Cite a single InCollection without the “Eds.” in apacite?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am pretty new to LaTeX, so this will probably be a stupid question.
I am citing a number of chapters from Collections in my thesis. Today, my advisor criticized me for a minor flaw in my references. I have a reference like this:
@InCollection{Example2010,
author = {Smith, John and Smith, Peter},
title = {A Nice Chapter},
booktitle = {An Interesting Book},
publisher = {Bielefeld University Press},
year = {2010},
editor = {John Smith and Peter Smith and Mary White and Other Dude},
pages = {261--310},
}
Apacite does the following:
Smith, J. & Smith, P. (2010). A Nice Chapter. In J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude (Eds.), An Interesting Book (pp. 261-310). Bielefeld University Press.
However, the people I listed as editors are not really the editors of the vorlume but all the authors that wrote chapters. Is there a way of getting rid of the "Eds." in this case without losing it for all the chapters in edited volumes i cite?
Thank you very much!
apacite
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am pretty new to LaTeX, so this will probably be a stupid question.
I am citing a number of chapters from Collections in my thesis. Today, my advisor criticized me for a minor flaw in my references. I have a reference like this:
@InCollection{Example2010,
author = {Smith, John and Smith, Peter},
title = {A Nice Chapter},
booktitle = {An Interesting Book},
publisher = {Bielefeld University Press},
year = {2010},
editor = {John Smith and Peter Smith and Mary White and Other Dude},
pages = {261--310},
}
Apacite does the following:
Smith, J. & Smith, P. (2010). A Nice Chapter. In J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude (Eds.), An Interesting Book (pp. 261-310). Bielefeld University Press.
However, the people I listed as editors are not really the editors of the vorlume but all the authors that wrote chapters. Is there a way of getting rid of the "Eds." in this case without losing it for all the chapters in edited volumes i cite?
Thank you very much!
apacite
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Your writeup isn't exactly clear. If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are not the actual editors, why do you list them in theeditor
field? Why don't you list the actual editors? Finally, if the actual editors can't be found, have you considered simply omitting theeditor
field?
– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:16
Sorry, I wrote this a bit confusing: This is a book with chapters by different authors. All the authors of any of the chapters are listed on the cover, i still need to reference them. I just need a way to just say "J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude, An Interesting Book" in this case and leave out the word "Eds.". If this is possible.
– Spike
Apr 25 at 18:25
If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are listed on the book cover as the editors, they are the editors. In addition, if you're forced to useapacite
-based bibliography formatting, I don't understand why you'd want to suppress the(Eds.)
string. Otherwise, you'll have two separate groups of names, and your readers may well get confused as to what's going on.
– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:34
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am pretty new to LaTeX, so this will probably be a stupid question.
I am citing a number of chapters from Collections in my thesis. Today, my advisor criticized me for a minor flaw in my references. I have a reference like this:
@InCollection{Example2010,
author = {Smith, John and Smith, Peter},
title = {A Nice Chapter},
booktitle = {An Interesting Book},
publisher = {Bielefeld University Press},
year = {2010},
editor = {John Smith and Peter Smith and Mary White and Other Dude},
pages = {261--310},
}
Apacite does the following:
Smith, J. & Smith, P. (2010). A Nice Chapter. In J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude (Eds.), An Interesting Book (pp. 261-310). Bielefeld University Press.
However, the people I listed as editors are not really the editors of the vorlume but all the authors that wrote chapters. Is there a way of getting rid of the "Eds." in this case without losing it for all the chapters in edited volumes i cite?
Thank you very much!
apacite
I am pretty new to LaTeX, so this will probably be a stupid question.
I am citing a number of chapters from Collections in my thesis. Today, my advisor criticized me for a minor flaw in my references. I have a reference like this:
@InCollection{Example2010,
author = {Smith, John and Smith, Peter},
title = {A Nice Chapter},
booktitle = {An Interesting Book},
publisher = {Bielefeld University Press},
year = {2010},
editor = {John Smith and Peter Smith and Mary White and Other Dude},
pages = {261--310},
}
Apacite does the following:
Smith, J. & Smith, P. (2010). A Nice Chapter. In J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude (Eds.), An Interesting Book (pp. 261-310). Bielefeld University Press.
However, the people I listed as editors are not really the editors of the vorlume but all the authors that wrote chapters. Is there a way of getting rid of the "Eds." in this case without losing it for all the chapters in edited volumes i cite?
Thank you very much!
apacite
apacite
asked Apr 25 at 18:06
Spike
1
1
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Your writeup isn't exactly clear. If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are not the actual editors, why do you list them in theeditor
field? Why don't you list the actual editors? Finally, if the actual editors can't be found, have you considered simply omitting theeditor
field?
– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:16
Sorry, I wrote this a bit confusing: This is a book with chapters by different authors. All the authors of any of the chapters are listed on the cover, i still need to reference them. I just need a way to just say "J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude, An Interesting Book" in this case and leave out the word "Eds.". If this is possible.
– Spike
Apr 25 at 18:25
If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are listed on the book cover as the editors, they are the editors. In addition, if you're forced to useapacite
-based bibliography formatting, I don't understand why you'd want to suppress the(Eds.)
string. Otherwise, you'll have two separate groups of names, and your readers may well get confused as to what's going on.
– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:34
add a comment |
Your writeup isn't exactly clear. If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are not the actual editors, why do you list them in theeditor
field? Why don't you list the actual editors? Finally, if the actual editors can't be found, have you considered simply omitting theeditor
field?
– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:16
Sorry, I wrote this a bit confusing: This is a book with chapters by different authors. All the authors of any of the chapters are listed on the cover, i still need to reference them. I just need a way to just say "J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude, An Interesting Book" in this case and leave out the word "Eds.". If this is possible.
– Spike
Apr 25 at 18:25
If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are listed on the book cover as the editors, they are the editors. In addition, if you're forced to useapacite
-based bibliography formatting, I don't understand why you'd want to suppress the(Eds.)
string. Otherwise, you'll have two separate groups of names, and your readers may well get confused as to what's going on.
– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:34
Your writeup isn't exactly clear. If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are not the actual editors, why do you list them in the
editor
field? Why don't you list the actual editors? Finally, if the actual editors can't be found, have you considered simply omitting the editor
field?– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:16
Your writeup isn't exactly clear. If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are not the actual editors, why do you list them in the
editor
field? Why don't you list the actual editors? Finally, if the actual editors can't be found, have you considered simply omitting the editor
field?– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:16
Sorry, I wrote this a bit confusing: This is a book with chapters by different authors. All the authors of any of the chapters are listed on the cover, i still need to reference them. I just need a way to just say "J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude, An Interesting Book" in this case and leave out the word "Eds.". If this is possible.
– Spike
Apr 25 at 18:25
Sorry, I wrote this a bit confusing: This is a book with chapters by different authors. All the authors of any of the chapters are listed on the cover, i still need to reference them. I just need a way to just say "J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude, An Interesting Book" in this case and leave out the word "Eds.". If this is possible.
– Spike
Apr 25 at 18:25
If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are listed on the book cover as the editors, they are the editors. In addition, if you're forced to use
apacite
-based bibliography formatting, I don't understand why you'd want to suppress the (Eds.)
string. Otherwise, you'll have two separate groups of names, and your readers may well get confused as to what's going on.– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:34
If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are listed on the book cover as the editors, they are the editors. In addition, if you're forced to use
apacite
-based bibliography formatting, I don't understand why you'd want to suppress the (Eds.)
string. Otherwise, you'll have two separate groups of names, and your readers may well get confused as to what's going on.– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:34
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
As I, like I said, need it like this and cannot really use the usual Stackoverflow
"I need to do A"
"Don't do A, it's bad to do A"
-thingy, i figured out a way how to do it and am just posting it if anyone should have the same problem and find this thread. I just deleted the "editor"-field and changed "booktitle" to
booktitle = {emph{J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude,} An Interesting Book}
not elegant, works perfectly.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
As I, like I said, need it like this and cannot really use the usual Stackoverflow
"I need to do A"
"Don't do A, it's bad to do A"
-thingy, i figured out a way how to do it and am just posting it if anyone should have the same problem and find this thread. I just deleted the "editor"-field and changed "booktitle" to
booktitle = {emph{J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude,} An Interesting Book}
not elegant, works perfectly.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
As I, like I said, need it like this and cannot really use the usual Stackoverflow
"I need to do A"
"Don't do A, it's bad to do A"
-thingy, i figured out a way how to do it and am just posting it if anyone should have the same problem and find this thread. I just deleted the "editor"-field and changed "booktitle" to
booktitle = {emph{J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude,} An Interesting Book}
not elegant, works perfectly.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
As I, like I said, need it like this and cannot really use the usual Stackoverflow
"I need to do A"
"Don't do A, it's bad to do A"
-thingy, i figured out a way how to do it and am just posting it if anyone should have the same problem and find this thread. I just deleted the "editor"-field and changed "booktitle" to
booktitle = {emph{J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude,} An Interesting Book}
not elegant, works perfectly.
As I, like I said, need it like this and cannot really use the usual Stackoverflow
"I need to do A"
"Don't do A, it's bad to do A"
-thingy, i figured out a way how to do it and am just posting it if anyone should have the same problem and find this thread. I just deleted the "editor"-field and changed "booktitle" to
booktitle = {emph{J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude,} An Interesting Book}
not elegant, works perfectly.
answered Apr 26 at 20:50
Spike
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428555%2fcite-a-single-incollection-without-the-eds-in-apacite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Your writeup isn't exactly clear. If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are not the actual editors, why do you list them in the
editor
field? Why don't you list the actual editors? Finally, if the actual editors can't be found, have you considered simply omitting theeditor
field?– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:16
Sorry, I wrote this a bit confusing: This is a book with chapters by different authors. All the authors of any of the chapters are listed on the cover, i still need to reference them. I just need a way to just say "J. Smith, P. Smith, M. White & O. Dude, An Interesting Book" in this case and leave out the word "Eds.". If this is possible.
– Spike
Apr 25 at 18:25
If Smith, Smith, White, and Dude are listed on the book cover as the editors, they are the editors. In addition, if you're forced to use
apacite
-based bibliography formatting, I don't understand why you'd want to suppress the(Eds.)
string. Otherwise, you'll have two separate groups of names, and your readers may well get confused as to what's going on.– Mico
Apr 25 at 18:34