How use subquery in `in`?












0















I try create query with in (subquery)



sub = from(
d in Deffered,
select: d."ИД Категории",
distinct: true,
where:
d.date_change >= ^date and d.deleted != true
and fragment("md5(Исполнитель) = ?", ^hash)
)
from(
a in Answered,
select: {count(a."Номер")},
where: a.answer_date >= ^date
and a.deleted != true
and fragment("md5(Исполнитель) = ?", ^hash)
and a."ИД Категории" not in ^sub
)|>Repo.all()


throw error:




value #Ecto.Query<from d in Dobrobot.Deffered, where: d.date_change
= ^"2018-11-19 00:00:00" and d.deleted != true and fragment("md5(Исполнитель) = ?", ^"6634F0A9A3C5EB7D97FBA08C1F08A45D"),
distinct: true, select: d."ИД Категории">
in where cannot be cast
to type {:in, :integer}




I can not find answer how use not in with subquery in google or chats










share|improve this question



























    0















    I try create query with in (subquery)



    sub = from(
    d in Deffered,
    select: d."ИД Категории",
    distinct: true,
    where:
    d.date_change >= ^date and d.deleted != true
    and fragment("md5(Исполнитель) = ?", ^hash)
    )
    from(
    a in Answered,
    select: {count(a."Номер")},
    where: a.answer_date >= ^date
    and a.deleted != true
    and fragment("md5(Исполнитель) = ?", ^hash)
    and a."ИД Категории" not in ^sub
    )|>Repo.all()


    throw error:




    value #Ecto.Query<from d in Dobrobot.Deffered, where: d.date_change
    = ^"2018-11-19 00:00:00" and d.deleted != true and fragment("md5(Исполнитель) = ?", ^"6634F0A9A3C5EB7D97FBA08C1F08A45D"),
    distinct: true, select: d."ИД Категории">
    in where cannot be cast
    to type {:in, :integer}




    I can not find answer how use not in with subquery in google or chats










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I try create query with in (subquery)



      sub = from(
      d in Deffered,
      select: d."ИД Категории",
      distinct: true,
      where:
      d.date_change >= ^date and d.deleted != true
      and fragment("md5(Исполнитель) = ?", ^hash)
      )
      from(
      a in Answered,
      select: {count(a."Номер")},
      where: a.answer_date >= ^date
      and a.deleted != true
      and fragment("md5(Исполнитель) = ?", ^hash)
      and a."ИД Категории" not in ^sub
      )|>Repo.all()


      throw error:




      value #Ecto.Query<from d in Dobrobot.Deffered, where: d.date_change
      = ^"2018-11-19 00:00:00" and d.deleted != true and fragment("md5(Исполнитель) = ?", ^"6634F0A9A3C5EB7D97FBA08C1F08A45D"),
      distinct: true, select: d."ИД Категории">
      in where cannot be cast
      to type {:in, :integer}




      I can not find answer how use not in with subquery in google or chats










      share|improve this question














      I try create query with in (subquery)



      sub = from(
      d in Deffered,
      select: d."ИД Категории",
      distinct: true,
      where:
      d.date_change >= ^date and d.deleted != true
      and fragment("md5(Исполнитель) = ?", ^hash)
      )
      from(
      a in Answered,
      select: {count(a."Номер")},
      where: a.answer_date >= ^date
      and a.deleted != true
      and fragment("md5(Исполнитель) = ?", ^hash)
      and a."ИД Категории" not in ^sub
      )|>Repo.all()


      throw error:




      value #Ecto.Query<from d in Dobrobot.Deffered, where: d.date_change
      = ^"2018-11-19 00:00:00" and d.deleted != true and fragment("md5(Исполнитель) = ?", ^"6634F0A9A3C5EB7D97FBA08C1F08A45D"),
      distinct: true, select: d."ИД Категории">
      in where cannot be cast
      to type {:in, :integer}




      I can not find answer how use not in with subquery in google or chats







      elixir ecto






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 26 '18 at 8:17









      Максим БарулинМаксим Барулин

      87113




      87113
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          As stated in Ecto.Query.API.in/2 documentation:




          The right side may either be a list, a literal list or even a column in the database with array type.




          That said, the right side of in clause cannot be a query. The easiest solution would be to first get the actual list from sub with Repo.all(sub) and use this list. This leads to 1 extra query and IMHO is fairly acceptable.



          Another solution would be to use fragment if the DB behind allows in with a SELECT statement.





          This reference might also shed a light.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Yes, now i do with extra query. But i can not understand why standard construction like not in (subquery) not added to ecto

            – Максим Барулин
            Nov 26 '18 at 9:27






          • 1





            Ecto is open source, if you need a feature ecto apparently lacks, feel free to submit a PR.

            – Aleksei Matiushkin
            Nov 26 '18 at 9:44













          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53477031%2fhow-use-subquery-in-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          As stated in Ecto.Query.API.in/2 documentation:




          The right side may either be a list, a literal list or even a column in the database with array type.




          That said, the right side of in clause cannot be a query. The easiest solution would be to first get the actual list from sub with Repo.all(sub) and use this list. This leads to 1 extra query and IMHO is fairly acceptable.



          Another solution would be to use fragment if the DB behind allows in with a SELECT statement.





          This reference might also shed a light.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Yes, now i do with extra query. But i can not understand why standard construction like not in (subquery) not added to ecto

            – Максим Барулин
            Nov 26 '18 at 9:27






          • 1





            Ecto is open source, if you need a feature ecto apparently lacks, feel free to submit a PR.

            – Aleksei Matiushkin
            Nov 26 '18 at 9:44


















          2














          As stated in Ecto.Query.API.in/2 documentation:




          The right side may either be a list, a literal list or even a column in the database with array type.




          That said, the right side of in clause cannot be a query. The easiest solution would be to first get the actual list from sub with Repo.all(sub) and use this list. This leads to 1 extra query and IMHO is fairly acceptable.



          Another solution would be to use fragment if the DB behind allows in with a SELECT statement.





          This reference might also shed a light.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Yes, now i do with extra query. But i can not understand why standard construction like not in (subquery) not added to ecto

            – Максим Барулин
            Nov 26 '18 at 9:27






          • 1





            Ecto is open source, if you need a feature ecto apparently lacks, feel free to submit a PR.

            – Aleksei Matiushkin
            Nov 26 '18 at 9:44
















          2












          2








          2







          As stated in Ecto.Query.API.in/2 documentation:




          The right side may either be a list, a literal list or even a column in the database with array type.




          That said, the right side of in clause cannot be a query. The easiest solution would be to first get the actual list from sub with Repo.all(sub) and use this list. This leads to 1 extra query and IMHO is fairly acceptable.



          Another solution would be to use fragment if the DB behind allows in with a SELECT statement.





          This reference might also shed a light.






          share|improve this answer















          As stated in Ecto.Query.API.in/2 documentation:




          The right side may either be a list, a literal list or even a column in the database with array type.




          That said, the right side of in clause cannot be a query. The easiest solution would be to first get the actual list from sub with Repo.all(sub) and use this list. This leads to 1 extra query and IMHO is fairly acceptable.



          Another solution would be to use fragment if the DB behind allows in with a SELECT statement.





          This reference might also shed a light.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 26 '18 at 9:49

























          answered Nov 26 '18 at 8:57









          Aleksei MatiushkinAleksei Matiushkin

          81.5k95591




          81.5k95591













          • Yes, now i do with extra query. But i can not understand why standard construction like not in (subquery) not added to ecto

            – Максим Барулин
            Nov 26 '18 at 9:27






          • 1





            Ecto is open source, if you need a feature ecto apparently lacks, feel free to submit a PR.

            – Aleksei Matiushkin
            Nov 26 '18 at 9:44





















          • Yes, now i do with extra query. But i can not understand why standard construction like not in (subquery) not added to ecto

            – Максим Барулин
            Nov 26 '18 at 9:27






          • 1





            Ecto is open source, if you need a feature ecto apparently lacks, feel free to submit a PR.

            – Aleksei Matiushkin
            Nov 26 '18 at 9:44



















          Yes, now i do with extra query. But i can not understand why standard construction like not in (subquery) not added to ecto

          – Максим Барулин
          Nov 26 '18 at 9:27





          Yes, now i do with extra query. But i can not understand why standard construction like not in (subquery) not added to ecto

          – Максим Барулин
          Nov 26 '18 at 9:27




          1




          1





          Ecto is open source, if you need a feature ecto apparently lacks, feel free to submit a PR.

          – Aleksei Matiushkin
          Nov 26 '18 at 9:44







          Ecto is open source, if you need a feature ecto apparently lacks, feel free to submit a PR.

          – Aleksei Matiushkin
          Nov 26 '18 at 9:44






















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53477031%2fhow-use-subquery-in-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

          Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

          Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)