Separate Ember Addon from vendor.js file to a separate file
I'm using a "core"-addon which contains logic that is used in multiple "boilerplate" - ember applications, when I build a boilerplate-application, the addon code is added to the "vendor.js" file found in the "assets"-folder. Is there a way I can make this code build to a separate "my-addon-vendor.js" file?
While browsing I found others with the same need, but an answer has yet to be found.
My "core"-addon is linked to my "boilerplate"-project using "npm link my-core-addon".
Thanks in advance
Versions:
- Ember Version: 3.5.0
- Ember CLI: 3.5.0
- Node: 8.11.3
- npm: 5.6.0
npm ember.js ember-cli
asked Nov 27 '18 at 13:39
Bert HuysBert Huys
386
add a comment |
I'm using a "core"-addon which contains logic that is used in multiple "boilerplate" - ember applications, when I build a boilerplate-application, the addon code is added to the "vendor.js" file found in the "assets"-folder. Is there a way I can make this code build to a separate "my-addon-vendor.js" file?
While browsing I found others with the same need, but an answer has yet to be found.
My "core"-addon is linked to my "boilerplate"-project using "npm link my-core-addon".
Thanks in advance
Versions:
- Ember Version: 3.5.0
- Ember CLI: 3.5.0
- Node: 8.11.3
- npm: 5.6.0
npm ember.js ember-cli
asked Nov 27 '18 at 13:39
Bert HuysBert Huys
386
is there purely for optimization reasons? It would help to understand your need for this because there might be alternative solutions.
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 13:59
Indeed for optimization and debugging reasons. We want our own custom addon(s) separated from our vendor file which is becoming very large.
– Bert Huys
Nov 27 '18 at 14:08
you might have best luck discordapp.com/invite/zT3asNS joining the discord and asking in theember-clicommunity chat. Your question is nuanced and it'd be easier to answer understanding more deeply the reasons
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 14:16
discuss.emberjs.com/t/…
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 14:54
add a comment |
I'm using a "core"-addon which contains logic that is used in multiple "boilerplate" - ember applications, when I build a boilerplate-application, the addon code is added to the "vendor.js" file found in the "assets"-folder. Is there a way I can make this code build to a separate "my-addon-vendor.js" file?
While browsing I found others with the same need, but an answer has yet to be found.
My "core"-addon is linked to my "boilerplate"-project using "npm link my-core-addon".
Thanks in advance
Versions:
- Ember Version: 3.5.0
- Ember CLI: 3.5.0
- Node: 8.11.3
- npm: 5.6.0
npm ember.js ember-cli
asked Nov 27 '18 at 13:39
Bert HuysBert Huys
386
I'm using a "core"-addon which contains logic that is used in multiple "boilerplate" - ember applications, when I build a boilerplate-application, the addon code is added to the "vendor.js" file found in the "assets"-folder. Is there a way I can make this code build to a separate "my-addon-vendor.js" file?
While browsing I found others with the same need, but an answer has yet to be found.
My "core"-addon is linked to my "boilerplate"-project using "npm link my-core-addon".
Thanks in advance
Versions:
- Ember Version: 3.5.0
- Ember CLI: 3.5.0
- Node: 8.11.3
- npm: 5.6.0
npm ember.js ember-cli
npm ember.js ember-cli
asked Nov 27 '18 at 13:39
Bert HuysBert Huys
386
asked Nov 27 '18 at 13:39
Bert HuysBert Huys
386
edited Nov 27 '18 at 13:47
Bert Huys
asked Nov 27 '18 at 13:39
Bert HuysBert Huys
386
asked Nov 27 '18 at 13:39
Bert HuysBert Huys
386
asked Nov 27 '18 at 13:39
Bert HuysBert Huys
386
386
is there purely for optimization reasons? It would help to understand your need for this because there might be alternative solutions.
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 13:59
Indeed for optimization and debugging reasons. We want our own custom addon(s) separated from our vendor file which is becoming very large.
– Bert Huys
Nov 27 '18 at 14:08
you might have best luck discordapp.com/invite/zT3asNS joining the discord and asking in theember-clicommunity chat. Your question is nuanced and it'd be easier to answer understanding more deeply the reasons
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 14:16
discuss.emberjs.com/t/…
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 14:54
add a comment |
is there purely for optimization reasons? It would help to understand your need for this because there might be alternative solutions.
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 13:59
Indeed for optimization and debugging reasons. We want our own custom addon(s) separated from our vendor file which is becoming very large.
– Bert Huys
Nov 27 '18 at 14:08
you might have best luck discordapp.com/invite/zT3asNS joining the discord and asking in theember-clicommunity chat. Your question is nuanced and it'd be easier to answer understanding more deeply the reasons
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 14:16
discuss.emberjs.com/t/…
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 14:54
is there purely for optimization reasons? It would help to understand your need for this because there might be alternative solutions.
