Is Quantum Entanglement technology possible for interplanetary communication in future to achieve low...











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












There is a small debate over the comment session in NASA Lands InSight on Mars video uploaded by JPL. The 1 minute and a half video is about the essential part of InSight's EDL event cropped out from the full live broadcast back on Nov 26.





The commenter posted a comment: "The actual celebration is 7 Minutes in delay." Under the reply session, a Indian user named SCIENCE SIDE claims that he's currently studying PhD in Theoretical Physics, IISc Bangalore. He replied that we actually received the signals in just 1-2 seconds with the help of MarCO CubeSats. Later on followed up with confusion from other users with his statement and asked for clarification, he then mentioned that it is relating to quantum entanglement for communications.



Whether or not that is accurate, I'd still like to ask the following: Could using entangled photons be used instead for interplanetary communications (between Earth & Mars) to shorten the real-time latency as much as possible in future?




A statement about Quantum Entanglement from Wikipedia :-



Entanglement is considered fundamental to quantum mechanics, even though it wasn't recognized in the beginning. Quantum entanglement has been demonstrated experimentally with photons, neutrinos, electrons, molecules as large as buckyballs, and even small diamonds. The utilization of entanglement in communication and computation is a very active area of research.




**Do note me if this is considered as cross-site question with any other SE site. Enclose a relatable useful reference regarding to communication in space.










share|improve this question









New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    I made small edits for two reasons 1) entangled photons work in principle for radio or light or any other wavelength, 2) the comments may not be true, but you don't want that to invalidate your question, which is a good one!
    – uhoh
    3 hours ago















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












There is a small debate over the comment session in NASA Lands InSight on Mars video uploaded by JPL. The 1 minute and a half video is about the essential part of InSight's EDL event cropped out from the full live broadcast back on Nov 26.





The commenter posted a comment: "The actual celebration is 7 Minutes in delay." Under the reply session, a Indian user named SCIENCE SIDE claims that he's currently studying PhD in Theoretical Physics, IISc Bangalore. He replied that we actually received the signals in just 1-2 seconds with the help of MarCO CubeSats. Later on followed up with confusion from other users with his statement and asked for clarification, he then mentioned that it is relating to quantum entanglement for communications.



Whether or not that is accurate, I'd still like to ask the following: Could using entangled photons be used instead for interplanetary communications (between Earth & Mars) to shorten the real-time latency as much as possible in future?




A statement about Quantum Entanglement from Wikipedia :-



Entanglement is considered fundamental to quantum mechanics, even though it wasn't recognized in the beginning. Quantum entanglement has been demonstrated experimentally with photons, neutrinos, electrons, molecules as large as buckyballs, and even small diamonds. The utilization of entanglement in communication and computation is a very active area of research.




**Do note me if this is considered as cross-site question with any other SE site. Enclose a relatable useful reference regarding to communication in space.










share|improve this question









New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    I made small edits for two reasons 1) entangled photons work in principle for radio or light or any other wavelength, 2) the comments may not be true, but you don't want that to invalidate your question, which is a good one!
    – uhoh
    3 hours ago













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











There is a small debate over the comment session in NASA Lands InSight on Mars video uploaded by JPL. The 1 minute and a half video is about the essential part of InSight's EDL event cropped out from the full live broadcast back on Nov 26.





The commenter posted a comment: "The actual celebration is 7 Minutes in delay." Under the reply session, a Indian user named SCIENCE SIDE claims that he's currently studying PhD in Theoretical Physics, IISc Bangalore. He replied that we actually received the signals in just 1-2 seconds with the help of MarCO CubeSats. Later on followed up with confusion from other users with his statement and asked for clarification, he then mentioned that it is relating to quantum entanglement for communications.



Whether or not that is accurate, I'd still like to ask the following: Could using entangled photons be used instead for interplanetary communications (between Earth & Mars) to shorten the real-time latency as much as possible in future?




A statement about Quantum Entanglement from Wikipedia :-



Entanglement is considered fundamental to quantum mechanics, even though it wasn't recognized in the beginning. Quantum entanglement has been demonstrated experimentally with photons, neutrinos, electrons, molecules as large as buckyballs, and even small diamonds. The utilization of entanglement in communication and computation is a very active area of research.




**Do note me if this is considered as cross-site question with any other SE site. Enclose a relatable useful reference regarding to communication in space.










share|improve this question









New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











There is a small debate over the comment session in NASA Lands InSight on Mars video uploaded by JPL. The 1 minute and a half video is about the essential part of InSight's EDL event cropped out from the full live broadcast back on Nov 26.





The commenter posted a comment: "The actual celebration is 7 Minutes in delay." Under the reply session, a Indian user named SCIENCE SIDE claims that he's currently studying PhD in Theoretical Physics, IISc Bangalore. He replied that we actually received the signals in just 1-2 seconds with the help of MarCO CubeSats. Later on followed up with confusion from other users with his statement and asked for clarification, he then mentioned that it is relating to quantum entanglement for communications.



Whether or not that is accurate, I'd still like to ask the following: Could using entangled photons be used instead for interplanetary communications (between Earth & Mars) to shorten the real-time latency as much as possible in future?




A statement about Quantum Entanglement from Wikipedia :-



Entanglement is considered fundamental to quantum mechanics, even though it wasn't recognized in the beginning. Quantum entanglement has been demonstrated experimentally with photons, neutrinos, electrons, molecules as large as buckyballs, and even small diamonds. The utilization of entanglement in communication and computation is a very active area of research.




**Do note me if this is considered as cross-site question with any other SE site. Enclose a relatable useful reference regarding to communication in space.







mars communication radio-communication






share|improve this question









New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









uhoh

32.9k16112403




32.9k16112403






New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









si_the_nibba

1079




1079




New contributor




si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






si_the_nibba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    I made small edits for two reasons 1) entangled photons work in principle for radio or light or any other wavelength, 2) the comments may not be true, but you don't want that to invalidate your question, which is a good one!
    – uhoh
    3 hours ago














  • 1




    I made small edits for two reasons 1) entangled photons work in principle for radio or light or any other wavelength, 2) the comments may not be true, but you don't want that to invalidate your question, which is a good one!
    – uhoh
    3 hours ago








1




1




I made small edits for two reasons 1) entangled photons work in principle for radio or light or any other wavelength, 2) the comments may not be true, but you don't want that to invalidate your question, which is a good one!
– uhoh
3 hours ago




I made small edits for two reasons 1) entangled photons work in principle for radio or light or any other wavelength, 2) the comments may not be true, but you don't want that to invalidate your question, which is a good one!
– uhoh
3 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote














He replied that we actually received the signals in just 1-2 seconds with the help of MarCO CubeSats. Later on followed up with confusion from other users with his statement and asked for clarification, he then mentioned that it is relating to quantum entanglement for communications.




This is nonsense; the MarCOs received the signals in 1-2 seconds, but relaying the signals to Earth took the usual several-minute speed-of-light delay.



Quantum entanglement doesn't presently offer any practical way of achieving faster-than-light communication. The reasons are complex, but you can read an overview here. MarCO were not equipped with any quantum-entanglement communication devices.






share|improve this answer





















  • I edited the question at the same time you posted but I don't think it changes the suitability of your answer.
    – uhoh
    3 hours ago










  • In fact I didn't believe his statement in the first place as well; in which that doesn't make any sense at all. That is why I tried to focus my question on Quantum Entanglement in interplanetary communications rather than debates over his statement that would twists my question and its meaning :)
    – si_the_nibba
    3 hours ago












  • Commentary on that link, not that it makes it easer to understand... forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/…
    – uhoh
    30 mins ago


















up vote
1
down vote













I like this Quora answer. Here's part of it, the rest is worth reading as well:




No experiment conducted using entangled photons has ever demonstrated faster than light communication!



There have been many such experiments. They were not looking for faster than light communication. They were testing quantum mechanics against Einstein's local hidden variable hypothesis. They essentially have shown that quantum mechanics works as advertised.



Furthermore, there are no proposals for faster than light communication using entangled particles!



If ever there was the slightest hint that FTL communication were possible, expect a media explosion… The world would definitely notice and there would be no need to ask such questions on Quora.



As it stands, quantum mechanics is still consistent with causality and is compatible with special relativity. That means no information transfer faster than the speed of light.







share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "508"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    si_the_nibba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32371%2fis-quantum-entanglement-technology-possible-for-interplanetary-communication-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote














    He replied that we actually received the signals in just 1-2 seconds with the help of MarCO CubeSats. Later on followed up with confusion from other users with his statement and asked for clarification, he then mentioned that it is relating to quantum entanglement for communications.




    This is nonsense; the MarCOs received the signals in 1-2 seconds, but relaying the signals to Earth took the usual several-minute speed-of-light delay.



    Quantum entanglement doesn't presently offer any practical way of achieving faster-than-light communication. The reasons are complex, but you can read an overview here. MarCO were not equipped with any quantum-entanglement communication devices.






    share|improve this answer





















    • I edited the question at the same time you posted but I don't think it changes the suitability of your answer.
      – uhoh
      3 hours ago










    • In fact I didn't believe his statement in the first place as well; in which that doesn't make any sense at all. That is why I tried to focus my question on Quantum Entanglement in interplanetary communications rather than debates over his statement that would twists my question and its meaning :)
      – si_the_nibba
      3 hours ago












    • Commentary on that link, not that it makes it easer to understand... forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/…
      – uhoh
      30 mins ago















    up vote
    3
    down vote














    He replied that we actually received the signals in just 1-2 seconds with the help of MarCO CubeSats. Later on followed up with confusion from other users with his statement and asked for clarification, he then mentioned that it is relating to quantum entanglement for communications.




    This is nonsense; the MarCOs received the signals in 1-2 seconds, but relaying the signals to Earth took the usual several-minute speed-of-light delay.



    Quantum entanglement doesn't presently offer any practical way of achieving faster-than-light communication. The reasons are complex, but you can read an overview here. MarCO were not equipped with any quantum-entanglement communication devices.






    share|improve this answer





















    • I edited the question at the same time you posted but I don't think it changes the suitability of your answer.
      – uhoh
      3 hours ago










    • In fact I didn't believe his statement in the first place as well; in which that doesn't make any sense at all. That is why I tried to focus my question on Quantum Entanglement in interplanetary communications rather than debates over his statement that would twists my question and its meaning :)
      – si_the_nibba
      3 hours ago












    • Commentary on that link, not that it makes it easer to understand... forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/…
      – uhoh
      30 mins ago













    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote










    He replied that we actually received the signals in just 1-2 seconds with the help of MarCO CubeSats. Later on followed up with confusion from other users with his statement and asked for clarification, he then mentioned that it is relating to quantum entanglement for communications.




    This is nonsense; the MarCOs received the signals in 1-2 seconds, but relaying the signals to Earth took the usual several-minute speed-of-light delay.



    Quantum entanglement doesn't presently offer any practical way of achieving faster-than-light communication. The reasons are complex, but you can read an overview here. MarCO were not equipped with any quantum-entanglement communication devices.






    share|improve this answer













    He replied that we actually received the signals in just 1-2 seconds with the help of MarCO CubeSats. Later on followed up with confusion from other users with his statement and asked for clarification, he then mentioned that it is relating to quantum entanglement for communications.




    This is nonsense; the MarCOs received the signals in 1-2 seconds, but relaying the signals to Earth took the usual several-minute speed-of-light delay.



    Quantum entanglement doesn't presently offer any practical way of achieving faster-than-light communication. The reasons are complex, but you can read an overview here. MarCO were not equipped with any quantum-entanglement communication devices.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 3 hours ago









    Russell Borogove

    77.7k2250338




    77.7k2250338












    • I edited the question at the same time you posted but I don't think it changes the suitability of your answer.
      – uhoh
      3 hours ago










    • In fact I didn't believe his statement in the first place as well; in which that doesn't make any sense at all. That is why I tried to focus my question on Quantum Entanglement in interplanetary communications rather than debates over his statement that would twists my question and its meaning :)
      – si_the_nibba
      3 hours ago












    • Commentary on that link, not that it makes it easer to understand... forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/…
      – uhoh
      30 mins ago


















    • I edited the question at the same time you posted but I don't think it changes the suitability of your answer.
      – uhoh
      3 hours ago










    • In fact I didn't believe his statement in the first place as well; in which that doesn't make any sense at all. That is why I tried to focus my question on Quantum Entanglement in interplanetary communications rather than debates over his statement that would twists my question and its meaning :)
      – si_the_nibba
      3 hours ago












    • Commentary on that link, not that it makes it easer to understand... forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/…
      – uhoh
      30 mins ago
















    I edited the question at the same time you posted but I don't think it changes the suitability of your answer.
    – uhoh
    3 hours ago




    I edited the question at the same time you posted but I don't think it changes the suitability of your answer.
    – uhoh
    3 hours ago












    In fact I didn't believe his statement in the first place as well; in which that doesn't make any sense at all. That is why I tried to focus my question on Quantum Entanglement in interplanetary communications rather than debates over his statement that would twists my question and its meaning :)
    – si_the_nibba
    3 hours ago






    In fact I didn't believe his statement in the first place as well; in which that doesn't make any sense at all. That is why I tried to focus my question on Quantum Entanglement in interplanetary communications rather than debates over his statement that would twists my question and its meaning :)
    – si_the_nibba
    3 hours ago














    Commentary on that link, not that it makes it easer to understand... forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/…
    – uhoh
    30 mins ago




    Commentary on that link, not that it makes it easer to understand... forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/…
    – uhoh
    30 mins ago










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    I like this Quora answer. Here's part of it, the rest is worth reading as well:




    No experiment conducted using entangled photons has ever demonstrated faster than light communication!



    There have been many such experiments. They were not looking for faster than light communication. They were testing quantum mechanics against Einstein's local hidden variable hypothesis. They essentially have shown that quantum mechanics works as advertised.



    Furthermore, there are no proposals for faster than light communication using entangled particles!



    If ever there was the slightest hint that FTL communication were possible, expect a media explosion… The world would definitely notice and there would be no need to ask such questions on Quora.



    As it stands, quantum mechanics is still consistent with causality and is compatible with special relativity. That means no information transfer faster than the speed of light.







    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      I like this Quora answer. Here's part of it, the rest is worth reading as well:




      No experiment conducted using entangled photons has ever demonstrated faster than light communication!



      There have been many such experiments. They were not looking for faster than light communication. They were testing quantum mechanics against Einstein's local hidden variable hypothesis. They essentially have shown that quantum mechanics works as advertised.



      Furthermore, there are no proposals for faster than light communication using entangled particles!



      If ever there was the slightest hint that FTL communication were possible, expect a media explosion… The world would definitely notice and there would be no need to ask such questions on Quora.



      As it stands, quantum mechanics is still consistent with causality and is compatible with special relativity. That means no information transfer faster than the speed of light.







      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        I like this Quora answer. Here's part of it, the rest is worth reading as well:




        No experiment conducted using entangled photons has ever demonstrated faster than light communication!



        There have been many such experiments. They were not looking for faster than light communication. They were testing quantum mechanics against Einstein's local hidden variable hypothesis. They essentially have shown that quantum mechanics works as advertised.



        Furthermore, there are no proposals for faster than light communication using entangled particles!



        If ever there was the slightest hint that FTL communication were possible, expect a media explosion… The world would definitely notice and there would be no need to ask such questions on Quora.



        As it stands, quantum mechanics is still consistent with causality and is compatible with special relativity. That means no information transfer faster than the speed of light.







        share|improve this answer












        I like this Quora answer. Here's part of it, the rest is worth reading as well:




        No experiment conducted using entangled photons has ever demonstrated faster than light communication!



        There have been many such experiments. They were not looking for faster than light communication. They were testing quantum mechanics against Einstein's local hidden variable hypothesis. They essentially have shown that quantum mechanics works as advertised.



        Furthermore, there are no proposals for faster than light communication using entangled particles!



        If ever there was the slightest hint that FTL communication were possible, expect a media explosion… The world would definitely notice and there would be no need to ask such questions on Quora.



        As it stands, quantum mechanics is still consistent with causality and is compatible with special relativity. That means no information transfer faster than the speed of light.








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 23 mins ago









        uhoh

        32.9k16112403




        32.9k16112403






















            si_the_nibba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            si_the_nibba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            si_the_nibba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            si_the_nibba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32371%2fis-quantum-entanglement-technology-possible-for-interplanetary-communication-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

            Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

            Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)