Positioning tables and figures at the end of the respective caption list











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Sir/Madam!



My landscape tables are appearing in the body of the text whereas portrait tables are appearing at the end of the file. Please help me to remove the figures and tables from the text of my file and place them at the end of the file, after the tables and figure caption list. I am enclosing the code.



documentclass[Journal,letterpaper]{ascelike-new}

usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{graphicx} %Allows to import images
usepackage{float} %Allows for control of float positions
graphicspath{ {images/} }

%Tables preamble
usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
usepackage{array}
newcolumntype{$}{>{globalletcurrentrowstylerelax}}
newcolumntype{^}{>{currentrowstyle}}
newcommand{rowstyle}[1]{gdefcurrentrowstyle{#1} #1ignorespaces}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage{lmodern}
usepackage{pdflscape}
usepackage{lscape}
usepackage{rotating} % Provides {sideways}{sidewaysfigure}{sidewaystable} environments
usepackage[figurename=Fig.,labelfont=bf,labelsep=period]{caption}
usepackage{caption}
usepackage{subcaption}
captionsetup{compatibility=false}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{siunitx}

usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
usepackage[colorlinks=true,citecolor=black,linkcolor=black]{hyperref}
usepackage{enumerate}% http://ctan.org/pkg/enumerate
%%Tables preamble
usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
usepackage{array}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{multirow}
usepackage{longtable}
usepackage{lipsum} % just for dummy text- not needed for a longtable

%Flowchart
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, arrows}
NameTag{Singh, today}

begin{document}

The range of Strain transducer was +/- 4000 micro-strain, sensitivity = 500 micro-strain/Vout/Vext with accuracy < +/- 1 percent.

Based on theoretical simulation of the bridge using MATLAB, strain gages were placed at critical locations as shown in Fig. ref{fig:sensorloc}.

%begin{landscape}
%begin{figure}[p !]
begin{sidewaysfigure}
centering
includegraphics[width=columnwidth]{sensor_loc}
caption{Location of sensors}
label{fig:sensorloc}
end{sidewaysfigure}
%end{figure}
%end{landscape}

section{Observations and calculations}
The details of trains for which strains have been measured have been shown in Table ref{tab:train_run}.

begin{table}
centering
caption{Details of trains instrumented for Fatigue life estimation}
label{tab:train_run}
begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{.2in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.2in}^p{.4in}^p{1in}}
hlinehline
Date& Run No& Train details& Engine details& Time (Hrs)& Speed (Kmph) \
hline
18.06.16& 1& 59 BOXN Empty Goods& 27540WAG7& 13:03& 20 to 5 to 20 \
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 16225R/WDM3A& 13:35& 20 \
-do-& 3& 12369 Up Upasana Exp& 22650/WAP4& 14:18& 20 \
-do-& 4& 11448 Up Shaktipunj Exp& 22531/WAP4& 14:26& 20 \
-do-& 5& 59 BXNHS Loaded Goods& 27537/WAG7& 14:46& 20 \
19.06.16& 1& 13151 Up Jammu Tawi Exp& 22906/WAP4& 13:19& 20 \
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 14006R/WDM3A& 13:28& 20 \
-do-& 3& 58 BOXN Loaded Goods& 24693/WAG9& 14:00& 5 to 20 \
hlinehline
end{tabular}
end{table}
%
begin{longtable}{$p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}}
caption{Cumulative GMT of Up Howrah-Barddhaman Chord line between Saktigarh and Barddhaman}
label{tab:GMT} \
hlinehline
Year &Annual GMT&Annual GMT per line&Cum GMT\
hline