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 13:59
is there purely for optimization reasons? It would help to understand your need for this because there might be alternative solutions.
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 13:59
Indeed for optimization and debugging reasons. We want our own custom addon(s) separated from our vendor file which is becoming very large.
– Bert Huys
Nov 27 '18 at 14:08
Indeed for optimization and debugging reasons. We want our own custom addon(s) separated from our vendor file which is becoming very large.
– Bert Huys
Nov 27 '18 at 14:08
you might have best luck discordapp.com/invite/zT3asNS joining the discord and asking in the
ember-cli community chat. Your question is nuanced and it'd be easier to answer understanding more deeply the reasons– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 14:16
you might have best luck discordapp.com/invite/zT3asNS joining the discord and asking in the
ember-cli community chat. Your question is nuanced and it'd be easier to answer understanding more deeply the reasons– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 14:16
discuss.emberjs.com/t/…
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 14:54
discuss.emberjs.com/t/…
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 14:54
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You could do something like this:
var qrScannerWorker = new Funnel(
'node_modules/qr-scanner/', {
include: ['qr-scanner-worker.min.js'],
destDir: '/libraries/qr-scanner/'
}
);
https://github.com/NullVoxPopuli/emberclear/blob/master/packages/frontend/ember-cli-build.js#L139
this won't work for addons, but it'll work for underlying dependencies. So, if an addon is doing the bundling for you, you may want to do it yourself.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 15:37
NullVoxPopuliNullVoxPopuli
21.1k62166309
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53501033%2fseparate-ember-addon-from-vendor-js-file-to-a-separate-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You could do something like this:
var qrScannerWorker = new Funnel(
'node_modules/qr-scanner/', {
include: ['qr-scanner-worker.min.js'],
destDir: '/libraries/qr-scanner/'
}
);
https://github.com/NullVoxPopuli/emberclear/blob/master/packages/frontend/ember-cli-build.js#L139
this won't work for addons, but it'll work for underlying dependencies. So, if an addon is doing the bundling for you, you may want to do it yourself.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 15:37
NullVoxPopuliNullVoxPopuli
21.1k62166309
add a comment |
You could do something like this:
var qrScannerWorker = new Funnel(
'node_modules/qr-scanner/', {
include: ['qr-scanner-worker.min.js'],
destDir: '/libraries/qr-scanner/'
}
);
https://github.com/NullVoxPopuli/emberclear/blob/master/packages/frontend/ember-cli-build.js#L139
this won't work for addons, but it'll work for underlying dependencies. So, if an addon is doing the bundling for you, you may want to do it yourself.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 15:37
NullVoxPopuliNullVoxPopuli
21.1k62166309
add a comment |
You could do something like this:
var qrScannerWorker = new Funnel(
'node_modules/qr-scanner/', {
include: ['qr-scanner-worker.min.js'],
destDir: '/libraries/qr-scanner/'
}
);
https://github.com/NullVoxPopuli/emberclear/blob/master/packages/frontend/ember-cli-build.js#L139
this won't work for addons, but it'll work for underlying dependencies. So, if an addon is doing the bundling for you, you may want to do it yourself.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 15:37
NullVoxPopuliNullVoxPopuli
21.1k62166309
You could do something like this:
var qrScannerWorker = new Funnel(
'node_modules/qr-scanner/', {
include: ['qr-scanner-worker.min.js'],
destDir: '/libraries/qr-scanner/'
}
);
https://github.com/NullVoxPopuli/emberclear/blob/master/packages/frontend/ember-cli-build.js#L139
this won't work for addons, but it'll work for underlying dependencies. So, if an addon is doing the bundling for you, you may want to do it yourself.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 15:37
NullVoxPopuliNullVoxPopuli
21.1k62166309
answered Nov 27 '18 at 15:37
NullVoxPopuliNullVoxPopuli
21.1k62166309
answered Nov 27 '18 at 15:37
NullVoxPopuliNullVoxPopuli
21.1k62166309
answered Nov 27 '18 at 15:37
NullVoxPopuliNullVoxPopuli
21.1k62166309
21.1k62166309
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53501033%2fseparate-ember-addon-from-vendor-js-file-to-a-separate-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
is there purely for optimization reasons? It would help to understand your need for this because there might be alternative solutions.
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 13:59
Indeed for optimization and debugging reasons. We want our own custom addon(s) separated from our vendor file which is becoming very large.
– Bert Huys
Nov 27 '18 at 14:08
you might have best luck discordapp.com/invite/zT3asNS joining the discord and asking in the
ember-clicommunity chat. Your question is nuanced and it'd be easier to answer understanding more deeply the reasons– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 14:16
discuss.emberjs.com/t/…
– mistahenry
Nov 27 '18 at 14:54