Non-Relativistic Limit of Klein-Gordon Probability Density












2














In the lecture notes accompanying an introductory course in relativistic quantum mechanics, the Klein-Gordon probability density and current are defined as:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
P & = & dfrac{ihbar}{2mc^2}left(Phi^*dfrac{partialPhi}{partial t}-Phidfrac{partialPhi^*}{partial t}right) \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Phi^*vec{nabla}Phi-Phivec{nabla}Phi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$
together with the statement that:




One can show that in the non-relativistic limit, the known expressions for the probability density and current are recovered.




The 'known' expressions are:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
rho &=& Psi^*Psi \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$



When taking a 'non-relativistic limit', I am used to taking the limit $c to infty$, which does give the right result for $vec{j}$, but for the density produces $P=0$. How should one then take said limit to recover the non-relativistic equations?






quantum-mechanics wavefunction speed-of-light schroedinger-equation klein-gordon-equation







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
    – Qmechanic♦
    5 hours ago
















2














In the lecture notes accompanying an introductory course in relativistic quantum mechanics, the Klein-Gordon probability density and current are defined as:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
P & = & dfrac{ihbar}{2mc^2}left(Phi^*dfrac{partialPhi}{partial t}-Phidfrac{partialPhi^*}{partial t}right) \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Phi^*vec{nabla}Phi-Phivec{nabla}Phi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$
together with the statement that:




One can show that in the non-relativistic limit, the known expressions for the probability density and current are recovered.




The 'known' expressions are:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
rho &=& Psi^*Psi \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$



When taking a 'non-relativistic limit', I am used to taking the limit $c to infty$, which does give the right result for $vec{j}$, but for the density produces $P=0$. How should one then take said limit to recover the non-relativistic equations?






quantum-mechanics wavefunction speed-of-light schroedinger-equation klein-gordon-equation







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
    – Qmechanic♦
    5 hours ago














2












2








2


1





In the lecture notes accompanying an introductory course in relativistic quantum mechanics, the Klein-Gordon probability density and current are defined as:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
P & = & dfrac{ihbar}{2mc^2}left(Phi^*dfrac{partialPhi}{partial t}-Phidfrac{partialPhi^*}{partial t}right) \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Phi^*vec{nabla}Phi-Phivec{nabla}Phi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$
together with the statement that:




One can show that in the non-relativistic limit, the known expressions for the probability density and current are recovered.




The 'known' expressions are:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
rho &=& Psi^*Psi \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$



When taking a 'non-relativistic limit', I am used to taking the limit $c to infty$, which does give the right result for $vec{j}$, but for the density produces $P=0$. How should one then take said limit to recover the non-relativistic equations?






quantum-mechanics wavefunction speed-of-light schroedinger-equation klein-gordon-equation







share|cite|improve this question















In the lecture notes accompanying an introductory course in relativistic quantum mechanics, the Klein-Gordon probability density and current are defined as:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
P & = & dfrac{ihbar}{2mc^2}left(Phi^*dfrac{partialPhi}{partial t}-Phidfrac{partialPhi^*}{partial t}right) \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Phi^*vec{nabla}Phi-Phivec{nabla}Phi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$
together with the statement that:




One can show that in the non-relativistic limit, the known expressions for the probability density and current are recovered.




The 'known' expressions are:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
rho &=& Psi^*Psi \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$



When taking a 'non-relativistic limit', I am used to taking the limit $c to infty$, which does give the right result for $vec{j}$, but for the density produces $P=0$. How should one then take said limit to recover the non-relativistic equations?






quantum-mechanics wavefunction speed-of-light schroedinger-equation klein-gordon-equation




quantum-mechanics wavefunction speed-of-light schroedinger-equation klein-gordon-equation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Qmechanic♦

101k121821140




101k121821140










asked 5 hours ago









Simon

755313




755313








  • 1




    For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
    – Qmechanic♦
    5 hours ago














  • 1




    For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
    – Qmechanic♦
    5 hours ago








1




1




For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
– Qmechanic♦
5 hours ago




For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
– Qmechanic♦
5 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














You can substitute $Phi = e^{-mc^2t/hbar} Psi$ and then neglect the second order time derivative of $Psi$. Drop the constant $mc^2$ and you will have recovered the Schrödinger equation.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    1














    The trick is to make the approach for the relativistic Klein-Gordon wave function
    $$ Phi(vec{r},t) = Psi(vec{r},t) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} $$
    (The physical reasoning behind this approach is:
    The fast oscillating exponential is the solution for the particle at rest.
    And compared to that, $Psi$ will give only slow variations.)



    From that you find its derivatives
    $$
    begin{eqnarray}
    frac{partialPhi}{partial t} &=& left( frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - frac{imc^2}{hbar}Psi right) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} \
    vec{nabla}Phi &=& vec{nabla}Psi e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}}
    end{eqnarray}
    $$



    Plug these into the definitions of the Klein-Gordon probability density and current ($P$ and $vec{j}$) and you get
    $$
    begin{eqnarray}
    P &=& Psi^* Psi + frac{ihbar}{2mc^2} left( Psi^*frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - Psi frac{partialPsi^*}{partial t} right) \
    vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
    end{eqnarray}
    $$



    Now you can do the limit $c to infty$ and get the 'known' expressions of the non-relativistic Schrödinger probability density and current.






    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "151"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450076%2fnon-relativistic-limit-of-klein-gordon-probability-density%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      You can substitute $Phi = e^{-mc^2t/hbar} Psi$ and then neglect the second order time derivative of $Psi$. Drop the constant $mc^2$ and you will have recovered the Schrödinger equation.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        2














        You can substitute $Phi = e^{-mc^2t/hbar} Psi$ and then neglect the second order time derivative of $Psi$. Drop the constant $mc^2$ and you will have recovered the Schrödinger equation.






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          2












          2








          2






          You can substitute $Phi = e^{-mc^2t/hbar} Psi$ and then neglect the second order time derivative of $Psi$. Drop the constant $mc^2$ and you will have recovered the Schrödinger equation.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          You can substitute $Phi = e^{-mc^2t/hbar} Psi$ and then neglect the second order time derivative of $Psi$. Drop the constant $mc^2$ and you will have recovered the Schrödinger equation.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          my2cts

          4,4482617




          4,4482617























              1














              The trick is to make the approach for the relativistic Klein-Gordon wave function
              $$ Phi(vec{r},t) = Psi(vec{r},t) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} $$
              (The physical reasoning behind this approach is:
              The fast oscillating exponential is the solution for the particle at rest.
              And compared to that, $Psi$ will give only slow variations.)



              From that you find its derivatives
              $$
              begin{eqnarray}
              frac{partialPhi}{partial t} &=& left( frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - frac{imc^2}{hbar}Psi right) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} \
              vec{nabla}Phi &=& vec{nabla}Psi e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}}
              end{eqnarray}
              $$



              Plug these into the definitions of the Klein-Gordon probability density and current ($P$ and $vec{j}$) and you get
              $$
              begin{eqnarray}
              P &=& Psi^* Psi + frac{ihbar}{2mc^2} left( Psi^*frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - Psi frac{partialPsi^*}{partial t} right) \
              vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
              end{eqnarray}
              $$



              Now you can do the limit $c to infty$ and get the 'known' expressions of the non-relativistic Schrödinger probability density and current.






              share|cite|improve this answer




























                1














                The trick is to make the approach for the relativistic Klein-Gordon wave function
                $$ Phi(vec{r},t) = Psi(vec{r},t) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} $$
                (The physical reasoning behind this approach is:
                The fast oscillating exponential is the solution for the particle at rest.
                And compared to that, $Psi$ will give only slow variations.)



                From that you find its derivatives
                $$
                begin{eqnarray}
                frac{partialPhi}{partial t} &=& left( frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - frac{imc^2}{hbar}Psi right) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} \
                vec{nabla}Phi &=& vec{nabla}Psi e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}}
                end{eqnarray}
                $$



                Plug these into the definitions of the Klein-Gordon probability density and current ($P$ and $vec{j}$) and you get
                $$
                begin{eqnarray}
                P &=& Psi^* Psi + frac{ihbar}{2mc^2} left( Psi^*frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - Psi frac{partialPsi^*}{partial t} right) \
                vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
                end{eqnarray}
                $$



                Now you can do the limit $c to infty$ and get the 'known' expressions of the non-relativistic Schrödinger probability density and current.






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1






                  The trick is to make the approach for the relativistic Klein-Gordon wave function
                  $$ Phi(vec{r},t) = Psi(vec{r},t) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} $$
                  (The physical reasoning behind this approach is:
                  The fast oscillating exponential is the solution for the particle at rest.
                  And compared to that, $Psi$ will give only slow variations.)



                  From that you find its derivatives
                  $$
                  begin{eqnarray}
                  frac{partialPhi}{partial t} &=& left( frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - frac{imc^2}{hbar}Psi right) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} \
                  vec{nabla}Phi &=& vec{nabla}Psi e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}}
                  end{eqnarray}
                  $$



                  Plug these into the definitions of the Klein-Gordon probability density and current ($P$ and $vec{j}$) and you get
                  $$
                  begin{eqnarray}
                  P &=& Psi^* Psi + frac{ihbar}{2mc^2} left( Psi^*frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - Psi frac{partialPsi^*}{partial t} right) \
                  vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
                  end{eqnarray}
                  $$



                  Now you can do the limit $c to infty$ and get the 'known' expressions of the non-relativistic Schrödinger probability density and current.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  The trick is to make the approach for the relativistic Klein-Gordon wave function
                  $$ Phi(vec{r},t) = Psi(vec{r},t) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} $$
                  (The physical reasoning behind this approach is:
                  The fast oscillating exponential is the solution for the particle at rest.
                  And compared to that, $Psi$ will give only slow variations.)



                  From that you find its derivatives
                  $$
                  begin{eqnarray}
                  frac{partialPhi}{partial t} &=& left( frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - frac{imc^2}{hbar}Psi right) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} \
                  vec{nabla}Phi &=& vec{nabla}Psi e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}}
                  end{eqnarray}
                  $$



                  Plug these into the definitions of the Klein-Gordon probability density and current ($P$ and $vec{j}$) and you get
                  $$
                  begin{eqnarray}
                  P &=& Psi^* Psi + frac{ihbar}{2mc^2} left( Psi^*frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - Psi frac{partialPsi^*}{partial t} right) \
                  vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
                  end{eqnarray}
                  $$



                  Now you can do the limit $c to infty$ and get the 'known' expressions of the non-relativistic Schrödinger probability density and current.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 36 mins ago

























                  answered 2 hours ago









                  Thomas Fritsch

                  18419




                  18419






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450076%2fnon-relativistic-limit-of-klein-gordon-probability-density%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

                      Image
                      up vote 0 down vote favorite I know this question already asked but not getting solution. From this code I will get all the information from the contact but image not found when open vcf files on mac os, also not getting when share this file. I use this stackoverflow link here but It's not help full. var contacts = [CNContact]() let keys = [CNContactVCardSerialization.descriptorForRequiredKeys() ] as [Any] let request = CNContactFetchRequest(keysToFetch: keys as! [CNKeyDescriptor]) do { try self.contactStore.enumerateContacts(with: request) { (contact, stop) in // Array containing all unified contacts from everywhere contacts.append(contact) } } catch { print("unable to fetch contacts") } do { let data = try
                      Read more

                      count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

                      Image
                      up vote 6 down vote favorite 1 This program is for count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets I am confusing here return k*countP(n-1, k) + countP(n-1, k-1); can some one explain what is happening here? why we are multiplying with k? NOTE->I know this is not the best way to calculate number of partitions that would be DP // A C++ program to count number of partitions // of a set with n elements into k subsets #include<iostream> using namespace std; // Returns count of different partitions of n // elements in k subsets int countP(int n, int k) { // Base cases if (n == 0 || k == 0 || k > n) return 0; if (k == 1 || k == n) return 1; // S(n+1, k) = k*S(n, k) + S(n, k-1) return k*countP(n-1, k) + countP(n-1, k-1); } // Driver program int ma
                      Read more

                      A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

                      Image
                      0 I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{
                      Read more