Cite a single InCollection without the “Eds.” in apacite?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am pretty new to LaTeX, so this will probably be a stupid question.



I am citing a number of chapters from Collections in my thesis. Today, my advisor criticized me for a minor flaw in my references. I have a reference like this:



   @InCollection{Example2010,
author = {Smith, John and Smith, Peter},
title = {A Nice Chapter},
booktitle = {An Interesting Book},
publisher = {Bielefeld University Press},
year = {2010},
editor = {John Smith and Peter Smith and Mary White and Other Dude},
pages = {261--310},
}


Apacite does the following:



Smith, J. & Smith, P. (2010). A Nice Chapter. In J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude (Eds.), An Interesting Book (pp. 261-310). Bielefeld University Press.



However, the people I listed as editors are not really the editors of the vorlume but all the authors that wrote chapters. Is there a way of getting rid of the "Eds." in this case without losing it for all the chapters in edited volumes i cite?



Thank you very much!










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 2 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Your writeup isn't exactly clear. If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are not the actual editors, why do you list them in the editor field? Why don't you list the actual editors? Finally, if the actual editors can't be found, have you considered simply omitting the editor field?
    – Mico
    Apr 25 at 18:16












  • Sorry, I wrote this a bit confusing: This is a book with chapters by different authors. All the authors of any of the chapters are listed on the cover, i still need to reference them. I just need a way to just say "J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude, An Interesting Book" in this case and leave out the word "Eds.". If this is possible.
    – Spike
    Apr 25 at 18:25










  • If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are listed on the book cover as the editors, they are the editors. In addition, if you're forced to use apacite-based bibliography formatting, I don't understand why you'd want to suppress the (Eds.) string. Otherwise, you'll have two separate groups of names, and your readers may well get confused as to what's going on.
    – Mico
    Apr 25 at 18:34

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am pretty new to LaTeX, so this will probably be a stupid question.



I am citing a number of chapters from Collections in my thesis. Today, my advisor criticized me for a minor flaw in my references. I have a reference like this:



   @InCollection{Example2010,
author = {Smith, John and Smith, Peter},
title = {A Nice Chapter},
booktitle = {An Interesting Book},
publisher = {Bielefeld University Press},
year = {2010},
editor = {John Smith and Peter Smith and Mary White and Other Dude},
pages = {261--310},
}


Apacite does the following:



Smith, J. & Smith, P. (2010). A Nice Chapter. In J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude (Eds.), An Interesting Book (pp. 261-310). Bielefeld University Press.



However, the people I listed as editors are not really the editors of the vorlume but all the authors that wrote chapters. Is there a way of getting rid of the "Eds." in this case without losing it for all the chapters in edited volumes i cite?



Thank you very much!










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 2 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Your writeup isn't exactly clear. If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are not the actual editors, why do you list them in the editor field? Why don't you list the actual editors? Finally, if the actual editors can't be found, have you considered simply omitting the editor field?
    – Mico
    Apr 25 at 18:16












  • Sorry, I wrote this a bit confusing: This is a book with chapters by different authors. All the authors of any of the chapters are listed on the cover, i still need to reference them. I just need a way to just say "J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude, An Interesting Book" in this case and leave out the word "Eds.". If this is possible.
    – Spike
    Apr 25 at 18:25










  • If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are listed on the book cover as the editors, they are the editors. In addition, if you're forced to use apacite-based bibliography formatting, I don't understand why you'd want to suppress the (Eds.) string. Otherwise, you'll have two separate groups of names, and your readers may well get confused as to what's going on.
    – Mico
    Apr 25 at 18:34















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I am pretty new to LaTeX, so this will probably be a stupid question.



I am citing a number of chapters from Collections in my thesis. Today, my advisor criticized me for a minor flaw in my references. I have a reference like this:



   @InCollection{Example2010,
author = {Smith, John and Smith, Peter},
title = {A Nice Chapter},
booktitle = {An Interesting Book},
publisher = {Bielefeld University Press},
year = {2010},
editor = {John Smith and Peter Smith and Mary White and Other Dude},
pages = {261--310},
}


Apacite does the following:



Smith, J. & Smith, P. (2010). A Nice Chapter. In J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude (Eds.), An Interesting Book (pp. 261-310). Bielefeld University Press.



However, the people I listed as editors are not really the editors of the vorlume but all the authors that wrote chapters. Is there a way of getting rid of the "Eds." in this case without losing it for all the chapters in edited volumes i cite?



Thank you very much!










share|improve this question













I am pretty new to LaTeX, so this will probably be a stupid question.



I am citing a number of chapters from Collections in my thesis. Today, my advisor criticized me for a minor flaw in my references. I have a reference like this:



   @InCollection{Example2010,
author = {Smith, John and Smith, Peter},
title = {A Nice Chapter},
booktitle = {An Interesting Book},
publisher = {Bielefeld University Press},
year = {2010},
editor = {John Smith and Peter Smith and Mary White and Other Dude},
pages = {261--310},
}


Apacite does the following:



Smith, J. & Smith, P. (2010). A Nice Chapter. In J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude (Eds.), An Interesting Book (pp. 261-310). Bielefeld University Press.



However, the people I listed as editors are not really the editors of the vorlume but all the authors that wrote chapters. Is there a way of getting rid of the "Eds." in this case without losing it for all the chapters in edited volumes i cite?



Thank you very much!







apacite






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 25 at 18:06









Spike

1




1





bumped to the homepage by Community 2 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 2 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.














  • Your writeup isn't exactly clear. If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are not the actual editors, why do you list them in the editor field? Why don't you list the actual editors? Finally, if the actual editors can't be found, have you considered simply omitting the editor field?
    – Mico
    Apr 25 at 18:16












  • Sorry, I wrote this a bit confusing: This is a book with chapters by different authors. All the authors of any of the chapters are listed on the cover, i still need to reference them. I just need a way to just say "J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude, An Interesting Book" in this case and leave out the word "Eds.". If this is possible.
    – Spike
    Apr 25 at 18:25










  • If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are listed on the book cover as the editors, they are the editors. In addition, if you're forced to use apacite-based bibliography formatting, I don't understand why you'd want to suppress the (Eds.) string. Otherwise, you'll have two separate groups of names, and your readers may well get confused as to what's going on.
    – Mico
    Apr 25 at 18:34




















  • Your writeup isn't exactly clear. If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are not the actual editors, why do you list them in the editor field? Why don't you list the actual editors? Finally, if the actual editors can't be found, have you considered simply omitting the editor field?
    – Mico
    Apr 25 at 18:16












  • Sorry, I wrote this a bit confusing: This is a book with chapters by different authors. All the authors of any of the chapters are listed on the cover, i still need to reference them. I just need a way to just say "J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude, An Interesting Book" in this case and leave out the word "Eds.". If this is possible.
    – Spike
    Apr 25 at 18:25










  • If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are listed on the book cover as the editors, they are the editors. In addition, if you're forced to use apacite-based bibliography formatting, I don't understand why you'd want to suppress the (Eds.) string. Otherwise, you'll have two separate groups of names, and your readers may well get confused as to what's going on.
    – Mico
    Apr 25 at 18:34


















Your writeup isn't exactly clear. If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are not the actual editors, why do you list them in the editor field? Why don't you list the actual editors? Finally, if the actual editors can't be found, have you considered simply omitting the editor field?
– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:16






Your writeup isn't exactly clear. If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are not the actual editors, why do you list them in the editor field? Why don't you list the actual editors? Finally, if the actual editors can't be found, have you considered simply omitting the editor field?
– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:16














Sorry, I wrote this a bit confusing: This is a book with chapters by different authors. All the authors of any of the chapters are listed on the cover, i still need to reference them. I just need a way to just say "J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude, An Interesting Book" in this case and leave out the word "Eds.". If this is possible.
– Spike
Apr 25 at 18:25




Sorry, I wrote this a bit confusing: This is a book with chapters by different authors. All the authors of any of the chapters are listed on the cover, i still need to reference them. I just need a way to just say "J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude, An Interesting Book" in this case and leave out the word "Eds.". If this is possible.
– Spike
Apr 25 at 18:25












If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are listed on the book cover as the editors, they are the editors. In addition, if you're forced to use apacite-based bibliography formatting, I don't understand why you'd want to suppress the (Eds.) string. Otherwise, you'll have two separate groups of names, and your readers may well get confused as to what's going on.
– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:34






If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are listed on the book cover as the editors, they are the editors. In addition, if you're forced to use apacite-based bibliography formatting, I don't understand why you'd want to suppress the (Eds.) string. Otherwise, you'll have two separate groups of names, and your readers may well get confused as to what's going on.
– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:34












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













As I, like I said, need it like this and cannot really use the usual Stackoverflow



"I need to do A"



"Don't do A, it's bad to do A"



-thingy, i figured out a way how to do it and am just posting it if anyone should have the same problem and find this thread. I just deleted the "editor"-field and changed "booktitle" to



booktitle = {emph{J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude,} An Interesting Book}


not elegant, works perfectly.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428555%2fcite-a-single-incollection-without-the-eds-in-apacite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    As I, like I said, need it like this and cannot really use the usual Stackoverflow



    "I need to do A"



    "Don't do A, it's bad to do A"



    -thingy, i figured out a way how to do it and am just posting it if anyone should have the same problem and find this thread. I just deleted the "editor"-field and changed "booktitle" to



    booktitle = {emph{J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude,} An Interesting Book}


    not elegant, works perfectly.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      As I, like I said, need it like this and cannot really use the usual Stackoverflow



      "I need to do A"



      "Don't do A, it's bad to do A"



      -thingy, i figured out a way how to do it and am just posting it if anyone should have the same problem and find this thread. I just deleted the "editor"-field and changed "booktitle" to



      booktitle = {emph{J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude,} An Interesting Book}


      not elegant, works perfectly.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        As I, like I said, need it like this and cannot really use the usual Stackoverflow



        "I need to do A"



        "Don't do A, it's bad to do A"



        -thingy, i figured out a way how to do it and am just posting it if anyone should have the same problem and find this thread. I just deleted the "editor"-field and changed "booktitle" to



        booktitle = {emph{J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude,} An Interesting Book}


        not elegant, works perfectly.






        share|improve this answer












        As I, like I said, need it like this and cannot really use the usual Stackoverflow



        "I need to do A"



        "Don't do A, it's bad to do A"



        -thingy, i figured out a way how to do it and am just posting it if anyone should have the same problem and find this thread. I just deleted the "editor"-field and changed "booktitle" to



        booktitle = {emph{J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude,} An Interesting Book}


        not elegant, works perfectly.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 26 at 20:50









        Spike

        1




        1






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428555%2fcite-a-single-incollection-without-the-eds-in-apacite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

            Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

            Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)