1996-97& 38& 19& 480.155\
1997-98& 41& 20.5& 500.655\
1998-99& 42& 21& 521.655\
1999-00& 42& 21& 542.655\
2000-01& 40& 20& 562.655\
2001-02& 43& 21.5& 584.155\
2002-03& 42& 21& 605.155\
2003-04& 42& 21& 626.155\
2004-05& 44& 22& 648.155\
2005-06& 47& 23.5& 671.655\
2006-07& 46& 23& 694.655\
2007-08& 50& 25& 719.655\
2008-09& 58& 29& 748.655\
2009-10& 62& 31& 779.655\
2010-11& 63& 31.5& 811.155\
2011-12& 60& 30& 841.155\
2012-13& 62& 31& 872.155\
2013-14& 63& 31.5& 903.655\
2014-15& 63& 31.5& 935.155\
2015-16& 63& 31.5& 966.655\
hlinehline
multicolumn{5}{l}{Note: Data obtained from Track Modernization Cell of Eastern Railway}
end{longtable}

Sample calculation of effective cycles for the critical member i.e. cross girder (Strain gauge no. 2289) has been furnished in Table ref{tab:SampleCalc}.

begin{table}
centering
caption{Sample calculation of effective cycles for cross girder}
label{tab:SampleCalc}
begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.5in}^p{1.5in}}
hlinehline
Stress range in N/mm2&No. of observed effective cycles from Rain flow histogram (say a)&No. of modified effective cycles (ni) = ax(68/8)x1.4)&No. of theoretical cycles (Ni) as per S-N curve x $10^6$ \
hline
0-10& 117& 1392& 3990.00 \
10-20& 91& 1083& 498.75 \
20-30& 1& 11.9& 147.78 \
30-40& 2& 23.8& 62.34 \
40-50& 2& 23.8& 31.92 \
hlinehline
end{tabular}
end{table}

From Table ref{tab:reslifeeuro3}, it is seen that stringers (after replacement) are still the critical members from fatigue considerations with residual fatigue life of 169 years.

begin{sidewaystable}
centering
caption{Calculation of residual life from Fatigue considerations using S-N curve in Eurocode 3}
label{tab:reslifeeuro3}
begin{tabular}{lllllllllllllll}
hlinehline
multirow{3}{*}{Member} & multirow{3}{*}{Strain} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Observed ni for 8 trains (5 Pass + 3 Goods)} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Equated for 68 trains (48 Pass + 20 Goods)} & {Damage} & {Total} & {Residual} \
& & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & {per} & {life} & {life} \
& Gauge & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & {Day(D)} \
hline
multirow{1}{*}{Top chord} & 2897 & 125 & 4 & 3 & 1 & & 1488 & 47.6 & 35.7 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
Vertical & 2895 & 18 & & & & & 214.2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{Diagonal} & 2892 & 92 & 1 & 2 & & & 1095 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{End raker} & 2829 & 36 & 0 & 2 & 1 & & 428.4 & 0 & 23.8 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
multirow{1}{*}{Bottom chord} & 2891 & 109 & 9 & & & & 1297 & 107 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
multirow{1}{*}{Cross girder} & 2889 & 117 & 91 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1392 & 1083 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 23.8 & 2.7767 & 296 & 204 \
multirow{1}{*}{Stringers} & 2890 & 107 & 111 & 1 & 2 & 4 & 1273 & 1321 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 47.6 & 4.8681 & 169 & 167* \
hlinehline \
multicolumn{5}{l}{*Not reduced as Stringers have been recently changed.} \
multicolumn{9}{l}{Theoretical cycles below 32MPa (stress below cut-off limit) have not been considered.}
end{tabular}
end{sidewaystable}

For this kind of cycle the maximum stress is equal to the minimum stress but completely opposite in nature i.e. $sigma _m$ = 0 as shown Fig. ref{fig:revcycle}.

begin{figure}
centering
includegraphics[scale=0.8]{HCFtest}
caption{Experimental Setup of High Cycle Fatigue test}
label{fig:hcftest}
end{figure}

pagebreak

end{document}


May kindly help..



Thanking you & regards Sitesh










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Sir/Madam!



    My landscape tables are appearing in the body of the text whereas portrait tables are appearing at the end of the file. Please help me to remove the figures and tables from the text of my file and place them at the end of the file, after the tables and figure caption list. I am enclosing the code.



    documentclass[Journal,letterpaper]{ascelike-new}

    usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
    usepackage{graphicx} %Allows to import images
    usepackage{float} %Allows for control of float positions
    graphicspath{ {images/} }

    %Tables preamble
    usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
    usepackage{array}
    newcolumntype{$}{>{globalletcurrentrowstylerelax}}
    newcolumntype{^}{>{currentrowstyle}}
    newcommand{rowstyle}[1]{gdefcurrentrowstyle{#1} #1ignorespaces}
    usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
    usepackage{lmodern}
    usepackage{pdflscape}
    usepackage{lscape}
    usepackage{rotating} % Provides {sideways}{sidewaysfigure}{sidewaystable} environments
    usepackage[figurename=Fig.,labelfont=bf,labelsep=period]{caption}
    usepackage{caption}
    usepackage{subcaption}
    captionsetup{compatibility=false}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    usepackage{siunitx}

    usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
    usepackage[colorlinks=true,citecolor=black,linkcolor=black]{hyperref}
    usepackage{enumerate}% http://ctan.org/pkg/enumerate
    %%Tables preamble
    usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
    usepackage{array}
    usepackage{booktabs}
    usepackage{multirow}
    usepackage{longtable}
    usepackage{lipsum} % just for dummy text- not needed for a longtable

    %Flowchart
    usepackage{tikz}
    usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, arrows}
    NameTag{Singh, today}

    begin{document}

    The range of Strain transducer was +/- 4000 micro-strain, sensitivity = 500 micro-strain/Vout/Vext with accuracy < +/- 1 percent.

    Based on theoretical simulation of the bridge using MATLAB, strain gages were placed at critical locations as shown in Fig. ref{fig:sensorloc}.

    %begin{landscape}
    %begin{figure}[p !]
    begin{sidewaysfigure}
    centering
    includegraphics[width=columnwidth]{sensor_loc}
    caption{Location of sensors}
    label{fig:sensorloc}
    end{sidewaysfigure}
    %end{figure}
    %end{landscape}

    section{Observations and calculations}
    The details of trains for which strains have been measured have been shown in Table ref{tab:train_run}.

    begin{table}
    centering
    caption{Details of trains instrumented for Fatigue life estimation}
    label{tab:train_run}
    begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{.2in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.2in}^p{.4in}^p{1in}}
    hlinehline
    Date& Run No& Train details& Engine details& Time (Hrs)& Speed (Kmph) \
    hline
    18.06.16& 1& 59 BOXN Empty Goods& 27540WAG7& 13:03& 20 to 5 to 20 \
    -do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 16225R/WDM3A& 13:35& 20 \
    -do-& 3& 12369 Up Upasana Exp& 22650/WAP4& 14:18& 20 \
    -do-& 4& 11448 Up Shaktipunj Exp& 22531/WAP4& 14:26& 20 \
    -do-& 5& 59 BXNHS Loaded Goods& 27537/WAG7& 14:46& 20 \
    19.06.16& 1& 13151 Up Jammu Tawi Exp& 22906/WAP4& 13:19& 20 \
    -do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 14006R/WDM3A& 13:28& 20 \
    -do-& 3& 58 BOXN Loaded Goods& 24693/WAG9& 14:00& 5 to 20 \
    hlinehline
    end{tabular}
    end{table}
    %
    begin{longtable}{$p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}}
    caption{Cumulative GMT of Up Howrah-Barddhaman Chord line between Saktigarh and Barddhaman}
    label{tab:GMT} \
    hlinehline
    Year &Annual GMT&Annual GMT per line&Cum GMT\
    hline

    1996-97& 38& 19& 480.155\
    1997-98& 41& 20.5& 500.655\
    1998-99& 42& 21& 521.655\
    1999-00& 42& 21& 542.655\
    2000-01& 40& 20& 562.655\
    2001-02& 43& 21.5& 584.155\
    2002-03& 42& 21& 605.155\
    2003-04& 42& 21& 626.155\
    2004-05& 44& 22& 648.155\
    2005-06& 47& 23.5& 671.655\
    2006-07& 46& 23& 694.655\
    2007-08& 50& 25& 719.655\
    2008-09& 58& 29& 748.655\
    2009-10& 62& 31& 779.655\
    2010-11& 63& 31.5& 811.155\
    2011-12& 60& 30& 841.155\
    2012-13& 62& 31& 872.155\
    2013-14& 63& 31.5& 903.655\
    2014-15& 63& 31.5& 935.155\
    2015-16& 63& 31.5& 966.655\
    hlinehline
    multicolumn{5}{l}{Note: Data obtained from Track Modernization Cell of Eastern Railway}
    end{longtable}

    Sample calculation of effective cycles for the critical member i.e. cross girder (Strain gauge no. 2289) has been furnished in Table ref{tab:SampleCalc}.

    begin{table}
    centering
    caption{Sample calculation of effective cycles for cross girder}
    label{tab:SampleCalc}
    begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.5in}^p{1.5in}}
    hlinehline
    Stress range in N/mm2&No. of observed effective cycles from Rain flow histogram (say a)&No. of modified effective cycles (ni) = ax(68/8)x1.4)&No. of theoretical cycles (Ni) as per S-N curve x $10^6$ \
    hline
    0-10& 117& 1392& 3990.00 \
    10-20& 91& 1083& 498.75 \
    20-30& 1& 11.9& 147.78 \
    30-40& 2& 23.8& 62.34 \
    40-50& 2& 23.8& 31.92 \
    hlinehline
    end{tabular}
    end{table}

    From Table ref{tab:reslifeeuro3}, it is seen that stringers (after replacement) are still the critical members from fatigue considerations with residual fatigue life of 169 years.

    begin{sidewaystable}
    centering
    caption{Calculation of residual life from Fatigue considerations using S-N curve in Eurocode 3}
    label{tab:reslifeeuro3}
    begin{tabular}{lllllllllllllll}
    hlinehline
    multirow{3}{*}{Member} & multirow{3}{*}{Strain} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Observed ni for 8 trains (5 Pass + 3 Goods)} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Equated for 68 trains (48 Pass + 20 Goods)} & {Damage} & {Total} & {Residual} \
    & & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & {per} & {life} & {life} \
    & Gauge & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & {Day(D)} \
    hline
    multirow{1}{*}{Top chord} & 2897 & 125 & 4 & 3 & 1 & & 1488 & 47.6 & 35.7 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
    Vertical & 2895 & 18 & & & & & 214.2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
    multirow{1}{*}{Diagonal} & 2892 & 92 & 1 & 2 & & & 1095 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
    multirow{1}{*}{End raker} & 2829 & 36 & 0 & 2 & 1 & & 428.4 & 0 & 23.8 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
    multirow{1}{*}{Bottom chord} & 2891 & 109 & 9 & & & & 1297 & 107 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
    multirow{1}{*}{Cross girder} & 2889 & 117 & 91 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1392 & 1083 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 23.8 & 2.7767 & 296 & 204 \
    multirow{1}{*}{Stringers} & 2890 & 107 & 111 & 1 & 2 & 4 & 1273 & 1321 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 47.6 & 4.8681 & 169 & 167* \
    hlinehline \
    multicolumn{5}{l}{*Not reduced as Stringers have been recently changed.} \
    multicolumn{9}{l}{Theoretical cycles below 32MPa (stress below cut-off limit) have not been considered.}
    end{tabular}
    end{sidewaystable}

    For this kind of cycle the maximum stress is equal to the minimum stress but completely opposite in nature i.e. $sigma _m$ = 0 as shown Fig. ref{fig:revcycle}.

    begin{figure}
    centering
    includegraphics[scale=0.8]{HCFtest}
    caption{Experimental Setup of High Cycle Fatigue test}
    label{fig:hcftest}
    end{figure}

    pagebreak

    end{document}


    May kindly help..



    Thanking you & regards Sitesh










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Sir/Madam!



      My landscape tables are appearing in the body of the text whereas portrait tables are appearing at the end of the file. Please help me to remove the figures and tables from the text of my file and place them at the end of the file, after the tables and figure caption list. I am enclosing the code.



      documentclass[Journal,letterpaper]{ascelike-new}

      usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
      usepackage{graphicx} %Allows to import images
      usepackage{float} %Allows for control of float positions
      graphicspath{ {images/} }

      %Tables preamble
      usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
      usepackage{array}
      newcolumntype{$}{>{globalletcurrentrowstylerelax}}
      newcolumntype{^}{>{currentrowstyle}}
      newcommand{rowstyle}[1]{gdefcurrentrowstyle{#1} #1ignorespaces}
      usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
      usepackage{lmodern}
      usepackage{pdflscape}
      usepackage{lscape}
      usepackage{rotating} % Provides {sideways}{sidewaysfigure}{sidewaystable} environments
      usepackage[figurename=Fig.,labelfont=bf,labelsep=period]{caption}
      usepackage{caption}
      usepackage{subcaption}
      captionsetup{compatibility=false}
      usepackage{amsmath}
      usepackage{siunitx}

      usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
      usepackage[colorlinks=true,citecolor=black,linkcolor=black]{hyperref}
      usepackage{enumerate}% http://ctan.org/pkg/enumerate
      %%Tables preamble
      usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
      usepackage{array}
      usepackage{booktabs}
      usepackage{multirow}
      usepackage{longtable}
      usepackage{lipsum} % just for dummy text- not needed for a longtable

      %Flowchart
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, arrows}
      NameTag{Singh, today}

      begin{document}

      The range of Strain transducer was +/- 4000 micro-strain, sensitivity = 500 micro-strain/Vout/Vext with accuracy < +/- 1 percent.

      Based on theoretical simulation of the bridge using MATLAB, strain gages were placed at critical locations as shown in Fig. ref{fig:sensorloc}.

      %begin{landscape}
      %begin{figure}[p !]
      begin{sidewaysfigure}
      centering
      includegraphics[width=columnwidth]{sensor_loc}
      caption{Location of sensors}
      label{fig:sensorloc}
      end{sidewaysfigure}
      %end{figure}
      %end{landscape}

      section{Observations and calculations}
      The details of trains for which strains have been measured have been shown in Table ref{tab:train_run}.

      begin{table}
      centering
      caption{Details of trains instrumented for Fatigue life estimation}
      label{tab:train_run}
      begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{.2in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.2in}^p{.4in}^p{1in}}
      hlinehline
      Date& Run No& Train details& Engine details& Time (Hrs)& Speed (Kmph) \
      hline
      18.06.16& 1& 59 BOXN Empty Goods& 27540WAG7& 13:03& 20 to 5 to 20 \
      -do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 16225R/WDM3A& 13:35& 20 \
      -do-& 3& 12369 Up Upasana Exp& 22650/WAP4& 14:18& 20 \
      -do-& 4& 11448 Up Shaktipunj Exp& 22531/WAP4& 14:26& 20 \
      -do-& 5& 59 BXNHS Loaded Goods& 27537/WAG7& 14:46& 20 \
      19.06.16& 1& 13151 Up Jammu Tawi Exp& 22906/WAP4& 13:19& 20 \
      -do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 14006R/WDM3A& 13:28& 20 \
      -do-& 3& 58 BOXN Loaded Goods& 24693/WAG9& 14:00& 5 to 20 \
      hlinehline
      end{tabular}
      end{table}
      %
      begin{longtable}{$p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}}
      caption{Cumulative GMT of Up Howrah-Barddhaman Chord line between Saktigarh and Barddhaman}
      label{tab:GMT} \
      hlinehline
      Year &Annual GMT&Annual GMT per line&Cum GMT\
      hline

      1996-97& 38& 19& 480.155\
      1997-98& 41& 20.5& 500.655\
      1998-99& 42& 21& 521.655\
      1999-00& 42& 21& 542.655\
      2000-01& 40& 20& 562.655\
      2001-02& 43& 21.5& 584.155\
      2002-03& 42& 21& 605.155\
      2003-04& 42& 21& 626.155\
      2004-05& 44& 22& 648.155\
      2005-06& 47& 23.5& 671.655\
      2006-07& 46& 23& 694.655\
      2007-08& 50& 25& 719.655\
      2008-09& 58& 29& 748.655\
      2009-10& 62& 31& 779.655\
      2010-11& 63& 31.5& 811.155\
      2011-12& 60& 30& 841.155\
      2012-13& 62& 31& 872.155\
      2013-14& 63& 31.5& 903.655\
      2014-15& 63& 31.5& 935.155\
      2015-16& 63& 31.5& 966.655\
      hlinehline
      multicolumn{5}{l}{Note: Data obtained from Track Modernization Cell of Eastern Railway}
      end{longtable}

      Sample calculation of effective cycles for the critical member i.e. cross girder (Strain gauge no. 2289) has been furnished in Table ref{tab:SampleCalc}.

      begin{table}
      centering
      caption{Sample calculation of effective cycles for cross girder}
      label{tab:SampleCalc}
      begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.5in}^p{1.5in}}
      hlinehline
      Stress range in N/mm2&No. of observed effective cycles from Rain flow histogram (say a)&No. of modified effective cycles (ni) = ax(68/8)x1.4)&No. of theoretical cycles (Ni) as per S-N curve x $10^6$ \
      hline
      0-10& 117& 1392& 3990.00 \
      10-20& 91& 1083& 498.75 \
      20-30& 1& 11.9& 147.78 \
      30-40& 2& 23.8& 62.34 \
      40-50& 2& 23.8& 31.92 \
      hlinehline
      end{tabular}
      end{table}

      From Table ref{tab:reslifeeuro3}, it is seen that stringers (after replacement) are still the critical members from fatigue considerations with residual fatigue life of 169 years.

      begin{sidewaystable}
      centering
      caption{Calculation of residual life from Fatigue considerations using S-N curve in Eurocode 3}
      label{tab:reslifeeuro3}
      begin{tabular}{lllllllllllllll}
      hlinehline
      multirow{3}{*}{Member} & multirow{3}{*}{Strain} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Observed ni for 8 trains (5 Pass + 3 Goods)} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Equated for 68 trains (48 Pass + 20 Goods)} & {Damage} & {Total} & {Residual} \
      & & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & {per} & {life} & {life} \
      & Gauge & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & {Day(D)} \
      hline
      multirow{1}{*}{Top chord} & 2897 & 125 & 4 & 3 & 1 & & 1488 & 47.6 & 35.7 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
      Vertical & 2895 & 18 & & & & & 214.2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
      multirow{1}{*}{Diagonal} & 2892 & 92 & 1 & 2 & & & 1095 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
      multirow{1}{*}{End raker} & 2829 & 36 & 0 & 2 & 1 & & 428.4 & 0 & 23.8 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
      multirow{1}{*}{Bottom chord} & 2891 & 109 & 9 & & & & 1297 & 107 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
      multirow{1}{*}{Cross girder} & 2889 & 117 & 91 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1392 & 1083 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 23.8 & 2.7767 & 296 & 204 \
      multirow{1}{*}{Stringers} & 2890 & 107 & 111 & 1 & 2 & 4 & 1273 & 1321 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 47.6 & 4.8681 & 169 & 167* \
      hlinehline \
      multicolumn{5}{l}{*Not reduced as Stringers have been recently changed.} \
      multicolumn{9}{l}{Theoretical cycles below 32MPa (stress below cut-off limit) have not been considered.}
      end{tabular}
      end{sidewaystable}

      For this kind of cycle the maximum stress is equal to the minimum stress but completely opposite in nature i.e. $sigma _m$ = 0 as shown Fig. ref{fig:revcycle}.

      begin{figure}
      centering
      includegraphics[scale=0.8]{HCFtest}
      caption{Experimental Setup of High Cycle Fatigue test}
      label{fig:hcftest}
      end{figure}

      pagebreak

      end{document}


      May kindly help..



      Thanking you & regards Sitesh










      share|improve this question















      Sir/Madam!



      My landscape tables are appearing in the body of the text whereas portrait tables are appearing at the end of the file. Please help me to remove the figures and tables from the text of my file and place them at the end of the file, after the tables and figure caption list. I am enclosing the code.



      documentclass[Journal,letterpaper]{ascelike-new}

      usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
      usepackage{graphicx} %Allows to import images
      usepackage{float} %Allows for control of float positions
      graphicspath{ {images/} }

      %Tables preamble
      usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
      usepackage{array}
      newcolumntype{$}{>{globalletcurrentrowstylerelax}}
      newcolumntype{^}{>{currentrowstyle}}
      newcommand{rowstyle}[1]{gdefcurrentrowstyle{#1} #1ignorespaces}
      usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
      usepackage{lmodern}
      usepackage{pdflscape}
      usepackage{lscape}
      usepackage{rotating} % Provides {sideways}{sidewaysfigure}{sidewaystable} environments
      usepackage[figurename=Fig.,labelfont=bf,labelsep=period]{caption}
      usepackage{caption}
      usepackage{subcaption}
      captionsetup{compatibility=false}
      usepackage{amsmath}
      usepackage{siunitx}

      usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
      usepackage[colorlinks=true,citecolor=black,linkcolor=black]{hyperref}
      usepackage{enumerate}% http://ctan.org/pkg/enumerate
      %%Tables preamble
      usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
      usepackage{array}
      usepackage{booktabs}
      usepackage{multirow}
      usepackage{longtable}
      usepackage{lipsum} % just for dummy text- not needed for a longtable

      %Flowchart
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, arrows}
      NameTag{Singh, today}

      begin{document}

      The range of Strain transducer was +/- 4000 micro-strain, sensitivity = 500 micro-strain/Vout/Vext with accuracy < +/- 1 percent.

      Based on theoretical simulation of the bridge using MATLAB, strain gages were placed at critical locations as shown in Fig. ref{fig:sensorloc}.

      %begin{landscape}
      %begin{figure}[p !]
      begin{sidewaysfigure}
      centering
      includegraphics[width=columnwidth]{sensor_loc}
      caption{Location of sensors}
      label{fig:sensorloc}
      end{sidewaysfigure}
      %end{figure}
      %end{landscape}

      section{Observations and calculations}
      The details of trains for which strains have been measured have been shown in Table ref{tab:train_run}.

      begin{table}
      centering
      caption{Details of trains instrumented for Fatigue life estimation}
      label{tab:train_run}
      begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{.2in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.2in}^p{.4in}^p{1in}}
      hlinehline
      Date& Run No& Train details& Engine details& Time (Hrs)& Speed (Kmph) \
      hline
      18.06.16& 1& 59 BOXN Empty Goods& 27540WAG7& 13:03& 20 to 5 to 20 \
      -do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 16225R/WDM3A& 13:35& 20 \
      -do-& 3& 12369 Up Upasana Exp& 22650/WAP4& 14:18& 20 \
      -do-& 4& 11448 Up Shaktipunj Exp& 22531/WAP4& 14:26& 20 \
      -do-& 5& 59 BXNHS Loaded Goods& 27537/WAG7& 14:46& 20 \
      19.06.16& 1& 13151 Up Jammu Tawi Exp& 22906/WAP4& 13:19& 20 \
      -do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 14006R/WDM3A& 13:28& 20 \
      -do-& 3& 58 BOXN Loaded Goods& 24693/WAG9& 14:00& 5 to 20 \
      hlinehline
      end{tabular}
      end{table}
      %
      begin{longtable}{$p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}}
      caption{Cumulative GMT of Up Howrah-Barddhaman Chord line between Saktigarh and Barddhaman}
      label{tab:GMT} \
      hlinehline
      Year &Annual GMT&Annual GMT per line&Cum GMT\
      hline

      1996-97& 38& 19& 480.155\
      1997-98& 41& 20.5& 500.655\
      1998-99& 42& 21& 521.655\
      1999-00& 42& 21& 542.655\
      2000-01& 40& 20& 562.655\
      2001-02& 43& 21.5& 584.155\
      2002-03& 42& 21& 605.155\
      2003-04& 42& 21& 626.155\
      2004-05& 44& 22& 648.155\
      2005-06& 47& 23.5& 671.655\
      2006-07& 46& 23& 694.655\
      2007-08& 50& 25& 719.655\
      2008-09& 58& 29& 748.655\
      2009-10& 62& 31& 779.655\
      2010-11& 63& 31.5& 811.155\
      2011-12& 60& 30& 841.155\
      2012-13& 62& 31& 872.155\
      2013-14& 63& 31.5& 903.655\
      2014-15& 63& 31.5& 935.155\
      2015-16& 63& 31.5& 966.655\
      hlinehline
      multicolumn{5}{l}{Note: Data obtained from Track Modernization Cell of Eastern Railway}
      end{longtable}

      Sample calculation of effective cycles for the critical member i.e. cross girder (Strain gauge no. 2289) has been furnished in Table ref{tab:SampleCalc}.

      begin{table}
      centering
      caption{Sample calculation of effective cycles for cross girder}
      label{tab:SampleCalc}
      begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.5in}^p{1.5in}}
      hlinehline
      Stress range in N/mm2&No. of observed effective cycles from Rain flow histogram (say a)&No. of modified effective cycles (ni) = ax(68/8)x1.4)&No. of theoretical cycles (Ni) as per S-N curve x $10^6$ \
      hline
      0-10& 117& 1392& 3990.00 \
      10-20& 91& 1083& 498.75 \
      20-30& 1& 11.9& 147.78 \
      30-40& 2& 23.8& 62.34 \
      40-50& 2& 23.8& 31.92 \
      hlinehline
      end{tabular}
      end{table}

      From Table ref{tab:reslifeeuro3}, it is seen that stringers (after replacement) are still the critical members from fatigue considerations with residual fatigue life of 169 years.

      begin{sidewaystable}
      centering
      caption{Calculation of residual life from Fatigue considerations using S-N curve in Eurocode 3}
      label{tab:reslifeeuro3}
      begin{tabular}{lllllllllllllll}
      hlinehline
      multirow{3}{*}{Member} & multirow{3}{*}{Strain} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Observed ni for 8 trains (5 Pass + 3 Goods)} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Equated for 68 trains (48 Pass + 20 Goods)} & {Damage} & {Total} & {Residual} \
      & & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & {per} & {life} & {life} \
      & Gauge & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & {Day(D)} \
      hline
      multirow{1}{*}{Top chord} & 2897 & 125 & 4 & 3 & 1 & & 1488 & 47.6 & 35.7 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
      Vertical & 2895 & 18 & & & & & 214.2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
      multirow{1}{*}{Diagonal} & 2892 & 92 & 1 & 2 & & & 1095 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
      multirow{1}{*}{End raker} & 2829 & 36 & 0 & 2 & 1 & & 428.4 & 0 & 23.8 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \
      multirow{1}{*}{Bottom chord} & 2891 & 109 & 9 & & & & 1297 & 107 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \
      multirow{1}{*}{Cross girder} & 2889 & 117 & 91 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1392 & 1083 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 23.8 & 2.7767 & 296 & 204 \
      multirow{1}{*}{Stringers} & 2890 & 107 & 111 & 1 & 2 & 4 & 1273 & 1321 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 47.6 & 4.8681 & 169 & 167* \
      hlinehline \
      multicolumn{5}{l}{*Not reduced as Stringers have been recently changed.} \
      multicolumn{9}{l}{Theoretical cycles below 32MPa (stress below cut-off limit) have not been considered.}
      end{tabular}
      end{sidewaystable}

      For this kind of cycle the maximum stress is equal to the minimum stress but completely opposite in nature i.e. $sigma _m$ = 0 as shown Fig. ref{fig:revcycle}.

      begin{figure}
      centering
      includegraphics[scale=0.8]{HCFtest}
      caption{Experimental Setup of High Cycle Fatigue test}
      label{fig:hcftest}
      end{figure}

      pagebreak

      end{document}


      May kindly help..



      Thanking you & regards Sitesh







      tables floats positioning






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      Zarko

      117k865155




      117k865155










      asked 1 hour ago









      Sitesh Singh

      61




      61



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462290%2fpositioning-tables-and-figures-at-the-end-of-the-respective-caption-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462290%2fpositioning-tables-and-figures-at-the-end-of-the-respective-caption-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

          Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

          Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)