How to find the largest number(s) in a list of elements, possibly non-unique?












14















Here is my program,



item_no = 
max = 0
for i in range(5):
input_no = int(input("Enter an item number: "))
item_no.append(input_no)
for i in item_no:
if i > max:
max = i
high = item_no.index(max)
print (item_no[high])


Example input: [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]



Example output: 8



How can I change my program to output the same highest numbers in an array?



Expected output: [8, 8]










share|improve this question









New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    Band indent at line 8

    – DirtyBit
    21 hours ago






  • 1





    You can use Dictionary to store the maximum number and its count as item_no = {}, if you max is different then original in item_no, reinitialize it and add that item and add count =1

    – dkb
    21 hours ago








  • 2





    ("Band" probably is a misspelling for "Bad")

    – tripleee
    21 hours ago






  • 1





    @tripleee Indeed. bulls-eye!

    – DirtyBit
    20 hours ago











  • As answers show, it's more Pythonic to do it with list comprehensions, rather than loops. But if you use loops to iterate over the list, a style tip: don't use the same variable name i both for indices i in range(5) then also for items/values: for i in item_no. Better to do for no in item_no

    – smci
    3 hours ago


















14















Here is my program,



item_no = 
max = 0
for i in range(5):
input_no = int(input("Enter an item number: "))
item_no.append(input_no)
for i in item_no:
if i > max:
max = i
high = item_no.index(max)
print (item_no[high])


Example input: [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]



Example output: 8



How can I change my program to output the same highest numbers in an array?



Expected output: [8, 8]










share|improve this question









New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    Band indent at line 8

    – DirtyBit
    21 hours ago






  • 1





    You can use Dictionary to store the maximum number and its count as item_no = {}, if you max is different then original in item_no, reinitialize it and add that item and add count =1

    – dkb
    21 hours ago








  • 2





    ("Band" probably is a misspelling for "Bad")

    – tripleee
    21 hours ago






  • 1





    @tripleee Indeed. bulls-eye!

    – DirtyBit
    20 hours ago











  • As answers show, it's more Pythonic to do it with list comprehensions, rather than loops. But if you use loops to iterate over the list, a style tip: don't use the same variable name i both for indices i in range(5) then also for items/values: for i in item_no. Better to do for no in item_no

    – smci
    3 hours ago
















14












14








14


4






Here is my program,



item_no = 
max = 0
for i in range(5):
input_no = int(input("Enter an item number: "))
item_no.append(input_no)
for i in item_no:
if i > max:
max = i
high = item_no.index(max)
print (item_no[high])


Example input: [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]



Example output: 8



How can I change my program to output the same highest numbers in an array?



Expected output: [8, 8]










share|improve this question









New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Here is my program,



item_no = 
max = 0
for i in range(5):
input_no = int(input("Enter an item number: "))
item_no.append(input_no)
for i in item_no:
if i > max:
max = i
high = item_no.index(max)
print (item_no[high])


Example input: [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]



Example output: 8



How can I change my program to output the same highest numbers in an array?



Expected output: [8, 8]







python arrays python-3.x






share|improve this question









New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









smci

15.4k677108




15.4k677108






New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 21 hours ago









user11206537user11206537

8012




8012




New contributor




user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user11206537 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2





    Band indent at line 8

    – DirtyBit
    21 hours ago






  • 1





    You can use Dictionary to store the maximum number and its count as item_no = {}, if you max is different then original in item_no, reinitialize it and add that item and add count =1

    – dkb
    21 hours ago








  • 2





    ("Band" probably is a misspelling for "Bad")

    – tripleee
    21 hours ago






  • 1





    @tripleee Indeed. bulls-eye!

    – DirtyBit
    20 hours ago











  • As answers show, it's more Pythonic to do it with list comprehensions, rather than loops. But if you use loops to iterate over the list, a style tip: don't use the same variable name i both for indices i in range(5) then also for items/values: for i in item_no. Better to do for no in item_no

    – smci
    3 hours ago
















  • 2





    Band indent at line 8

    – DirtyBit
    21 hours ago






  • 1





    You can use Dictionary to store the maximum number and its count as item_no = {}, if you max is different then original in item_no, reinitialize it and add that item and add count =1

    – dkb
    21 hours ago








  • 2





    ("Band" probably is a misspelling for "Bad")

    – tripleee
    21 hours ago






  • 1





    @tripleee Indeed. bulls-eye!

    – DirtyBit
    20 hours ago











  • As answers show, it's more Pythonic to do it with list comprehensions, rather than loops. But if you use loops to iterate over the list, a style tip: don't use the same variable name i both for indices i in range(5) then also for items/values: for i in item_no. Better to do for no in item_no

    – smci
    3 hours ago










2




2





Band indent at line 8

– DirtyBit
21 hours ago





Band indent at line 8

– DirtyBit
21 hours ago




1




1





You can use Dictionary to store the maximum number and its count as item_no = {}, if you max is different then original in item_no, reinitialize it and add that item and add count =1

– dkb
21 hours ago







You can use Dictionary to store the maximum number and its count as item_no = {}, if you max is different then original in item_no, reinitialize it and add that item and add count =1

– dkb
21 hours ago






2




2





("Band" probably is a misspelling for "Bad")

– tripleee
21 hours ago





("Band" probably is a misspelling for "Bad")

– tripleee
21 hours ago




1




1





@tripleee Indeed. bulls-eye!

– DirtyBit
20 hours ago





@tripleee Indeed. bulls-eye!

– DirtyBit
20 hours ago













As answers show, it's more Pythonic to do it with list comprehensions, rather than loops. But if you use loops to iterate over the list, a style tip: don't use the same variable name i both for indices i in range(5) then also for items/values: for i in item_no. Better to do for no in item_no

– smci
3 hours ago







As answers show, it's more Pythonic to do it with list comprehensions, rather than loops. But if you use loops to iterate over the list, a style tip: don't use the same variable name i both for indices i in range(5) then also for items/values: for i in item_no. Better to do for no in item_no

– smci
3 hours ago














5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















21














Just get the maximum using max and then its count and combine the two in a list-comprehension.



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]

max_no = max(item_no)
highest = [max_no for _ in range(item_no.count(max_no))]
print(highest) # -> [8, 8]


Note that this will return a list of a single item in case your maximum value appears only once.





A solution closer to your current programming style would be the following:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
max_no = 0
for i in item_no:
if i > max_no:
max_no = i
high = [i]
elif i == max_no:
high.append(i)


with the same results as above of course.



Note that this last one is less efficient than the first by quite a margin. Python allows you to be more efficient than these explicit, fortran-like loops and it is more efficient itself when you use it properly.






share|improve this answer


























  • Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

    – user11206537
    20 hours ago






  • 2





    @user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

    – Ev. Kounis
    20 hours ago











  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago













  • You might want to start with a smaller number than 0.

    – Eric Duminil
    19 hours ago






  • 2





    @user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

    – Ev. Kounis
    18 hours ago



















12














You can do it even shorter:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
#compute once - use many
max_item = max(item_no)
print(item_no.count(max_item) * [max_item])


output:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer


























  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago





















4














You could use list comprehension for that task following way:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max(numbers)]
print(*maxnumbers,sep=',')


output:



8,8


* operator in print is used to unpack values, sep is used to inform print what seperator to use: , in this case.



EDIT: If you want to get indices of biggest value and call max only once then do:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
biggest = max(numbers)
positions = [inx for inx,i in enumerate(numbers) if i==biggest]
print(*positions,sep=',')


Output:



3,4


As you might check numbers[3] is equal to biggest and numbers[4] is equal to biggest.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

    – Ev. Kounis
    20 hours ago













  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago











  • @Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

    – user1717828
    11 hours ago



















2














This issue can be solved in one line, by finding an item which is equal to the maximum value:



[i for i in item_no if i==max(item_no)]






share|improve this answer


























  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago











  • By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

    – Pradeep Pandey
    16 hours ago





















1















  1. Count the occurrence of max number


  2. iterate over the list to print the max number for the range of the count (1)



Hence:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
counter = item_no.count(max(item_no)) # 2
print([max(item_no) for x in range(counter)])


OUTPUT:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer
























  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






user11206537 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55216278%2fhow-to-find-the-largest-numbers-in-a-list-of-elements-possibly-non-unique%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes








5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









21














Just get the maximum using max and then its count and combine the two in a list-comprehension.



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]

max_no = max(item_no)
highest = [max_no for _ in range(item_no.count(max_no))]
print(highest) # -> [8, 8]


Note that this will return a list of a single item in case your maximum value appears only once.





A solution closer to your current programming style would be the following:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
max_no = 0
for i in item_no:
if i > max_no:
max_no = i
high = [i]
elif i == max_no:
high.append(i)


with the same results as above of course.



Note that this last one is less efficient than the first by quite a margin. Python allows you to be more efficient than these explicit, fortran-like loops and it is more efficient itself when you use it properly.






share|improve this answer


























  • Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

    – user11206537
    20 hours ago






  • 2





    @user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

    – Ev. Kounis
    20 hours ago











  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago













  • You might want to start with a smaller number than 0.

    – Eric Duminil
    19 hours ago






  • 2





    @user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

    – Ev. Kounis
    18 hours ago
















21














Just get the maximum using max and then its count and combine the two in a list-comprehension.



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]

max_no = max(item_no)
highest = [max_no for _ in range(item_no.count(max_no))]
print(highest) # -> [8, 8]


Note that this will return a list of a single item in case your maximum value appears only once.





A solution closer to your current programming style would be the following:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
max_no = 0
for i in item_no:
if i > max_no:
max_no = i
high = [i]
elif i == max_no:
high.append(i)


with the same results as above of course.



Note that this last one is less efficient than the first by quite a margin. Python allows you to be more efficient than these explicit, fortran-like loops and it is more efficient itself when you use it properly.






share|improve this answer


























  • Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

    – user11206537
    20 hours ago






  • 2





    @user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

    – Ev. Kounis
    20 hours ago











  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago













  • You might want to start with a smaller number than 0.

    – Eric Duminil
    19 hours ago






  • 2





    @user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

    – Ev. Kounis
    18 hours ago














21












21








21







Just get the maximum using max and then its count and combine the two in a list-comprehension.



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]

max_no = max(item_no)
highest = [max_no for _ in range(item_no.count(max_no))]
print(highest) # -> [8, 8]


Note that this will return a list of a single item in case your maximum value appears only once.





A solution closer to your current programming style would be the following:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
max_no = 0
for i in item_no:
if i > max_no:
max_no = i
high = [i]
elif i == max_no:
high.append(i)


with the same results as above of course.



Note that this last one is less efficient than the first by quite a margin. Python allows you to be more efficient than these explicit, fortran-like loops and it is more efficient itself when you use it properly.






share|improve this answer















Just get the maximum using max and then its count and combine the two in a list-comprehension.



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]

max_no = max(item_no)
highest = [max_no for _ in range(item_no.count(max_no))]
print(highest) # -> [8, 8]


Note that this will return a list of a single item in case your maximum value appears only once.





A solution closer to your current programming style would be the following:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
max_no = 0
for i in item_no:
if i > max_no:
max_no = i
high = [i]
elif i == max_no:
high.append(i)


with the same results as above of course.



Note that this last one is less efficient than the first by quite a margin. Python allows you to be more efficient than these explicit, fortran-like loops and it is more efficient itself when you use it properly.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 19 hours ago









idmean

10.7k73669




10.7k73669










answered 21 hours ago









Ev. KounisEv. Kounis

11.3k21651




11.3k21651













  • Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

    – user11206537
    20 hours ago






  • 2





    @user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

    – Ev. Kounis
    20 hours ago











  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago













  • You might want to start with a smaller number than 0.

    – Eric Duminil
    19 hours ago






  • 2





    @user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

    – Ev. Kounis
    18 hours ago



















  • Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

    – user11206537
    20 hours ago






  • 2





    @user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

    – Ev. Kounis
    20 hours ago











  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago













  • You might want to start with a smaller number than 0.

    – Eric Duminil
    19 hours ago






  • 2





    @user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

    – Ev. Kounis
    18 hours ago

















Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

– user11206537
20 hours ago





Actually, I would love to use the first code, but since this part of my school project, I am not allowed to use inbuilt functions, therefore I need to use the second code.

– user11206537
20 hours ago




2




2





@user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

– Ev. Kounis
20 hours ago





@user11206537 I kinda saw this coming. Knowing what a better way would be is still of some value. Have fun!

– Ev. Kounis
20 hours ago













One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

– user11206537
19 hours ago







One last question, how do you find the index of the result (high) in item_no?

– user11206537
19 hours ago















You might want to start with a smaller number than 0.

– Eric Duminil
19 hours ago





You might want to start with a smaller number than 0.

– Eric Duminil
19 hours ago




2




2





@user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

– Ev. Kounis
18 hours ago





@user11206537 To get the index as well, you can modify the code slightly and use enumerate on item_no. As you loop through, store the index in a 2nd list as you do for the max. Take a look at this

– Ev. Kounis
18 hours ago













12














You can do it even shorter:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
#compute once - use many
max_item = max(item_no)
print(item_no.count(max_item) * [max_item])


output:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer


























  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago


















12














You can do it even shorter:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
#compute once - use many
max_item = max(item_no)
print(item_no.count(max_item) * [max_item])


output:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer


























  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago
















12












12








12







You can do it even shorter:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
#compute once - use many
max_item = max(item_no)
print(item_no.count(max_item) * [max_item])


output:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer















You can do it even shorter:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
#compute once - use many
max_item = max(item_no)
print(item_no.count(max_item) * [max_item])


output:



[8, 8]






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 16 hours ago

























answered 20 hours ago









AllanAllan

7,94231534




7,94231534













  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago





















  • One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago



















One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
19 hours ago







One last question, how do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
19 hours ago













4














You could use list comprehension for that task following way:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max(numbers)]
print(*maxnumbers,sep=',')


output:



8,8


* operator in print is used to unpack values, sep is used to inform print what seperator to use: , in this case.



EDIT: If you want to get indices of biggest value and call max only once then do:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
biggest = max(numbers)
positions = [inx for inx,i in enumerate(numbers) if i==biggest]
print(*positions,sep=',')


Output:



3,4


As you might check numbers[3] is equal to biggest and numbers[4] is equal to biggest.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

    – Ev. Kounis
    20 hours ago













  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago











  • @Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

    – user1717828
    11 hours ago
















4














You could use list comprehension for that task following way:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max(numbers)]
print(*maxnumbers,sep=',')


output:



8,8


* operator in print is used to unpack values, sep is used to inform print what seperator to use: , in this case.



EDIT: If you want to get indices of biggest value and call max only once then do:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
biggest = max(numbers)
positions = [inx for inx,i in enumerate(numbers) if i==biggest]
print(*positions,sep=',')


Output:



3,4


As you might check numbers[3] is equal to biggest and numbers[4] is equal to biggest.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

    – Ev. Kounis
    20 hours ago













  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago











  • @Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

    – user1717828
    11 hours ago














4












4








4







You could use list comprehension for that task following way:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max(numbers)]
print(*maxnumbers,sep=',')


output:



8,8


* operator in print is used to unpack values, sep is used to inform print what seperator to use: , in this case.



EDIT: If you want to get indices of biggest value and call max only once then do:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
biggest = max(numbers)
positions = [inx for inx,i in enumerate(numbers) if i==biggest]
print(*positions,sep=',')


Output:



3,4


As you might check numbers[3] is equal to biggest and numbers[4] is equal to biggest.






share|improve this answer















You could use list comprehension for that task following way:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
maxnumbers = [i for i in numbers if i==max(numbers)]
print(*maxnumbers,sep=',')


output:



8,8


* operator in print is used to unpack values, sep is used to inform print what seperator to use: , in this case.



EDIT: If you want to get indices of biggest value and call max only once then do:



numbers = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
biggest = max(numbers)
positions = [inx for inx,i in enumerate(numbers) if i==biggest]
print(*positions,sep=',')


Output:



3,4


As you might check numbers[3] is equal to biggest and numbers[4] is equal to biggest.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 18 hours ago

























answered 21 hours ago









DaweoDaweo

1,03525




1,03525








  • 2





    note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

    – Ev. Kounis
    20 hours ago













  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago











  • @Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

    – user1717828
    11 hours ago














  • 2





    note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

    – Ev. Kounis
    20 hours ago













  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago











  • @Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

    – user1717828
    11 hours ago








2




2





note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

– Ev. Kounis
20 hours ago







note that your solution calls max a total of len(numbers) times. Storing it outside the list and then using that would be better.

– Ev. Kounis
20 hours ago















How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
19 hours ago





How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
19 hours ago













@Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

– user1717828
11 hours ago





@Ev.Kounis I assume the Python interpreter optimizes this, no?

– user1717828
11 hours ago











2














This issue can be solved in one line, by finding an item which is equal to the maximum value:



[i for i in item_no if i==max(item_no)]






share|improve this answer


























  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago











  • By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

    – Pradeep Pandey
    16 hours ago


















2














This issue can be solved in one line, by finding an item which is equal to the maximum value:



[i for i in item_no if i==max(item_no)]






share|improve this answer


























  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago











  • By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

    – Pradeep Pandey
    16 hours ago
















2












2








2







This issue can be solved in one line, by finding an item which is equal to the maximum value:



[i for i in item_no if i==max(item_no)]






share|improve this answer















This issue can be solved in one line, by finding an item which is equal to the maximum value:



[i for i in item_no if i==max(item_no)]







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 19 hours ago









376writer

132




132










answered 20 hours ago









Pradeep PandeyPradeep Pandey

15417




15417













  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago











  • By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

    – Pradeep Pandey
    16 hours ago





















  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago











  • By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

    – Pradeep Pandey
    16 hours ago



















How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
19 hours ago





How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
19 hours ago













By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

– Pradeep Pandey
16 hours ago







By using enumerate function, we can get index position: [i for i, val in enumerate(item_no) if val in result]

– Pradeep Pandey
16 hours ago













1















  1. Count the occurrence of max number


  2. iterate over the list to print the max number for the range of the count (1)



Hence:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
counter = item_no.count(max(item_no)) # 2
print([max(item_no) for x in range(counter)])


OUTPUT:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer
























  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago
















1















  1. Count the occurrence of max number


  2. iterate over the list to print the max number for the range of the count (1)



Hence:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
counter = item_no.count(max(item_no)) # 2
print([max(item_no) for x in range(counter)])


OUTPUT:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer
























  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago














1












1








1








  1. Count the occurrence of max number


  2. iterate over the list to print the max number for the range of the count (1)



Hence:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
counter = item_no.count(max(item_no)) # 2
print([max(item_no) for x in range(counter)])


OUTPUT:



[8, 8]





share|improve this answer














  1. Count the occurrence of max number


  2. iterate over the list to print the max number for the range of the count (1)



Hence:



item_no = [5, 6, 7, 8, 8]
counter = item_no.count(max(item_no)) # 2
print([max(item_no) for x in range(counter)])


OUTPUT:



[8, 8]






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 20 hours ago









DirtyBitDirtyBit

9,05821540




9,05821540













  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago



















  • How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

    – user11206537
    19 hours ago

















How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
19 hours ago





How do you find the index of the result in item_no?

– user11206537
19 hours ago










user11206537 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















user11206537 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













user11206537 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












user11206537 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55216278%2fhow-to-find-the-largest-numbers-in-a-list-of-elements-possibly-non-unique%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)