Normal footnote in epigraph command
8
I would like to create a "normal" footnote inside epigraph command.
This command cites the reference in a footnote just below the epigraph and not at the end of the page :
epigraph{text}{sourcefootcite{key}}
For example :
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}
creates :
How can I create a normal footnote?
MWE :
begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}
@Book{author00:_title,
author = {Author},
title = {Title},
publisher = {Publisher},
year = 2000}
end{filecontents}
documentclass[12pt,twoside,a4paper]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[english,french]{babel}
frenchbsetup{StandardLists=true}
usepackage{setspace}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{xspace}
usepackage{epigraph}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{filecontents}
usepackage[autostyle=true]{csquotes}
usepackage[style=authoryear-comp,
hyperref,
backend=biber,
isbn=false,
doi=false,
url=false,
date=year]{biblatex}
AtEveryBibitem{clearlist{language}}
renewcommand*{newunitpunct}{addcommaspace}
bibliography{bib}
usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref}
begin{document}
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}
test
end{document}
footnotes epigraphs
asked Jan 15 '14 at 13:31
pprppr
5,11132564
add a comment |
8
I would like to create a "normal" footnote inside epigraph command.
This command cites the reference in a footnote just below the epigraph and not at the end of the page :
epigraph{text}{sourcefootcite{key}}
For example :
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}
creates :
How can I create a normal footnote?
MWE :
begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}
@Book{author00:_title,
author = {Author},
title = {Title},
publisher = {Publisher},
year = 2000}
end{filecontents}
documentclass[12pt,twoside,a4paper]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[english,french]{babel}
frenchbsetup{StandardLists=true}
usepackage{setspace}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{xspace}
usepackage{epigraph}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{filecontents}
usepackage[autostyle=true]{csquotes}
usepackage[style=authoryear-comp,
hyperref,
backend=biber,
isbn=false,
doi=false,
url=false,
date=year]{biblatex}
AtEveryBibitem{clearlist{language}}
renewcommand*{newunitpunct}{addcommaspace}
bibliography{bib}
usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref}
begin{document}
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}
test
end{document}
footnotes epigraphs
asked Jan 15 '14 at 13:31
pprppr
5,11132564
@HarishKumar Sorry I updated my question.footcitecallsfootnoteso it is the same thing. Andfootnotemarkhas the same behavior.
– ppr
Jan 15 '14 at 13:49
add a comment |
8
8
8
I would like to create a "normal" footnote inside epigraph command.
This command cites the reference in a footnote just below the epigraph and not at the end of the page :
epigraph{text}{sourcefootcite{key}}
For example :
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}
creates :
How can I create a normal footnote?
MWE :
begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}
@Book{author00:_title,
author = {Author},
title = {Title},
publisher = {Publisher},
year = 2000}
end{filecontents}
documentclass[12pt,twoside,a4paper]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[english,french]{babel}
frenchbsetup{StandardLists=true}
usepackage{setspace}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{xspace}
usepackage{epigraph}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{filecontents}
usepackage[autostyle=true]{csquotes}
usepackage[style=authoryear-comp,
hyperref,
backend=biber,
isbn=false,
doi=false,
url=false,
date=year]{biblatex}
AtEveryBibitem{clearlist{language}}
renewcommand*{newunitpunct}{addcommaspace}
bibliography{bib}
usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref}
begin{document}
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}
test
end{document}
footnotes epigraphs
asked Jan 15 '14 at 13:31
pprppr
5,11132564
I would like to create a "normal" footnote inside epigraph command.
This command cites the reference in a footnote just below the epigraph and not at the end of the page :
epigraph{text}{sourcefootcite{key}}
For example :
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}
creates :
How can I create a normal footnote?
MWE :
begin{filecontents}{bib.bib}
@Book{author00:_title,
author = {Author},
title = {Title},
publisher = {Publisher},
year = 2000}
end{filecontents}
documentclass[12pt,twoside,a4paper]{article}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[english,french]{babel}
frenchbsetup{StandardLists=true}
usepackage{setspace}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{xspace}
usepackage{epigraph}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{filecontents}
usepackage[autostyle=true]{csquotes}
usepackage[style=authoryear-comp,
hyperref,
backend=biber,
isbn=false,
doi=false,
url=false,
date=year]{biblatex}
AtEveryBibitem{clearlist{language}}
renewcommand*{newunitpunct}{addcommaspace}
bibliography{bib}
usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref}
begin{document}
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootcite{author00:_title}}
test
end{document}
footnotes epigraphs
footnotes epigraphs
asked Jan 15 '14 at 13:31
pprppr
5,11132564
asked Jan 15 '14 at 13:31
pprppr
5,11132564
edited Jan 15 '14 at 13:52
user11232
asked Jan 15 '14 at 13:31
pprppr
5,11132564
asked Jan 15 '14 at 13:31
pprppr
5,11132564
asked Jan 15 '14 at 13:31
pprppr
5,11132564
5,11132564
@HarishKumar Sorry I updated my question.footcitecallsfootnoteso it is the same thing. Andfootnotemarkhas the same behavior.
– ppr
Jan 15 '14 at 13:49
add a comment |
@HarishKumar Sorry I updated my question.footcitecallsfootnoteso it is the same thing. Andfootnotemarkhas the same behavior.
– ppr
Jan 15 '14 at 13:49
@HarishKumar Sorry I updated my question.
footcite calls footnote so it is the same thing. And footnotemark has the same behavior.– ppr
Jan 15 '14 at 13:49
@HarishKumar Sorry I updated my question.
footcite calls footnote so it is the same thing. And footnotemark has the same behavior.– ppr
Jan 15 '14 at 13:49
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
8
Just use footcitetext:
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootnotemark}
footcitetext{author00:_title}
answered Jan 15 '14 at 13:55
egregegreg
710k8618883172
2
@HarishKumar I'm a great expert inbiblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did aacksearch forfootciteand I happened to find near itfootcitetext. Et voilà.
– egreg
Jan 15 '14 at 14:00
1
Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
– ajeh
Aug 17 '14 at 22:58
@egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I writefootnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?
– Kolmin
Apr 19 '17 at 14:37
1
@Kolmin The argument tofootnotemarkis a number, not a symbol
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 16:45
1
@Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (withbigfoot) and defining newfootcitecommands for using it.
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 17:22
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154202%2fnormal-footnote-in-epigraph-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
8
Just use footcitetext:
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootnotemark}
footcitetext{author00:_title}
answered Jan 15 '14 at 13:55
egregegreg
710k8618883172
2
@HarishKumar I'm a great expert inbiblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did aacksearch forfootciteand I happened to find near itfootcitetext. Et voilà.
– egreg
Jan 15 '14 at 14:00
1
Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
– ajeh
Aug 17 '14 at 22:58
@egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I writefootnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?
– Kolmin
Apr 19 '17 at 14:37
1
@Kolmin The argument tofootnotemarkis a number, not a symbol
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 16:45
1
@Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (withbigfoot) and defining newfootcitecommands for using it.
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 17:22
|
show 2 more comments
8
Just use footcitetext:
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootnotemark}
footcitetext{author00:_title}
answered Jan 15 '14 at 13:55
egregegreg
710k8618883172
2
@HarishKumar I'm a great expert inbiblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did aacksearch forfootciteand I happened to find near itfootcitetext. Et voilà.
– egreg
Jan 15 '14 at 14:00
1
Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
– ajeh
Aug 17 '14 at 22:58
@egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I writefootnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?
– Kolmin
Apr 19 '17 at 14:37
1
@Kolmin The argument tofootnotemarkis a number, not a symbol
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 16:45
1
@Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (withbigfoot) and defining newfootcitecommands for using it.
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 17:22
|
show 2 more comments
8
8
8
Just use footcitetext:
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootnotemark}
footcitetext{author00:_title}
answered Jan 15 '14 at 13:55
egregegreg
710k8618883172
Just use footcitetext:
epigraph{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
Ut purus elit, vestibulum ut}{Authorfootnotemark}
footcitetext{author00:_title}
answered Jan 15 '14 at 13:55
egregegreg
710k8618883172
answered Jan 15 '14 at 13:55
egregegreg
710k8618883172
answered Jan 15 '14 at 13:55
egregegreg
710k8618883172
answered Jan 15 '14 at 13:55
egregegreg
710k8618883172
710k8618883172
2
@HarishKumar I'm a great expert inbiblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did aacksearch forfootciteand I happened to find near itfootcitetext. Et voilà.
– egreg
Jan 15 '14 at 14:00
1
Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
– ajeh
Aug 17 '14 at 22:58
@egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I writefootnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?
– Kolmin
Apr 19 '17 at 14:37
1
@Kolmin The argument tofootnotemarkis a number, not a symbol
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 16:45
1
@Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (withbigfoot) and defining newfootcitecommands for using it.
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 17:22
|
show 2 more comments
2
@HarishKumar I'm a great expert inbiblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did aacksearch forfootciteand I happened to find near itfootcitetext. Et voilà.
– egreg
Jan 15 '14 at 14:00
1
Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
– ajeh
Aug 17 '14 at 22:58
@egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I writefootnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?
– Kolmin
Apr 19 '17 at 14:37
1
@Kolmin The argument tofootnotemarkis a number, not a symbol
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 16:45
1
@Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (withbigfoot) and defining newfootcitecommands for using it.
– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 17:22
2
2
@HarishKumar I'm a great expert in
biblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did a ack search for footcite and I happened to find near it footcitetext. Et voilà.– egreg
Jan 15 '14 at 14:00
@HarishKumar I'm a great expert in
biblatex, as you know. ;-) Just did a ack search for footcite and I happened to find near it footcitetext. Et voilà.– egreg
Jan 15 '14 at 14:00
1
1
Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
– ajeh
Aug 17 '14 at 22:58
Maybe I am using this approach wrong, but here is what I am getting: 1) Footnote is bold regular size text (not footnotesize); 2) Latex commands (textit) are included literally; 3) Hyphenation does not work. What am I missing?
– ajeh
Aug 17 '14 at 22:58
@egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I write
footnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?– Kolmin
Apr 19 '17 at 14:37
@egreg I find the answer brilliant! I just have a problem, when I try to customise the footnote symbol, strange things happens, e.g. if I write
footnotemark[dagger], the first symbol ends up being a 4-digit string of numbers starting with $0$, while the footnote symbol is $0$. Is there a way to fix this?– Kolmin
Apr 19 '17 at 14:37
1
1
@Kolmin The argument to
footnotemark is a number, not a symbol– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 16:45
@Kolmin The argument to
footnotemark is a number, not a symbol– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 16:45
1
1
@Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (with
bigfoot) and defining new footcite commands for using it.– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 17:22
@Kolmin I see no other way than defining a new series of footnotes (with
bigfoot) and defining new footcite commands for using it.– egreg
Apr 19 '17 at 17:22
|
show 2 more comments
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154202%2fnormal-footnote-in-epigraph-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
@HarishKumar Sorry I updated my question.
footcitecallsfootnoteso it is the same thing. Andfootnotemarkhas the same behavior.– ppr
Jan 15 '14 at 13:49