Regression: Insignificant Intercept [duplicate]












1












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • When is it ok to remove the intercept in a linear regression model?

    8 answers




I ran a regression and the intercept is statistically insignificant (the p-value is greater than 0.05). I tried to look in some textbooks as to how to handle this scenario but I am still unsure. One textbook I looked at 'Basic Econometrics'by Gujarati and Porter says that if the intercept is insignificant then we have a regression through the origin and that if we remove the intercept, in this case, the model will be more precise. On the other hand, 'Introductory Econometrics'by Chris Brooks says that even if the intercept is insignificant, we should not remove it from the model.



Which one of these textbooks is correct? Should I leave the insignificant intercept in the model or run a regression through the origin?






regression linear-model intercept







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by kjetil b halvorsen, Peter Flom♦ regression
Users with the  regression badge can single-handedly close regression questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
 Nov 26 '18 at 10:48


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It bears mentioning that failure to detect a nonzero intercept is not the same thing as inferring that the intercept is actually zero.
    $endgroup$
    – heropup
    Nov 26 '18 at 7:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why do you think this is a problem?
    $endgroup$
    – kjetil b halvorsen
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:16










  • $begingroup$
    I don't think its a problem sorry. I re edited the question. Rather its a scenario I haven't encountered before.
    $endgroup$
    – user198848
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:19


















1












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • When is it ok to remove the intercept in a linear regression model?

    8 answers




I ran a regression and the intercept is statistically insignificant (the p-value is greater than 0.05). I tried to look in some textbooks as to how to handle this scenario but I am still unsure. One textbook I looked at 'Basic Econometrics'by Gujarati and Porter says that if the intercept is insignificant then we have a regression through the origin and that if we remove the intercept, in this case, the model will be more precise. On the other hand, 'Introductory Econometrics'by Chris Brooks says that even if the intercept is insignificant, we should not remove it from the model.



Which one of these textbooks is correct? Should I leave the insignificant intercept in the model or run a regression through the origin?






regression linear-model intercept







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by kjetil b halvorsen, Peter Flom♦ regression
Users with the  regression badge can single-handedly close regression questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
 Nov 26 '18 at 10:48


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It bears mentioning that failure to detect a nonzero intercept is not the same thing as inferring that the intercept is actually zero.
    $endgroup$
    – heropup
    Nov 26 '18 at 7:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why do you think this is a problem?
    $endgroup$
    – kjetil b halvorsen
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:16










  • $begingroup$
    I don't think its a problem sorry. I re edited the question. Rather its a scenario I haven't encountered before.
    $endgroup$
    – user198848
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:19
















1












1








1





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • When is it ok to remove the intercept in a linear regression model?

    8 answers




I ran a regression and the intercept is statistically insignificant (the p-value is greater than 0.05). I tried to look in some textbooks as to how to handle this scenario but I am still unsure. One textbook I looked at 'Basic Econometrics'by Gujarati and Porter says that if the intercept is insignificant then we have a regression through the origin and that if we remove the intercept, in this case, the model will be more precise. On the other hand, 'Introductory Econometrics'by Chris Brooks says that even if the intercept is insignificant, we should not remove it from the model.



Which one of these textbooks is correct? Should I leave the insignificant intercept in the model or run a regression through the origin?






regression linear-model intercept







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • When is it ok to remove the intercept in a linear regression model?

    8 answers




I ran a regression and the intercept is statistically insignificant (the p-value is greater than 0.05). I tried to look in some textbooks as to how to handle this scenario but I am still unsure. One textbook I looked at 'Basic Econometrics'by Gujarati and Porter says that if the intercept is insignificant then we have a regression through the origin and that if we remove the intercept, in this case, the model will be more precise. On the other hand, 'Introductory Econometrics'by Chris Brooks says that even if the intercept is insignificant, we should not remove it from the model.



Which one of these textbooks is correct? Should I leave the insignificant intercept in the model or run a regression through the origin?





This question already has an answer here:




  • When is it ok to remove the intercept in a linear regression model?

    8 answers







regression linear-model intercept




regression linear-model intercept






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 27 '18 at 0:18







user198848

















asked Nov 26 '18 at 2:17









user198848user198848

83




83




marked as duplicate by kjetil b halvorsen, Peter Flom♦ regression
Users with the  regression badge can single-handedly close regression questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
 Nov 26 '18 at 10:48


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by kjetil b halvorsen, Peter Flom♦ regression
Users with the  regression badge can single-handedly close regression questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
 Nov 26 '18 at 10:48


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It bears mentioning that failure to detect a nonzero intercept is not the same thing as inferring that the intercept is actually zero.
    $endgroup$
    – heropup
    Nov 26 '18 at 7:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why do you think this is a problem?
    $endgroup$
    – kjetil b halvorsen
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:16










  • $begingroup$
    I don't think its a problem sorry. I re edited the question. Rather its a scenario I haven't encountered before.
    $endgroup$
    – user198848
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:19
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It bears mentioning that failure to detect a nonzero intercept is not the same thing as inferring that the intercept is actually zero.
    $endgroup$
    – heropup
    Nov 26 '18 at 7:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why do you think this is a problem?
    $endgroup$
    – kjetil b halvorsen
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:16










  • $begingroup$
    I don't think its a problem sorry. I re edited the question. Rather its a scenario I haven't encountered before.
    $endgroup$
    – user198848
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:19










1




1




$begingroup$
It bears mentioning that failure to detect a nonzero intercept is not the same thing as inferring that the intercept is actually zero.
$endgroup$
– heropup
Nov 26 '18 at 7:32




$begingroup$
It bears mentioning that failure to detect a nonzero intercept is not the same thing as inferring that the intercept is actually zero.
$endgroup$
– heropup
Nov 26 '18 at 7:32




1




1




$begingroup$
Why do you think this is a problem?
$endgroup$
– kjetil b halvorsen
Nov 26 '18 at 9:16




$begingroup$
Why do you think this is a problem?
$endgroup$
– kjetil b halvorsen
Nov 26 '18 at 9:16












$begingroup$
I don't think its a problem sorry. I re edited the question. Rather its a scenario I haven't encountered before.
$endgroup$
– user198848
Nov 27 '18 at 0:19






$begingroup$
I don't think its a problem sorry. I re edited the question. Rather its a scenario I haven't encountered before.
$endgroup$
– user198848
Nov 27 '18 at 0:19












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

If the true data generating process implies that Y=0 whenever X=0, then exclude the intercept, otherwise keep the intercept, even it is not significant. One example of this: response variable (Y) is distance the can run, and the covariate (X) is volume of gasoline consumed by the car. When X = 0, Y = 0.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    There are many reasons not to follow this advice. See stats.stackexchange.com/questions/102709/…
    $endgroup$
    – kjetil b halvorsen
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:16










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the link. I read and saw that it was pointed out that the insignificance of the intercept is not enough to remove it from the model. So is it that we remove the intercept only when we have strong theoretical reason to believe that when x=0, y must also equal 0?
    $endgroup$
    – user198848
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:26


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

If the true data generating process implies that Y=0 whenever X=0, then exclude the intercept, otherwise keep the intercept, even it is not significant. One example of this: response variable (Y) is distance the can run, and the covariate (X) is volume of gasoline consumed by the car. When X = 0, Y = 0.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    There are many reasons not to follow this advice. See stats.stackexchange.com/questions/102709/…
    $endgroup$
    – kjetil b halvorsen
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:16










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the link. I read and saw that it was pointed out that the insignificance of the intercept is not enough to remove it from the model. So is it that we remove the intercept only when we have strong theoretical reason to believe that when x=0, y must also equal 0?
    $endgroup$
    – user198848
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:26
















2












$begingroup$

If the true data generating process implies that Y=0 whenever X=0, then exclude the intercept, otherwise keep the intercept, even it is not significant. One example of this: response variable (Y) is distance the can run, and the covariate (X) is volume of gasoline consumed by the car. When X = 0, Y = 0.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    There are many reasons not to follow this advice. See stats.stackexchange.com/questions/102709/…
    $endgroup$
    – kjetil b halvorsen
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:16










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the link. I read and saw that it was pointed out that the insignificance of the intercept is not enough to remove it from the model. So is it that we remove the intercept only when we have strong theoretical reason to believe that when x=0, y must also equal 0?
    $endgroup$
    – user198848
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:26














2












2








2





$begingroup$

If the true data generating process implies that Y=0 whenever X=0, then exclude the intercept, otherwise keep the intercept, even it is not significant. One example of this: response variable (Y) is distance the can run, and the covariate (X) is volume of gasoline consumed by the car. When X = 0, Y = 0.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



If the true data generating process implies that Y=0 whenever X=0, then exclude the intercept, otherwise keep the intercept, even it is not significant. One example of this: response variable (Y) is distance the can run, and the covariate (X) is volume of gasoline consumed by the car. When X = 0, Y = 0.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 30 '18 at 22:50









braaterAfrikaaner

1031




1031










answered Nov 26 '18 at 3:40









user158565user158565

5,3921518




5,3921518












  • $begingroup$
    There are many reasons not to follow this advice. See stats.stackexchange.com/questions/102709/…
    $endgroup$
    – kjetil b halvorsen
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:16










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the link. I read and saw that it was pointed out that the insignificance of the intercept is not enough to remove it from the model. So is it that we remove the intercept only when we have strong theoretical reason to believe that when x=0, y must also equal 0?
    $endgroup$
    – user198848
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:26


















  • $begingroup$
    There are many reasons not to follow this advice. See stats.stackexchange.com/questions/102709/…
    $endgroup$
    – kjetil b halvorsen
    Nov 26 '18 at 9:16










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the link. I read and saw that it was pointed out that the insignificance of the intercept is not enough to remove it from the model. So is it that we remove the intercept only when we have strong theoretical reason to believe that when x=0, y must also equal 0?
    $endgroup$
    – user198848
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:26
















$begingroup$
There are many reasons not to follow this advice. See stats.stackexchange.com/questions/102709/…
$endgroup$
– kjetil b halvorsen
Nov 26 '18 at 9:16




$begingroup$
There are many reasons not to follow this advice. See stats.stackexchange.com/questions/102709/…
$endgroup$
– kjetil b halvorsen
Nov 26 '18 at 9:16












$begingroup$
Thanks for the link. I read and saw that it was pointed out that the insignificance of the intercept is not enough to remove it from the model. So is it that we remove the intercept only when we have strong theoretical reason to believe that when x=0, y must also equal 0?
$endgroup$
– user198848
Nov 27 '18 at 0:26




$begingroup$
Thanks for the link. I read and saw that it was pointed out that the insignificance of the intercept is not enough to remove it from the model. So is it that we remove the intercept only when we have strong theoretical reason to believe that when x=0, y must also equal 0?
$endgroup$
– user198848
Nov 27 '18 at 0:26



-

Popular posts from this blog

Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

Image
up vote 0 down vote favorite I know this question already asked but not getting solution. From this code I will get all the information from the contact but image not found when open vcf files on mac os, also not getting when share this file. I use this stackoverflow link here but It's not help full. var contacts = [CNContact]() let keys = [CNContactVCardSerialization.descriptorForRequiredKeys() ] as [Any] let request = CNContactFetchRequest(keysToFetch: keys as! [CNKeyDescriptor]) do { try self.contactStore.enumerateContacts(with: request) { (contact, stop) in // Array containing all unified contacts from everywhere contacts.append(contact) } } catch { print("unable to fetch contacts") } do { let data = try
Read more

count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

Image
up vote 6 down vote favorite 1 This program is for count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets I am confusing here return k*countP(n-1, k) + countP(n-1, k-1); can some one explain what is happening here? why we are multiplying with k? NOTE->I know this is not the best way to calculate number of partitions that would be DP // A C++ program to count number of partitions // of a set with n elements into k subsets #include<iostream> using namespace std; // Returns count of different partitions of n // elements in k subsets int countP(int n, int k) { // Base cases if (n == 0 || k == 0 || k > n) return 0; if (k == 1 || k == n) return 1; // S(n+1, k) = k*S(n, k) + S(n, k-1) return k*countP(n-1, k) + countP(n-1, k-1); } // Driver program int ma
Read more

A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

Image
0 I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{
Read more