How to determine which value of a grouping in shown in Reporting Services











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a report, in which the highest level of detail produces 2 rows of the dataset, which I need to show grouped. The grouping works fine, but a few of the columns still contain different values; how do I tell the report which value it should display?



Example:
The user wants each row of the report to be grouped by Brand name. 1 Brand can have multiple agreement that are relevant for the numbers to be shown in the report. The numbers can be aggregated, but there is also data that has changed with the new agreement, so only the most recent version needs to be shown



Agreement 1: item-A, item-B, value-A
Agreement 2: item-B, item-C, value B



Grouping by Brand should show:
Agreement: item-B, item-C, sum(value-A+B). But I do not know how to tell the report which items to show.



SQL for the dataset shouldn't be modified in order to maintain option in report to show both rows separate as well.



Any help would be much appreciated :)



Thank you










share|improve this question






















  • That depends on the format and value of Item-A, Item-B and Value-A (For Stringor Numberyou can choose different aggregate functions, which might help or not). Do you have maybe a minimal example of this data? It would be best if you add a table with the raw data and a table that shows the end result.
    – Strawberryshrub
    Nov 22 at 7:03












  • The aggregation of the Value-A (which are Numbers) is working as expected. Item-A and B though are Strings, for which I want to choose what to show. Example of the data: row 1: cre-h&m-045, 1000 row 2: cre-h&m-37/38, null In this case, the grouped result should show: row1: cre-h&m-045, 1000
    – tkloosterman
    Nov 22 at 8:46

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a report, in which the highest level of detail produces 2 rows of the dataset, which I need to show grouped. The grouping works fine, but a few of the columns still contain different values; how do I tell the report which value it should display?



Example:
The user wants each row of the report to be grouped by Brand name. 1 Brand can have multiple agreement that are relevant for the numbers to be shown in the report. The numbers can be aggregated, but there is also data that has changed with the new agreement, so only the most recent version needs to be shown



Agreement 1: item-A, item-B, value-A
Agreement 2: item-B, item-C, value B



Grouping by Brand should show:
Agreement: item-B, item-C, sum(value-A+B). But I do not know how to tell the report which items to show.



SQL for the dataset shouldn't be modified in order to maintain option in report to show both rows separate as well.



Any help would be much appreciated :)



Thank you










share|improve this question






















  • That depends on the format and value of Item-A, Item-B and Value-A (For Stringor Numberyou can choose different aggregate functions, which might help or not). Do you have maybe a minimal example of this data? It would be best if you add a table with the raw data and a table that shows the end result.
    – Strawberryshrub
    Nov 22 at 7:03












  • The aggregation of the Value-A (which are Numbers) is working as expected. Item-A and B though are Strings, for which I want to choose what to show. Example of the data: row 1: cre-h&m-045, 1000 row 2: cre-h&m-37/38, null In this case, the grouped result should show: row1: cre-h&m-045, 1000
    – tkloosterman
    Nov 22 at 8:46















up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I have a report, in which the highest level of detail produces 2 rows of the dataset, which I need to show grouped. The grouping works fine, but a few of the columns still contain different values; how do I tell the report which value it should display?



Example:
The user wants each row of the report to be grouped by Brand name. 1 Brand can have multiple agreement that are relevant for the numbers to be shown in the report. The numbers can be aggregated, but there is also data that has changed with the new agreement, so only the most recent version needs to be shown



Agreement 1: item-A, item-B, value-A
Agreement 2: item-B, item-C, value B



Grouping by Brand should show:
Agreement: item-B, item-C, sum(value-A+B). But I do not know how to tell the report which items to show.



SQL for the dataset shouldn't be modified in order to maintain option in report to show both rows separate as well.



Any help would be much appreciated :)



Thank you










share|improve this question













I have a report, in which the highest level of detail produces 2 rows of the dataset, which I need to show grouped. The grouping works fine, but a few of the columns still contain different values; how do I tell the report which value it should display?



Example:
The user wants each row of the report to be grouped by Brand name. 1 Brand can have multiple agreement that are relevant for the numbers to be shown in the report. The numbers can be aggregated, but there is also data that has changed with the new agreement, so only the most recent version needs to be shown



Agreement 1: item-A, item-B, value-A
Agreement 2: item-B, item-C, value B



Grouping by Brand should show:
Agreement: item-B, item-C, sum(value-A+B). But I do not know how to tell the report which items to show.



SQL for the dataset shouldn't be modified in order to maintain option in report to show both rows separate as well.



Any help would be much appreciated :)



Thank you







reporting-services visual-studio-2015






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 21 at 18:11









tkloosterman

2028




2028












  • That depends on the format and value of Item-A, Item-B and Value-A (For Stringor Numberyou can choose different aggregate functions, which might help or not). Do you have maybe a minimal example of this data? It would be best if you add a table with the raw data and a table that shows the end result.
    – Strawberryshrub
    Nov 22 at 7:03












  • The aggregation of the Value-A (which are Numbers) is working as expected. Item-A and B though are Strings, for which I want to choose what to show. Example of the data: row 1: cre-h&m-045, 1000 row 2: cre-h&m-37/38, null In this case, the grouped result should show: row1: cre-h&m-045, 1000
    – tkloosterman
    Nov 22 at 8:46




















  • That depends on the format and value of Item-A, Item-B and Value-A (For Stringor Numberyou can choose different aggregate functions, which might help or not). Do you have maybe a minimal example of this data? It would be best if you add a table with the raw data and a table that shows the end result.
    – Strawberryshrub
    Nov 22 at 7:03












  • The aggregation of the Value-A (which are Numbers) is working as expected. Item-A and B though are Strings, for which I want to choose what to show. Example of the data: row 1: cre-h&m-045, 1000 row 2: cre-h&m-37/38, null In this case, the grouped result should show: row1: cre-h&m-045, 1000
    – tkloosterman
    Nov 22 at 8:46


















That depends on the format and value of Item-A, Item-B and Value-A (For Stringor Numberyou can choose different aggregate functions, which might help or not). Do you have maybe a minimal example of this data? It would be best if you add a table with the raw data and a table that shows the end result.
– Strawberryshrub
Nov 22 at 7:03






That depends on the format and value of Item-A, Item-B and Value-A (For Stringor Numberyou can choose different aggregate functions, which might help or not). Do you have maybe a minimal example of this data? It would be best if you add a table with the raw data and a table that shows the end result.
– Strawberryshrub
Nov 22 at 7:03














The aggregation of the Value-A (which are Numbers) is working as expected. Item-A and B though are Strings, for which I want to choose what to show. Example of the data: row 1: cre-h&m-045, 1000 row 2: cre-h&m-37/38, null In this case, the grouped result should show: row1: cre-h&m-045, 1000
– tkloosterman
Nov 22 at 8:46






The aggregation of the Value-A (which are Numbers) is working as expected. Item-A and B though are Strings, for which I want to choose what to show. Example of the data: row 1: cre-h&m-045, 1000 row 2: cre-h&m-37/38, null In this case, the grouped result should show: row1: cre-h&m-045, 1000
– tkloosterman
Nov 22 at 8:46














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













If it is a string you propably can just use the aggregations First() and Last().



But there is a workaround. You have to define a calculated field in your dataset and write your desired expression into it. Think of it like a rating system. The biggest value is the value you will chose in the grouping, because in the grouping you just have to use Max()then.



For example as calculated field (This is a example for strings, you can also convert in double and use > or <, that depens on your variations from the value of ItemA):



'Calculated field name: CustomField
=Switch(Fields!ItemA.Value = Nothing, 1,
Fields!ItemA.Value = "500", 2,
Fields!ItemA.Value = "1000", 3)


Now add your grouping and chose the calculated field in the groupings like this:



Max(Fields!CustomField.Value)


Then hide the Fields!CustomField.Value and show the Fields!ItemA.Value. This way it will display the row value of Fields!ItemA.Value and you custom grouped after Fields!CustomField.Value.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53418201%2fhow-to-determine-which-value-of-a-grouping-in-shown-in-reporting-services%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    If it is a string you propably can just use the aggregations First() and Last().



    But there is a workaround. You have to define a calculated field in your dataset and write your desired expression into it. Think of it like a rating system. The biggest value is the value you will chose in the grouping, because in the grouping you just have to use Max()then.



    For example as calculated field (This is a example for strings, you can also convert in double and use > or <, that depens on your variations from the value of ItemA):



    'Calculated field name: CustomField
    =Switch(Fields!ItemA.Value = Nothing, 1,
    Fields!ItemA.Value = "500", 2,
    Fields!ItemA.Value = "1000", 3)


    Now add your grouping and chose the calculated field in the groupings like this:



    Max(Fields!CustomField.Value)


    Then hide the Fields!CustomField.Value and show the Fields!ItemA.Value. This way it will display the row value of Fields!ItemA.Value and you custom grouped after Fields!CustomField.Value.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      If it is a string you propably can just use the aggregations First() and Last().



      But there is a workaround. You have to define a calculated field in your dataset and write your desired expression into it. Think of it like a rating system. The biggest value is the value you will chose in the grouping, because in the grouping you just have to use Max()then.



      For example as calculated field (This is a example for strings, you can also convert in double and use > or <, that depens on your variations from the value of ItemA):



      'Calculated field name: CustomField
      =Switch(Fields!ItemA.Value = Nothing, 1,
      Fields!ItemA.Value = "500", 2,
      Fields!ItemA.Value = "1000", 3)


      Now add your grouping and chose the calculated field in the groupings like this:



      Max(Fields!CustomField.Value)


      Then hide the Fields!CustomField.Value and show the Fields!ItemA.Value. This way it will display the row value of Fields!ItemA.Value and you custom grouped after Fields!CustomField.Value.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        If it is a string you propably can just use the aggregations First() and Last().



        But there is a workaround. You have to define a calculated field in your dataset and write your desired expression into it. Think of it like a rating system. The biggest value is the value you will chose in the grouping, because in the grouping you just have to use Max()then.



        For example as calculated field (This is a example for strings, you can also convert in double and use > or <, that depens on your variations from the value of ItemA):



        'Calculated field name: CustomField
        =Switch(Fields!ItemA.Value = Nothing, 1,
        Fields!ItemA.Value = "500", 2,
        Fields!ItemA.Value = "1000", 3)


        Now add your grouping and chose the calculated field in the groupings like this:



        Max(Fields!CustomField.Value)


        Then hide the Fields!CustomField.Value and show the Fields!ItemA.Value. This way it will display the row value of Fields!ItemA.Value and you custom grouped after Fields!CustomField.Value.






        share|improve this answer












        If it is a string you propably can just use the aggregations First() and Last().



        But there is a workaround. You have to define a calculated field in your dataset and write your desired expression into it. Think of it like a rating system. The biggest value is the value you will chose in the grouping, because in the grouping you just have to use Max()then.



        For example as calculated field (This is a example for strings, you can also convert in double and use > or <, that depens on your variations from the value of ItemA):



        'Calculated field name: CustomField
        =Switch(Fields!ItemA.Value = Nothing, 1,
        Fields!ItemA.Value = "500", 2,
        Fields!ItemA.Value = "1000", 3)


        Now add your grouping and chose the calculated field in the groupings like this:



        Max(Fields!CustomField.Value)


        Then hide the Fields!CustomField.Value and show the Fields!ItemA.Value. This way it will display the row value of Fields!ItemA.Value and you custom grouped after Fields!CustomField.Value.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 22 at 11:34









        Strawberryshrub

        9311215




        9311215






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53418201%2fhow-to-determine-which-value-of-a-grouping-in-shown-in-reporting-services%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

            Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

            Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)