Performance comparaison betwen ff4j and togglz
We're working on a project , and we want to use some toggling feature tool like ff4j or togglz but we have a real constraints about performances, i mean we really need a tool with the less time of execution , i've checked a little bit ff4j and togglz but i don't know what is best for this solution, or may be if you know some other tools.
Context of project: its a netflix microservices architecture, so we have eureka,ribbon,zuul and microservices.
otherwise , if you have another solution , may be develop a sidecar please give me some ideas.
thank you in advance :)
performance toggle togglz ff4j
asked Nov 22 at 20:27
user3851186
12
add a comment |
We're working on a project , and we want to use some toggling feature tool like ff4j or togglz but we have a real constraints about performances, i mean we really need a tool with the less time of execution , i've checked a little bit ff4j and togglz but i don't know what is best for this solution, or may be if you know some other tools.
Context of project: its a netflix microservices architecture, so we have eureka,ribbon,zuul and microservices.
otherwise , if you have another solution , may be develop a sidecar please give me some ideas.
thank you in advance :)
performance toggle togglz ff4j
asked Nov 22 at 20:27
user3851186
12
add a comment |
We're working on a project , and we want to use some toggling feature tool like ff4j or togglz but we have a real constraints about performances, i mean we really need a tool with the less time of execution , i've checked a little bit ff4j and togglz but i don't know what is best for this solution, or may be if you know some other tools.
Context of project: its a netflix microservices architecture, so we have eureka,ribbon,zuul and microservices.
otherwise , if you have another solution , may be develop a sidecar please give me some ideas.
thank you in advance :)
performance toggle togglz ff4j
asked Nov 22 at 20:27
user3851186
12
We're working on a project , and we want to use some toggling feature tool like ff4j or togglz but we have a real constraints about performances, i mean we really need a tool with the less time of execution , i've checked a little bit ff4j and togglz but i don't know what is best for this solution, or may be if you know some other tools.
Context of project: its a netflix microservices architecture, so we have eureka,ribbon,zuul and microservices.
otherwise , if you have another solution , may be develop a sidecar please give me some ideas.
thank you in advance :)
performance toggle togglz ff4j
performance toggle togglz ff4j
asked Nov 22 at 20:27
user3851186
12
asked Nov 22 at 20:27
user3851186
12
asked Nov 22 at 20:27
user3851186
12
asked Nov 22 at 20:27
user3851186
12
asked Nov 22 at 20:27
user3851186
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Disclaimer : I created FF4j, as such I won't give you answer relative to performance comparison. I will provide architecture design principles.
Microservices means distributed architecture so you will have to store the state of your features in a common persistence storage (DB).
The cost of feature toggle framework won't be time to evaluate the feature state predicate (it is a simple condition) it will be the time to access the data from the persistence storage.
FF4j provides support for both REDIS and CONSUL:
- Redis seems a good candidate as very fast for put/get and distribute.
- Consul is also a good idea in distributed microservice : it provides a key-value store.
- Eureka may does the same, I don't know, ff4j does not have store for it yet.
If you have to store your features in a slower DB such as SQL-Like then you might consider to use caching. FF4j provides some cacheProxy to handle such use cases.
Other Considerations :
- Put the administration console only in a backend application not on each microservices (security + performance overhead)
- Feature Toggle can do more with Configuration Management and monitoring.
You may want to have a look at this 15min talk exactly on that subject. LIVE DEMO starting at 7:10
and related github repository for sample with Spring-Cloud
answered Nov 23 at 13:52
clunven
1064
Thank you for your answer , but we're already working with caching service , the question is more related to the time that the request is taking to be created ( the tcp/ip request) , can't we do something about it ?
– user3851186
Nov 25 at 17:29
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53437651%2fperformance-comparaison-betwen-ff4j-and-togglz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Disclaimer : I created FF4j, as such I won't give you answer relative to performance comparison. I will provide architecture design principles.
Microservices means distributed architecture so you will have to store the state of your features in a common persistence storage (DB).
The cost of feature toggle framework won't be time to evaluate the feature state predicate (it is a simple condition) it will be the time to access the data from the persistence storage.
FF4j provides support for both REDIS and CONSUL:
- Redis seems a good candidate as very fast for put/get and distribute.
- Consul is also a good idea in distributed microservice : it provides a key-value store.
- Eureka may does the same, I don't know, ff4j does not have store for it yet.
If you have to store your features in a slower DB such as SQL-Like then you might consider to use caching. FF4j provides some cacheProxy to handle such use cases.
Other Considerations :
- Put the administration console only in a backend application not on each microservices (security + performance overhead)
- Feature Toggle can do more with Configuration Management and monitoring.
You may want to have a look at this 15min talk exactly on that subject. LIVE DEMO starting at 7:10
and related github repository for sample with Spring-Cloud
answered Nov 23 at 13:52
clunven
1064
Thank you for your answer , but we're already working with caching service , the question is more related to the time that the request is taking to be created ( the tcp/ip request) , can't we do something about it ?
– user3851186
Nov 25 at 17:29
add a comment |
Disclaimer : I created FF4j, as such I won't give you answer relative to performance comparison. I will provide architecture design principles.
Microservices means distributed architecture so you will have to store the state of your features in a common persistence storage (DB).
The cost of feature toggle framework won't be time to evaluate the feature state predicate (it is a simple condition) it will be the time to access the data from the persistence storage.
FF4j provides support for both REDIS and CONSUL:
- Redis seems a good candidate as very fast for put/get and distribute.
- Consul is also a good idea in distributed microservice : it provides a key-value store.
- Eureka may does the same, I don't know, ff4j does not have store for it yet.
If you have to store your features in a slower DB such as SQL-Like then you might consider to use caching. FF4j provides some cacheProxy to handle such use cases.
Other Considerations :
- Put the administration console only in a backend application not on each microservices (security + performance overhead)
- Feature Toggle can do more with Configuration Management and monitoring.
You may want to have a look at this 15min talk exactly on that subject. LIVE DEMO starting at 7:10
and related github repository for sample with Spring-Cloud
answered Nov 23 at 13:52
clunven
1064
Thank you for your answer , but we're already working with caching service , the question is more related to the time that the request is taking to be created ( the tcp/ip request) , can't we do something about it ?
– user3851186
Nov 25 at 17:29
add a comment |
Disclaimer : I created FF4j, as such I won't give you answer relative to performance comparison. I will provide architecture design principles.
Microservices means distributed architecture so you will have to store the state of your features in a common persistence storage (DB).
The cost of feature toggle framework won't be time to evaluate the feature state predicate (it is a simple condition) it will be the time to access the data from the persistence storage.
FF4j provides support for both REDIS and CONSUL:
- Redis seems a good candidate as very fast for put/get and distribute.
- Consul is also a good idea in distributed microservice : it provides a key-value store.
- Eureka may does the same, I don't know, ff4j does not have store for it yet.
If you have to store your features in a slower DB such as SQL-Like then you might consider to use caching. FF4j provides some cacheProxy to handle such use cases.
Other Considerations :
- Put the administration console only in a backend application not on each microservices (security + performance overhead)
- Feature Toggle can do more with Configuration Management and monitoring.
You may want to have a look at this 15min talk exactly on that subject. LIVE DEMO starting at 7:10
and related github repository for sample with Spring-Cloud
answered Nov 23 at 13:52
clunven
1064
Disclaimer : I created FF4j, as such I won't give you answer relative to performance comparison. I will provide architecture design principles.
Microservices means distributed architecture so you will have to store the state of your features in a common persistence storage (DB).
The cost of feature toggle framework won't be time to evaluate the feature state predicate (it is a simple condition) it will be the time to access the data from the persistence storage.
FF4j provides support for both REDIS and CONSUL:
- Redis seems a good candidate as very fast for put/get and distribute.
- Consul is also a good idea in distributed microservice : it provides a key-value store.
- Eureka may does the same, I don't know, ff4j does not have store for it yet.
If you have to store your features in a slower DB such as SQL-Like then you might consider to use caching. FF4j provides some cacheProxy to handle such use cases.
Other Considerations :
- Put the administration console only in a backend application not on each microservices (security + performance overhead)
- Feature Toggle can do more with Configuration Management and monitoring.
You may want to have a look at this 15min talk exactly on that subject. LIVE DEMO starting at 7:10
and related github repository for sample with Spring-Cloud
answered Nov 23 at 13:52
clunven
1064
answered Nov 23 at 13:52
clunven
1064
answered Nov 23 at 13:52
clunven
1064
answered Nov 23 at 13:52
clunven
1064
1064
Thank you for your answer , but we're already working with caching service , the question is more related to the time that the request is taking to be created ( the tcp/ip request) , can't we do something about it ?
– user3851186
Nov 25 at 17:29
add a comment |
Thank you for your answer , but we're already working with caching service , the question is more related to the time that the request is taking to be created ( the tcp/ip request) , can't we do something about it ?
– user3851186
Nov 25 at 17:29
Thank you for your answer , but we're already working with caching service , the question is more related to the time that the request is taking to be created ( the tcp/ip request) , can't we do something about it ?
– user3851186
Nov 25 at 17:29
Thank you for your answer , but we're already working with caching service , the question is more related to the time that the request is taking to be created ( the tcp/ip request) , can't we do something about it ?
– user3851186
Nov 25 at 17:29
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53437651%2fperformance-comparaison-betwen-ff4j-and-togglz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
