Create new bounded number data types in Haskell











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I need to create a data type, that represents only the real numbers between 0 and 1. How would i go about that? Expected Behavior:



0 :: DataType        ===> DataType 0
(-1) :: DataType ===> Error









share|improve this question




















  • 6




    You could write an instance Num DataType and define fromInteger so that it errors out on invalid values. I'm not sure if that's a good idea, but it's the only way to achieve your goal.
    – chi
    Nov 22 at 14:38










  • @chi I actually suspect a transcription error there, given that it's ascribing function types to literals. Not impossible, but I suspect that it's actually about creating a function to behave in such a way.
    – Carl
    Nov 22 at 14:50










  • @Carl I'm pretty sure the above -> represents "evaluates to", not function arrow. My comment assumed that interpretation, otherwise the question makes no sense. I'm now replacing them with ==> to avoid confusion.
    – chi
    Nov 22 at 15:12








  • 1




    Beyond instance Num DataType, for real numbers we would also need instance Fractional DataType, and define a partial fromRational to reject invalid numbers.
    – chi
    Nov 22 at 15:16






  • 1




    Have you considered using smart constructors. Might by a good idea here. wiki.haskell.org/Smart_constructors
    – Luis Morillo
    Nov 23 at 8:49

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I need to create a data type, that represents only the real numbers between 0 and 1. How would i go about that? Expected Behavior:



0 :: DataType        ===> DataType 0
(-1) :: DataType ===> Error









share|improve this question




















  • 6




    You could write an instance Num DataType and define fromInteger so that it errors out on invalid values. I'm not sure if that's a good idea, but it's the only way to achieve your goal.
    – chi
    Nov 22 at 14:38










  • @chi I actually suspect a transcription error there, given that it's ascribing function types to literals. Not impossible, but I suspect that it's actually about creating a function to behave in such a way.
    – Carl
    Nov 22 at 14:50










  • @Carl I'm pretty sure the above -> represents "evaluates to", not function arrow. My comment assumed that interpretation, otherwise the question makes no sense. I'm now replacing them with ==> to avoid confusion.
    – chi
    Nov 22 at 15:12








  • 1




    Beyond instance Num DataType, for real numbers we would also need instance Fractional DataType, and define a partial fromRational to reject invalid numbers.
    – chi
    Nov 22 at 15:16






  • 1




    Have you considered using smart constructors. Might by a good idea here. wiki.haskell.org/Smart_constructors
    – Luis Morillo
    Nov 23 at 8:49















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I need to create a data type, that represents only the real numbers between 0 and 1. How would i go about that? Expected Behavior:



0 :: DataType        ===> DataType 0
(-1) :: DataType ===> Error









share|improve this question















I need to create a data type, that represents only the real numbers between 0 and 1. How would i go about that? Expected Behavior:



0 :: DataType        ===> DataType 0
(-1) :: DataType ===> Error






haskell types numbers






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 15:13









chi

72.6k280135




72.6k280135










asked Nov 22 at 14:27









Agilix

10111




10111








  • 6




    You could write an instance Num DataType and define fromInteger so that it errors out on invalid values. I'm not sure if that's a good idea, but it's the only way to achieve your goal.
    – chi
    Nov 22 at 14:38










  • @chi I actually suspect a transcription error there, given that it's ascribing function types to literals. Not impossible, but I suspect that it's actually about creating a function to behave in such a way.
    – Carl
    Nov 22 at 14:50










  • @Carl I'm pretty sure the above -> represents "evaluates to", not function arrow. My comment assumed that interpretation, otherwise the question makes no sense. I'm now replacing them with ==> to avoid confusion.
    – chi
    Nov 22 at 15:12








  • 1




    Beyond instance Num DataType, for real numbers we would also need instance Fractional DataType, and define a partial fromRational to reject invalid numbers.
    – chi
    Nov 22 at 15:16






  • 1




    Have you considered using smart constructors. Might by a good idea here. wiki.haskell.org/Smart_constructors
    – Luis Morillo
    Nov 23 at 8:49
















  • 6




    You could write an instance Num DataType and define fromInteger so that it errors out on invalid values. I'm not sure if that's a good idea, but it's the only way to achieve your goal.
    – chi
    Nov 22 at 14:38










  • @chi I actually suspect a transcription error there, given that it's ascribing function types to literals. Not impossible, but I suspect that it's actually about creating a function to behave in such a way.
    – Carl
    Nov 22 at 14:50










  • @Carl I'm pretty sure the above -> represents "evaluates to", not function arrow. My comment assumed that interpretation, otherwise the question makes no sense. I'm now replacing them with ==> to avoid confusion.
    – chi
    Nov 22 at 15:12








  • 1




    Beyond instance Num DataType, for real numbers we would also need instance Fractional DataType, and define a partial fromRational to reject invalid numbers.
    – chi
    Nov 22 at 15:16






  • 1




    Have you considered using smart constructors. Might by a good idea here. wiki.haskell.org/Smart_constructors
    – Luis Morillo
    Nov 23 at 8:49










6




6




You could write an instance Num DataType and define fromInteger so that it errors out on invalid values. I'm not sure if that's a good idea, but it's the only way to achieve your goal.
– chi
Nov 22 at 14:38




You could write an instance Num DataType and define fromInteger so that it errors out on invalid values. I'm not sure if that's a good idea, but it's the only way to achieve your goal.
– chi
Nov 22 at 14:38












@chi I actually suspect a transcription error there, given that it's ascribing function types to literals. Not impossible, but I suspect that it's actually about creating a function to behave in such a way.
– Carl
Nov 22 at 14:50




@chi I actually suspect a transcription error there, given that it's ascribing function types to literals. Not impossible, but I suspect that it's actually about creating a function to behave in such a way.
– Carl
Nov 22 at 14:50












@Carl I'm pretty sure the above -> represents "evaluates to", not function arrow. My comment assumed that interpretation, otherwise the question makes no sense. I'm now replacing them with ==> to avoid confusion.
– chi
Nov 22 at 15:12






@Carl I'm pretty sure the above -> represents "evaluates to", not function arrow. My comment assumed that interpretation, otherwise the question makes no sense. I'm now replacing them with ==> to avoid confusion.
– chi
Nov 22 at 15:12






1




1




Beyond instance Num DataType, for real numbers we would also need instance Fractional DataType, and define a partial fromRational to reject invalid numbers.
– chi
Nov 22 at 15:16




Beyond instance Num DataType, for real numbers we would also need instance Fractional DataType, and define a partial fromRational to reject invalid numbers.
– chi
Nov 22 at 15:16




1




1




Have you considered using smart constructors. Might by a good idea here. wiki.haskell.org/Smart_constructors
– Luis Morillo
Nov 23 at 8:49






Have you considered using smart constructors. Might by a good idea here. wiki.haskell.org/Smart_constructors
– Luis Morillo
Nov 23 at 8:49



















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53433088%2fcreate-new-bounded-number-data-types-in-haskell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53433088%2fcreate-new-bounded-number-data-types-in-haskell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks