Looking for a working example of `SupportsRound`
There's not a lot of detailed information online about making type annotations work with __round__
. I have implemented this but I still get an error on line 16 (calling round
without an ndigits
argument) when I run mypy:
error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "int", variable has type "MyClass")
The test passes, i.e. in both calls to round
I get back an object of type MyClass
. But the MyPy check fails only when I call round
without an argument.
Version numbers: Python 3.6.5, mypy 0.641.
from typing import Any, SupportsRound, overload
class MyClass(SupportsRound['MyClass']):
def __round__(self: 'MyClass', ndigits: int = 0) -> 'MyClass':
return self
def test_tmp() -> None:
x = MyClass()
result: MyClass
result = round(x, 0)
assert type(result) == MyClass
result = round(x)
assert type(result) == MyClass
python mypy
add a comment |
There's not a lot of detailed information online about making type annotations work with __round__
. I have implemented this but I still get an error on line 16 (calling round
without an ndigits
argument) when I run mypy:
error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "int", variable has type "MyClass")
The test passes, i.e. in both calls to round
I get back an object of type MyClass
. But the MyPy check fails only when I call round
without an argument.
Version numbers: Python 3.6.5, mypy 0.641.
from typing import Any, SupportsRound, overload
class MyClass(SupportsRound['MyClass']):
def __round__(self: 'MyClass', ndigits: int = 0) -> 'MyClass':
return self
def test_tmp() -> None:
x = MyClass()
result: MyClass
result = round(x, 0)
assert type(result) == MyClass
result = round(x)
assert type(result) == MyClass
python mypy
add a comment |
There's not a lot of detailed information online about making type annotations work with __round__
. I have implemented this but I still get an error on line 16 (calling round
without an ndigits
argument) when I run mypy:
error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "int", variable has type "MyClass")
The test passes, i.e. in both calls to round
I get back an object of type MyClass
. But the MyPy check fails only when I call round
without an argument.
Version numbers: Python 3.6.5, mypy 0.641.
from typing import Any, SupportsRound, overload
class MyClass(SupportsRound['MyClass']):
def __round__(self: 'MyClass', ndigits: int = 0) -> 'MyClass':
return self
def test_tmp() -> None:
x = MyClass()
result: MyClass
result = round(x, 0)
assert type(result) == MyClass
result = round(x)
assert type(result) == MyClass
python mypy
There's not a lot of detailed information online about making type annotations work with __round__
. I have implemented this but I still get an error on line 16 (calling round
without an ndigits
argument) when I run mypy:
error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "int", variable has type "MyClass")
The test passes, i.e. in both calls to round
I get back an object of type MyClass
. But the MyPy check fails only when I call round
without an argument.
Version numbers: Python 3.6.5, mypy 0.641.
from typing import Any, SupportsRound, overload
class MyClass(SupportsRound['MyClass']):
def __round__(self: 'MyClass', ndigits: int = 0) -> 'MyClass':
return self
def test_tmp() -> None:
x = MyClass()
result: MyClass
result = round(x, 0)
assert type(result) == MyClass
result = round(x)
assert type(result) == MyClass
python mypy
python mypy
edited Nov 26 '18 at 13:16
shadowtalker
4,44012148
4,44012148
asked Nov 26 '18 at 13:12
migwellianmigwellian
535
535
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I believe the problem here has less to do with your use of SupportsRound
and more to do with the definition of the round
function. The round
function is defined in typeshed, the repository of type hints for the standard library, to have the following signature:
@overload
def round(number: float) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: float, ndigits: None) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: float, ndigits: int) -> float: ...
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T]) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T], ndigits: None) -> int: ... # type: ignore
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T], ndigits: int) -> _T: ...
Note that when only one argument is provided or ndigits
is None, the output is always int
. This is consistent with the documented behavior of the round
function in the standard library: https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#round
Unfortunately, I don't see a really clean way of working around this: I don't think the implementation of SupportsRound is really consistent with this behavior.
Specifically, SupportsRound probably ought to have been defined to be something like so:
@runtime
class SupportsRound(Protocol[_T_co]):
@abstractmethod
@overload
def __round__(self, ndigits: None = None) -> int: ...
@abstractmethod
@overload
def __round__(self, ndigits: int) -> _T_co: ...
Basically, force the user to handle these two cases.
Actually changing the definition would probably be complicated though: there isn't really a clean way of updating any older versions of Python that come bundled with older versions of the typing module.
I would recommend filing an issue about this on the typeshed issue tracker. I personally think you've discovered a genuine inconsistency/bug here, but there's possibly some nuance here that I'm missing, so I think it would be good to escalate this.
Thanks. I have filed github.com/python/typeshed/issues/2638
– migwellian
Nov 27 '18 at 17:01
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53481887%2flooking-for-a-working-example-of-supportsround%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I believe the problem here has less to do with your use of SupportsRound
and more to do with the definition of the round
function. The round
function is defined in typeshed, the repository of type hints for the standard library, to have the following signature:
@overload
def round(number: float) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: float, ndigits: None) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: float, ndigits: int) -> float: ...
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T]) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T], ndigits: None) -> int: ... # type: ignore
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T], ndigits: int) -> _T: ...
Note that when only one argument is provided or ndigits
is None, the output is always int
. This is consistent with the documented behavior of the round
function in the standard library: https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#round
Unfortunately, I don't see a really clean way of working around this: I don't think the implementation of SupportsRound is really consistent with this behavior.
Specifically, SupportsRound probably ought to have been defined to be something like so:
@runtime
class SupportsRound(Protocol[_T_co]):
@abstractmethod
@overload
def __round__(self, ndigits: None = None) -> int: ...
@abstractmethod
@overload
def __round__(self, ndigits: int) -> _T_co: ...
Basically, force the user to handle these two cases.
Actually changing the definition would probably be complicated though: there isn't really a clean way of updating any older versions of Python that come bundled with older versions of the typing module.
I would recommend filing an issue about this on the typeshed issue tracker. I personally think you've discovered a genuine inconsistency/bug here, but there's possibly some nuance here that I'm missing, so I think it would be good to escalate this.
Thanks. I have filed github.com/python/typeshed/issues/2638
– migwellian
Nov 27 '18 at 17:01
add a comment |
I believe the problem here has less to do with your use of SupportsRound
and more to do with the definition of the round
function. The round
function is defined in typeshed, the repository of type hints for the standard library, to have the following signature:
@overload
def round(number: float) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: float, ndigits: None) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: float, ndigits: int) -> float: ...
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T]) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T], ndigits: None) -> int: ... # type: ignore
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T], ndigits: int) -> _T: ...
Note that when only one argument is provided or ndigits
is None, the output is always int
. This is consistent with the documented behavior of the round
function in the standard library: https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#round
Unfortunately, I don't see a really clean way of working around this: I don't think the implementation of SupportsRound is really consistent with this behavior.
Specifically, SupportsRound probably ought to have been defined to be something like so:
@runtime
class SupportsRound(Protocol[_T_co]):
@abstractmethod
@overload
def __round__(self, ndigits: None = None) -> int: ...
@abstractmethod
@overload
def __round__(self, ndigits: int) -> _T_co: ...
Basically, force the user to handle these two cases.
Actually changing the definition would probably be complicated though: there isn't really a clean way of updating any older versions of Python that come bundled with older versions of the typing module.
I would recommend filing an issue about this on the typeshed issue tracker. I personally think you've discovered a genuine inconsistency/bug here, but there's possibly some nuance here that I'm missing, so I think it would be good to escalate this.
Thanks. I have filed github.com/python/typeshed/issues/2638
– migwellian
Nov 27 '18 at 17:01
add a comment |
I believe the problem here has less to do with your use of SupportsRound
and more to do with the definition of the round
function. The round
function is defined in typeshed, the repository of type hints for the standard library, to have the following signature:
@overload
def round(number: float) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: float, ndigits: None) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: float, ndigits: int) -> float: ...
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T]) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T], ndigits: None) -> int: ... # type: ignore
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T], ndigits: int) -> _T: ...
Note that when only one argument is provided or ndigits
is None, the output is always int
. This is consistent with the documented behavior of the round
function in the standard library: https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#round
Unfortunately, I don't see a really clean way of working around this: I don't think the implementation of SupportsRound is really consistent with this behavior.
Specifically, SupportsRound probably ought to have been defined to be something like so:
@runtime
class SupportsRound(Protocol[_T_co]):
@abstractmethod
@overload
def __round__(self, ndigits: None = None) -> int: ...
@abstractmethod
@overload
def __round__(self, ndigits: int) -> _T_co: ...
Basically, force the user to handle these two cases.
Actually changing the definition would probably be complicated though: there isn't really a clean way of updating any older versions of Python that come bundled with older versions of the typing module.
I would recommend filing an issue about this on the typeshed issue tracker. I personally think you've discovered a genuine inconsistency/bug here, but there's possibly some nuance here that I'm missing, so I think it would be good to escalate this.
I believe the problem here has less to do with your use of SupportsRound
and more to do with the definition of the round
function. The round
function is defined in typeshed, the repository of type hints for the standard library, to have the following signature:
@overload
def round(number: float) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: float, ndigits: None) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: float, ndigits: int) -> float: ...
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T]) -> int: ...
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T], ndigits: None) -> int: ... # type: ignore
@overload
def round(number: SupportsRound[_T], ndigits: int) -> _T: ...
Note that when only one argument is provided or ndigits
is None, the output is always int
. This is consistent with the documented behavior of the round
function in the standard library: https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#round
Unfortunately, I don't see a really clean way of working around this: I don't think the implementation of SupportsRound is really consistent with this behavior.
Specifically, SupportsRound probably ought to have been defined to be something like so:
@runtime
class SupportsRound(Protocol[_T_co]):
@abstractmethod
@overload
def __round__(self, ndigits: None = None) -> int: ...
@abstractmethod
@overload
def __round__(self, ndigits: int) -> _T_co: ...
Basically, force the user to handle these two cases.
Actually changing the definition would probably be complicated though: there isn't really a clean way of updating any older versions of Python that come bundled with older versions of the typing module.
I would recommend filing an issue about this on the typeshed issue tracker. I personally think you've discovered a genuine inconsistency/bug here, but there's possibly some nuance here that I'm missing, so I think it would be good to escalate this.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 2:37
Michael0x2aMichael0x2a
22.8k1674126
22.8k1674126
Thanks. I have filed github.com/python/typeshed/issues/2638
– migwellian
Nov 27 '18 at 17:01
add a comment |
Thanks. I have filed github.com/python/typeshed/issues/2638
– migwellian
Nov 27 '18 at 17:01
Thanks. I have filed github.com/python/typeshed/issues/2638
– migwellian
Nov 27 '18 at 17:01
Thanks. I have filed github.com/python/typeshed/issues/2638
– migwellian
Nov 27 '18 at 17:01
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53481887%2flooking-for-a-working-example-of-supportsround%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown