Convert HH:MM:SS string to seconds only in javascript
62
I am having similar requirement as this: Convert time in HH:MM:SS format to seconds only?
but in javascript. I have seen many examples of converting seconds into different formats but not HH:MM:SS into seconds. Any help would be appreciated.
javascript time
edited May 23 '17 at 11:54
Community♦
11
asked Mar 9 '12 at 20:06
Sri ReddySri Reddy
2,398175598
|
show 3 more comments
62
I am having similar requirement as this: Convert time in HH:MM:SS format to seconds only?
but in javascript. I have seen many examples of converting seconds into different formats but not HH:MM:SS into seconds. Any help would be appreciated.
javascript time
edited May 23 '17 at 11:54
Community♦
11
asked Mar 9 '12 at 20:06
Sri ReddySri Reddy
2,398175598
did you mean HH:MM:SS?
– MilkyWayJoe
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
oops.. sorry for the typo. yes, it's time hh:mm:ss
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
What is theDDinHH:MM:DD?
– Brian Driscoll
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
2
It's the same algorithm as is in that PHP question.
– scottheckel
Mar 9 '12 at 20:11
1
Only solution I think of is to split the string in array and then multiply 3600 to hour and multiply 60 to min and add all with seconds part. Is this is the simplest solution?
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:13
|
show 3 more comments
62
62
62
26
I am having similar requirement as this: Convert time in HH:MM:SS format to seconds only?
but in javascript. I have seen many examples of converting seconds into different formats but not HH:MM:SS into seconds. Any help would be appreciated.
javascript time
edited May 23 '17 at 11:54
Community♦
11
asked Mar 9 '12 at 20:06
Sri ReddySri Reddy
2,398175598
I am having similar requirement as this: Convert time in HH:MM:SS format to seconds only?
but in javascript. I have seen many examples of converting seconds into different formats but not HH:MM:SS into seconds. Any help would be appreciated.
javascript time
javascript time
edited May 23 '17 at 11:54
Community♦
11
asked Mar 9 '12 at 20:06
Sri ReddySri Reddy
2,398175598
edited May 23 '17 at 11:54
Community♦
11
asked Mar 9 '12 at 20:06
Sri ReddySri Reddy
2,398175598
edited May 23 '17 at 11:54
Community♦
11
edited May 23 '17 at 11:54
Community♦
11
edited May 23 '17 at 11:54
Community♦
11
11
asked Mar 9 '12 at 20:06
Sri ReddySri Reddy
2,398175598
asked Mar 9 '12 at 20:06
Sri ReddySri Reddy
2,398175598
asked Mar 9 '12 at 20:06
Sri ReddySri Reddy
2,398175598
2,398175598
did you mean HH:MM:SS?
– MilkyWayJoe
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
oops.. sorry for the typo. yes, it's time hh:mm:ss
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
What is theDDinHH:MM:DD?
– Brian Driscoll
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
2
It's the same algorithm as is in that PHP question.
– scottheckel
Mar 9 '12 at 20:11
1
Only solution I think of is to split the string in array and then multiply 3600 to hour and multiply 60 to min and add all with seconds part. Is this is the simplest solution?
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:13
|
show 3 more comments
did you mean HH:MM:SS?
– MilkyWayJoe
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
oops.. sorry for the typo. yes, it's time hh:mm:ss
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
What is theDDinHH:MM:DD?
– Brian Driscoll
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
2
It's the same algorithm as is in that PHP question.
– scottheckel
Mar 9 '12 at 20:11
1
Only solution I think of is to split the string in array and then multiply 3600 to hour and multiply 60 to min and add all with seconds part. Is this is the simplest solution?
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:13
did you mean HH:MM:SS?
– MilkyWayJoe
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
did you mean HH:MM:SS?
– MilkyWayJoe
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
oops.. sorry for the typo. yes, it's time hh:mm:ss
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
oops.. sorry for the typo. yes, it's time hh:mm:ss
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
What is the
DD in HH:MM:DD?– Brian Driscoll
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
What is the
DD in HH:MM:DD?– Brian Driscoll
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
2
2
It's the same algorithm as is in that PHP question.
– scottheckel
Mar 9 '12 at 20:11
It's the same algorithm as is in that PHP question.
– scottheckel
Mar 9 '12 at 20:11
1
1
Only solution I think of is to split the string in array and then multiply 3600 to hour and multiply 60 to min and add all with seconds part. Is this is the simplest solution?
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:13
Only solution I think of is to split the string in array and then multiply 3600 to hour and multiply 60 to min and add all with seconds part. Is this is the simplest solution?
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:13
|
show 3 more comments
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
137
Try this:
var hms = '02:04:33'; // your input string
var a = hms.split(':'); // split it at the colons
// minutes are worth 60 seconds. Hours are worth 60 minutes.
var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2]);
console.log(seconds);
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:15
Dagg NabbitDagg Nabbit
50.8k1686131
2
Here's a prototype version of this!String.prototype.toSeconds = function () { if (!this) return null; var hms = this.split(':'); return (+hms[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+hms[1]) * 60 + (+hms[2] || 0); }NOTE: the|| 0at the end is good for any implementation of this code - it prevents issues with a (still valid) time representation of HH:MM (Chrome type="time" inputs will output in this format when seconds=0).
– Fateh Khalsa
May 6 '16 at 0:47
Awesome stuff dude
– edward
Nov 30 '16 at 15:25
i have onlyhh:mmnotsecondsin this case what i have to modify..?
– Mr world wide
Dec 21 '16 at 6:02
1
@AbdulWaheed Change this line:var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2]);tovar seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60;
– Rova
Mar 2 '17 at 16:05
2
The use of "+" operator to convert numeric string to number is not a good idea. It's short and looks "clever", but it's confusing and not clean code. Use parseInt(x, 10) instead. And avoid one-liner. Also prevent errors by undefined input. For example: it's not a string, has no ":" or only "HH:MM". etc.
– Dominik
Sep 26 '17 at 14:09
add a comment |
52
This function handels "HH:MM:SS" as well as "MM:SS" or "SS".
function hmsToSecondsOnly(str) {
var p = str.split(':'),
s = 0, m = 1;
while (p.length > 0) {
s += m * parseInt(p.pop(), 10);
m *= 60;
}
return s;
}
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:18
NikoNiko
23.4k774105
Nice, I will keep it if requirement comes up for time passed is any format. Thanks!
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:27
Works perfect !
– Shan Eapen Koshy
Sep 4 '15 at 17:34
Best answer for me so far
– Rezwan Azfar Haleem
Nov 14 '16 at 1:49
This answer is useful
– Mike Aron
Sep 8 '18 at 18:02
add a comment |
23
This can be done quite resiliently with the following:
'01:02:03'.split(':').reduce((acc,time) => (60 * acc) + +time);
This is because each unit of time within the hours, minutes and seconds is a multiple of 60 greater than the smaller unit. Time is split into hour minutes and seconds components, then reduced to seconds by using the accumulated value of the higher units multiplied by 60 as it goes through each unit.
The +time is used to cast the time to a number.
It basically ends up doing: (60 * ((60 * HHHH) + MM)) + SS
answered Jul 25 '17 at 1:49
PaulPaul
4,1172841
thats actually pretty damn clever.. question is how fast this is compared to a calculation
– ThatBrianDude
Sep 20 '17 at 17:35
1
Yes it's clever, but a good example of creating difficult to maintain code for no practical gain. It saves 4 characters when minified vs a minified version of the accepted answer. Given that many web pages are now in excess of 1MB, that saving is somewhat less than insignificant.
– RobG
May 19 '18 at 9:24
2
Although this answer isn't as comprehensible, it does gracefully handle bothHH:MM:SSas well asMM:SS, while the accepted answer does not.
– ckeeney
Aug 31 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
9
Convert hh:mm:ss string to seconds in one line. Also allowed h:m:s format and mm:ss, m:s etc
'08:45:20'.split(':').reverse().reduce((prev, curr, i) => prev + curr*Math.pow(60, i), 0)
edited Nov 25 '16 at 14:34
B001ᛦ
1,13951320
answered Nov 10 '16 at 13:35
Paul HidePaul Hide
10612
4
Please explain your answer
– B001ᛦ
Nov 10 '16 at 13:43
Converthh:mm:ssstring to seconds in one line. Also allowedh:m:sformat andmm:ss,m:setc.
– Paul Hide
Nov 25 '16 at 12:56
Nice answer! But you could skip thereverse(): '00:01:11'.split(':').reduce((val, entry, i) => val + entry * (3600/Math.pow(60, i)), 0) === 71
– CMR
Jan 7 '17 at 20:55
@CMR, interesting aproach, but in case ofmm:ssit will not work correctly.
– Paul Hide
Jan 9 '17 at 13:43
add a comment |
7
Since the getTime function of the Date object gets the milliseconds since 1970/01/01, we can do this:
var time = '12:23:00';
var seconds = new Date('1970-01-01T' + time + 'Z').getTime() / 1000;
answered Mar 15 '13 at 18:57
boskopboskop
31146
1
Just realized, this doesnt work with daylight savings time. Need to use the actual date
– Yablargo
Jun 13 '13 at 3:08
@Yablargo Thanks. Previous version didn't work very well with local timezone, so i edited it to use iso 8601 utc datetime format.
– boskop
Jul 15 '13 at 10:30
add a comment |
6
try
time="12:12:12";
tt=time.split(":");
sec=tt[0]*3600+tt[1]*60+tt[2]*1;
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:16
LucaLuca
3,69811623
4
ah, that *1 is a clever way to get it not to do string concatenation :)
– Dagg Nabbit
Mar 9 '12 at 20:22
add a comment |
4
Javascript's static method Date.UTC() does the trick:
alert(getSeconds('00:22:17'));
function getSeconds(time)
{
var ts = time.split(':');
return Date.UTC(1970, 0, 1, ts[0], ts[1], ts[2]) / 1000;
}
answered Jun 14 '13 at 8:06
ChronozoaChronozoa
195410
add a comment |
2
new Date(moment('23:04:33', "HH:mm")).getTime()
Output: 1499755980000 (in millisecond)
( 1499755980000/1000) (in second)
Note : this output calculate diff from 1970-01-01 12:0:0 to now
and we need to implement the moment.js
answered Jul 11 '17 at 7:27
ITsDEvITsDEv
213
OP asked for seconds not milliseconds
– user7294900
Jul 11 '17 at 7:51
Hi user7294900, Thx for your comment i ll update my answer, jst we need divide by 1000
– ITsDEv
Jul 27 '17 at 8:06
add a comment |
1
This function works for MM:SS as well:
const convertTime = (hms) => {
if (hms.length <3){
return hms
} else if (hms.length <6){
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 + (+a[1])
} else {
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2])
}
}answered Mar 16 '17 at 8:19
Philip TranPhilip Tran
111
add a comment |
0
function parsehhmmsst(arg) {
var result = 0, arr = arg.split(':')
if (arr[0] < 12) {
result = arr[0] * 3600 // hours
}
result += arr[1] * 60 // minutes
result += parseInt(arr[2]) // seconds
if (arg.indexOf('P') > -1) { // 8:00 PM > 8:00 AM
result += 43200
}
return result
}
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 PM') + '<br>')<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>answered Jul 14 '15 at 17:34
Phillip SennPhillip Senn
19.4k72213328
add a comment |
0
You can do this dynamically - in case you encounter not only: HH:mm:ss, but also, mm:ss, or even ss alone.
var str = '12:99:07';
var times = str.split(":");
times.reverse();
var x = times.length, y = 0, z;
for (var i = 0; i < x; i++) {
z = times[i] * Math.pow(60, i);
y += z;
}
console.log(y);
edited Apr 21 '16 at 1:51
Mogsdad
33.3k1290194
answered Apr 21 '16 at 0:59
JeffzJeffz
1,27741937
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f9640266%2fconvert-hhmmss-string-to-seconds-only-in-javascript%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
137
Try this:
var hms = '02:04:33'; // your input string
var a = hms.split(':'); // split it at the colons
// minutes are worth 60 seconds. Hours are worth 60 minutes.
var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2]);
console.log(seconds);
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:15
Dagg NabbitDagg Nabbit
50.8k1686131
2
Here's a prototype version of this!String.prototype.toSeconds = function () { if (!this) return null; var hms = this.split(':'); return (+hms[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+hms[1]) * 60 + (+hms[2] || 0); }NOTE: the|| 0at the end is good for any implementation of this code - it prevents issues with a (still valid) time representation of HH:MM (Chrome type="time" inputs will output in this format when seconds=0).
– Fateh Khalsa
May 6 '16 at 0:47
Awesome stuff dude
– edward
Nov 30 '16 at 15:25
i have onlyhh:mmnotsecondsin this case what i have to modify..?
– Mr world wide
Dec 21 '16 at 6:02
1
@AbdulWaheed Change this line:var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2]);tovar seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60;
– Rova
Mar 2 '17 at 16:05
2
The use of "+" operator to convert numeric string to number is not a good idea. It's short and looks "clever", but it's confusing and not clean code. Use parseInt(x, 10) instead. And avoid one-liner. Also prevent errors by undefined input. For example: it's not a string, has no ":" or only "HH:MM". etc.
– Dominik
Sep 26 '17 at 14:09
add a comment |
137
Try this:
var hms = '02:04:33'; // your input string
var a = hms.split(':'); // split it at the colons
// minutes are worth 60 seconds. Hours are worth 60 minutes.
var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2]);
console.log(seconds);
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:15
Dagg NabbitDagg Nabbit
50.8k1686131
2
Here's a prototype version of this!String.prototype.toSeconds = function () { if (!this) return null; var hms = this.split(':'); return (+hms[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+hms[1]) * 60 + (+hms[2] || 0); }NOTE: the|| 0at the end is good for any implementation of this code - it prevents issues with a (still valid) time representation of HH:MM (Chrome type="time" inputs will output in this format when seconds=0).
– Fateh Khalsa
May 6 '16 at 0:47
Awesome stuff dude
– edward
Nov 30 '16 at 15:25
i have onlyhh:mmnotsecondsin this case what i have to modify..?
– Mr world wide
Dec 21 '16 at 6:02
1
@AbdulWaheed Change this line:var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2]);tovar seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60;
– Rova
Mar 2 '17 at 16:05
2
The use of "+" operator to convert numeric string to number is not a good idea. It's short and looks "clever", but it's confusing and not clean code. Use parseInt(x, 10) instead. And avoid one-liner. Also prevent errors by undefined input. For example: it's not a string, has no ":" or only "HH:MM". etc.
– Dominik
Sep 26 '17 at 14:09
add a comment |
137
137
137
Try this:
var hms = '02:04:33'; // your input string
var a = hms.split(':'); // split it at the colons
// minutes are worth 60 seconds. Hours are worth 60 minutes.
var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2]);
console.log(seconds);
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:15
Dagg NabbitDagg Nabbit
50.8k1686131
Try this:
var hms = '02:04:33'; // your input string
var a = hms.split(':'); // split it at the colons
// minutes are worth 60 seconds. Hours are worth 60 minutes.
var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2]);
console.log(seconds);
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:15
Dagg NabbitDagg Nabbit
50.8k1686131
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:15
Dagg NabbitDagg Nabbit
50.8k1686131
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:15
Dagg NabbitDagg Nabbit
50.8k1686131
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:15
Dagg NabbitDagg Nabbit
50.8k1686131
50.8k1686131
2
Here's a prototype version of this!String.prototype.toSeconds = function () { if (!this) return null; var hms = this.split(':'); return (+hms[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+hms[1]) * 60 + (+hms[2] || 0); }NOTE: the|| 0at the end is good for any implementation of this code - it prevents issues with a (still valid) time representation of HH:MM (Chrome type="time" inputs will output in this format when seconds=0).
– Fateh Khalsa
May 6 '16 at 0:47
Awesome stuff dude
– edward
Nov 30 '16 at 15:25
i have onlyhh:mmnotsecondsin this case what i have to modify..?
– Mr world wide
Dec 21 '16 at 6:02
1
@AbdulWaheed Change this line:var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2]);tovar seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60;
– Rova
Mar 2 '17 at 16:05
2
The use of "+" operator to convert numeric string to number is not a good idea. It's short and looks "clever", but it's confusing and not clean code. Use parseInt(x, 10) instead. And avoid one-liner. Also prevent errors by undefined input. For example: it's not a string, has no ":" or only "HH:MM". etc.
– Dominik
Sep 26 '17 at 14:09
add a comment |
2
Here's a prototype version of this!String.prototype.toSeconds = function () { if (!this) return null; var hms = this.split(':'); return (+hms[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+hms[1]) * 60 + (+hms[2] || 0); }NOTE: the|| 0at the end is good for any implementation of this code - it prevents issues with a (still valid) time representation of HH:MM (Chrome type="time" inputs will output in this format when seconds=0).
– Fateh Khalsa
May 6 '16 at 0:47
Awesome stuff dude
– edward
Nov 30 '16 at 15:25
i have onlyhh:mmnotsecondsin this case what i have to modify..?
– Mr world wide
Dec 21 '16 at 6:02
1
@AbdulWaheed Change this line:var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2]);tovar seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60;
– Rova
Mar 2 '17 at 16:05
2
The use of "+" operator to convert numeric string to number is not a good idea. It's short and looks "clever", but it's confusing and not clean code. Use parseInt(x, 10) instead. And avoid one-liner. Also prevent errors by undefined input. For example: it's not a string, has no ":" or only "HH:MM". etc.
– Dominik
Sep 26 '17 at 14:09
2
2
Here's a prototype version of this!
String.prototype.toSeconds = function () { if (!this) return null; var hms = this.split(':'); return (+hms[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+hms[1]) * 60 + (+hms[2] || 0); } NOTE: the || 0 at the end is good for any implementation of this code - it prevents issues with a (still valid) time representation of HH:MM (Chrome type="time" inputs will output in this format when seconds=0).– Fateh Khalsa
May 6 '16 at 0:47
Here's a prototype version of this!
String.prototype.toSeconds = function () { if (!this) return null; var hms = this.split(':'); return (+hms[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+hms[1]) * 60 + (+hms[2] || 0); } NOTE: the || 0 at the end is good for any implementation of this code - it prevents issues with a (still valid) time representation of HH:MM (Chrome type="time" inputs will output in this format when seconds=0).– Fateh Khalsa
May 6 '16 at 0:47
Awesome stuff dude
– edward
Nov 30 '16 at 15:25
Awesome stuff dude
– edward
Nov 30 '16 at 15:25
i have only
hh:mm not seconds in this case what i have to modify..?– Mr world wide
Dec 21 '16 at 6:02
i have only
hh:mm not seconds in this case what i have to modify..?– Mr world wide
Dec 21 '16 at 6:02
1
1
@AbdulWaheed Change this line:
var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2]); to var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60; – Rova
Mar 2 '17 at 16:05
@AbdulWaheed Change this line:
var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2]); to var seconds = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60; – Rova
Mar 2 '17 at 16:05
2
2
The use of "+" operator to convert numeric string to number is not a good idea. It's short and looks "clever", but it's confusing and not clean code. Use parseInt(x, 10) instead. And avoid one-liner. Also prevent errors by undefined input. For example: it's not a string, has no ":" or only "HH:MM". etc.
– Dominik
Sep 26 '17 at 14:09
The use of "+" operator to convert numeric string to number is not a good idea. It's short and looks "clever", but it's confusing and not clean code. Use parseInt(x, 10) instead. And avoid one-liner. Also prevent errors by undefined input. For example: it's not a string, has no ":" or only "HH:MM". etc.
– Dominik
Sep 26 '17 at 14:09
add a comment |
52
This function handels "HH:MM:SS" as well as "MM:SS" or "SS".
function hmsToSecondsOnly(str) {
var p = str.split(':'),
s = 0, m = 1;
while (p.length > 0) {
s += m * parseInt(p.pop(), 10);
m *= 60;
}
return s;
}
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:18
NikoNiko
23.4k774105
Nice, I will keep it if requirement comes up for time passed is any format. Thanks!
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:27
Works perfect !
– Shan Eapen Koshy
Sep 4 '15 at 17:34
Best answer for me so far
– Rezwan Azfar Haleem
Nov 14 '16 at 1:49
This answer is useful
– Mike Aron
Sep 8 '18 at 18:02
add a comment |
52
This function handels "HH:MM:SS" as well as "MM:SS" or "SS".
function hmsToSecondsOnly(str) {
var p = str.split(':'),
s = 0, m = 1;
while (p.length > 0) {
s += m * parseInt(p.pop(), 10);
m *= 60;
}
return s;
}
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:18
NikoNiko
23.4k774105
Nice, I will keep it if requirement comes up for time passed is any format. Thanks!
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:27
Works perfect !
– Shan Eapen Koshy
Sep 4 '15 at 17:34
Best answer for me so far
– Rezwan Azfar Haleem
Nov 14 '16 at 1:49
This answer is useful
– Mike Aron
Sep 8 '18 at 18:02
add a comment |
52
52
52
This function handels "HH:MM:SS" as well as "MM:SS" or "SS".
function hmsToSecondsOnly(str) {
var p = str.split(':'),
s = 0, m = 1;
while (p.length > 0) {
s += m * parseInt(p.pop(), 10);
m *= 60;
}
return s;
}
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:18
NikoNiko
23.4k774105
This function handels "HH:MM:SS" as well as "MM:SS" or "SS".
function hmsToSecondsOnly(str) {
var p = str.split(':'),
s = 0, m = 1;
while (p.length > 0) {
s += m * parseInt(p.pop(), 10);
m *= 60;
}
return s;
}
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:18
NikoNiko
23.4k774105
edited Apr 12 '13 at 19:33
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:18
NikoNiko
23.4k774105
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:18
NikoNiko
23.4k774105
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:18
NikoNiko
23.4k774105
23.4k774105
Nice, I will keep it if requirement comes up for time passed is any format. Thanks!
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:27
Works perfect !
– Shan Eapen Koshy
Sep 4 '15 at 17:34
Best answer for me so far
– Rezwan Azfar Haleem
Nov 14 '16 at 1:49
This answer is useful
– Mike Aron
Sep 8 '18 at 18:02
add a comment |
Nice, I will keep it if requirement comes up for time passed is any format. Thanks!
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:27
Works perfect !
– Shan Eapen Koshy
Sep 4 '15 at 17:34
Best answer for me so far
– Rezwan Azfar Haleem
Nov 14 '16 at 1:49
This answer is useful
– Mike Aron
Sep 8 '18 at 18:02
Nice, I will keep it if requirement comes up for time passed is any format. Thanks!
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:27
Nice, I will keep it if requirement comes up for time passed is any format. Thanks!
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:27
Works perfect !
– Shan Eapen Koshy
Sep 4 '15 at 17:34
Works perfect !
– Shan Eapen Koshy
Sep 4 '15 at 17:34
Best answer for me so far
– Rezwan Azfar Haleem
Nov 14 '16 at 1:49
Best answer for me so far
– Rezwan Azfar Haleem
Nov 14 '16 at 1:49
This answer is useful
– Mike Aron
Sep 8 '18 at 18:02
This answer is useful
– Mike Aron
Sep 8 '18 at 18:02
add a comment |
23
This can be done quite resiliently with the following:
'01:02:03'.split(':').reduce((acc,time) => (60 * acc) + +time);
This is because each unit of time within the hours, minutes and seconds is a multiple of 60 greater than the smaller unit. Time is split into hour minutes and seconds components, then reduced to seconds by using the accumulated value of the higher units multiplied by 60 as it goes through each unit.
The +time is used to cast the time to a number.
It basically ends up doing: (60 * ((60 * HHHH) + MM)) + SS
answered Jul 25 '17 at 1:49
PaulPaul
4,1172841
thats actually pretty damn clever.. question is how fast this is compared to a calculation
– ThatBrianDude
Sep 20 '17 at 17:35
1
Yes it's clever, but a good example of creating difficult to maintain code for no practical gain. It saves 4 characters when minified vs a minified version of the accepted answer. Given that many web pages are now in excess of 1MB, that saving is somewhat less than insignificant.
– RobG
May 19 '18 at 9:24
2
Although this answer isn't as comprehensible, it does gracefully handle bothHH:MM:SSas well asMM:SS, while the accepted answer does not.
– ckeeney
Aug 31 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
23
This can be done quite resiliently with the following:
'01:02:03'.split(':').reduce((acc,time) => (60 * acc) + +time);
This is because each unit of time within the hours, minutes and seconds is a multiple of 60 greater than the smaller unit. Time is split into hour minutes and seconds components, then reduced to seconds by using the accumulated value of the higher units multiplied by 60 as it goes through each unit.
The +time is used to cast the time to a number.
It basically ends up doing: (60 * ((60 * HHHH) + MM)) + SS
answered Jul 25 '17 at 1:49
PaulPaul
4,1172841
thats actually pretty damn clever.. question is how fast this is compared to a calculation
– ThatBrianDude
Sep 20 '17 at 17:35
1
Yes it's clever, but a good example of creating difficult to maintain code for no practical gain. It saves 4 characters when minified vs a minified version of the accepted answer. Given that many web pages are now in excess of 1MB, that saving is somewhat less than insignificant.
– RobG
May 19 '18 at 9:24
2
Although this answer isn't as comprehensible, it does gracefully handle bothHH:MM:SSas well asMM:SS, while the accepted answer does not.
– ckeeney
Aug 31 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
23
23
23
This can be done quite resiliently with the following:
'01:02:03'.split(':').reduce((acc,time) => (60 * acc) + +time);
This is because each unit of time within the hours, minutes and seconds is a multiple of 60 greater than the smaller unit. Time is split into hour minutes and seconds components, then reduced to seconds by using the accumulated value of the higher units multiplied by 60 as it goes through each unit.
The +time is used to cast the time to a number.
It basically ends up doing: (60 * ((60 * HHHH) + MM)) + SS
answered Jul 25 '17 at 1:49
PaulPaul
4,1172841
This can be done quite resiliently with the following:
'01:02:03'.split(':').reduce((acc,time) => (60 * acc) + +time);
This is because each unit of time within the hours, minutes and seconds is a multiple of 60 greater than the smaller unit. Time is split into hour minutes and seconds components, then reduced to seconds by using the accumulated value of the higher units multiplied by 60 as it goes through each unit.
The +time is used to cast the time to a number.
It basically ends up doing: (60 * ((60 * HHHH) + MM)) + SS
answered Jul 25 '17 at 1:49
PaulPaul
4,1172841
answered Jul 25 '17 at 1:49
PaulPaul
4,1172841
answered Jul 25 '17 at 1:49
PaulPaul
4,1172841
answered Jul 25 '17 at 1:49
PaulPaul
4,1172841
4,1172841
thats actually pretty damn clever.. question is how fast this is compared to a calculation
– ThatBrianDude
Sep 20 '17 at 17:35
1
Yes it's clever, but a good example of creating difficult to maintain code for no practical gain. It saves 4 characters when minified vs a minified version of the accepted answer. Given that many web pages are now in excess of 1MB, that saving is somewhat less than insignificant.
– RobG
May 19 '18 at 9:24
2
Although this answer isn't as comprehensible, it does gracefully handle bothHH:MM:SSas well asMM:SS, while the accepted answer does not.
– ckeeney
Aug 31 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
thats actually pretty damn clever.. question is how fast this is compared to a calculation
– ThatBrianDude
Sep 20 '17 at 17:35
1
Yes it's clever, but a good example of creating difficult to maintain code for no practical gain. It saves 4 characters when minified vs a minified version of the accepted answer. Given that many web pages are now in excess of 1MB, that saving is somewhat less than insignificant.
– RobG
May 19 '18 at 9:24
2
Although this answer isn't as comprehensible, it does gracefully handle bothHH:MM:SSas well asMM:SS, while the accepted answer does not.
– ckeeney
Aug 31 '18 at 18:45
thats actually pretty damn clever.. question is how fast this is compared to a calculation
– ThatBrianDude
Sep 20 '17 at 17:35
thats actually pretty damn clever.. question is how fast this is compared to a calculation
– ThatBrianDude
Sep 20 '17 at 17:35
1
1
Yes it's clever, but a good example of creating difficult to maintain code for no practical gain. It saves 4 characters when minified vs a minified version of the accepted answer. Given that many web pages are now in excess of 1MB, that saving is somewhat less than insignificant.
– RobG
May 19 '18 at 9:24
Yes it's clever, but a good example of creating difficult to maintain code for no practical gain. It saves 4 characters when minified vs a minified version of the accepted answer. Given that many web pages are now in excess of 1MB, that saving is somewhat less than insignificant.
– RobG
May 19 '18 at 9:24
2
2
Although this answer isn't as comprehensible, it does gracefully handle both
HH:MM:SS as well as MM:SS, while the accepted answer does not.– ckeeney
Aug 31 '18 at 18:45
Although this answer isn't as comprehensible, it does gracefully handle both
HH:MM:SS as well as MM:SS, while the accepted answer does not.– ckeeney
Aug 31 '18 at 18:45
add a comment |
9
Convert hh:mm:ss string to seconds in one line. Also allowed h:m:s format and mm:ss, m:s etc
'08:45:20'.split(':').reverse().reduce((prev, curr, i) => prev + curr*Math.pow(60, i), 0)
edited Nov 25 '16 at 14:34
B001ᛦ
1,13951320
answered Nov 10 '16 at 13:35
Paul HidePaul Hide
10612
4
Please explain your answer
– B001ᛦ
Nov 10 '16 at 13:43
Converthh:mm:ssstring to seconds in one line. Also allowedh:m:sformat andmm:ss,m:setc.
– Paul Hide
Nov 25 '16 at 12:56
Nice answer! But you could skip thereverse(): '00:01:11'.split(':').reduce((val, entry, i) => val + entry * (3600/Math.pow(60, i)), 0) === 71
– CMR
Jan 7 '17 at 20:55
@CMR, interesting aproach, but in case ofmm:ssit will not work correctly.
– Paul Hide
Jan 9 '17 at 13:43
add a comment |
9
Convert hh:mm:ss string to seconds in one line. Also allowed h:m:s format and mm:ss, m:s etc
'08:45:20'.split(':').reverse().reduce((prev, curr, i) => prev + curr*Math.pow(60, i), 0)
edited Nov 25 '16 at 14:34
B001ᛦ
1,13951320
answered Nov 10 '16 at 13:35
Paul HidePaul Hide
10612
4
Please explain your answer
– B001ᛦ
Nov 10 '16 at 13:43
Converthh:mm:ssstring to seconds in one line. Also allowedh:m:sformat andmm:ss,m:setc.
– Paul Hide
Nov 25 '16 at 12:56
Nice answer! But you could skip thereverse(): '00:01:11'.split(':').reduce((val, entry, i) => val + entry * (3600/Math.pow(60, i)), 0) === 71
– CMR
Jan 7 '17 at 20:55
@CMR, interesting aproach, but in case ofmm:ssit will not work correctly.
– Paul Hide
Jan 9 '17 at 13:43
add a comment |
9
9
9
Convert hh:mm:ss string to seconds in one line. Also allowed h:m:s format and mm:ss, m:s etc
'08:45:20'.split(':').reverse().reduce((prev, curr, i) => prev + curr*Math.pow(60, i), 0)
edited Nov 25 '16 at 14:34
B001ᛦ
1,13951320
answered Nov 10 '16 at 13:35
Paul HidePaul Hide
10612
Convert hh:mm:ss string to seconds in one line. Also allowed h:m:s format and mm:ss, m:s etc
'08:45:20'.split(':').reverse().reduce((prev, curr, i) => prev + curr*Math.pow(60, i), 0)
edited Nov 25 '16 at 14:34
B001ᛦ
1,13951320
answered Nov 10 '16 at 13:35
Paul HidePaul Hide
10612
edited Nov 25 '16 at 14:34
B001ᛦ
1,13951320
edited Nov 25 '16 at 14:34
B001ᛦ
1,13951320
edited Nov 25 '16 at 14:34
B001ᛦ
1,13951320
1,13951320
answered Nov 10 '16 at 13:35
Paul HidePaul Hide
10612
answered Nov 10 '16 at 13:35
Paul HidePaul Hide
10612
answered Nov 10 '16 at 13:35
Paul HidePaul Hide
10612
10612
4
Please explain your answer
– B001ᛦ
Nov 10 '16 at 13:43
Converthh:mm:ssstring to seconds in one line. Also allowedh:m:sformat andmm:ss,m:setc.
– Paul Hide
Nov 25 '16 at 12:56
Nice answer! But you could skip thereverse(): '00:01:11'.split(':').reduce((val, entry, i) => val + entry * (3600/Math.pow(60, i)), 0) === 71
– CMR
Jan 7 '17 at 20:55
@CMR, interesting aproach, but in case ofmm:ssit will not work correctly.
– Paul Hide
Jan 9 '17 at 13:43
add a comment |
4
Please explain your answer
– B001ᛦ
Nov 10 '16 at 13:43
Converthh:mm:ssstring to seconds in one line. Also allowedh:m:sformat andmm:ss,m:setc.
– Paul Hide
Nov 25 '16 at 12:56
Nice answer! But you could skip thereverse(): '00:01:11'.split(':').reduce((val, entry, i) => val + entry * (3600/Math.pow(60, i)), 0) === 71
– CMR
Jan 7 '17 at 20:55
@CMR, interesting aproach, but in case ofmm:ssit will not work correctly.
– Paul Hide
Jan 9 '17 at 13:43
4
4
Please explain your answer
– B001ᛦ
Nov 10 '16 at 13:43
Please explain your answer
– B001ᛦ
Nov 10 '16 at 13:43
Convert
hh:mm:ss string to seconds in one line. Also allowed h:m:s format and mm:ss, m:s etc.– Paul Hide
Nov 25 '16 at 12:56
Convert
hh:mm:ss string to seconds in one line. Also allowed h:m:s format and mm:ss, m:s etc.– Paul Hide
Nov 25 '16 at 12:56
Nice answer! But you could skip the
reverse(): '00:01:11'.split(':').reduce((val, entry, i) => val + entry * (3600/Math.pow(60, i)), 0) === 71– CMR
Jan 7 '17 at 20:55
Nice answer! But you could skip the
reverse(): '00:01:11'.split(':').reduce((val, entry, i) => val + entry * (3600/Math.pow(60, i)), 0) === 71– CMR
Jan 7 '17 at 20:55
@CMR, interesting aproach, but in case of
mm:ss it will not work correctly.– Paul Hide
Jan 9 '17 at 13:43
@CMR, interesting aproach, but in case of
mm:ss it will not work correctly.– Paul Hide
Jan 9 '17 at 13:43
add a comment |
7
Since the getTime function of the Date object gets the milliseconds since 1970/01/01, we can do this:
var time = '12:23:00';
var seconds = new Date('1970-01-01T' + time + 'Z').getTime() / 1000;
answered Mar 15 '13 at 18:57
boskopboskop
31146
1
Just realized, this doesnt work with daylight savings time. Need to use the actual date
– Yablargo
Jun 13 '13 at 3:08
@Yablargo Thanks. Previous version didn't work very well with local timezone, so i edited it to use iso 8601 utc datetime format.
– boskop
Jul 15 '13 at 10:30
add a comment |
7
Since the getTime function of the Date object gets the milliseconds since 1970/01/01, we can do this:
var time = '12:23:00';
var seconds = new Date('1970-01-01T' + time + 'Z').getTime() / 1000;
answered Mar 15 '13 at 18:57
boskopboskop
31146
1
Just realized, this doesnt work with daylight savings time. Need to use the actual date
– Yablargo
Jun 13 '13 at 3:08
@Yablargo Thanks. Previous version didn't work very well with local timezone, so i edited it to use iso 8601 utc datetime format.
– boskop
Jul 15 '13 at 10:30
add a comment |
7
7
7
Since the getTime function of the Date object gets the milliseconds since 1970/01/01, we can do this:
var time = '12:23:00';
var seconds = new Date('1970-01-01T' + time + 'Z').getTime() / 1000;
answered Mar 15 '13 at 18:57
boskopboskop
31146
Since the getTime function of the Date object gets the milliseconds since 1970/01/01, we can do this:
var time = '12:23:00';
var seconds = new Date('1970-01-01T' + time + 'Z').getTime() / 1000;
answered Mar 15 '13 at 18:57
boskopboskop
31146
edited Jul 15 '13 at 10:24
answered Mar 15 '13 at 18:57
boskopboskop
31146
answered Mar 15 '13 at 18:57
boskopboskop
31146
answered Mar 15 '13 at 18:57
boskopboskop
31146
31146
1
Just realized, this doesnt work with daylight savings time. Need to use the actual date
– Yablargo
Jun 13 '13 at 3:08
@Yablargo Thanks. Previous version didn't work very well with local timezone, so i edited it to use iso 8601 utc datetime format.
– boskop
Jul 15 '13 at 10:30
add a comment |
1
Just realized, this doesnt work with daylight savings time. Need to use the actual date
– Yablargo
Jun 13 '13 at 3:08
@Yablargo Thanks. Previous version didn't work very well with local timezone, so i edited it to use iso 8601 utc datetime format.
– boskop
Jul 15 '13 at 10:30
1
1
Just realized, this doesnt work with daylight savings time. Need to use the actual date
– Yablargo
Jun 13 '13 at 3:08
Just realized, this doesnt work with daylight savings time. Need to use the actual date
– Yablargo
Jun 13 '13 at 3:08
@Yablargo Thanks. Previous version didn't work very well with local timezone, so i edited it to use iso 8601 utc datetime format.
– boskop
Jul 15 '13 at 10:30
@Yablargo Thanks. Previous version didn't work very well with local timezone, so i edited it to use iso 8601 utc datetime format.
– boskop
Jul 15 '13 at 10:30
add a comment |
6
try
time="12:12:12";
tt=time.split(":");
sec=tt[0]*3600+tt[1]*60+tt[2]*1;
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:16
LucaLuca
3,69811623
4
ah, that *1 is a clever way to get it not to do string concatenation :)
– Dagg Nabbit
Mar 9 '12 at 20:22
add a comment |
6
try
time="12:12:12";
tt=time.split(":");
sec=tt[0]*3600+tt[1]*60+tt[2]*1;
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:16
LucaLuca
3,69811623
4
ah, that *1 is a clever way to get it not to do string concatenation :)
– Dagg Nabbit
Mar 9 '12 at 20:22
add a comment |
6
6
6
try
time="12:12:12";
tt=time.split(":");
sec=tt[0]*3600+tt[1]*60+tt[2]*1;
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:16
LucaLuca
3,69811623
try
time="12:12:12";
tt=time.split(":");
sec=tt[0]*3600+tt[1]*60+tt[2]*1;
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:16
LucaLuca
3,69811623
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:16
LucaLuca
3,69811623
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:16
LucaLuca
3,69811623
answered Mar 9 '12 at 20:16
LucaLuca
3,69811623
3,69811623
4
ah, that *1 is a clever way to get it not to do string concatenation :)
– Dagg Nabbit
Mar 9 '12 at 20:22
add a comment |
4
ah, that *1 is a clever way to get it not to do string concatenation :)
– Dagg Nabbit
Mar 9 '12 at 20:22
4
4
ah, that *1 is a clever way to get it not to do string concatenation :)
– Dagg Nabbit
Mar 9 '12 at 20:22
ah, that *1 is a clever way to get it not to do string concatenation :)
– Dagg Nabbit
Mar 9 '12 at 20:22
add a comment |
4
Javascript's static method Date.UTC() does the trick:
alert(getSeconds('00:22:17'));
function getSeconds(time)
{
var ts = time.split(':');
return Date.UTC(1970, 0, 1, ts[0], ts[1], ts[2]) / 1000;
}
answered Jun 14 '13 at 8:06
ChronozoaChronozoa
195410
add a comment |
4
Javascript's static method Date.UTC() does the trick:
alert(getSeconds('00:22:17'));
function getSeconds(time)
{
var ts = time.split(':');
return Date.UTC(1970, 0, 1, ts[0], ts[1], ts[2]) / 1000;
}
answered Jun 14 '13 at 8:06
ChronozoaChronozoa
195410
add a comment |
4
4
4
Javascript's static method Date.UTC() does the trick:
alert(getSeconds('00:22:17'));
function getSeconds(time)
{
var ts = time.split(':');
return Date.UTC(1970, 0, 1, ts[0], ts[1], ts[2]) / 1000;
}
answered Jun 14 '13 at 8:06
ChronozoaChronozoa
195410
Javascript's static method Date.UTC() does the trick:
alert(getSeconds('00:22:17'));
function getSeconds(time)
{
var ts = time.split(':');
return Date.UTC(1970, 0, 1, ts[0], ts[1], ts[2]) / 1000;
}
answered Jun 14 '13 at 8:06
ChronozoaChronozoa
195410
answered Jun 14 '13 at 8:06
ChronozoaChronozoa
195410
answered Jun 14 '13 at 8:06
ChronozoaChronozoa
195410
answered Jun 14 '13 at 8:06
ChronozoaChronozoa
195410
195410
add a comment |
add a comment |
2
new Date(moment('23:04:33', "HH:mm")).getTime()
Output: 1499755980000 (in millisecond)
( 1499755980000/1000) (in second)
Note : this output calculate diff from 1970-01-01 12:0:0 to now
and we need to implement the moment.js
answered Jul 11 '17 at 7:27
ITsDEvITsDEv
213
OP asked for seconds not milliseconds
– user7294900
Jul 11 '17 at 7:51
Hi user7294900, Thx for your comment i ll update my answer, jst we need divide by 1000
– ITsDEv
Jul 27 '17 at 8:06
add a comment |
2
new Date(moment('23:04:33', "HH:mm")).getTime()
Output: 1499755980000 (in millisecond)
( 1499755980000/1000) (in second)
Note : this output calculate diff from 1970-01-01 12:0:0 to now
and we need to implement the moment.js
answered Jul 11 '17 at 7:27
ITsDEvITsDEv
213
OP asked for seconds not milliseconds
– user7294900
Jul 11 '17 at 7:51
Hi user7294900, Thx for your comment i ll update my answer, jst we need divide by 1000
– ITsDEv
Jul 27 '17 at 8:06
add a comment |
2
2
2
new Date(moment('23:04:33', "HH:mm")).getTime()
Output: 1499755980000 (in millisecond)
( 1499755980000/1000) (in second)
Note : this output calculate diff from 1970-01-01 12:0:0 to now
and we need to implement the moment.js
answered Jul 11 '17 at 7:27
ITsDEvITsDEv
213
new Date(moment('23:04:33', "HH:mm")).getTime()
Output: 1499755980000 (in millisecond)
( 1499755980000/1000) (in second)
Note : this output calculate diff from 1970-01-01 12:0:0 to now
and we need to implement the moment.js
answered Jul 11 '17 at 7:27
ITsDEvITsDEv
213
edited Jul 27 '17 at 8:09
answered Jul 11 '17 at 7:27
ITsDEvITsDEv
213
answered Jul 11 '17 at 7:27
ITsDEvITsDEv
213
answered Jul 11 '17 at 7:27
ITsDEvITsDEv
213
213
OP asked for seconds not milliseconds
– user7294900
Jul 11 '17 at 7:51
Hi user7294900, Thx for your comment i ll update my answer, jst we need divide by 1000
– ITsDEv
Jul 27 '17 at 8:06
add a comment |
OP asked for seconds not milliseconds
– user7294900
Jul 11 '17 at 7:51
Hi user7294900, Thx for your comment i ll update my answer, jst we need divide by 1000
– ITsDEv
Jul 27 '17 at 8:06
OP asked for seconds not milliseconds
– user7294900
Jul 11 '17 at 7:51
OP asked for seconds not milliseconds
– user7294900
Jul 11 '17 at 7:51
Hi user7294900, Thx for your comment i ll update my answer, jst we need divide by 1000
– ITsDEv
Jul 27 '17 at 8:06
Hi user7294900, Thx for your comment i ll update my answer, jst we need divide by 1000
– ITsDEv
Jul 27 '17 at 8:06
add a comment |
1
This function works for MM:SS as well:
const convertTime = (hms) => {
if (hms.length <3){
return hms
} else if (hms.length <6){
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 + (+a[1])
} else {
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2])
}
}answered Mar 16 '17 at 8:19
Philip TranPhilip Tran
111
add a comment |
1
This function works for MM:SS as well:
const convertTime = (hms) => {
if (hms.length <3){
return hms
} else if (hms.length <6){
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 + (+a[1])
} else {
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2])
}
}answered Mar 16 '17 at 8:19
Philip TranPhilip Tran
111
add a comment |
1
1
1
This function works for MM:SS as well:
const convertTime = (hms) => {
if (hms.length <3){
return hms
} else if (hms.length <6){
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 + (+a[1])
} else {
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2])
}
}answered Mar 16 '17 at 8:19
Philip TranPhilip Tran
111
This function works for MM:SS as well:
const convertTime = (hms) => {
if (hms.length <3){
return hms
} else if (hms.length <6){
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 + (+a[1])
} else {
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2])
}
}const convertTime = (hms) => {
if (hms.length <3){
return hms
} else if (hms.length <6){
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 + (+a[1])
} else {
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2])
}
}const convertTime = (hms) => {
if (hms.length <3){
return hms
} else if (hms.length <6){
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 + (+a[1])
} else {
const a = hms.split(':')
return hms = (+a[0]) * 60 * 60 + (+a[1]) * 60 + (+a[2])
}
}answered Mar 16 '17 at 8:19
Philip TranPhilip Tran
111
answered Mar 16 '17 at 8:19
Philip TranPhilip Tran
111
answered Mar 16 '17 at 8:19
Philip TranPhilip Tran
111
answered Mar 16 '17 at 8:19
Philip TranPhilip Tran
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
function parsehhmmsst(arg) {
var result = 0, arr = arg.split(':')
if (arr[0] < 12) {
result = arr[0] * 3600 // hours
}
result += arr[1] * 60 // minutes
result += parseInt(arr[2]) // seconds
if (arg.indexOf('P') > -1) { // 8:00 PM > 8:00 AM
result += 43200
}
return result
}
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 PM') + '<br>')<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>answered Jul 14 '15 at 17:34
Phillip SennPhillip Senn
19.4k72213328
add a comment |
0
function parsehhmmsst(arg) {
var result = 0, arr = arg.split(':')
if (arr[0] < 12) {
result = arr[0] * 3600 // hours
}
result += arr[1] * 60 // minutes
result += parseInt(arr[2]) // seconds
if (arg.indexOf('P') > -1) { // 8:00 PM > 8:00 AM
result += 43200
}
return result
}
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 PM') + '<br>')<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>answered Jul 14 '15 at 17:34
Phillip SennPhillip Senn
19.4k72213328
add a comment |
0
0
0
function parsehhmmsst(arg) {
var result = 0, arr = arg.split(':')
if (arr[0] < 12) {
result = arr[0] * 3600 // hours
}
result += arr[1] * 60 // minutes
result += parseInt(arr[2]) // seconds
if (arg.indexOf('P') > -1) { // 8:00 PM > 8:00 AM
result += 43200
}
return result
}
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 PM') + '<br>')<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>answered Jul 14 '15 at 17:34
Phillip SennPhillip Senn
19.4k72213328
function parsehhmmsst(arg) {
var result = 0, arr = arg.split(':')
if (arr[0] < 12) {
result = arr[0] * 3600 // hours
}
result += arr[1] * 60 // minutes
result += parseInt(arr[2]) // seconds
if (arg.indexOf('P') > -1) { // 8:00 PM > 8:00 AM
result += 43200
}
return result
}
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 PM') + '<br>')<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>function parsehhmmsst(arg) {
var result = 0, arr = arg.split(':')
if (arr[0] < 12) {
result = arr[0] * 3600 // hours
}
result += arr[1] * 60 // minutes
result += parseInt(arr[2]) // seconds
if (arg.indexOf('P') > -1) { // 8:00 PM > 8:00 AM
result += 43200
}
return result
}
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 PM') + '<br>')<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>function parsehhmmsst(arg) {
var result = 0, arr = arg.split(':')
if (arr[0] < 12) {
result = arr[0] * 3600 // hours
}
result += arr[1] * 60 // minutes
result += parseInt(arr[2]) // seconds
if (arg.indexOf('P') > -1) { // 8:00 PM > 8:00 AM
result += 43200
}
return result
}
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 AM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('12:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('1:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('2:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('3:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('4:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('5:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('6:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('7:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('8:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('9:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('10:00:00 PM') + '<br>')
$('body').append(parsehhmmsst('11:00:00 PM') + '<br>')<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>answered Jul 14 '15 at 17:34
Phillip SennPhillip Senn
19.4k72213328
answered Jul 14 '15 at 17:34
Phillip SennPhillip Senn
19.4k72213328
answered Jul 14 '15 at 17:34
Phillip SennPhillip Senn
19.4k72213328
answered Jul 14 '15 at 17:34
Phillip SennPhillip Senn
19.4k72213328
19.4k72213328
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
You can do this dynamically - in case you encounter not only: HH:mm:ss, but also, mm:ss, or even ss alone.
var str = '12:99:07';
var times = str.split(":");
times.reverse();
var x = times.length, y = 0, z;
for (var i = 0; i < x; i++) {
z = times[i] * Math.pow(60, i);
y += z;
}
console.log(y);
edited Apr 21 '16 at 1:51
Mogsdad
33.3k1290194
answered Apr 21 '16 at 0:59
JeffzJeffz
1,27741937
add a comment |
0
You can do this dynamically - in case you encounter not only: HH:mm:ss, but also, mm:ss, or even ss alone.
var str = '12:99:07';
var times = str.split(":");
times.reverse();
var x = times.length, y = 0, z;
for (var i = 0; i < x; i++) {
z = times[i] * Math.pow(60, i);
y += z;
}
console.log(y);
edited Apr 21 '16 at 1:51
Mogsdad
33.3k1290194
answered Apr 21 '16 at 0:59
JeffzJeffz
1,27741937
add a comment |
0
0
0
You can do this dynamically - in case you encounter not only: HH:mm:ss, but also, mm:ss, or even ss alone.
var str = '12:99:07';
var times = str.split(":");
times.reverse();
var x = times.length, y = 0, z;
for (var i = 0; i < x; i++) {
z = times[i] * Math.pow(60, i);
y += z;
}
console.log(y);
edited Apr 21 '16 at 1:51
Mogsdad
33.3k1290194
answered Apr 21 '16 at 0:59
JeffzJeffz
1,27741937
You can do this dynamically - in case you encounter not only: HH:mm:ss, but also, mm:ss, or even ss alone.
var str = '12:99:07';
var times = str.split(":");
times.reverse();
var x = times.length, y = 0, z;
for (var i = 0; i < x; i++) {
z = times[i] * Math.pow(60, i);
y += z;
}
console.log(y);
edited Apr 21 '16 at 1:51
Mogsdad
33.3k1290194
answered Apr 21 '16 at 0:59
JeffzJeffz
1,27741937
edited Apr 21 '16 at 1:51
Mogsdad
33.3k1290194
edited Apr 21 '16 at 1:51
Mogsdad
33.3k1290194
edited Apr 21 '16 at 1:51
Mogsdad
33.3k1290194
33.3k1290194
answered Apr 21 '16 at 0:59
JeffzJeffz
1,27741937
answered Apr 21 '16 at 0:59
JeffzJeffz
1,27741937
answered Apr 21 '16 at 0:59
JeffzJeffz
1,27741937
1,27741937
add a comment |
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f9640266%2fconvert-hhmmss-string-to-seconds-only-in-javascript%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
did you mean HH:MM:SS?
– MilkyWayJoe
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
oops.. sorry for the typo. yes, it's time hh:mm:ss
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
What is the
DDinHH:MM:DD?– Brian Driscoll
Mar 9 '12 at 20:10
2
It's the same algorithm as is in that PHP question.
– scottheckel
Mar 9 '12 at 20:11
1
Only solution I think of is to split the string in array and then multiply 3600 to hour and multiply 60 to min and add all with seconds part. Is this is the simplest solution?
– Sri Reddy
Mar 9 '12 at 20:13