Question about errata on page 171 of MetaFontBook











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In errata there is this errata for page 171 of MetaFontBook:



bugonpage C171, line 16 from the bottom (06/18/02)



tenpoint

<loop>is<loop header>|:|<loop text> {tt endfor}


I have an edition of MetafontBook from 1986 (softcover) and from 2012 (hardcover). In both of them text on page 171 is the same as in output produced from errata.tex. Can anybody explain why this text is in errata if it seems not to correct anything?






metafont







share|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    In errata there is this errata for page 171 of MetaFontBook:



    bugonpage C171, line 16 from the bottom (06/18/02)
    

    
tenpoint
    
<loop>is<loop header>|:|<loop text> {tt endfor}


    I have an edition of MetafontBook from 1986 (softcover) and from 2012 (hardcover). In both of them text on page 171 is the same as in output produced from errata.tex. Can anybody explain why this text is in errata if it seems not to correct anything?






    metafont







    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      In errata there is this errata for page 171 of MetaFontBook:



      bugonpage C171, line 16 from the bottom (06/18/02)
      

      
tenpoint
      
<loop>is<loop header>|:|<loop text> {tt endfor}


      I have an edition of MetafontBook from 1986 (softcover) and from 2012 (hardcover). In both of them text on page 171 is the same as in output produced from errata.tex. Can anybody explain why this text is in errata if it seems not to correct anything?






      metafont







      share|improve this question













      In errata there is this errata for page 171 of MetaFontBook:



      bugonpage C171, line 16 from the bottom (06/18/02)
      

      
tenpoint
      
<loop>is<loop header>|:|<loop text> {tt endfor}


      I have an edition of MetafontBook from 1986 (softcover) and from 2012 (hardcover). In both of them text on page 171 is the same as in output produced from errata.tex. Can anybody explain why this text is in errata if it seems not to correct anything?






      metafont




      metafont






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 24 mins ago









      Igor Liferenko

      2,042729




      2,042729



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463898%2fquestion-about-errata-on-page-171-of-metafontbook%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463898%2fquestion-about-errata-on-page-171-of-metafontbook%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

          Image
          0 I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{...
          Read more

          Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

          Image
          1 In the sklearn.model_selection.cross_val_predict page it is stated: Generate cross-validated estimates for each input data point. It is not appropriate to pass these predictions into an evaluation metric. Can someone explain what does it mean? If this gives estimate of Y (y prediction) for every Y (true Y), why can't I calculate metrics such as RMSE or coefficient of determination using these results? python scikit-learn cross-validation share | improve this question edited Nov 28 '18 at 17:52 desertnaut 20.3k 7 43 79 ...
          Read more

          Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)

          Image
          0 I have problem with inserting data to MySQL from modal. My modal: <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-success">6 komentarzy</a> <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-danger">brak komentarzy</a> <a data-toggle="modal" href="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" data-target="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" class="ediiit">(dodaj)</a> <div class="modal fade" id="add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="edit_printer" aria-hidden="true"> <div class="modal-dialog" role="document"> ...
          Read more