Is this symbol another version of a ferrite bead symbol?












2












$begingroup$


I saw this symbol in the schematic of the ADPD2140z eval board. From what Ive seen online, ferrite bead symbols are usually slanted rectangles with right angled corners. This is slightly different, but is this also a symbol for a ferrite bead?



From ADPD2140z Eval-Board Schematic



Here is an image of the component E1 in question:
Eval board






schematics symbol ferrite







share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @jsotola Yea as I mentioned in the description Ive already done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Tapatio Sombrero
    4 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$


I saw this symbol in the schematic of the ADPD2140z eval board. From what Ive seen online, ferrite bead symbols are usually slanted rectangles with right angled corners. This is slightly different, but is this also a symbol for a ferrite bead?



From ADPD2140z Eval-Board Schematic



Here is an image of the component E1 in question:
Eval board






schematics symbol ferrite







share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @jsotola Yea as I mentioned in the description Ive already done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Tapatio Sombrero
    4 hours ago
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


I saw this symbol in the schematic of the ADPD2140z eval board. From what Ive seen online, ferrite bead symbols are usually slanted rectangles with right angled corners. This is slightly different, but is this also a symbol for a ferrite bead?



From ADPD2140z Eval-Board Schematic



Here is an image of the component E1 in question:
Eval board






schematics symbol ferrite







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I saw this symbol in the schematic of the ADPD2140z eval board. From what Ive seen online, ferrite bead symbols are usually slanted rectangles with right angled corners. This is slightly different, but is this also a symbol for a ferrite bead?



From ADPD2140z Eval-Board Schematic



Here is an image of the component E1 in question:
Eval board






schematics symbol ferrite




schematics symbol ferrite






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









rdtsc

4,99531239




4,99531239










asked 4 hours ago









Tapatio SombreroTapatio Sombrero

14717




14717












  • $begingroup$
    @jsotola Yea as I mentioned in the description Ive already done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Tapatio Sombrero
    4 hours ago




















  • $begingroup$
    @jsotola Yea as I mentioned in the description Ive already done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Tapatio Sombrero
    4 hours ago


















$begingroup$
@jsotola Yea as I mentioned in the description Ive already done that.
$endgroup$
– Tapatio Sombrero
4 hours ago






$begingroup$
@jsotola Yea as I mentioned in the description Ive already done that.
$endgroup$
– Tapatio Sombrero
4 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Yes, it is indeed a ferrite bead symbol.




There are standards for component symbols, however as with all standards, people choose not to follow them, and instead make up their own variants (obligatory XKCD Comic).






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom Carpenter
    3 hours ago



















1












$begingroup$

Yes, its a 50Ohm ferrite. Usually manufacturers post BOM's with their eval boards but with analog deveices it's hit or miss. So its hard to say what the part number is but I'll bet its an 0805 or 1206 (or metric equivalent) size.



Analog really likes to separate out ground planes which is interesting but not necessary to control noise (you can do this with proper layout to control return currents). So I would think this not necessary but it depends on the board layout.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    });
    }, "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f417732%2fis-this-symbol-another-version-of-a-ferrite-bead-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Yes, it is indeed a ferrite bead symbol.




    There are standards for component symbols, however as with all standards, people choose not to follow them, and instead make up their own variants (obligatory XKCD Comic).






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
      $endgroup$
      – Tom Carpenter
      3 hours ago
















    3












    $begingroup$

    Yes, it is indeed a ferrite bead symbol.




    There are standards for component symbols, however as with all standards, people choose not to follow them, and instead make up their own variants (obligatory XKCD Comic).






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
      $endgroup$
      – Tom Carpenter
      3 hours ago














    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Yes, it is indeed a ferrite bead symbol.




    There are standards for component symbols, however as with all standards, people choose not to follow them, and instead make up their own variants (obligatory XKCD Comic).






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Yes, it is indeed a ferrite bead symbol.




    There are standards for component symbols, however as with all standards, people choose not to follow them, and instead make up their own variants (obligatory XKCD Comic).







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 3 hours ago









    Tom CarpenterTom Carpenter

    38.4k271118




    38.4k271118












    • $begingroup$
      Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
      $endgroup$
      – Tom Carpenter
      3 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
      $endgroup$
      – Tom Carpenter
      3 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom Carpenter
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom Carpenter
    3 hours ago













    1












    $begingroup$

    Yes, its a 50Ohm ferrite. Usually manufacturers post BOM's with their eval boards but with analog deveices it's hit or miss. So its hard to say what the part number is but I'll bet its an 0805 or 1206 (or metric equivalent) size.



    Analog really likes to separate out ground planes which is interesting but not necessary to control noise (you can do this with proper layout to control return currents). So I would think this not necessary but it depends on the board layout.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Yes, its a 50Ohm ferrite. Usually manufacturers post BOM's with their eval boards but with analog deveices it's hit or miss. So its hard to say what the part number is but I'll bet its an 0805 or 1206 (or metric equivalent) size.



      Analog really likes to separate out ground planes which is interesting but not necessary to control noise (you can do this with proper layout to control return currents). So I would think this not necessary but it depends on the board layout.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Yes, its a 50Ohm ferrite. Usually manufacturers post BOM's with their eval boards but with analog deveices it's hit or miss. So its hard to say what the part number is but I'll bet its an 0805 or 1206 (or metric equivalent) size.



        Analog really likes to separate out ground planes which is interesting but not necessary to control noise (you can do this with proper layout to control return currents). So I would think this not necessary but it depends on the board layout.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Yes, its a 50Ohm ferrite. Usually manufacturers post BOM's with their eval boards but with analog deveices it's hit or miss. So its hard to say what the part number is but I'll bet its an 0805 or 1206 (or metric equivalent) size.



        Analog really likes to separate out ground planes which is interesting but not necessary to control noise (you can do this with proper layout to control return currents). So I would think this not necessary but it depends on the board layout.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        laptop2dlaptop2d

        23.8k123276




        23.8k123276






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f417732%2fis-this-symbol-another-version-of-a-ferrite-bead-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

            Image
            0 I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{...
            Read more

            Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

            Image
            1 In the sklearn.model_selection.cross_val_predict page it is stated: Generate cross-validated estimates for each input data point. It is not appropriate to pass these predictions into an evaluation metric. Can someone explain what does it mean? If this gives estimate of Y (y prediction) for every Y (true Y), why can't I calculate metrics such as RMSE or coefficient of determination using these results? python scikit-learn cross-validation share | improve this question edited Nov 28 '18 at 17:52 desertnaut 20.3k 7 43 79 ...
            Read more

            Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)

            Image
            0 I have problem with inserting data to MySQL from modal. My modal: <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-success">6 komentarzy</a> <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-danger">brak komentarzy</a> <a data-toggle="modal" href="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" data-target="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" class="ediiit">(dodaj)</a> <div class="modal fade" id="add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="edit_printer" aria-hidden="true"> <div class="modal-dialog" role="document"> ...
            Read more