Why is it so easy to decrypt MD5 checksums
I have recently been plyaing aroud with a website that converts MD5 to the plain text format. Why is it so easy to decrypt it ?
Take this example
8466fa8e428bf83c4d2d9893b4bada64
7d53cbd3f0c0e2af31c3ba1eab940f22
dc647eb65e6711e155375218212b3964
27d4cf7da57f6748f79254f7be42cca3
909cea0c97058cfe2e3ea8d675cb08e1
Decrypts to "My gmail password is orange" in under 1 second.
Picture
Even with sha256 it got decrypted instantly
Picture
md5
asked Nov 24 '18 at 9:19
F.AhmedF.Ahmed
64
add a comment |
I have recently been plyaing aroud with a website that converts MD5 to the plain text format. Why is it so easy to decrypt it ?
Take this example
8466fa8e428bf83c4d2d9893b4bada64
7d53cbd3f0c0e2af31c3ba1eab940f22
dc647eb65e6711e155375218212b3964
27d4cf7da57f6748f79254f7be42cca3
909cea0c97058cfe2e3ea8d675cb08e1
Decrypts to "My gmail password is orange" in under 1 second.
Picture
Even with sha256 it got decrypted instantly
Picture
md5
asked Nov 24 '18 at 9:19
F.AhmedF.Ahmed
64
add a comment |
I have recently been plyaing aroud with a website that converts MD5 to the plain text format. Why is it so easy to decrypt it ?
Take this example
8466fa8e428bf83c4d2d9893b4bada64
7d53cbd3f0c0e2af31c3ba1eab940f22
dc647eb65e6711e155375218212b3964
27d4cf7da57f6748f79254f7be42cca3
909cea0c97058cfe2e3ea8d675cb08e1
Decrypts to "My gmail password is orange" in under 1 second.
Picture
Even with sha256 it got decrypted instantly
Picture
md5
asked Nov 24 '18 at 9:19
F.AhmedF.Ahmed
64
I have recently been plyaing aroud with a website that converts MD5 to the plain text format. Why is it so easy to decrypt it ?
Take this example
8466fa8e428bf83c4d2d9893b4bada64
7d53cbd3f0c0e2af31c3ba1eab940f22
dc647eb65e6711e155375218212b3964
27d4cf7da57f6748f79254f7be42cca3
909cea0c97058cfe2e3ea8d675cb08e1
Decrypts to "My gmail password is orange" in under 1 second.
Picture
Even with sha256 it got decrypted instantly
Picture
md5
md5
asked Nov 24 '18 at 9:19
F.AhmedF.Ahmed
64
asked Nov 24 '18 at 9:19
F.AhmedF.Ahmed
64
edited Nov 24 '18 at 9:39
F.Ahmed
asked Nov 24 '18 at 9:19
F.AhmedF.Ahmed
64
asked Nov 24 '18 at 9:19
F.AhmedF.Ahmed
64
asked Nov 24 '18 at 9:19
F.AhmedF.Ahmed
64
64
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Because md5 is not an encryption mechanism, it is a very old one-way hash algorithm. What you are finding are collisions, and they are highly unlikely to be the original input. They have produced a possible match. Consider
$ echo "My Gmail Password Is Orange" | md5sum
97ec87f89796b683feae88008c302d22 -
$ echo -n "My Gmail Password Is Orange" | md5sum
52b4551c065189631be8b506eee9b62e -
The only difference between those two String(s) is the newline. It's true that md5 is broken. But it's not reversible, unless you consider very short words and a dictionary.
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:20
Elliott FrischElliott Frisch
153k1389178
Frisch It is the original inout
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:21
@F.Ahmed For trivial sample words. What does it give you for 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023349? BTW, if that comes back fast, it's still only an example of a rainbow table at work. That was "floccinaucinihilipilification", now try 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023350.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
1
Frisch it comes to floccinaucinihilipilification
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:29
@F.Ahmed How it works ? MD5 means a 128-bit encryption algorithm, generating a 32-character hexadecimal hash, whatever the captcha. This algorithm is not reversible, ie it is normally impossible to find the original word from the md5 hash. Our tool uses a huge database in order to have the best chance possible to trace the captcha. Just enter an MD5 hash in the form above to try to decrypt! Words in the database : 1,154,869,433,999 From here.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
It's a big rainbow table. SALT your passwords folks!
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:31
add a comment |
md5 is a one-way digest function, also known as a hash function. It is not an encryption mechanism.
md5 is known to have several weaknesses, and common advice has been to avoid using it for over a decade now.
On this particular site, you are likely seeing an example of rainbow tables being used to find collisions, or perhaps even the original inputs. Rainbow tables work by precomputing very large amounts of likely inputs (such as known passwords, the entire dictionary for multiple languages, common word combinations, etc). Such tables can be efficiently searched for a given hash to find an input that produces said hash.
Note that in some cases, you may receive a different result from the rainbow table from what you used as the input. In this case, it is also an example of a collision.
It is possible to protect against rainbow attacks using salting, which adds random data to each input, such that a precomputed rainbow table is unlikely to have your exact input in it.
Although md5 is considered broken, it is not broken to the extent that you can perform a direct "decryption" given a hash - most attacks attempt to produce collisions as opposed to finding preimages.
For any security sensitive applications, you should consider using modern hash functions such as sha256. For password hashing, consider using hash functions specifically designed for password hashing, such as bcrypt.
edited Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
tilz0R
5,59411131
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
Raghav SoodRaghav Sood
71.9k19159172
Even with sha256 it got decrypyed in under 1 second
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:36
1
Again, it is very likely using a rainbow table attack. Any hash function will be vulnerable to a rainbow table by definition, as long as the table contains the input. If you try md5 or sha256 with some random data,r8p,j9fwjp9fjewp9,qhzh.wphg9whreegc9,wgrp.9e8rxphrew9,xujvsmudsh9mo84ahpch9,vpjr9x.hgp9re.xfor example, it will not be able to provide the input.
– Raghav Sood
Nov 24 '18 at 9:40
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53456790%2fwhy-is-it-so-easy-to-decrypt-md5-checksums%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Because md5 is not an encryption mechanism, it is a very old one-way hash algorithm. What you are finding are collisions, and they are highly unlikely to be the original input. They have produced a possible match. Consider
$ echo "My Gmail Password Is Orange" | md5sum
97ec87f89796b683feae88008c302d22 -
$ echo -n "My Gmail Password Is Orange" | md5sum
52b4551c065189631be8b506eee9b62e -
The only difference between those two String(s) is the newline. It's true that md5 is broken. But it's not reversible, unless you consider very short words and a dictionary.
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:20
Elliott FrischElliott Frisch
153k1389178
Frisch It is the original inout
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:21
@F.Ahmed For trivial sample words. What does it give you for 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023349? BTW, if that comes back fast, it's still only an example of a rainbow table at work. That was "floccinaucinihilipilification", now try 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023350.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
1
Frisch it comes to floccinaucinihilipilification
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:29
@F.Ahmed How it works ? MD5 means a 128-bit encryption algorithm, generating a 32-character hexadecimal hash, whatever the captcha. This algorithm is not reversible, ie it is normally impossible to find the original word from the md5 hash. Our tool uses a huge database in order to have the best chance possible to trace the captcha. Just enter an MD5 hash in the form above to try to decrypt! Words in the database : 1,154,869,433,999 From here.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
It's a big rainbow table. SALT your passwords folks!
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:31
add a comment |
Because md5 is not an encryption mechanism, it is a very old one-way hash algorithm. What you are finding are collisions, and they are highly unlikely to be the original input. They have produced a possible match. Consider
$ echo "My Gmail Password Is Orange" | md5sum
97ec87f89796b683feae88008c302d22 -
$ echo -n "My Gmail Password Is Orange" | md5sum
52b4551c065189631be8b506eee9b62e -
The only difference between those two String(s) is the newline. It's true that md5 is broken. But it's not reversible, unless you consider very short words and a dictionary.
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:20
Elliott FrischElliott Frisch
153k1389178
Frisch It is the original inout
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:21
@F.Ahmed For trivial sample words. What does it give you for 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023349? BTW, if that comes back fast, it's still only an example of a rainbow table at work. That was "floccinaucinihilipilification", now try 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023350.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
1
Frisch it comes to floccinaucinihilipilification
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:29
@F.Ahmed How it works ? MD5 means a 128-bit encryption algorithm, generating a 32-character hexadecimal hash, whatever the captcha. This algorithm is not reversible, ie it is normally impossible to find the original word from the md5 hash. Our tool uses a huge database in order to have the best chance possible to trace the captcha. Just enter an MD5 hash in the form above to try to decrypt! Words in the database : 1,154,869,433,999 From here.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
It's a big rainbow table. SALT your passwords folks!
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:31
add a comment |
Because md5 is not an encryption mechanism, it is a very old one-way hash algorithm. What you are finding are collisions, and they are highly unlikely to be the original input. They have produced a possible match. Consider
$ echo "My Gmail Password Is Orange" | md5sum
97ec87f89796b683feae88008c302d22 -
$ echo -n "My Gmail Password Is Orange" | md5sum
52b4551c065189631be8b506eee9b62e -
The only difference between those two String(s) is the newline. It's true that md5 is broken. But it's not reversible, unless you consider very short words and a dictionary.
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:20
Elliott FrischElliott Frisch
153k1389178
Because md5 is not an encryption mechanism, it is a very old one-way hash algorithm. What you are finding are collisions, and they are highly unlikely to be the original input. They have produced a possible match. Consider
$ echo "My Gmail Password Is Orange" | md5sum
97ec87f89796b683feae88008c302d22 -
$ echo -n "My Gmail Password Is Orange" | md5sum
52b4551c065189631be8b506eee9b62e -
The only difference between those two String(s) is the newline. It's true that md5 is broken. But it's not reversible, unless you consider very short words and a dictionary.
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:20
Elliott FrischElliott Frisch
153k1389178
edited Nov 24 '18 at 9:22
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:20
Elliott FrischElliott Frisch
153k1389178
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:20
Elliott FrischElliott Frisch
153k1389178
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:20
Elliott FrischElliott Frisch
153k1389178
153k1389178
Frisch It is the original inout
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:21
@F.Ahmed For trivial sample words. What does it give you for 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023349? BTW, if that comes back fast, it's still only an example of a rainbow table at work. That was "floccinaucinihilipilification", now try 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023350.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
1
Frisch it comes to floccinaucinihilipilification
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:29
@F.Ahmed How it works ? MD5 means a 128-bit encryption algorithm, generating a 32-character hexadecimal hash, whatever the captcha. This algorithm is not reversible, ie it is normally impossible to find the original word from the md5 hash. Our tool uses a huge database in order to have the best chance possible to trace the captcha. Just enter an MD5 hash in the form above to try to decrypt! Words in the database : 1,154,869,433,999 From here.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
It's a big rainbow table. SALT your passwords folks!
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:31
add a comment |
Frisch It is the original inout
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:21
@F.Ahmed For trivial sample words. What does it give you for 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023349? BTW, if that comes back fast, it's still only an example of a rainbow table at work. That was "floccinaucinihilipilification", now try 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023350.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
1
Frisch it comes to floccinaucinihilipilification
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:29
@F.Ahmed How it works ? MD5 means a 128-bit encryption algorithm, generating a 32-character hexadecimal hash, whatever the captcha. This algorithm is not reversible, ie it is normally impossible to find the original word from the md5 hash. Our tool uses a huge database in order to have the best chance possible to trace the captcha. Just enter an MD5 hash in the form above to try to decrypt! Words in the database : 1,154,869,433,999 From here.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
It's a big rainbow table. SALT your passwords folks!
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:31
Frisch It is the original inout
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:21
Frisch It is the original inout
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:21
@F.Ahmed For trivial sample words. What does it give you for 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023349? BTW, if that comes back fast, it's still only an example of a rainbow table at work. That was "floccinaucinihilipilification", now try 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023350.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
@F.Ahmed For trivial sample words. What does it give you for 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023349? BTW, if that comes back fast, it's still only an example of a rainbow table at work. That was "floccinaucinihilipilification", now try 8a2c1ee4c9faf18992a59cedd9023350.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
1
1
Frisch it comes to floccinaucinihilipilification
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:29
Frisch it comes to floccinaucinihilipilification
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:29
@F.Ahmed How it works ? MD5 means a 128-bit encryption algorithm, generating a 32-character hexadecimal hash, whatever the captcha. This algorithm is not reversible, ie it is normally impossible to find the original word from the md5 hash. Our tool uses a huge database in order to have the best chance possible to trace the captcha. Just enter an MD5 hash in the form above to try to decrypt! Words in the database : 1,154,869,433,999 From here.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
@F.Ahmed How it works ? MD5 means a 128-bit encryption algorithm, generating a 32-character hexadecimal hash, whatever the captcha. This algorithm is not reversible, ie it is normally impossible to find the original word from the md5 hash. Our tool uses a huge database in order to have the best chance possible to trace the captcha. Just enter an MD5 hash in the form above to try to decrypt! Words in the database : 1,154,869,433,999 From here.
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
It's a big rainbow table. SALT your passwords folks!
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:31
It's a big rainbow table. SALT your passwords folks!
– Elliott Frisch
Nov 24 '18 at 9:31
add a comment |
md5 is a one-way digest function, also known as a hash function. It is not an encryption mechanism.
md5 is known to have several weaknesses, and common advice has been to avoid using it for over a decade now.
On this particular site, you are likely seeing an example of rainbow tables being used to find collisions, or perhaps even the original inputs. Rainbow tables work by precomputing very large amounts of likely inputs (such as known passwords, the entire dictionary for multiple languages, common word combinations, etc). Such tables can be efficiently searched for a given hash to find an input that produces said hash.
Note that in some cases, you may receive a different result from the rainbow table from what you used as the input. In this case, it is also an example of a collision.
It is possible to protect against rainbow attacks using salting, which adds random data to each input, such that a precomputed rainbow table is unlikely to have your exact input in it.
Although md5 is considered broken, it is not broken to the extent that you can perform a direct "decryption" given a hash - most attacks attempt to produce collisions as opposed to finding preimages.
For any security sensitive applications, you should consider using modern hash functions such as sha256. For password hashing, consider using hash functions specifically designed for password hashing, such as bcrypt.
edited Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
tilz0R
5,59411131
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
Raghav SoodRaghav Sood
71.9k19159172
Even with sha256 it got decrypyed in under 1 second
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:36
1
Again, it is very likely using a rainbow table attack. Any hash function will be vulnerable to a rainbow table by definition, as long as the table contains the input. If you try md5 or sha256 with some random data,r8p,j9fwjp9fjewp9,qhzh.wphg9whreegc9,wgrp.9e8rxphrew9,xujvsmudsh9mo84ahpch9,vpjr9x.hgp9re.xfor example, it will not be able to provide the input.
– Raghav Sood
Nov 24 '18 at 9:40
add a comment |
md5 is a one-way digest function, also known as a hash function. It is not an encryption mechanism.
md5 is known to have several weaknesses, and common advice has been to avoid using it for over a decade now.
On this particular site, you are likely seeing an example of rainbow tables being used to find collisions, or perhaps even the original inputs. Rainbow tables work by precomputing very large amounts of likely inputs (such as known passwords, the entire dictionary for multiple languages, common word combinations, etc). Such tables can be efficiently searched for a given hash to find an input that produces said hash.
Note that in some cases, you may receive a different result from the rainbow table from what you used as the input. In this case, it is also an example of a collision.
It is possible to protect against rainbow attacks using salting, which adds random data to each input, such that a precomputed rainbow table is unlikely to have your exact input in it.
Although md5 is considered broken, it is not broken to the extent that you can perform a direct "decryption" given a hash - most attacks attempt to produce collisions as opposed to finding preimages.
For any security sensitive applications, you should consider using modern hash functions such as sha256. For password hashing, consider using hash functions specifically designed for password hashing, such as bcrypt.
edited Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
tilz0R
5,59411131
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
Raghav SoodRaghav Sood
71.9k19159172
Even with sha256 it got decrypyed in under 1 second
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:36
1
Again, it is very likely using a rainbow table attack. Any hash function will be vulnerable to a rainbow table by definition, as long as the table contains the input. If you try md5 or sha256 with some random data,r8p,j9fwjp9fjewp9,qhzh.wphg9whreegc9,wgrp.9e8rxphrew9,xujvsmudsh9mo84ahpch9,vpjr9x.hgp9re.xfor example, it will not be able to provide the input.
– Raghav Sood
Nov 24 '18 at 9:40
add a comment |
md5 is a one-way digest function, also known as a hash function. It is not an encryption mechanism.
md5 is known to have several weaknesses, and common advice has been to avoid using it for over a decade now.
On this particular site, you are likely seeing an example of rainbow tables being used to find collisions, or perhaps even the original inputs. Rainbow tables work by precomputing very large amounts of likely inputs (such as known passwords, the entire dictionary for multiple languages, common word combinations, etc). Such tables can be efficiently searched for a given hash to find an input that produces said hash.
Note that in some cases, you may receive a different result from the rainbow table from what you used as the input. In this case, it is also an example of a collision.
It is possible to protect against rainbow attacks using salting, which adds random data to each input, such that a precomputed rainbow table is unlikely to have your exact input in it.
Although md5 is considered broken, it is not broken to the extent that you can perform a direct "decryption" given a hash - most attacks attempt to produce collisions as opposed to finding preimages.
For any security sensitive applications, you should consider using modern hash functions such as sha256. For password hashing, consider using hash functions specifically designed for password hashing, such as bcrypt.
edited Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
tilz0R
5,59411131
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
Raghav SoodRaghav Sood
71.9k19159172
md5 is a one-way digest function, also known as a hash function. It is not an encryption mechanism.
md5 is known to have several weaknesses, and common advice has been to avoid using it for over a decade now.
On this particular site, you are likely seeing an example of rainbow tables being used to find collisions, or perhaps even the original inputs. Rainbow tables work by precomputing very large amounts of likely inputs (such as known passwords, the entire dictionary for multiple languages, common word combinations, etc). Such tables can be efficiently searched for a given hash to find an input that produces said hash.
Note that in some cases, you may receive a different result from the rainbow table from what you used as the input. In this case, it is also an example of a collision.
It is possible to protect against rainbow attacks using salting, which adds random data to each input, such that a precomputed rainbow table is unlikely to have your exact input in it.
Although md5 is considered broken, it is not broken to the extent that you can perform a direct "decryption" given a hash - most attacks attempt to produce collisions as opposed to finding preimages.
For any security sensitive applications, you should consider using modern hash functions such as sha256. For password hashing, consider using hash functions specifically designed for password hashing, such as bcrypt.
edited Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
tilz0R
5,59411131
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
Raghav SoodRaghav Sood
71.9k19159172
edited Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
tilz0R
5,59411131
edited Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
tilz0R
5,59411131
edited Nov 24 '18 at 9:30
tilz0R
5,59411131
5,59411131
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
Raghav SoodRaghav Sood
71.9k19159172
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
Raghav SoodRaghav Sood
71.9k19159172
answered Nov 24 '18 at 9:25
Raghav SoodRaghav Sood
71.9k19159172
71.9k19159172
Even with sha256 it got decrypyed in under 1 second
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:36
1
Again, it is very likely using a rainbow table attack. Any hash function will be vulnerable to a rainbow table by definition, as long as the table contains the input. If you try md5 or sha256 with some random data,r8p,j9fwjp9fjewp9,qhzh.wphg9whreegc9,wgrp.9e8rxphrew9,xujvsmudsh9mo84ahpch9,vpjr9x.hgp9re.xfor example, it will not be able to provide the input.
– Raghav Sood
Nov 24 '18 at 9:40
add a comment |
Even with sha256 it got decrypyed in under 1 second
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:36
1
Again, it is very likely using a rainbow table attack. Any hash function will be vulnerable to a rainbow table by definition, as long as the table contains the input. If you try md5 or sha256 with some random data,r8p,j9fwjp9fjewp9,qhzh.wphg9whreegc9,wgrp.9e8rxphrew9,xujvsmudsh9mo84ahpch9,vpjr9x.hgp9re.xfor example, it will not be able to provide the input.
– Raghav Sood
Nov 24 '18 at 9:40
Even with sha256 it got decrypyed in under 1 second
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:36
Even with sha256 it got decrypyed in under 1 second
– F.Ahmed
Nov 24 '18 at 9:36
1
1
Again, it is very likely using a rainbow table attack. Any hash function will be vulnerable to a rainbow table by definition, as long as the table contains the input. If you try md5 or sha256 with some random data,
r8p,j9fwjp9fjewp9,qhzh.wphg9whreegc9,wgrp.9e8rxphrew9,xujvsmudsh9mo84ahpch9,vpjr9x.hgp9re.x for example, it will not be able to provide the input.– Raghav Sood
Nov 24 '18 at 9:40
Again, it is very likely using a rainbow table attack. Any hash function will be vulnerable to a rainbow table by definition, as long as the table contains the input. If you try md5 or sha256 with some random data,
r8p,j9fwjp9fjewp9,qhzh.wphg9whreegc9,wgrp.9e8rxphrew9,xujvsmudsh9mo84ahpch9,vpjr9x.hgp9re.x for example, it will not be able to provide the input.– Raghav Sood
Nov 24 '18 at 9:40
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53456790%2fwhy-is-it-so-easy-to-decrypt-md5-checksums%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
