Spark source code: new stage in DAGScheduler
I am reading the source code of DAGScheduler from Spark's 0.5 branch.
The newStage
method:
def newStage(rdd: RDD[_], shuffleDep: Option[ShuffleDependency[_,_,_]]): Stage = {
cacheTracker.registerRDD(rdd.id, rdd.splits.size)
...
val id = nextStageId.getAndIncrement()
val stage = new Stage(id, rdd, shuffleDep, getParentStages(rdd))
...
}
Firstly, it calls registerRDD
to register the rdd
, and is actually stored as a Hashset
.
Secondly, it crates a new Stage
.
Inside the getParentStages
, it will return the parents dependencies of the rdd
, but it will also always register this rdd
again in addition to its parents.
The basic logic (pseudocode) of getParentStages
is:
def visit(rdd) {
if (rdd not visited) {
set rdd visited;
registerRDD(rdd);
for (each dep in rdd.dependencies) {
visit(dep.rdd)
}
}
}
visit(rdd)
In my view, since this rdd
will be registered in getParentStages
anyway, is it necessary to register it in newStage
method?
Of course, since the underlying data structure is a HashSet
, nothing will happen when registering again.
scala apache-spark
add a comment |
I am reading the source code of DAGScheduler from Spark's 0.5 branch.
The newStage
method:
def newStage(rdd: RDD[_], shuffleDep: Option[ShuffleDependency[_,_,_]]): Stage = {
cacheTracker.registerRDD(rdd.id, rdd.splits.size)
...
val id = nextStageId.getAndIncrement()
val stage = new Stage(id, rdd, shuffleDep, getParentStages(rdd))
...
}
Firstly, it calls registerRDD
to register the rdd
, and is actually stored as a Hashset
.
Secondly, it crates a new Stage
.
Inside the getParentStages
, it will return the parents dependencies of the rdd
, but it will also always register this rdd
again in addition to its parents.
The basic logic (pseudocode) of getParentStages
is:
def visit(rdd) {
if (rdd not visited) {
set rdd visited;
registerRDD(rdd);
for (each dep in rdd.dependencies) {
visit(dep.rdd)
}
}
}
visit(rdd)
In my view, since this rdd
will be registered in getParentStages
anyway, is it necessary to register it in newStage
method?
Of course, since the underlying data structure is a HashSet
, nothing will happen when registering again.
scala apache-spark
add a comment |
I am reading the source code of DAGScheduler from Spark's 0.5 branch.
The newStage
method:
def newStage(rdd: RDD[_], shuffleDep: Option[ShuffleDependency[_,_,_]]): Stage = {
cacheTracker.registerRDD(rdd.id, rdd.splits.size)
...
val id = nextStageId.getAndIncrement()
val stage = new Stage(id, rdd, shuffleDep, getParentStages(rdd))
...
}
Firstly, it calls registerRDD
to register the rdd
, and is actually stored as a Hashset
.
Secondly, it crates a new Stage
.
Inside the getParentStages
, it will return the parents dependencies of the rdd
, but it will also always register this rdd
again in addition to its parents.
The basic logic (pseudocode) of getParentStages
is:
def visit(rdd) {
if (rdd not visited) {
set rdd visited;
registerRDD(rdd);
for (each dep in rdd.dependencies) {
visit(dep.rdd)
}
}
}
visit(rdd)
In my view, since this rdd
will be registered in getParentStages
anyway, is it necessary to register it in newStage
method?
Of course, since the underlying data structure is a HashSet
, nothing will happen when registering again.
scala apache-spark
I am reading the source code of DAGScheduler from Spark's 0.5 branch.
The newStage
method:
def newStage(rdd: RDD[_], shuffleDep: Option[ShuffleDependency[_,_,_]]): Stage = {
cacheTracker.registerRDD(rdd.id, rdd.splits.size)
...
val id = nextStageId.getAndIncrement()
val stage = new Stage(id, rdd, shuffleDep, getParentStages(rdd))
...
}
Firstly, it calls registerRDD
to register the rdd
, and is actually stored as a Hashset
.
Secondly, it crates a new Stage
.
Inside the getParentStages
, it will return the parents dependencies of the rdd
, but it will also always register this rdd
again in addition to its parents.
The basic logic (pseudocode) of getParentStages
is:
def visit(rdd) {
if (rdd not visited) {
set rdd visited;
registerRDD(rdd);
for (each dep in rdd.dependencies) {
visit(dep.rdd)
}
}
}
visit(rdd)
In my view, since this rdd
will be registered in getParentStages
anyway, is it necessary to register it in newStage
method?
Of course, since the underlying data structure is a HashSet
, nothing will happen when registering again.
scala apache-spark
scala apache-spark
edited Nov 23 at 7:51
asked Nov 23 at 7:35
chenzhongpu
2,24232451
2,24232451
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53442416%2fspark-source-code-new-stage-in-dagscheduler%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53442416%2fspark-source-code-new-stage-in-dagscheduler%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown