Atypical way to find angle between vectors












1












$begingroup$


At my work I have come across code with the following way of calculating the angle between two vectors.



$theta = 2 sin^{-1}(|hat{A}-hat{B} | frac{1}{2})$



I've spent some time but I can't think of how this was derived using typical methodologies (law of sines, law of cosines, dot product, cross product), it is pretty different. So my questions is, how could this have been derived?






linear-algebra trigonometry vectors







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I would write $2 sin^{-1}(frac12 | hat{A} - hat{B} |).$ The way you wrote it, it almost looks like you wanted to write $2 sin^{-1}(| hat{A} - hat{B} |^{1/2})$ but made a mistake in the typesetting.
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    40 mins ago
















1












$begingroup$


At my work I have come across code with the following way of calculating the angle between two vectors.



$theta = 2 sin^{-1}(|hat{A}-hat{B} | frac{1}{2})$



I've spent some time but I can't think of how this was derived using typical methodologies (law of sines, law of cosines, dot product, cross product), it is pretty different. So my questions is, how could this have been derived?






linear-algebra trigonometry vectors







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I would write $2 sin^{-1}(frac12 | hat{A} - hat{B} |).$ The way you wrote it, it almost looks like you wanted to write $2 sin^{-1}(| hat{A} - hat{B} |^{1/2})$ but made a mistake in the typesetting.
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    40 mins ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


At my work I have come across code with the following way of calculating the angle between two vectors.



$theta = 2 sin^{-1}(|hat{A}-hat{B} | frac{1}{2})$



I've spent some time but I can't think of how this was derived using typical methodologies (law of sines, law of cosines, dot product, cross product), it is pretty different. So my questions is, how could this have been derived?






linear-algebra trigonometry vectors







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




At my work I have come across code with the following way of calculating the angle between two vectors.



$theta = 2 sin^{-1}(|hat{A}-hat{B} | frac{1}{2})$



I've spent some time but I can't think of how this was derived using typical methodologies (law of sines, law of cosines, dot product, cross product), it is pretty different. So my questions is, how could this have been derived?






linear-algebra trigonometry vectors




linear-algebra trigonometry vectors






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Martin Argerami

125k1179178




125k1179178










asked 5 hours ago









WolcottRWolcottR

202




202












  • $begingroup$
    I would write $2 sin^{-1}(frac12 | hat{A} - hat{B} |).$ The way you wrote it, it almost looks like you wanted to write $2 sin^{-1}(| hat{A} - hat{B} |^{1/2})$ but made a mistake in the typesetting.
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    40 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    I would write $2 sin^{-1}(frac12 | hat{A} - hat{B} |).$ The way you wrote it, it almost looks like you wanted to write $2 sin^{-1}(| hat{A} - hat{B} |^{1/2})$ but made a mistake in the typesetting.
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    40 mins ago
















$begingroup$
I would write $2 sin^{-1}(frac12 | hat{A} - hat{B} |).$ The way you wrote it, it almost looks like you wanted to write $2 sin^{-1}(| hat{A} - hat{B} |^{1/2})$ but made a mistake in the typesetting.
$endgroup$
– David K
40 mins ago




$begingroup$
I would write $2 sin^{-1}(frac12 | hat{A} - hat{B} |).$ The way you wrote it, it almost looks like you wanted to write $2 sin^{-1}(| hat{A} - hat{B} |^{1/2})$ but made a mistake in the typesetting.
$endgroup$
– David K
40 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

This works when $A$ and $B$ are unit vectors.



You have
$$
|A-B|^2=(A-B)cdot(A-B)=|A|^2+|B|^2-2,Acdot B=2-2costheta=4sin^2tfractheta2.
$$
Solving,
$$
theta=2arcsintfrac{|A-B|}2.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    A general comment: note the hats on the vectors, which often indicates normalization.
    $endgroup$
    – Will R
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Good to know! I haven't seen that in the last 30 years of doing math.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's fairly common in physics, I think. Some people denote the standard unit vectors in $mathbb{R}^{3}$ with $i,j,k,$ and some of those people put hats on them, to emphasize that they are unit vectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Will R
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I have been using the hats on $i,j,k$ for many years, but I never saw the notation being used for other vectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I was thinking there was going to be a square/root step in there somewhere
    $endgroup$
    – WolcottR
    5 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082469%2fatypical-way-to-find-angle-between-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

This works when $A$ and $B$ are unit vectors.



You have
$$
|A-B|^2=(A-B)cdot(A-B)=|A|^2+|B|^2-2,Acdot B=2-2costheta=4sin^2tfractheta2.
$$
Solving,
$$
theta=2arcsintfrac{|A-B|}2.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    A general comment: note the hats on the vectors, which often indicates normalization.
    $endgroup$
    – Will R
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Good to know! I haven't seen that in the last 30 years of doing math.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's fairly common in physics, I think. Some people denote the standard unit vectors in $mathbb{R}^{3}$ with $i,j,k,$ and some of those people put hats on them, to emphasize that they are unit vectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Will R
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I have been using the hats on $i,j,k$ for many years, but I never saw the notation being used for other vectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I was thinking there was going to be a square/root step in there somewhere
    $endgroup$
    – WolcottR
    5 hours ago
















7












$begingroup$

This works when $A$ and $B$ are unit vectors.



You have
$$
|A-B|^2=(A-B)cdot(A-B)=|A|^2+|B|^2-2,Acdot B=2-2costheta=4sin^2tfractheta2.
$$
Solving,
$$
theta=2arcsintfrac{|A-B|}2.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    A general comment: note the hats on the vectors, which often indicates normalization.
    $endgroup$
    – Will R
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Good to know! I haven't seen that in the last 30 years of doing math.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's fairly common in physics, I think. Some people denote the standard unit vectors in $mathbb{R}^{3}$ with $i,j,k,$ and some of those people put hats on them, to emphasize that they are unit vectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Will R
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I have been using the hats on $i,j,k$ for many years, but I never saw the notation being used for other vectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I was thinking there was going to be a square/root step in there somewhere
    $endgroup$
    – WolcottR
    5 hours ago














7












7








7





$begingroup$

This works when $A$ and $B$ are unit vectors.



You have
$$
|A-B|^2=(A-B)cdot(A-B)=|A|^2+|B|^2-2,Acdot B=2-2costheta=4sin^2tfractheta2.
$$
Solving,
$$
theta=2arcsintfrac{|A-B|}2.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



This works when $A$ and $B$ are unit vectors.



You have
$$
|A-B|^2=(A-B)cdot(A-B)=|A|^2+|B|^2-2,Acdot B=2-2costheta=4sin^2tfractheta2.
$$
Solving,
$$
theta=2arcsintfrac{|A-B|}2.
$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 5 hours ago









Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami

125k1179178




125k1179178












  • $begingroup$
    A general comment: note the hats on the vectors, which often indicates normalization.
    $endgroup$
    – Will R
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Good to know! I haven't seen that in the last 30 years of doing math.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's fairly common in physics, I think. Some people denote the standard unit vectors in $mathbb{R}^{3}$ with $i,j,k,$ and some of those people put hats on them, to emphasize that they are unit vectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Will R
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I have been using the hats on $i,j,k$ for many years, but I never saw the notation being used for other vectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I was thinking there was going to be a square/root step in there somewhere
    $endgroup$
    – WolcottR
    5 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    A general comment: note the hats on the vectors, which often indicates normalization.
    $endgroup$
    – Will R
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Good to know! I haven't seen that in the last 30 years of doing math.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's fairly common in physics, I think. Some people denote the standard unit vectors in $mathbb{R}^{3}$ with $i,j,k,$ and some of those people put hats on them, to emphasize that they are unit vectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Will R
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I have been using the hats on $i,j,k$ for many years, but I never saw the notation being used for other vectors.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I was thinking there was going to be a square/root step in there somewhere
    $endgroup$
    – WolcottR
    5 hours ago
















$begingroup$
A general comment: note the hats on the vectors, which often indicates normalization.
$endgroup$
– Will R
5 hours ago






$begingroup$
A general comment: note the hats on the vectors, which often indicates normalization.
$endgroup$
– Will R
5 hours ago














$begingroup$
Good to know! I haven't seen that in the last 30 years of doing math.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Good to know! I haven't seen that in the last 30 years of doing math.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
5 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
It's fairly common in physics, I think. Some people denote the standard unit vectors in $mathbb{R}^{3}$ with $i,j,k,$ and some of those people put hats on them, to emphasize that they are unit vectors.
$endgroup$
– Will R
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
It's fairly common in physics, I think. Some people denote the standard unit vectors in $mathbb{R}^{3}$ with $i,j,k,$ and some of those people put hats on them, to emphasize that they are unit vectors.
$endgroup$
– Will R
5 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
I have been using the hats on $i,j,k$ for many years, but I never saw the notation being used for other vectors.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
I have been using the hats on $i,j,k$ for many years, but I never saw the notation being used for other vectors.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
Thank you! I was thinking there was going to be a square/root step in there somewhere
$endgroup$
– WolcottR
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you! I was thinking there was going to be a square/root step in there somewhere
$endgroup$
– WolcottR
5 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082469%2fatypical-way-to-find-angle-between-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

Image
0 I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{...
Read more

Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

Image
1 In the sklearn.model_selection.cross_val_predict page it is stated: Generate cross-validated estimates for each input data point. It is not appropriate to pass these predictions into an evaluation metric. Can someone explain what does it mean? If this gives estimate of Y (y prediction) for every Y (true Y), why can't I calculate metrics such as RMSE or coefficient of determination using these results? python scikit-learn cross-validation share | improve this question edited Nov 28 '18 at 17:52 desertnaut 20.3k 7 43 79 ...
Read more

Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)

Image
0 I have problem with inserting data to MySQL from modal. My modal: <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-success">6 komentarzy</a> <a href="#" class="badge badge-pill badge-danger">brak komentarzy</a> <a data-toggle="modal" href="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" data-target="#add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" class="ediiit">(dodaj)</a> <div class="modal fade" id="add_desk_comm_{$desk_['desk_id']}" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="edit_printer" aria-hidden="true"> <div class="modal-dialog" role="document"> ...
Read more