Real number symbol (UTF-8: ℝ) in XeTeX












87















How can I get the 'real number' sign (something like mathbb{R} with the amssymb package in LaTeX) in XeTeX?










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    Can you add the essential part of your preamble, particularly the font setting?

    – egreg
    Mar 25 '13 at 21:24













  • well I have no preamble since I'm on XeTeX ;-)

    – lvaneesbeeck
    Mar 25 '13 at 21:48











  • @ivaneesbeeck, i don't understand your answer.

    – jpayansomet
    Mar 25 '13 at 21:51






  • 2





    @Ivaneesbeeck Please add the username in your comment to respond properly (as I did here), otherwise the person will not be notified of your message. It would still be interesting to see your font setup. font1="Linux Libertine O"1 ℝbye works great for me.

    – Qrrbrbirlbel
    Mar 25 '13 at 22:36








  • 2





    I see; nothing prevents you from using the msbm10 font with XeTeX. In any case, if you don't set fonts, you're basically using the same setting as normal TeX.

    – egreg
    Mar 25 '13 at 22:39


















87















How can I get the 'real number' sign (something like mathbb{R} with the amssymb package in LaTeX) in XeTeX?










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    Can you add the essential part of your preamble, particularly the font setting?

    – egreg
    Mar 25 '13 at 21:24













  • well I have no preamble since I'm on XeTeX ;-)

    – lvaneesbeeck
    Mar 25 '13 at 21:48











  • @ivaneesbeeck, i don't understand your answer.

    – jpayansomet
    Mar 25 '13 at 21:51






  • 2





    @Ivaneesbeeck Please add the username in your comment to respond properly (as I did here), otherwise the person will not be notified of your message. It would still be interesting to see your font setup. font1="Linux Libertine O"1 ℝbye works great for me.

    – Qrrbrbirlbel
    Mar 25 '13 at 22:36








  • 2





    I see; nothing prevents you from using the msbm10 font with XeTeX. In any case, if you don't set fonts, you're basically using the same setting as normal TeX.

    – egreg
    Mar 25 '13 at 22:39
















87












87








87


21






How can I get the 'real number' sign (something like mathbb{R} with the amssymb package in LaTeX) in XeTeX?










share|improve this question
















How can I get the 'real number' sign (something like mathbb{R} with the amssymb package in LaTeX) in XeTeX?







math-mode xetex symbols amsmath plain-tex






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 6 '14 at 23:37









Jonas Stein

3,16242642




3,16242642










asked Mar 25 '13 at 21:18









lvaneesbeecklvaneesbeeck

1,2221819




1,2221819








  • 3





    Can you add the essential part of your preamble, particularly the font setting?

    – egreg
    Mar 25 '13 at 21:24













  • well I have no preamble since I'm on XeTeX ;-)

    – lvaneesbeeck
    Mar 25 '13 at 21:48











  • @ivaneesbeeck, i don't understand your answer.

    – jpayansomet
    Mar 25 '13 at 21:51






  • 2





    @Ivaneesbeeck Please add the username in your comment to respond properly (as I did here), otherwise the person will not be notified of your message. It would still be interesting to see your font setup. font1="Linux Libertine O"1 ℝbye works great for me.

    – Qrrbrbirlbel
    Mar 25 '13 at 22:36








  • 2





    I see; nothing prevents you from using the msbm10 font with XeTeX. In any case, if you don't set fonts, you're basically using the same setting as normal TeX.

    – egreg
    Mar 25 '13 at 22:39
















  • 3





    Can you add the essential part of your preamble, particularly the font setting?

    – egreg
    Mar 25 '13 at 21:24













  • well I have no preamble since I'm on XeTeX ;-)

    – lvaneesbeeck
    Mar 25 '13 at 21:48











  • @ivaneesbeeck, i don't understand your answer.

    – jpayansomet
    Mar 25 '13 at 21:51






  • 2





    @Ivaneesbeeck Please add the username in your comment to respond properly (as I did here), otherwise the person will not be notified of your message. It would still be interesting to see your font setup. font1="Linux Libertine O"1 ℝbye works great for me.

    – Qrrbrbirlbel
    Mar 25 '13 at 22:36








  • 2





    I see; nothing prevents you from using the msbm10 font with XeTeX. In any case, if you don't set fonts, you're basically using the same setting as normal TeX.

    – egreg
    Mar 25 '13 at 22:39










3




3





Can you add the essential part of your preamble, particularly the font setting?

– egreg
Mar 25 '13 at 21:24







Can you add the essential part of your preamble, particularly the font setting?

– egreg
Mar 25 '13 at 21:24















well I have no preamble since I'm on XeTeX ;-)

– lvaneesbeeck
Mar 25 '13 at 21:48





well I have no preamble since I'm on XeTeX ;-)

– lvaneesbeeck
Mar 25 '13 at 21:48













@ivaneesbeeck, i don't understand your answer.

– jpayansomet
Mar 25 '13 at 21:51





@ivaneesbeeck, i don't understand your answer.

– jpayansomet
Mar 25 '13 at 21:51




2




2





@Ivaneesbeeck Please add the username in your comment to respond properly (as I did here), otherwise the person will not be notified of your message. It would still be interesting to see your font setup. font1="Linux Libertine O"1 ℝbye works great for me.

– Qrrbrbirlbel
Mar 25 '13 at 22:36







@Ivaneesbeeck Please add the username in your comment to respond properly (as I did here), otherwise the person will not be notified of your message. It would still be interesting to see your font setup. font1="Linux Libertine O"1 ℝbye works great for me.

– Qrrbrbirlbel
Mar 25 '13 at 22:36






2




2





I see; nothing prevents you from using the msbm10 font with XeTeX. In any case, if you don't set fonts, you're basically using the same setting as normal TeX.

– egreg
Mar 25 '13 at 22:39







I see; nothing prevents you from using the msbm10 font with XeTeX. In any case, if you don't set fonts, you're basically using the same setting as normal TeX.

– egreg
Mar 25 '13 at 22:39












7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















105














How about this?



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amssymb}
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{ll}
Plain-TeX{}: & ${rm I!R}$\
amssymb: & $mathbb{R}$
end{tabular}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    In a mathematical view (if you mean the symbol for real numbers) the second symbol is wrong ...

    – Kurt
    Mar 26 '13 at 3:30






  • 9





    @Kurt Please explain what you mean by "wrong". It's a matter of convention, isn't it? This Wikipedia article reports the Blackboard-Bold R as acceptable for denoting the set of real numbers. What symbol do you usually use for that set?

    – jubobs
    Mar 26 '13 at 11:45






  • 2





    My English is not so good, but in the exact correct way you have only one doubled rule, usual the longest one, if there are two longest one only the first. So the letter R should be IR ... You can try usepackage{txfonts} and then ` $varmathbb{ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ}$`. In my opinion they fit better the usual writing by hand. (Or you use a mathematical trick: I define that IIR is set of real numbers or something else ...) BTW: which symbol has D.E. Knuth used?

    – Kurt
    Mar 26 '13 at 14:37






  • 7





    @Kurt I agree that varmathbb{R} is closer to what I use in handwriting than mathbb{R} and I'm actually considering using it instead in the future. However, saying that mathbb{R} is "wrong" seems excessive to me. It's just a matter of taste, eh?

    – jubobs
    Mar 26 '13 at 14:43






  • 2





    Well, perhaps is wrong a little bit too hard, but "in a mathematial view wrong" was ment to say, that there are usually special signs for the sets of real numbers, all numbers, numbers like 1, 2, 3 (German ganze Zahlen, don't know in English), irrational numbers: I,N,Q,R,Z. They should only used for this purpose. The typographical view is with which font can I set the mathematical sign needed here? Which font does fit best what is needed? Now it is a matter of taste ... Or a matter of definition, for example in a section "typhographical remarks". Too excact? Remember - I'm a German :-)

    – Kurt
    Mar 26 '13 at 15:40



















10














You should put your symbol format definitions in another TeX file; publications tend to have their own styles, and some may use bold Roman for fields like R instead of blackboard bold. You can swap nams.tex with aom.tex. I know, this is more common with LaTeX, but the principle still applies.



For example:



% paper.tex
input nams.tex
$realnumbers$ is connected.

% nams.tex
defrealnumbers{mathbb{R}}
% more definitions for the Notices.

% aom.tex
defrealnumbers{mathbf{R}}
% more definitions for the Annals.


Just change one line in paper.tex to submit to the Annals instead of the Notices.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.sx!. May be an example/illustration would help to support the answer.

    – texenthusiast
    Mar 26 '13 at 3:07





















8














With lualatex



documentclass{article}
usepackage{unicode-math}
setmathfont{Latin Modern Math}
begin{document}
$ℝ$
end{document}


real symbol



(not sure how to make it work with XeLaTeX or XeTeX)






share|improve this answer































    8














    There's a couple of ways to go about this:




    1. Using the default Computer Modern -font (which, as you've already found out, can be extended with the amssym to have access to BlackBoardBold.)

    2. Using Unicode OpenType math fonts. Now this is a bit tricky because the glyph locations need to be (re-)told to TeX. This step can further be split into two different approaches:


      1. Use just one family and change the active range by re-telling TeX the glyph positions every time the style changes (i.e. script, fraktur, etc. This is the way I've understood the unicode-math -package does it). For plain-xetex, you could do something along these lines.

      2. Fix the styles to their own families using mapping-files created with teckit_compile from SIL. See: Changing math font to OTF in XeTeX using plaintex-format.








    share|improve this answer

































      7














      Auto-answer:



      input amssym.tex
      ${Bbb R}$
      bye


      works fine






      share|improve this answer


























      • Did you mean input amssymb.tex?

        – jubobs
        Apr 21 '13 at 16:37











      • @Jubobs Nope, amssym. On my computer this code snippet does the job

        – lvaneesbeeck
        Apr 26 '13 at 12:46



















      0














      You can use Re, it works very well






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        Re does not show ℝ however!!

        – Christian Hupfer
        Aug 29 '17 at 10:19











      • The command produces a “Fraktur R”, which is seldom used for denoting the real numbers; it usually denotes the real part.

        – egreg
        Aug 29 '17 at 10:37






      • 1





        I guess that your proposed Re command stands for real part, to be used like Re{a}

        – Alessandro Cuttin
        Aug 29 '17 at 12:47



















      0














      In Jupyter Notebook Bbb{R} works out of the box without any input.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Kristjan Jonasson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.
















      • 1





        But Jupyter notebook is not using TeX.

        – Henri Menke
        4 mins ago










      protected by Henri Menke 4 mins ago



      Thank you for your interest in this question.
      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














      7 Answers
      7






      active

      oldest

      votes








      7 Answers
      7






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      105














      How about this?



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{amssymb}
      begin{document}
      begin{tabular}{ll}
      Plain-TeX{}: & ${rm I!R}$\
      amssymb: & $mathbb{R}$
      end{tabular}
      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        In a mathematical view (if you mean the symbol for real numbers) the second symbol is wrong ...

        – Kurt
        Mar 26 '13 at 3:30






      • 9





        @Kurt Please explain what you mean by "wrong". It's a matter of convention, isn't it? This Wikipedia article reports the Blackboard-Bold R as acceptable for denoting the set of real numbers. What symbol do you usually use for that set?

        – jubobs
        Mar 26 '13 at 11:45






      • 2





        My English is not so good, but in the exact correct way you have only one doubled rule, usual the longest one, if there are two longest one only the first. So the letter R should be IR ... You can try usepackage{txfonts} and then ` $varmathbb{ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ}$`. In my opinion they fit better the usual writing by hand. (Or you use a mathematical trick: I define that IIR is set of real numbers or something else ...) BTW: which symbol has D.E. Knuth used?

        – Kurt
        Mar 26 '13 at 14:37






      • 7





        @Kurt I agree that varmathbb{R} is closer to what I use in handwriting than mathbb{R} and I'm actually considering using it instead in the future. However, saying that mathbb{R} is "wrong" seems excessive to me. It's just a matter of taste, eh?

        – jubobs
        Mar 26 '13 at 14:43






      • 2





        Well, perhaps is wrong a little bit too hard, but "in a mathematial view wrong" was ment to say, that there are usually special signs for the sets of real numbers, all numbers, numbers like 1, 2, 3 (German ganze Zahlen, don't know in English), irrational numbers: I,N,Q,R,Z. They should only used for this purpose. The typographical view is with which font can I set the mathematical sign needed here? Which font does fit best what is needed? Now it is a matter of taste ... Or a matter of definition, for example in a section "typhographical remarks". Too excact? Remember - I'm a German :-)

        – Kurt
        Mar 26 '13 at 15:40
















      105














      How about this?



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{amssymb}
      begin{document}
      begin{tabular}{ll}
      Plain-TeX{}: & ${rm I!R}$\
      amssymb: & $mathbb{R}$
      end{tabular}
      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        In a mathematical view (if you mean the symbol for real numbers) the second symbol is wrong ...

        – Kurt
        Mar 26 '13 at 3:30






      • 9





        @Kurt Please explain what you mean by "wrong". It's a matter of convention, isn't it? This Wikipedia article reports the Blackboard-Bold R as acceptable for denoting the set of real numbers. What symbol do you usually use for that set?

        – jubobs
        Mar 26 '13 at 11:45






      • 2





        My English is not so good, but in the exact correct way you have only one doubled rule, usual the longest one, if there are two longest one only the first. So the letter R should be IR ... You can try usepackage{txfonts} and then ` $varmathbb{ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ}$`. In my opinion they fit better the usual writing by hand. (Or you use a mathematical trick: I define that IIR is set of real numbers or something else ...) BTW: which symbol has D.E. Knuth used?

        – Kurt
        Mar 26 '13 at 14:37






      • 7





        @Kurt I agree that varmathbb{R} is closer to what I use in handwriting than mathbb{R} and I'm actually considering using it instead in the future. However, saying that mathbb{R} is "wrong" seems excessive to me. It's just a matter of taste, eh?

        – jubobs
        Mar 26 '13 at 14:43






      • 2





        Well, perhaps is wrong a little bit too hard, but "in a mathematial view wrong" was ment to say, that there are usually special signs for the sets of real numbers, all numbers, numbers like 1, 2, 3 (German ganze Zahlen, don't know in English), irrational numbers: I,N,Q,R,Z. They should only used for this purpose. The typographical view is with which font can I set the mathematical sign needed here? Which font does fit best what is needed? Now it is a matter of taste ... Or a matter of definition, for example in a section "typhographical remarks". Too excact? Remember - I'm a German :-)

        – Kurt
        Mar 26 '13 at 15:40














      105












      105








      105







      How about this?



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{amssymb}
      begin{document}
      begin{tabular}{ll}
      Plain-TeX{}: & ${rm I!R}$\
      amssymb: & $mathbb{R}$
      end{tabular}
      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer















      How about this?



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{amssymb}
      begin{document}
      begin{tabular}{ll}
      Plain-TeX{}: & ${rm I!R}$\
      amssymb: & $mathbb{R}$
      end{tabular}
      end{document}


      enter image description here







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Jun 16 '17 at 15:57









      Moriambar

      7,88731846




      7,88731846










      answered Mar 25 '13 at 22:37









      jubobsjubobs

      41.4k17153240




      41.4k17153240








      • 1





        In a mathematical view (if you mean the symbol for real numbers) the second symbol is wrong ...

        – Kurt
        Mar 26 '13 at 3:30






      • 9





        @Kurt Please explain what you mean by "wrong". It's a matter of convention, isn't it? This Wikipedia article reports the Blackboard-Bold R as acceptable for denoting the set of real numbers. What symbol do you usually use for that set?

        – jubobs
        Mar 26 '13 at 11:45






      • 2





        My English is not so good, but in the exact correct way you have only one doubled rule, usual the longest one, if there are two longest one only the first. So the letter R should be IR ... You can try usepackage{txfonts} and then ` $varmathbb{ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ}$`. In my opinion they fit better the usual writing by hand. (Or you use a mathematical trick: I define that IIR is set of real numbers or something else ...) BTW: which symbol has D.E. Knuth used?

        – Kurt
        Mar 26 '13 at 14:37






      • 7





        @Kurt I agree that varmathbb{R} is closer to what I use in handwriting than mathbb{R} and I'm actually considering using it instead in the future. However, saying that mathbb{R} is "wrong" seems excessive to me. It's just a matter of taste, eh?

        – jubobs
        Mar 26 '13 at 14:43






      • 2





        Well, perhaps is wrong a little bit too hard, but "in a mathematial view wrong" was ment to say, that there are usually special signs for the sets of real numbers, all numbers, numbers like 1, 2, 3 (German ganze Zahlen, don't know in English), irrational numbers: I,N,Q,R,Z. They should only used for this purpose. The typographical view is with which font can I set the mathematical sign needed here? Which font does fit best what is needed? Now it is a matter of taste ... Or a matter of definition, for example in a section "typhographical remarks". Too excact? Remember - I'm a German :-)

        – Kurt
        Mar 26 '13 at 15:40














      • 1





        In a mathematical view (if you mean the symbol for real numbers) the second symbol is wrong ...

        – Kurt
        Mar 26 '13 at 3:30






      • 9





        @Kurt Please explain what you mean by "wrong". It's a matter of convention, isn't it? This Wikipedia article reports the Blackboard-Bold R as acceptable for denoting the set of real numbers. What symbol do you usually use for that set?

        – jubobs
        Mar 26 '13 at 11:45






      • 2





        My English is not so good, but in the exact correct way you have only one doubled rule, usual the longest one, if there are two longest one only the first. So the letter R should be IR ... You can try usepackage{txfonts} and then ` $varmathbb{ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ}$`. In my opinion they fit better the usual writing by hand. (Or you use a mathematical trick: I define that IIR is set of real numbers or something else ...) BTW: which symbol has D.E. Knuth used?

        – Kurt
        Mar 26 '13 at 14:37






      • 7





        @Kurt I agree that varmathbb{R} is closer to what I use in handwriting than mathbb{R} and I'm actually considering using it instead in the future. However, saying that mathbb{R} is "wrong" seems excessive to me. It's just a matter of taste, eh?

        – jubobs
        Mar 26 '13 at 14:43






      • 2





        Well, perhaps is wrong a little bit too hard, but "in a mathematial view wrong" was ment to say, that there are usually special signs for the sets of real numbers, all numbers, numbers like 1, 2, 3 (German ganze Zahlen, don't know in English), irrational numbers: I,N,Q,R,Z. They should only used for this purpose. The typographical view is with which font can I set the mathematical sign needed here? Which font does fit best what is needed? Now it is a matter of taste ... Or a matter of definition, for example in a section "typhographical remarks". Too excact? Remember - I'm a German :-)

        – Kurt
        Mar 26 '13 at 15:40








      1




      1





      In a mathematical view (if you mean the symbol for real numbers) the second symbol is wrong ...

      – Kurt
      Mar 26 '13 at 3:30





      In a mathematical view (if you mean the symbol for real numbers) the second symbol is wrong ...

      – Kurt
      Mar 26 '13 at 3:30




      9




      9





      @Kurt Please explain what you mean by "wrong". It's a matter of convention, isn't it? This Wikipedia article reports the Blackboard-Bold R as acceptable for denoting the set of real numbers. What symbol do you usually use for that set?

      – jubobs
      Mar 26 '13 at 11:45





      @Kurt Please explain what you mean by "wrong". It's a matter of convention, isn't it? This Wikipedia article reports the Blackboard-Bold R as acceptable for denoting the set of real numbers. What symbol do you usually use for that set?

      – jubobs
      Mar 26 '13 at 11:45




      2




      2





      My English is not so good, but in the exact correct way you have only one doubled rule, usual the longest one, if there are two longest one only the first. So the letter R should be IR ... You can try usepackage{txfonts} and then ` $varmathbb{ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ}$`. In my opinion they fit better the usual writing by hand. (Or you use a mathematical trick: I define that IIR is set of real numbers or something else ...) BTW: which symbol has D.E. Knuth used?

      – Kurt
      Mar 26 '13 at 14:37





      My English is not so good, but in the exact correct way you have only one doubled rule, usual the longest one, if there are two longest one only the first. So the letter R should be IR ... You can try usepackage{txfonts} and then ` $varmathbb{ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ}$`. In my opinion they fit better the usual writing by hand. (Or you use a mathematical trick: I define that IIR is set of real numbers or something else ...) BTW: which symbol has D.E. Knuth used?

      – Kurt
      Mar 26 '13 at 14:37




      7




      7





      @Kurt I agree that varmathbb{R} is closer to what I use in handwriting than mathbb{R} and I'm actually considering using it instead in the future. However, saying that mathbb{R} is "wrong" seems excessive to me. It's just a matter of taste, eh?

      – jubobs
      Mar 26 '13 at 14:43





      @Kurt I agree that varmathbb{R} is closer to what I use in handwriting than mathbb{R} and I'm actually considering using it instead in the future. However, saying that mathbb{R} is "wrong" seems excessive to me. It's just a matter of taste, eh?

      – jubobs
      Mar 26 '13 at 14:43




      2




      2





      Well, perhaps is wrong a little bit too hard, but "in a mathematial view wrong" was ment to say, that there are usually special signs for the sets of real numbers, all numbers, numbers like 1, 2, 3 (German ganze Zahlen, don't know in English), irrational numbers: I,N,Q,R,Z. They should only used for this purpose. The typographical view is with which font can I set the mathematical sign needed here? Which font does fit best what is needed? Now it is a matter of taste ... Or a matter of definition, for example in a section "typhographical remarks". Too excact? Remember - I'm a German :-)

      – Kurt
      Mar 26 '13 at 15:40





      Well, perhaps is wrong a little bit too hard, but "in a mathematial view wrong" was ment to say, that there are usually special signs for the sets of real numbers, all numbers, numbers like 1, 2, 3 (German ganze Zahlen, don't know in English), irrational numbers: I,N,Q,R,Z. They should only used for this purpose. The typographical view is with which font can I set the mathematical sign needed here? Which font does fit best what is needed? Now it is a matter of taste ... Or a matter of definition, for example in a section "typhographical remarks". Too excact? Remember - I'm a German :-)

      – Kurt
      Mar 26 '13 at 15:40











      10














      You should put your symbol format definitions in another TeX file; publications tend to have their own styles, and some may use bold Roman for fields like R instead of blackboard bold. You can swap nams.tex with aom.tex. I know, this is more common with LaTeX, but the principle still applies.



      For example:



      % paper.tex
      input nams.tex
      $realnumbers$ is connected.

      % nams.tex
      defrealnumbers{mathbb{R}}
      % more definitions for the Notices.

      % aom.tex
      defrealnumbers{mathbf{R}}
      % more definitions for the Annals.


      Just change one line in paper.tex to submit to the Annals instead of the Notices.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        Welcome to TeX.sx!. May be an example/illustration would help to support the answer.

        – texenthusiast
        Mar 26 '13 at 3:07


















      10














      You should put your symbol format definitions in another TeX file; publications tend to have their own styles, and some may use bold Roman for fields like R instead of blackboard bold. You can swap nams.tex with aom.tex. I know, this is more common with LaTeX, but the principle still applies.



      For example:



      % paper.tex
      input nams.tex
      $realnumbers$ is connected.

      % nams.tex
      defrealnumbers{mathbb{R}}
      % more definitions for the Notices.

      % aom.tex
      defrealnumbers{mathbf{R}}
      % more definitions for the Annals.


      Just change one line in paper.tex to submit to the Annals instead of the Notices.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        Welcome to TeX.sx!. May be an example/illustration would help to support the answer.

        – texenthusiast
        Mar 26 '13 at 3:07
















      10












      10








      10







      You should put your symbol format definitions in another TeX file; publications tend to have their own styles, and some may use bold Roman for fields like R instead of blackboard bold. You can swap nams.tex with aom.tex. I know, this is more common with LaTeX, but the principle still applies.



      For example:



      % paper.tex
      input nams.tex
      $realnumbers$ is connected.

      % nams.tex
      defrealnumbers{mathbb{R}}
      % more definitions for the Notices.

      % aom.tex
      defrealnumbers{mathbf{R}}
      % more definitions for the Annals.


      Just change one line in paper.tex to submit to the Annals instead of the Notices.






      share|improve this answer















      You should put your symbol format definitions in another TeX file; publications tend to have their own styles, and some may use bold Roman for fields like R instead of blackboard bold. You can swap nams.tex with aom.tex. I know, this is more common with LaTeX, but the principle still applies.



      For example:



      % paper.tex
      input nams.tex
      $realnumbers$ is connected.

      % nams.tex
      defrealnumbers{mathbb{R}}
      % more definitions for the Notices.

      % aom.tex
      defrealnumbers{mathbf{R}}
      % more definitions for the Annals.


      Just change one line in paper.tex to submit to the Annals instead of the Notices.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 26 '13 at 3:44

























      answered Mar 26 '13 at 3:05









      Eric JablowEric Jablow

      20114




      20114








      • 2





        Welcome to TeX.sx!. May be an example/illustration would help to support the answer.

        – texenthusiast
        Mar 26 '13 at 3:07
















      • 2





        Welcome to TeX.sx!. May be an example/illustration would help to support the answer.

        – texenthusiast
        Mar 26 '13 at 3:07










      2




      2





      Welcome to TeX.sx!. May be an example/illustration would help to support the answer.

      – texenthusiast
      Mar 26 '13 at 3:07







      Welcome to TeX.sx!. May be an example/illustration would help to support the answer.

      – texenthusiast
      Mar 26 '13 at 3:07













      8














      With lualatex



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{unicode-math}
      setmathfont{Latin Modern Math}
      begin{document}
      $ℝ$
      end{document}


      real symbol



      (not sure how to make it work with XeLaTeX or XeTeX)






      share|improve this answer




























        8














        With lualatex



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{unicode-math}
        setmathfont{Latin Modern Math}
        begin{document}
        $ℝ$
        end{document}


        real symbol



        (not sure how to make it work with XeLaTeX or XeTeX)






        share|improve this answer


























          8












          8








          8







          With lualatex



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{unicode-math}
          setmathfont{Latin Modern Math}
          begin{document}
          $ℝ$
          end{document}


          real symbol



          (not sure how to make it work with XeLaTeX or XeTeX)






          share|improve this answer













          With lualatex



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{unicode-math}
          setmathfont{Latin Modern Math}
          begin{document}
          $ℝ$
          end{document}


          real symbol



          (not sure how to make it work with XeLaTeX or XeTeX)







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 26 '13 at 6:31









          alfCalfC

          7,752653112




          7,752653112























              8














              There's a couple of ways to go about this:




              1. Using the default Computer Modern -font (which, as you've already found out, can be extended with the amssym to have access to BlackBoardBold.)

              2. Using Unicode OpenType math fonts. Now this is a bit tricky because the glyph locations need to be (re-)told to TeX. This step can further be split into two different approaches:


                1. Use just one family and change the active range by re-telling TeX the glyph positions every time the style changes (i.e. script, fraktur, etc. This is the way I've understood the unicode-math -package does it). For plain-xetex, you could do something along these lines.

                2. Fix the styles to their own families using mapping-files created with teckit_compile from SIL. See: Changing math font to OTF in XeTeX using plaintex-format.








              share|improve this answer






























                8














                There's a couple of ways to go about this:




                1. Using the default Computer Modern -font (which, as you've already found out, can be extended with the amssym to have access to BlackBoardBold.)

                2. Using Unicode OpenType math fonts. Now this is a bit tricky because the glyph locations need to be (re-)told to TeX. This step can further be split into two different approaches:


                  1. Use just one family and change the active range by re-telling TeX the glyph positions every time the style changes (i.e. script, fraktur, etc. This is the way I've understood the unicode-math -package does it). For plain-xetex, you could do something along these lines.

                  2. Fix the styles to their own families using mapping-files created with teckit_compile from SIL. See: Changing math font to OTF in XeTeX using plaintex-format.








                share|improve this answer




























                  8












                  8








                  8







                  There's a couple of ways to go about this:




                  1. Using the default Computer Modern -font (which, as you've already found out, can be extended with the amssym to have access to BlackBoardBold.)

                  2. Using Unicode OpenType math fonts. Now this is a bit tricky because the glyph locations need to be (re-)told to TeX. This step can further be split into two different approaches:


                    1. Use just one family and change the active range by re-telling TeX the glyph positions every time the style changes (i.e. script, fraktur, etc. This is the way I've understood the unicode-math -package does it). For plain-xetex, you could do something along these lines.

                    2. Fix the styles to their own families using mapping-files created with teckit_compile from SIL. See: Changing math font to OTF in XeTeX using plaintex-format.








                  share|improve this answer















                  There's a couple of ways to go about this:




                  1. Using the default Computer Modern -font (which, as you've already found out, can be extended with the amssym to have access to BlackBoardBold.)

                  2. Using Unicode OpenType math fonts. Now this is a bit tricky because the glyph locations need to be (re-)told to TeX. This step can further be split into two different approaches:


                    1. Use just one family and change the active range by re-telling TeX the glyph positions every time the style changes (i.e. script, fraktur, etc. This is the way I've understood the unicode-math -package does it). For plain-xetex, you could do something along these lines.

                    2. Fix the styles to their own families using mapping-files created with teckit_compile from SIL. See: Changing math font to OTF in XeTeX using plaintex-format.









                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36









                  Community

                  1




                  1










                  answered Mar 26 '13 at 8:42









                  morbusgmorbusg

                  20k362137




                  20k362137























                      7














                      Auto-answer:



                      input amssym.tex
                      ${Bbb R}$
                      bye


                      works fine






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • Did you mean input amssymb.tex?

                        – jubobs
                        Apr 21 '13 at 16:37











                      • @Jubobs Nope, amssym. On my computer this code snippet does the job

                        – lvaneesbeeck
                        Apr 26 '13 at 12:46
















                      7














                      Auto-answer:



                      input amssym.tex
                      ${Bbb R}$
                      bye


                      works fine






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • Did you mean input amssymb.tex?

                        – jubobs
                        Apr 21 '13 at 16:37











                      • @Jubobs Nope, amssym. On my computer this code snippet does the job

                        – lvaneesbeeck
                        Apr 26 '13 at 12:46














                      7












                      7








                      7







                      Auto-answer:



                      input amssym.tex
                      ${Bbb R}$
                      bye


                      works fine






                      share|improve this answer















                      Auto-answer:



                      input amssym.tex
                      ${Bbb R}$
                      bye


                      works fine







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 2 mins ago









                      Henri Menke

                      72.9k8161271




                      72.9k8161271










                      answered Mar 25 '13 at 22:44









                      lvaneesbeecklvaneesbeeck

                      1,2221819




                      1,2221819













                      • Did you mean input amssymb.tex?

                        – jubobs
                        Apr 21 '13 at 16:37











                      • @Jubobs Nope, amssym. On my computer this code snippet does the job

                        – lvaneesbeeck
                        Apr 26 '13 at 12:46



















                      • Did you mean input amssymb.tex?

                        – jubobs
                        Apr 21 '13 at 16:37











                      • @Jubobs Nope, amssym. On my computer this code snippet does the job

                        – lvaneesbeeck
                        Apr 26 '13 at 12:46

















                      Did you mean input amssymb.tex?

                      – jubobs
                      Apr 21 '13 at 16:37





                      Did you mean input amssymb.tex?

                      – jubobs
                      Apr 21 '13 at 16:37













                      @Jubobs Nope, amssym. On my computer this code snippet does the job

                      – lvaneesbeeck
                      Apr 26 '13 at 12:46





                      @Jubobs Nope, amssym. On my computer this code snippet does the job

                      – lvaneesbeeck
                      Apr 26 '13 at 12:46











                      0














                      You can use Re, it works very well






                      share|improve this answer





















                      • 1





                        Re does not show ℝ however!!

                        – Christian Hupfer
                        Aug 29 '17 at 10:19











                      • The command produces a “Fraktur R”, which is seldom used for denoting the real numbers; it usually denotes the real part.

                        – egreg
                        Aug 29 '17 at 10:37






                      • 1





                        I guess that your proposed Re command stands for real part, to be used like Re{a}

                        – Alessandro Cuttin
                        Aug 29 '17 at 12:47
















                      0














                      You can use Re, it works very well






                      share|improve this answer





















                      • 1





                        Re does not show ℝ however!!

                        – Christian Hupfer
                        Aug 29 '17 at 10:19











                      • The command produces a “Fraktur R”, which is seldom used for denoting the real numbers; it usually denotes the real part.

                        – egreg
                        Aug 29 '17 at 10:37






                      • 1





                        I guess that your proposed Re command stands for real part, to be used like Re{a}

                        – Alessandro Cuttin
                        Aug 29 '17 at 12:47














                      0












                      0








                      0







                      You can use Re, it works very well






                      share|improve this answer















                      You can use Re, it works very well







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Aug 29 '17 at 12:45









                      Alessandro Cuttin

                      2,73922349




                      2,73922349










                      answered Aug 29 '17 at 9:56









                      user3213048user3213048

                      11




                      11








                      • 1





                        Re does not show ℝ however!!

                        – Christian Hupfer
                        Aug 29 '17 at 10:19











                      • The command produces a “Fraktur R”, which is seldom used for denoting the real numbers; it usually denotes the real part.

                        – egreg
                        Aug 29 '17 at 10:37






                      • 1





                        I guess that your proposed Re command stands for real part, to be used like Re{a}

                        – Alessandro Cuttin
                        Aug 29 '17 at 12:47














                      • 1





                        Re does not show ℝ however!!

                        – Christian Hupfer
                        Aug 29 '17 at 10:19











                      • The command produces a “Fraktur R”, which is seldom used for denoting the real numbers; it usually denotes the real part.

                        – egreg
                        Aug 29 '17 at 10:37






                      • 1





                        I guess that your proposed Re command stands for real part, to be used like Re{a}

                        – Alessandro Cuttin
                        Aug 29 '17 at 12:47








                      1




                      1





                      Re does not show ℝ however!!

                      – Christian Hupfer
                      Aug 29 '17 at 10:19





                      Re does not show ℝ however!!

                      – Christian Hupfer
                      Aug 29 '17 at 10:19













                      The command produces a “Fraktur R”, which is seldom used for denoting the real numbers; it usually denotes the real part.

                      – egreg
                      Aug 29 '17 at 10:37





                      The command produces a “Fraktur R”, which is seldom used for denoting the real numbers; it usually denotes the real part.

                      – egreg
                      Aug 29 '17 at 10:37




                      1




                      1





                      I guess that your proposed Re command stands for real part, to be used like Re{a}

                      – Alessandro Cuttin
                      Aug 29 '17 at 12:47





                      I guess that your proposed Re command stands for real part, to be used like Re{a}

                      – Alessandro Cuttin
                      Aug 29 '17 at 12:47











                      0














                      In Jupyter Notebook Bbb{R} works out of the box without any input.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Kristjan Jonasson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      • 1





                        But Jupyter notebook is not using TeX.

                        – Henri Menke
                        4 mins ago
















                      0














                      In Jupyter Notebook Bbb{R} works out of the box without any input.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Kristjan Jonasson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      • 1





                        But Jupyter notebook is not using TeX.

                        – Henri Menke
                        4 mins ago














                      0












                      0








                      0







                      In Jupyter Notebook Bbb{R} works out of the box without any input.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Kristjan Jonasson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.










                      In Jupyter Notebook Bbb{R} works out of the box without any input.







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Kristjan Jonasson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer






                      New contributor




                      Kristjan Jonasson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered 17 mins ago









                      Kristjan JonassonKristjan Jonasson

                      1




                      1




                      New contributor




                      Kristjan Jonasson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      Kristjan Jonasson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      Kristjan Jonasson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.








                      • 1





                        But Jupyter notebook is not using TeX.

                        – Henri Menke
                        4 mins ago














                      • 1





                        But Jupyter notebook is not using TeX.

                        – Henri Menke
                        4 mins ago








                      1




                      1





                      But Jupyter notebook is not using TeX.

                      – Henri Menke
                      4 mins ago





                      But Jupyter notebook is not using TeX.

                      – Henri Menke
                      4 mins ago





                      protected by Henri Menke 4 mins ago



                      Thank you for your interest in this question.
                      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

                      count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

                      A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks