuring?






javascript ecmascript-6 google-closure-compiler destructuring







share|improve this question


















  • 2





    For others who, like me, hoped JSDoc's destructuring support would solve this, it appears not. I answered hoping it would (you can see the answer here: pastebin.com/dNgVLCMd), but the OP said it didn't work. (Thanks for letting me know, junvar, and good luck -- it may be that CC doesn't support this yet.)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Nov 27 '18 at 17:27








  • 1





    Your answer was still helpful in providing background; thank you.

    – junvar
    Nov 27 '18 at 17:40
















3















I'm unable to find the correct syntax for @param annotations for array destructuring. E.g.:



let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;


I tried imitating the object destructuring syntax:



// object destructuring works

/** @param {{one: number, two: number}} o */

let destructObject = ({one, two}) => one + two;



// array destructuring does not works

/** @param {[one: number, two: number]} a */

let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;


But that's not valid syntax. I've also tried /** @param {Array<number>} a */, but then it expects a single parameter named a, not one and two.



Does anyone know the correct syntax to use for array destructuring?






javascript ecmascript-6 google-closure-compiler destructuring







share|improve this question


















  • 2





    For others who, like me, hoped JSDoc's destructuring support would solve this, it appears not. I answered hoping it would (you can see the answer here: pastebin.com/dNgVLCMd), but the OP said it didn't work. (Thanks for letting me know, junvar, and good luck -- it may be that CC doesn't support this yet.)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Nov 27 '18 at 17:27








  • 1





    Your answer was still helpful in providing background; thank you.

    – junvar
    Nov 27 '18 at 17:40














3












3








3








I'm unable to find the correct syntax for @param annotations for array destructuring. E.g.:



let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;


I tried imitating the object destructuring syntax:



// object destructuring works

/** @param {{one: number, two: number}} o */

let destructObject = ({one, two}) => one + two;



// array destructuring does not works

/** @param {[one: number, two: number]} a */

let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;


But that's not valid syntax. I've also tried /** @param {Array<number>} a */, but then it expects a single parameter named a, not one and two.



Does anyone know the correct syntax to use for array destructuring?






javascript ecmascript-6 google-closure-compiler destructuring







share|improve this question














I'm unable to find the correct syntax for @param annotations for array destructuring. E.g.:



let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;


I tried imitating the object destructuring syntax:



// object destructuring works

/** @param {{one: number, two: number}} o */

let destructObject = ({one, two}) => one + two;



// array destructuring does not works

/** @param {[one: number, two: number]} a */

let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;


But that's not valid syntax. I've also tried /** @param {Array<number>} a */, but then it expects a single parameter named a, not one and two.



Does anyone know the correct syntax to use for array destructuring?






javascript ecmascript-6 google-closure-compiler destructuring




javascript ecmascript-6 google-closure-compiler destructuring






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 27 '18 at 16:35









junvarjunvar

479514




479514








  • 2





    For others who, like me, hoped JSDoc's destructuring support would solve this, it appears not. I answered hoping it would (you can see the answer here: pastebin.com/dNgVLCMd), but the OP said it didn't work. (Thanks for letting me know, junvar, and good luck -- it may be that CC doesn't support this yet.)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Nov 27 '18 at 17:27








  • 1





    Your answer was still helpful in providing background; thank you.

    – junvar
    Nov 27 '18 at 17:40














  • 2





    For others who, like me, hoped JSDoc's destructuring support would solve this, it appears not. I answered hoping it would (you can see the answer here: pastebin.com/dNgVLCMd), but the OP said it didn't work. (Thanks for letting me know, junvar, and good luck -- it may be that CC doesn't support this yet.)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Nov 27 '18 at 17:27








  • 1





    Your answer was still helpful in providing background; thank you.

    – junvar
    Nov 27 '18 at 17:40








2




2





For others who, like me, hoped JSDoc's destructuring support would solve this, it appears not. I answered hoping it would (you can see the answer here: pastebin.com/dNgVLCMd), but the OP said it didn't work. (Thanks for letting me know, junvar, and good luck -- it may be that CC doesn't support this yet.)

– T.J. Crowder
Nov 27 '18 at 17:27







For others who, like me, hoped JSDoc's destructuring support would solve this, it appears not. I answered hoping it would (you can see the answer here: pastebin.com/dNgVLCMd), but the OP said it didn't work. (Thanks for letting me know, junvar, and good luck -- it may be that CC doesn't support this yet.)

– T.J. Crowder
Nov 27 '18 at 17:27






1




1





Your answer was still helpful in providing background; thank you.

– junvar
Nov 27 '18 at 17:40





Your answer was still helpful in providing background; thank you.

– junvar
Nov 27 '18 at 17:40












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Closure Compiler does not currently support different types at different array indexes. So in this case, all you do is:



/** @type {function(!Array<number>):number} */

let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;





share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53504192%2fjs-closure-compiler-param-syntax-for-array-destructuring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Closure Compiler does not currently support different types at different array indexes. So in this case, all you do is:



    /** @type {function(!Array<number>):number} */
    
let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;





    share|improve this answer




























      1














      Closure Compiler does not currently support different types at different array indexes. So in this case, all you do is:



      /** @type {function(!Array<number>):number} */
      
let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;





      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        Closure Compiler does not currently support different types at different array indexes. So in this case, all you do is:



        /** @type {function(!Array<number>):number} */
        
let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;





        share|improve this answer













        Closure Compiler does not currently support different types at different array indexes. So in this case, all you do is:



        /** @type {function(!Array<number>):number} */
        
let destructArray = ([one, two]) => one + two;






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 27 '18 at 18:07









        Chad KillingsworthChad Killingsworth

        13.1k22951




        13.1k22951
































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53504192%2fjs-closure-compiler-param-syntax-for-array-destructuring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

            Image
            0 I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{...
            Read more

            Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

            Image
            1 In the sklearn.model_selection.cross_val_predict page it is stated: Generate cross-validated estimates for each input data point. It is not appropriate to pass these predictions into an evaluation metric. Can someone explain what does it mean? If this gives estimate of Y (y prediction) for every Y (true Y), why can't I calculate metrics such as RMSE or coefficient of determination using these results? python scikit-learn cross-validation share | improve this question edited Nov 28 '18 at 17:52 desertnaut 20.3k 7 43 79 ...
            Read more

            Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)

            Image
            0 I have problem with inserting data to MySQL from modal. My modal: <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-success">6 komentarzy</a> <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-danger">brak komentarzy</a> <a data-toggle="modal" href="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" data-target="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" class="ediiit">(dodaj)</a> <div class="modal fade" id="add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="edit_printer" aria-hidden="true"> <div class="modal-dialog" role="document"> ...
            Read more