Problems running/configure self hosted console application (ASP.net core 2.1, Kestrel) with public...
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have developed various webservices in the past (VB ASP.net web-api applications) with https for production.
I have done the development with http and then setup https on the production servers.
To setup a port on the production server for https and the certificate, I have:
- Imported a public certificate in the certificate store on the
windows server configured a specific port for https with netsh.
E.g:
netsh http add urlacl url=https://+:22224/ user=everyone
- bound the certificate (over the thumbprint) to the port. E.g:
netsh http add sslcert ipport=0.0.0.0:22224
certhash=31cf73308a768100d4d32fe6e77638593e68ab57
appid={a33a711f-c587-44e5-96bc-dca8a7f3fc3c}
- Setup the application to listen to the specific port, whereby I have
read the url from a config file at startup - e.g. https://IP:Port and applied
it to (vb.net) HttpSelfHostConfiguration()
This works without problems and I am able to configure the applications as I need it (e.g. configure a port in the config file for http for doing tests on a intranet server, configure another port in the config file for the production environment with https).
Now, I want to do the same with an asp.net core 2.1.6 application and it seems not to work the same way.
Public certificate (comodo) is installed in the certificate store of the windows web server.
Port 22224 is configured with netsh for https.
The certificate is bound to the port with netsh (certificate is showed correct with netsh http show sslcert ipport=0.0.0.0:22224
In Program.cs, I add the port to listen with UseUrls:
public static IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder(string args) =>
WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
.UseStartup<Startup>() //;
.UseUrls(GV.cURL, "http://localhost:5000");
}
whereby GV.curl contains https://IP:22224 at runtime
The application run’s fine (over the Internet), if I configure it to a http-port (e.g. http://IP:22222).
If I set the (configured) https port (https://IP:22224), the application don’t start and give out the error message:
Unable to configure HTTPS endpoint. No server certificate was specified, and the default developer certificate could not be found.
The information’s, I found on the web are confusing and it seems as this theme is a “moving target” (often changes in the base handling of asp.net core x-x).
My findings for now:
The snipped “No server certificate was specified” in the error message indicates, that the certificate has to be configured in the application?
I have found an example to specify a certificate in CreateWebHostBuilder with .useKestrel options:
.UseKestrel(options =>
{
options.Listen(IPAddress.Loopback, 5000);
options.Listen(IPAddress.Loopback, 5001, listenOptions =>
{
listenOptions.UseHttps("certificate.pfx", "topsecret");
});
Note: In my case, I would have to change 5001 to 22224.
Questions:
Do I really have to configure the (already to the port bound) public
certificate also in the asp.net core 2.1 application?If yes, what is the best way to do this (is the example above a good way)?
https asp.net-core-mvc certificate asp.net-core-2.1 kestrel-http-server
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have developed various webservices in the past (VB ASP.net web-api applications) with https for production.
I have done the development with http and then setup https on the production servers.
To setup a port on the production server for https and the certificate, I have:
- Imported a public certificate in the certificate store on the
windows server configured a specific port for https with netsh.
E.g:
netsh http add urlacl url=https://+:22224/ user=everyone
- bound the certificate (over the thumbprint) to the port. E.g:
netsh http add sslcert ipport=0.0.0.0:22224
certhash=31cf73308a768100d4d32fe6e77638593e68ab57
appid={a33a711f-c587-44e5-96bc-dca8a7f3fc3c}
- Setup the application to listen to the specific port, whereby I have
read the url from a config file at startup - e.g. https://IP:Port and applied
it to (vb.net) HttpSelfHostConfiguration()
This works without problems and I am able to configure the applications as I need it (e.g. configure a port in the config file for http for doing tests on a intranet server, configure another port in the config file for the production environment with https).
Now, I want to do the same with an asp.net core 2.1.6 application and it seems not to work the same way.
Public certificate (comodo) is installed in the certificate store of the windows web server.
Port 22224 is configured with netsh for https.
The certificate is bound to the port with netsh (certificate is showed correct with netsh http show sslcert ipport=0.0.0.0:22224
In Program.cs, I add the port to listen with UseUrls:
public static IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder(string args) =>
WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
.UseStartup<Startup>() //;
.UseUrls(GV.cURL, "http://localhost:5000");
}
whereby GV.curl contains https://IP:22224 at runtime
The application run’s fine (over the Internet), if I configure it to a http-port (e.g. http://IP:22222).
If I set the (configured) https port (https://IP:22224), the application don’t start and give out the error message:
Unable to configure HTTPS endpoint. No server certificate was specified, and the default developer certificate could not be found.
The information’s, I found on the web are confusing and it seems as this theme is a “moving target” (often changes in the base handling of asp.net core x-x).
My findings for now:
The snipped “No server certificate was specified” in the error message indicates, that the certificate has to be configured in the application?
I have found an example to specify a certificate in CreateWebHostBuilder with .useKestrel options:
.UseKestrel(options =>
{
options.Listen(IPAddress.Loopback, 5000);
options.Listen(IPAddress.Loopback, 5001, listenOptions =>
{
listenOptions.UseHttps("certificate.pfx", "topsecret");
});
Note: In my case, I would have to change 5001 to 22224.
Questions:
Do I really have to configure the (already to the port bound) public
certificate also in the asp.net core 2.1 application?If yes, what is the best way to do this (is the example above a good way)?
https asp.net-core-mvc certificate asp.net-core-2.1 kestrel-http-server
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have developed various webservices in the past (VB ASP.net web-api applications) with https for production.
I have done the development with http and then setup https on the production servers.
To setup a port on the production server for https and the certificate, I have:
- Imported a public certificate in the certificate store on the
windows server configured a specific port for https with netsh.
E.g:
netsh http add urlacl url=https://+:22224/ user=everyone
- bound the certificate (over the thumbprint) to the port. E.g:
netsh http add sslcert ipport=0.0.0.0:22224
certhash=31cf73308a768100d4d32fe6e77638593e68ab57
appid={a33a711f-c587-44e5-96bc-dca8a7f3fc3c}
- Setup the application to listen to the specific port, whereby I have
read the url from a config file at startup - e.g. https://IP:Port and applied
it to (vb.net) HttpSelfHostConfiguration()
This works without problems and I am able to configure the applications as I need it (e.g. configure a port in the config file for http for doing tests on a intranet server, configure another port in the config file for the production environment with https).
Now, I want to do the same with an asp.net core 2.1.6 application and it seems not to work the same way.
Public certificate (comodo) is installed in the certificate store of the windows web server.
Port 22224 is configured with netsh for https.
The certificate is bound to the port with netsh (certificate is showed correct with netsh http show sslcert ipport=0.0.0.0:22224
In Program.cs, I add the port to listen with UseUrls:
public static IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder(string args) =>
WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
.UseStartup<Startup>() //;
.UseUrls(GV.cURL, "http://localhost:5000");
}
whereby GV.curl contains https://IP:22224 at runtime
The application run’s fine (over the Internet), if I configure it to a http-port (e.g. http://IP:22222).
If I set the (configured) https port (https://IP:22224), the application don’t start and give out the error message:
Unable to configure HTTPS endpoint. No server certificate was specified, and the default developer certificate could not be found.
The information’s, I found on the web are confusing and it seems as this theme is a “moving target” (often changes in the base handling of asp.net core x-x).
My findings for now:
The snipped “No server certificate was specified” in the error message indicates, that the certificate has to be configured in the application?
I have found an example to specify a certificate in CreateWebHostBuilder with .useKestrel options:
.UseKestrel(options =>
{
options.Listen(IPAddress.Loopback, 5000);
options.Listen(IPAddress.Loopback, 5001, listenOptions =>
{
listenOptions.UseHttps("certificate.pfx", "topsecret");
});
Note: In my case, I would have to change 5001 to 22224.
Questions:
Do I really have to configure the (already to the port bound) public
certificate also in the asp.net core 2.1 application?If yes, what is the best way to do this (is the example above a good way)?
https asp.net-core-mvc certificate asp.net-core-2.1 kestrel-http-server
I have developed various webservices in the past (VB ASP.net web-api applications) with https for production.
I have done the development with http and then setup https on the production servers.
To setup a port on the production server for https and the certificate, I have:
- Imported a public certificate in the certificate store on the
windows server configured a specific port for https with netsh.
E.g:
netsh http add urlacl url=https://+:22224/ user=everyone
- bound the certificate (over the thumbprint) to the port. E.g:
netsh http add sslcert ipport=0.0.0.0:22224
certhash=31cf73308a768100d4d32fe6e77638593e68ab57
appid={a33a711f-c587-44e5-96bc-dca8a7f3fc3c}
- Setup the application to listen to the specific port, whereby I have
read the url from a config file at startup - e.g. https://IP:Port and applied
it to (vb.net) HttpSelfHostConfiguration()
This works without problems and I am able to configure the applications as I need it (e.g. configure a port in the config file for http for doing tests on a intranet server, configure another port in the config file for the production environment with https).
Now, I want to do the same with an asp.net core 2.1.6 application and it seems not to work the same way.
Public certificate (comodo) is installed in the certificate store of the windows web server.
Port 22224 is configured with netsh for https.
The certificate is bound to the port with netsh (certificate is showed correct with netsh http show sslcert ipport=0.0.0.0:22224
In Program.cs, I add the port to listen with UseUrls:
public static IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder(string args) =>
WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
.UseStartup<Startup>() //;
.UseUrls(GV.cURL, "http://localhost:5000");
}
whereby GV.curl contains https://IP:22224 at runtime
The application run’s fine (over the Internet), if I configure it to a http-port (e.g. http://IP:22222).
If I set the (configured) https port (https://IP:22224), the application don’t start and give out the error message:
Unable to configure HTTPS endpoint. No server certificate was specified, and the default developer certificate could not be found.
The information’s, I found on the web are confusing and it seems as this theme is a “moving target” (often changes in the base handling of asp.net core x-x).
My findings for now:
The snipped “No server certificate was specified” in the error message indicates, that the certificate has to be configured in the application?
I have found an example to specify a certificate in CreateWebHostBuilder with .useKestrel options:
.UseKestrel(options =>
{
options.Listen(IPAddress.Loopback, 5000);
options.Listen(IPAddress.Loopback, 5001, listenOptions =>
{
listenOptions.UseHttps("certificate.pfx", "topsecret");
});
Note: In my case, I would have to change 5001 to 22224.
Questions:
Do I really have to configure the (already to the port bound) public
certificate also in the asp.net core 2.1 application?If yes, what is the best way to do this (is the example above a good way)?
https asp.net-core-mvc certificate asp.net-core-2.1 kestrel-http-server
https asp.net-core-mvc certificate asp.net-core-2.1 kestrel-http-server
asked Nov 22 at 11:43
FredyWenger
1,15211624
1,15211624
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
After a lot of try-and-error, I have found the relevant information that works for me.
Note: I work with ASP.net core 2.1.6 now (if you work with an older version, this may not work for you...
You don’t need to do any configuration with netsh, but you have to configure the cert (including password).
You further not need to change the program.cs...
The configurations can be done completely in appsettings.json (included in the project root)
So... in the project (debugging on my machine), I work with the default appsettings.json (with http):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
}
On the intranet server, I use another appsettings.json (still with http):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
,
"Kestrel": {
"EndPoints": {
"Http1": { "Url": "http://localhost:5000" },
"Http2": { "Url": "http://172.16.1.120:22222" }
}
}
}
This way, the app can be tested in the LAN over the IP address of the intranet server and also directly on the intranet server (localhost port 5000).
On the internet server, I use another appsettings.json (for localhost with http, for the server IP with https and certficate):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
,
"Kestrel": {
"EndPoints": {
"Http": {
"Url": "http://localhost:5000"
},
"HttpsInlineCertFile": {
"Url": "https://192.168.3.3:22224",
"Certificate": {
"Path": "./certificate.pfx",
"Password": "NotReally",
"AllowInvalid": "true"
}
}
}
}
}
This way, the app can be tested with http directly on the intranet server and with https and cert over the internet.
Handling:
On the servers, I have a root directory for the application.
Directly under the root, I have stored copies of the "per machine" different files (including appsettings.json)
To publish a new version, I publish on my dev machine and then copy the publish directory to the servers (under the root directory) and overwrite the stored files.
To have the correct config, I have created a simple .cmd, that copies the (server specific) config files from the root in the subdirectory publish that I run after a fresh publish...
Notes to https and the certificate:
The certificate has to be stored in the publish folder.
As the (my) public contoso certificate does secure a few domains, https only works properly, if the app is called over the domain (else, the good knowing “not secure” messages are showed).
To be able to test the app with https, I have opened the port 22224 on the windows- and the “real” firewall.
The DNS points to the public IP of our internet server.
For testing, I call the App with https://www.Domain.xx:22224
And... it works...
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53430278%2fproblems-running-configure-self-hosted-console-application-asp-net-core-2-1-ke%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
After a lot of try-and-error, I have found the relevant information that works for me.
Note: I work with ASP.net core 2.1.6 now (if you work with an older version, this may not work for you...
You don’t need to do any configuration with netsh, but you have to configure the cert (including password).
You further not need to change the program.cs...
The configurations can be done completely in appsettings.json (included in the project root)
So... in the project (debugging on my machine), I work with the default appsettings.json (with http):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
}
On the intranet server, I use another appsettings.json (still with http):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
,
"Kestrel": {
"EndPoints": {
"Http1": { "Url": "http://localhost:5000" },
"Http2": { "Url": "http://172.16.1.120:22222" }
}
}
}
This way, the app can be tested in the LAN over the IP address of the intranet server and also directly on the intranet server (localhost port 5000).
On the internet server, I use another appsettings.json (for localhost with http, for the server IP with https and certficate):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
,
"Kestrel": {
"EndPoints": {
"Http": {
"Url": "http://localhost:5000"
},
"HttpsInlineCertFile": {
"Url": "https://192.168.3.3:22224",
"Certificate": {
"Path": "./certificate.pfx",
"Password": "NotReally",
"AllowInvalid": "true"
}
}
}
}
}
This way, the app can be tested with http directly on the intranet server and with https and cert over the internet.
Handling:
On the servers, I have a root directory for the application.
Directly under the root, I have stored copies of the "per machine" different files (including appsettings.json)
To publish a new version, I publish on my dev machine and then copy the publish directory to the servers (under the root directory) and overwrite the stored files.
To have the correct config, I have created a simple .cmd, that copies the (server specific) config files from the root in the subdirectory publish that I run after a fresh publish...
Notes to https and the certificate:
The certificate has to be stored in the publish folder.
As the (my) public contoso certificate does secure a few domains, https only works properly, if the app is called over the domain (else, the good knowing “not secure” messages are showed).
To be able to test the app with https, I have opened the port 22224 on the windows- and the “real” firewall.
The DNS points to the public IP of our internet server.
For testing, I call the App with https://www.Domain.xx:22224
And... it works...
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
After a lot of try-and-error, I have found the relevant information that works for me.
Note: I work with ASP.net core 2.1.6 now (if you work with an older version, this may not work for you...
You don’t need to do any configuration with netsh, but you have to configure the cert (including password).
You further not need to change the program.cs...
The configurations can be done completely in appsettings.json (included in the project root)
So... in the project (debugging on my machine), I work with the default appsettings.json (with http):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
}
On the intranet server, I use another appsettings.json (still with http):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
,
"Kestrel": {
"EndPoints": {
"Http1": { "Url": "http://localhost:5000" },
"Http2": { "Url": "http://172.16.1.120:22222" }
}
}
}
This way, the app can be tested in the LAN over the IP address of the intranet server and also directly on the intranet server (localhost port 5000).
On the internet server, I use another appsettings.json (for localhost with http, for the server IP with https and certficate):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
,
"Kestrel": {
"EndPoints": {
"Http": {
"Url": "http://localhost:5000"
},
"HttpsInlineCertFile": {
"Url": "https://192.168.3.3:22224",
"Certificate": {
"Path": "./certificate.pfx",
"Password": "NotReally",
"AllowInvalid": "true"
}
}
}
}
}
This way, the app can be tested with http directly on the intranet server and with https and cert over the internet.
Handling:
On the servers, I have a root directory for the application.
Directly under the root, I have stored copies of the "per machine" different files (including appsettings.json)
To publish a new version, I publish on my dev machine and then copy the publish directory to the servers (under the root directory) and overwrite the stored files.
To have the correct config, I have created a simple .cmd, that copies the (server specific) config files from the root in the subdirectory publish that I run after a fresh publish...
Notes to https and the certificate:
The certificate has to be stored in the publish folder.
As the (my) public contoso certificate does secure a few domains, https only works properly, if the app is called over the domain (else, the good knowing “not secure” messages are showed).
To be able to test the app with https, I have opened the port 22224 on the windows- and the “real” firewall.
The DNS points to the public IP of our internet server.
For testing, I call the App with https://www.Domain.xx:22224
And... it works...
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
After a lot of try-and-error, I have found the relevant information that works for me.
Note: I work with ASP.net core 2.1.6 now (if you work with an older version, this may not work for you...
You don’t need to do any configuration with netsh, but you have to configure the cert (including password).
You further not need to change the program.cs...
The configurations can be done completely in appsettings.json (included in the project root)
So... in the project (debugging on my machine), I work with the default appsettings.json (with http):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
}
On the intranet server, I use another appsettings.json (still with http):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
,
"Kestrel": {
"EndPoints": {
"Http1": { "Url": "http://localhost:5000" },
"Http2": { "Url": "http://172.16.1.120:22222" }
}
}
}
This way, the app can be tested in the LAN over the IP address of the intranet server and also directly on the intranet server (localhost port 5000).
On the internet server, I use another appsettings.json (for localhost with http, for the server IP with https and certficate):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
,
"Kestrel": {
"EndPoints": {
"Http": {
"Url": "http://localhost:5000"
},
"HttpsInlineCertFile": {
"Url": "https://192.168.3.3:22224",
"Certificate": {
"Path": "./certificate.pfx",
"Password": "NotReally",
"AllowInvalid": "true"
}
}
}
}
}
This way, the app can be tested with http directly on the intranet server and with https and cert over the internet.
Handling:
On the servers, I have a root directory for the application.
Directly under the root, I have stored copies of the "per machine" different files (including appsettings.json)
To publish a new version, I publish on my dev machine and then copy the publish directory to the servers (under the root directory) and overwrite the stored files.
To have the correct config, I have created a simple .cmd, that copies the (server specific) config files from the root in the subdirectory publish that I run after a fresh publish...
Notes to https and the certificate:
The certificate has to be stored in the publish folder.
As the (my) public contoso certificate does secure a few domains, https only works properly, if the app is called over the domain (else, the good knowing “not secure” messages are showed).
To be able to test the app with https, I have opened the port 22224 on the windows- and the “real” firewall.
The DNS points to the public IP of our internet server.
For testing, I call the App with https://www.Domain.xx:22224
And... it works...
After a lot of try-and-error, I have found the relevant information that works for me.
Note: I work with ASP.net core 2.1.6 now (if you work with an older version, this may not work for you...
You don’t need to do any configuration with netsh, but you have to configure the cert (including password).
You further not need to change the program.cs...
The configurations can be done completely in appsettings.json (included in the project root)
So... in the project (debugging on my machine), I work with the default appsettings.json (with http):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
}
On the intranet server, I use another appsettings.json (still with http):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
,
"Kestrel": {
"EndPoints": {
"Http1": { "Url": "http://localhost:5000" },
"Http2": { "Url": "http://172.16.1.120:22222" }
}
}
}
This way, the app can be tested in the LAN over the IP address of the intranet server and also directly on the intranet server (localhost port 5000).
On the internet server, I use another appsettings.json (for localhost with http, for the server IP with https and certficate):
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*"
,
"Kestrel": {
"EndPoints": {
"Http": {
"Url": "http://localhost:5000"
},
"HttpsInlineCertFile": {
"Url": "https://192.168.3.3:22224",
"Certificate": {
"Path": "./certificate.pfx",
"Password": "NotReally",
"AllowInvalid": "true"
}
}
}
}
}
This way, the app can be tested with http directly on the intranet server and with https and cert over the internet.
Handling:
On the servers, I have a root directory for the application.
Directly under the root, I have stored copies of the "per machine" different files (including appsettings.json)
To publish a new version, I publish on my dev machine and then copy the publish directory to the servers (under the root directory) and overwrite the stored files.
To have the correct config, I have created a simple .cmd, that copies the (server specific) config files from the root in the subdirectory publish that I run after a fresh publish...
Notes to https and the certificate:
The certificate has to be stored in the publish folder.
As the (my) public contoso certificate does secure a few domains, https only works properly, if the app is called over the domain (else, the good knowing “not secure” messages are showed).
To be able to test the app with https, I have opened the port 22224 on the windows- and the “real” firewall.
The DNS points to the public IP of our internet server.
For testing, I call the App with https://www.Domain.xx:22224
And... it works...
answered Nov 22 at 16:45
FredyWenger
1,15211624
1,15211624
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53430278%2fproblems-running-configure-self-hosted-console-application-asp-net-core-2-1-ke%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown