Does the Mind Blade count as a magic weapon in the hands of someone other than its intended wielder?











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
1












In Volo's Guide to Monsters (pg. 81), the mind blade weapon is described:




Mind Blade



Weapon (any sword), rare (requires attunement by a specific individual)



Mind flayers can turn any nonmagical sword into a mind blade. Only one creature can attune to it: either a specific mind flayer or one of its thralls. In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind. In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon that deals an extra 2d6 psychic damage to any target it hits.




I have emphasised "In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade" and "In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon".



My question is: would the mind blade count as a magical weapon (or at least, does the slashing or piercing damage it does count as magical damage) for the purposes of overcoming damage resistances in the hands of someone other than its intended wielder?



Ordinarily I would assume yes, since a magic weapon is still a magic weapon even if you haven't attuned to it. But given that it specifically calls out the fact the it's a "normal blade" in the hands of someone it's not intended for, and that it's a "magic weapon" in the hands of its intended wielder, it makes me doubt my default assumption. Also that it's gone out of its way to describe something outside of the usual language of attunement (i.e. it could have said "while attuned" or similar like the descriptions of many other magic items do, but instead it defines an "intended wielder").



Obviously either way the not-intended wielder cannot attune to it or deal psychic damage with it; this is just about it being a magical weapon for the purposes of overcoming damage resistance.










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    6
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    In Volo's Guide to Monsters (pg. 81), the mind blade weapon is described:




    Mind Blade



    Weapon (any sword), rare (requires attunement by a specific individual)



    Mind flayers can turn any nonmagical sword into a mind blade. Only one creature can attune to it: either a specific mind flayer or one of its thralls. In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind. In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon that deals an extra 2d6 psychic damage to any target it hits.




    I have emphasised "In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade" and "In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon".



    My question is: would the mind blade count as a magical weapon (or at least, does the slashing or piercing damage it does count as magical damage) for the purposes of overcoming damage resistances in the hands of someone other than its intended wielder?



    Ordinarily I would assume yes, since a magic weapon is still a magic weapon even if you haven't attuned to it. But given that it specifically calls out the fact the it's a "normal blade" in the hands of someone it's not intended for, and that it's a "magic weapon" in the hands of its intended wielder, it makes me doubt my default assumption. Also that it's gone out of its way to describe something outside of the usual language of attunement (i.e. it could have said "while attuned" or similar like the descriptions of many other magic items do, but instead it defines an "intended wielder").



    Obviously either way the not-intended wielder cannot attune to it or deal psychic damage with it; this is just about it being a magical weapon for the purposes of overcoming damage resistance.










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      In Volo's Guide to Monsters (pg. 81), the mind blade weapon is described:




      Mind Blade



      Weapon (any sword), rare (requires attunement by a specific individual)



      Mind flayers can turn any nonmagical sword into a mind blade. Only one creature can attune to it: either a specific mind flayer or one of its thralls. In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind. In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon that deals an extra 2d6 psychic damage to any target it hits.




      I have emphasised "In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade" and "In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon".



      My question is: would the mind blade count as a magical weapon (or at least, does the slashing or piercing damage it does count as magical damage) for the purposes of overcoming damage resistances in the hands of someone other than its intended wielder?



      Ordinarily I would assume yes, since a magic weapon is still a magic weapon even if you haven't attuned to it. But given that it specifically calls out the fact the it's a "normal blade" in the hands of someone it's not intended for, and that it's a "magic weapon" in the hands of its intended wielder, it makes me doubt my default assumption. Also that it's gone out of its way to describe something outside of the usual language of attunement (i.e. it could have said "while attuned" or similar like the descriptions of many other magic items do, but instead it defines an "intended wielder").



      Obviously either way the not-intended wielder cannot attune to it or deal psychic damage with it; this is just about it being a magical weapon for the purposes of overcoming damage resistance.










      share|improve this question















      In Volo's Guide to Monsters (pg. 81), the mind blade weapon is described:




      Mind Blade



      Weapon (any sword), rare (requires attunement by a specific individual)



      Mind flayers can turn any nonmagical sword into a mind blade. Only one creature can attune to it: either a specific mind flayer or one of its thralls. In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind. In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon that deals an extra 2d6 psychic damage to any target it hits.




      I have emphasised "In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade" and "In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon".



      My question is: would the mind blade count as a magical weapon (or at least, does the slashing or piercing damage it does count as magical damage) for the purposes of overcoming damage resistances in the hands of someone other than its intended wielder?



      Ordinarily I would assume yes, since a magic weapon is still a magic weapon even if you haven't attuned to it. But given that it specifically calls out the fact the it's a "normal blade" in the hands of someone it's not intended for, and that it's a "magic weapon" in the hands of its intended wielder, it makes me doubt my default assumption. Also that it's gone out of its way to describe something outside of the usual language of attunement (i.e. it could have said "while attuned" or similar like the descriptions of many other magic items do, but instead it defines an "intended wielder").



      Obviously either way the not-intended wielder cannot attune to it or deal psychic damage with it; this is just about it being a magical weapon for the purposes of overcoming damage resistance.







      dnd-5e magic-items weapons






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 58 mins ago









      V2Blast

      18.1k248114




      18.1k248114










      asked 17 hours ago









      NathanS

      19.7k685208




      19.7k685208






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          15
          down vote














          No, because that would be to "function" as a magic weapon, which it explicitly lacks the ability to do



          The key (as I see it) is parsing the word "function."



          Generally, the function of something is its capacity to act or behave in a certain manner, or to have a certain purpose. So an item's ability to be used in combat so as to overcome any specific resistance is certainly a "function" in the ordinary sense of that word.



          Thus whenever the sword "functions as a normal (not magic) blade" then it lacks the functions that are associated specifically with magic ones, including the function you are asking about.






          share|improve this answer




























            up vote
            8
            down vote













            No it does not



            As you already emphasis in the question:




            In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind.




            In other words it is not magical or special in any way. This is further emphasized by the sentence coming after it:




            In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon







            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "122"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136000%2fdoes-the-mind-blade-count-as-a-magic-weapon-in-the-hands-of-someone-other-than-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              15
              down vote














              No, because that would be to "function" as a magic weapon, which it explicitly lacks the ability to do



              The key (as I see it) is parsing the word "function."



              Generally, the function of something is its capacity to act or behave in a certain manner, or to have a certain purpose. So an item's ability to be used in combat so as to overcome any specific resistance is certainly a "function" in the ordinary sense of that word.



              Thus whenever the sword "functions as a normal (not magic) blade" then it lacks the functions that are associated specifically with magic ones, including the function you are asking about.






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                15
                down vote














                No, because that would be to "function" as a magic weapon, which it explicitly lacks the ability to do



                The key (as I see it) is parsing the word "function."



                Generally, the function of something is its capacity to act or behave in a certain manner, or to have a certain purpose. So an item's ability to be used in combat so as to overcome any specific resistance is certainly a "function" in the ordinary sense of that word.



                Thus whenever the sword "functions as a normal (not magic) blade" then it lacks the functions that are associated specifically with magic ones, including the function you are asking about.






                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  15
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  15
                  down vote










                  No, because that would be to "function" as a magic weapon, which it explicitly lacks the ability to do



                  The key (as I see it) is parsing the word "function."



                  Generally, the function of something is its capacity to act or behave in a certain manner, or to have a certain purpose. So an item's ability to be used in combat so as to overcome any specific resistance is certainly a "function" in the ordinary sense of that word.



                  Thus whenever the sword "functions as a normal (not magic) blade" then it lacks the functions that are associated specifically with magic ones, including the function you are asking about.






                  share|improve this answer













                  No, because that would be to "function" as a magic weapon, which it explicitly lacks the ability to do



                  The key (as I see it) is parsing the word "function."



                  Generally, the function of something is its capacity to act or behave in a certain manner, or to have a certain purpose. So an item's ability to be used in combat so as to overcome any specific resistance is certainly a "function" in the ordinary sense of that word.



                  Thus whenever the sword "functions as a normal (not magic) blade" then it lacks the functions that are associated specifically with magic ones, including the function you are asking about.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 16 hours ago









                  Valley Lad

                  1,063316




                  1,063316
























                      up vote
                      8
                      down vote













                      No it does not



                      As you already emphasis in the question:




                      In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind.




                      In other words it is not magical or special in any way. This is further emphasized by the sentence coming after it:




                      In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon







                      share|improve this answer



























                        up vote
                        8
                        down vote













                        No it does not



                        As you already emphasis in the question:




                        In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind.




                        In other words it is not magical or special in any way. This is further emphasized by the sentence coming after it:




                        In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon







                        share|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          8
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          8
                          down vote









                          No it does not



                          As you already emphasis in the question:




                          In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind.




                          In other words it is not magical or special in any way. This is further emphasized by the sentence coming after it:




                          In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon







                          share|improve this answer














                          No it does not



                          As you already emphasis in the question:




                          In the hands of any other creature, the mind blade functions as a normal blade of its kind.




                          In other words it is not magical or special in any way. This is further emphasized by the sentence coming after it:




                          In the hands of its intended wielder, the mind blade is a magic weapon








                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 16 hours ago









                          NathanS

                          19.7k685208




                          19.7k685208










                          answered 17 hours ago









                          Dinomaster

                          2,045418




                          2,045418






























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded



















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136000%2fdoes-the-mind-blade-count-as-a-magic-weapon-in-the-hands-of-someone-other-than-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

                              Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

                              Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)