How to align addlegendtry with the plot












3















Please consider this MWE:



documentclass{article}
usepackage[english]{babel}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[a4paper,margin=1in,footskip=0.25in]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
pgfplotsset{soldot/.style={color=black,only marks,mark=*}}
pgfplotsset{holdot/.style={color=red,fill=white,very thick,only marks,mark=*}}

begin{document}
begin{center}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x,y)=(x*y)/(x*x+2*y*y);}]
begin{axis} [
axis on top,
axis equal image,
axis lines=center,
xlabel=$x$,
ylabel=$y$,
zlabel=$z$,
zmin=-1,
zmax=1,
ztick={-1,0,0.33,1},
zticklabels={$-1$,$0$,$1/3$,$1$},
ticklabel style={font=tiny},
legend pos=outer north east,
legend style={cells={align=left}},
legend cell align={left},
view={-135}{25},
]
addplot3[surf,mesh/ordering=y varies,shader=interp,domain=-1:1,domain y=-1:1,samples=61, samples y=61] {f(x,y)};
addlegendentry{(f(x,y))}
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{center}

end{document}


MWE output



As you can see, addlegendentry as far from the graph. How can we keep them together? Something like:



What I want



Thanks!!










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Are you sure you want to plot the function in this way? If you use polar coordinates in the x-y plane, x=r cos(phi) and y=r sin(phi), you see that the function does not depend on r but only on the angle. This explains the behavior at 0, where the function is not well-defined. And otherwise the function depends only on one variable, so I am wondering if you would be better off if you plotted a function of one variable only, or at least use a different parametrization.

    – marmot
    47 mins ago











  • @marmot please see the edit. The function has a "normal" behaviour when changing domain y=-1.2:1 to domain y=-1:1. If you want to use change of variables go ahead :). Do you know how to "enlarge" the axis without rescaling the entire function in order to make it a little more bigger?

    – manooooh
    45 mins ago








  • 1





    Normally you can set width=15cm or something like this. Of course, with axis equal image, one needs to be a bit careful. What I meant to say is that the function is not well-defined at x=y=0 and otherwise only a function that depends on one variable, not on two. You see this actually rather well in the upper plot.

    – marmot
    39 mins ago






  • 1





    I need to sleep so I will just post some 1d plot.

    – marmot
    21 mins ago






  • 1





    Please do not alter the question that essentially by editing. It is much better to ask a new question.

    – TeXnician
    4 mins ago
















3















Please consider this MWE:



documentclass{article}
usepackage[english]{babel}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[a4paper,margin=1in,footskip=0.25in]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
pgfplotsset{soldot/.style={color=black,only marks,mark=*}}
pgfplotsset{holdot/.style={color=red,fill=white,very thick,only marks,mark=*}}

begin{document}
begin{center}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x,y)=(x*y)/(x*x+2*y*y);}]
begin{axis} [
axis on top,
axis equal image,
axis lines=center,
xlabel=$x$,
ylabel=$y$,
zlabel=$z$,
zmin=-1,
zmax=1,
ztick={-1,0,0.33,1},
zticklabels={$-1$,$0$,$1/3$,$1$},
ticklabel style={font=tiny},
legend pos=outer north east,
legend style={cells={align=left}},
legend cell align={left},
view={-135}{25},
]
addplot3[surf,mesh/ordering=y varies,shader=interp,domain=-1:1,domain y=-1:1,samples=61, samples y=61] {f(x,y)};
addlegendentry{(f(x,y))}
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{center}

end{document}


MWE output



As you can see, addlegendentry as far from the graph. How can we keep them together? Something like:



What I want



Thanks!!










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Are you sure you want to plot the function in this way? If you use polar coordinates in the x-y plane, x=r cos(phi) and y=r sin(phi), you see that the function does not depend on r but only on the angle. This explains the behavior at 0, where the function is not well-defined. And otherwise the function depends only on one variable, so I am wondering if you would be better off if you plotted a function of one variable only, or at least use a different parametrization.

    – marmot
    47 mins ago











  • @marmot please see the edit. The function has a "normal" behaviour when changing domain y=-1.2:1 to domain y=-1:1. If you want to use change of variables go ahead :). Do you know how to "enlarge" the axis without rescaling the entire function in order to make it a little more bigger?

    – manooooh
    45 mins ago








  • 1





    Normally you can set width=15cm or something like this. Of course, with axis equal image, one needs to be a bit careful. What I meant to say is that the function is not well-defined at x=y=0 and otherwise only a function that depends on one variable, not on two. You see this actually rather well in the upper plot.

    – marmot
    39 mins ago






  • 1





    I need to sleep so I will just post some 1d plot.

    – marmot
    21 mins ago






  • 1





    Please do not alter the question that essentially by editing. It is much better to ask a new question.

    – TeXnician
    4 mins ago














3












3








3








Please consider this MWE:



documentclass{article}
usepackage[english]{babel}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[a4paper,margin=1in,footskip=0.25in]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
pgfplotsset{soldot/.style={color=black,only marks,mark=*}}
pgfplotsset{holdot/.style={color=red,fill=white,very thick,only marks,mark=*}}

begin{document}
begin{center}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x,y)=(x*y)/(x*x+2*y*y);}]
begin{axis} [
axis on top,
axis equal image,
axis lines=center,
xlabel=$x$,
ylabel=$y$,
zlabel=$z$,
zmin=-1,
zmax=1,
ztick={-1,0,0.33,1},
zticklabels={$-1$,$0$,$1/3$,$1$},
ticklabel style={font=tiny},
legend pos=outer north east,
legend style={cells={align=left}},
legend cell align={left},
view={-135}{25},
]
addplot3[surf,mesh/ordering=y varies,shader=interp,domain=-1:1,domain y=-1:1,samples=61, samples y=61] {f(x,y)};
addlegendentry{(f(x,y))}
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{center}

end{document}


MWE output



As you can see, addlegendentry as far from the graph. How can we keep them together? Something like:



What I want



Thanks!!










share|improve this question
















Please consider this MWE:



documentclass{article}
usepackage[english]{babel}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[a4paper,margin=1in,footskip=0.25in]{geometry}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
pgfplotsset{soldot/.style={color=black,only marks,mark=*}}
pgfplotsset{holdot/.style={color=red,fill=white,very thick,only marks,mark=*}}

begin{document}
begin{center}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={f(x,y)=(x*y)/(x*x+2*y*y);}]
begin{axis} [
axis on top,
axis equal image,
axis lines=center,
xlabel=$x$,
ylabel=$y$,
zlabel=$z$,
zmin=-1,
zmax=1,
ztick={-1,0,0.33,1},
zticklabels={$-1$,$0$,$1/3$,$1$},
ticklabel style={font=tiny},
legend pos=outer north east,
legend style={cells={align=left}},
legend cell align={left},
view={-135}{25},
]
addplot3[surf,mesh/ordering=y varies,shader=interp,domain=-1:1,domain y=-1:1,samples=61, samples y=61] {f(x,y)};
addlegendentry{(f(x,y))}
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{center}

end{document}


MWE output



As you can see, addlegendentry as far from the graph. How can we keep them together? Something like:



What I want



Thanks!!







tikz-pgf






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 mins ago







manooooh

















asked 1 hour ago









manoooohmanooooh

1,0681516




1,0681516








  • 1





    Are you sure you want to plot the function in this way? If you use polar coordinates in the x-y plane, x=r cos(phi) and y=r sin(phi), you see that the function does not depend on r but only on the angle. This explains the behavior at 0, where the function is not well-defined. And otherwise the function depends only on one variable, so I am wondering if you would be better off if you plotted a function of one variable only, or at least use a different parametrization.

    – marmot
    47 mins ago











  • @marmot please see the edit. The function has a "normal" behaviour when changing domain y=-1.2:1 to domain y=-1:1. If you want to use change of variables go ahead :). Do you know how to "enlarge" the axis without rescaling the entire function in order to make it a little more bigger?

    – manooooh
    45 mins ago








  • 1





    Normally you can set width=15cm or something like this. Of course, with axis equal image, one needs to be a bit careful. What I meant to say is that the function is not well-defined at x=y=0 and otherwise only a function that depends on one variable, not on two. You see this actually rather well in the upper plot.

    – marmot
    39 mins ago






  • 1





    I need to sleep so I will just post some 1d plot.

    – marmot
    21 mins ago






  • 1





    Please do not alter the question that essentially by editing. It is much better to ask a new question.

    – TeXnician
    4 mins ago














  • 1





    Are you sure you want to plot the function in this way? If you use polar coordinates in the x-y plane, x=r cos(phi) and y=r sin(phi), you see that the function does not depend on r but only on the angle. This explains the behavior at 0, where the function is not well-defined. And otherwise the function depends only on one variable, so I am wondering if you would be better off if you plotted a function of one variable only, or at least use a different parametrization.

    – marmot
    47 mins ago











  • @marmot please see the edit. The function has a "normal" behaviour when changing domain y=-1.2:1 to domain y=-1:1. If you want to use change of variables go ahead :). Do you know how to "enlarge" the axis without rescaling the entire function in order to make it a little more bigger?

    – manooooh
    45 mins ago








  • 1





    Normally you can set width=15cm or something like this. Of course, with axis equal image, one needs to be a bit careful. What I meant to say is that the function is not well-defined at x=y=0 and otherwise only a function that depends on one variable, not on two. You see this actually rather well in the upper plot.

    – marmot
    39 mins ago






  • 1





    I need to sleep so I will just post some 1d plot.

    – marmot
    21 mins ago






  • 1





    Please do not alter the question that essentially by editing. It is much better to ask a new question.

    – TeXnician
    4 mins ago








1




1





Are you sure you want to plot the function in this way? If you use polar coordinates in the x-y plane, x=r cos(phi) and y=r sin(phi), you see that the function does not depend on r but only on the angle. This explains the behavior at 0, where the function is not well-defined. And otherwise the function depends only on one variable, so I am wondering if you would be better off if you plotted a function of one variable only, or at least use a different parametrization.

– marmot
47 mins ago





Are you sure you want to plot the function in this way? If you use polar coordinates in the x-y plane, x=r cos(phi) and y=r sin(phi), you see that the function does not depend on r but only on the angle. This explains the behavior at 0, where the function is not well-defined. And otherwise the function depends only on one variable, so I am wondering if you would be better off if you plotted a function of one variable only, or at least use a different parametrization.

– marmot
47 mins ago













@marmot please see the edit. The function has a "normal" behaviour when changing domain y=-1.2:1 to domain y=-1:1. If you want to use change of variables go ahead :). Do you know how to "enlarge" the axis without rescaling the entire function in order to make it a little more bigger?

– manooooh
45 mins ago







@marmot please see the edit. The function has a "normal" behaviour when changing domain y=-1.2:1 to domain y=-1:1. If you want to use change of variables go ahead :). Do you know how to "enlarge" the axis without rescaling the entire function in order to make it a little more bigger?

– manooooh
45 mins ago






1




1





Normally you can set width=15cm or something like this. Of course, with axis equal image, one needs to be a bit careful. What I meant to say is that the function is not well-defined at x=y=0 and otherwise only a function that depends on one variable, not on two. You see this actually rather well in the upper plot.

– marmot
39 mins ago





Normally you can set width=15cm or something like this. Of course, with axis equal image, one needs to be a bit careful. What I meant to say is that the function is not well-defined at x=y=0 and otherwise only a function that depends on one variable, not on two. You see this actually rather well in the upper plot.

– marmot
39 mins ago




1




1





I need to sleep so I will just post some 1d plot.

– marmot
21 mins ago





I need to sleep so I will just post some 1d plot.

– marmot
21 mins ago




1




1





Please do not alter the question that essentially by editing. It is much better to ask a new question.

– TeXnician
4 mins ago





Please do not alter the question that essentially by editing. It is much better to ask a new question.

– TeXnician
4 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Not an answer to the (LaTeX part of the) question. However, if you use polar coordinates in the x-y plane, x=r cos(phi) and y=r sin(phi), you see that the function does not depend on r but only on the angle. So away from the origin x=y=0 all the information is already in a one-dimensional plot.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={fan(t)=-(sin(2*t)/(-3 + cos(2*t)));}]
begin{axis}
addplot[domain=0:360,smooth,samples=101] {fan(x)};
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • I am so sorry, I have not found any problem with the requirement I thought I had a while ago. Please look at the question again. Apologies.

    – manooooh
    5 mins ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476422%2fhow-to-align-addlegendtry-with-the-plot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














Not an answer to the (LaTeX part of the) question. However, if you use polar coordinates in the x-y plane, x=r cos(phi) and y=r sin(phi), you see that the function does not depend on r but only on the angle. So away from the origin x=y=0 all the information is already in a one-dimensional plot.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={fan(t)=-(sin(2*t)/(-3 + cos(2*t)));}]
begin{axis}
addplot[domain=0:360,smooth,samples=101] {fan(x)};
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • I am so sorry, I have not found any problem with the requirement I thought I had a while ago. Please look at the question again. Apologies.

    – manooooh
    5 mins ago
















1














Not an answer to the (LaTeX part of the) question. However, if you use polar coordinates in the x-y plane, x=r cos(phi) and y=r sin(phi), you see that the function does not depend on r but only on the angle. So away from the origin x=y=0 all the information is already in a one-dimensional plot.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={fan(t)=-(sin(2*t)/(-3 + cos(2*t)));}]
begin{axis}
addplot[domain=0:360,smooth,samples=101] {fan(x)};
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • I am so sorry, I have not found any problem with the requirement I thought I had a while ago. Please look at the question again. Apologies.

    – manooooh
    5 mins ago














1












1








1







Not an answer to the (LaTeX part of the) question. However, if you use polar coordinates in the x-y plane, x=r cos(phi) and y=r sin(phi), you see that the function does not depend on r but only on the angle. So away from the origin x=y=0 all the information is already in a one-dimensional plot.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={fan(t)=-(sin(2*t)/(-3 + cos(2*t)));}]
begin{axis}
addplot[domain=0:360,smooth,samples=101] {fan(x)};
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer













Not an answer to the (LaTeX part of the) question. However, if you use polar coordinates in the x-y plane, x=r cos(phi) and y=r sin(phi), you see that the function does not depend on r but only on the angle. So away from the origin x=y=0 all the information is already in a one-dimensional plot.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{pgfplots}
pgfplotsset{compat=1.15}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={fan(t)=-(sin(2*t)/(-3 + cos(2*t)));}]
begin{axis}
addplot[domain=0:360,smooth,samples=101] {fan(x)};
end{axis}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 21 mins ago









marmotmarmot

103k4121233




103k4121233













  • I am so sorry, I have not found any problem with the requirement I thought I had a while ago. Please look at the question again. Apologies.

    – manooooh
    5 mins ago



















  • I am so sorry, I have not found any problem with the requirement I thought I had a while ago. Please look at the question again. Apologies.

    – manooooh
    5 mins ago

















I am so sorry, I have not found any problem with the requirement I thought I had a while ago. Please look at the question again. Apologies.

– manooooh
5 mins ago





I am so sorry, I have not found any problem with the requirement I thought I had a while ago. Please look at the question again. Apologies.

– manooooh
5 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476422%2fhow-to-align-addlegendtry-with-the-plot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks