Use sprintf syntax inside logstash's sprintf syntax












0















For the below data structure:



{
"sprints": [
{
"id": 17193,
"name": "Sprint 12"
},
{
"id": 16510,
"name": "Sprint 11"
}
],
"velocityStatEntries": {
"16510": {
"estimated": {
"value": 49
},
"completed": {
"value": 36
}
},
"17193": {
"estimated": {
"value": 52
},
"completed": {
"value": 70
}
}
}
}


Given this, I want to be able to produce an Elasticsearch object that's easier to handle, by adding the values of the Estimated and Completed fields to the sprints with their matching IDs.



Ideally, I would like to handle this without writing Ruby, but I am not finding a logstash-native solution that handles this scnenario.



First, I split the data on the sprints field using split, so, I only have a single sprints object, and can use [sprints][id] to know what sprint I'm processing.



Then, I have attempted to work with the mutate filter, in one of two ways:
- using merge to add the [velocityStateEntries] object to the
current sprint
- using add_field to add the two fields I need



Syntactically, is this possible? Ideally, I would want to be able to do a 'double substitution' of sorts, obtaining the estimated time for the current sprint something like:



add_field => {
"estimatedTime" => "%{[velocityStatEntries][%{[sprints][id]}][estimated][value]}"
}


but this only seems to work with a hardcoded format such as "estimatedTime" => "%{[velocityStatEntries][1234][estimated][value]}"



Do I have to use the Ruby format for this?










share|improve this question



























    0















    For the below data structure:



    {
    "sprints": [
    {
    "id": 17193,
    "name": "Sprint 12"
    },
    {
    "id": 16510,
    "name": "Sprint 11"
    }
    ],
    "velocityStatEntries": {
    "16510": {
    "estimated": {
    "value": 49
    },
    "completed": {
    "value": 36
    }
    },
    "17193": {
    "estimated": {
    "value": 52
    },
    "completed": {
    "value": 70
    }
    }
    }
    }


    Given this, I want to be able to produce an Elasticsearch object that's easier to handle, by adding the values of the Estimated and Completed fields to the sprints with their matching IDs.



    Ideally, I would like to handle this without writing Ruby, but I am not finding a logstash-native solution that handles this scnenario.



    First, I split the data on the sprints field using split, so, I only have a single sprints object, and can use [sprints][id] to know what sprint I'm processing.



    Then, I have attempted to work with the mutate filter, in one of two ways:
    - using merge to add the [velocityStateEntries] object to the
    current sprint
    - using add_field to add the two fields I need



    Syntactically, is this possible? Ideally, I would want to be able to do a 'double substitution' of sorts, obtaining the estimated time for the current sprint something like:



    add_field => {
    "estimatedTime" => "%{[velocityStatEntries][%{[sprints][id]}][estimated][value]}"
    }


    but this only seems to work with a hardcoded format such as "estimatedTime" => "%{[velocityStatEntries][1234][estimated][value]}"



    Do I have to use the Ruby format for this?










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      For the below data structure:



      {
      "sprints": [
      {
      "id": 17193,
      "name": "Sprint 12"
      },
      {
      "id": 16510,
      "name": "Sprint 11"
      }
      ],
      "velocityStatEntries": {
      "16510": {
      "estimated": {
      "value": 49
      },
      "completed": {
      "value": 36
      }
      },
      "17193": {
      "estimated": {
      "value": 52
      },
      "completed": {
      "value": 70
      }
      }
      }
      }


      Given this, I want to be able to produce an Elasticsearch object that's easier to handle, by adding the values of the Estimated and Completed fields to the sprints with their matching IDs.



      Ideally, I would like to handle this without writing Ruby, but I am not finding a logstash-native solution that handles this scnenario.



      First, I split the data on the sprints field using split, so, I only have a single sprints object, and can use [sprints][id] to know what sprint I'm processing.



      Then, I have attempted to work with the mutate filter, in one of two ways:
      - using merge to add the [velocityStateEntries] object to the
      current sprint
      - using add_field to add the two fields I need



      Syntactically, is this possible? Ideally, I would want to be able to do a 'double substitution' of sorts, obtaining the estimated time for the current sprint something like:



      add_field => {
      "estimatedTime" => "%{[velocityStatEntries][%{[sprints][id]}][estimated][value]}"
      }


      but this only seems to work with a hardcoded format such as "estimatedTime" => "%{[velocityStatEntries][1234][estimated][value]}"



      Do I have to use the Ruby format for this?










      share|improve this question














      For the below data structure:



      {
      "sprints": [
      {
      "id": 17193,
      "name": "Sprint 12"
      },
      {
      "id": 16510,
      "name": "Sprint 11"
      }
      ],
      "velocityStatEntries": {
      "16510": {
      "estimated": {
      "value": 49
      },
      "completed": {
      "value": 36
      }
      },
      "17193": {
      "estimated": {
      "value": 52
      },
      "completed": {
      "value": 70
      }
      }
      }
      }


      Given this, I want to be able to produce an Elasticsearch object that's easier to handle, by adding the values of the Estimated and Completed fields to the sprints with their matching IDs.



      Ideally, I would like to handle this without writing Ruby, but I am not finding a logstash-native solution that handles this scnenario.



      First, I split the data on the sprints field using split, so, I only have a single sprints object, and can use [sprints][id] to know what sprint I'm processing.



      Then, I have attempted to work with the mutate filter, in one of two ways:
      - using merge to add the [velocityStateEntries] object to the
      current sprint
      - using add_field to add the two fields I need



      Syntactically, is this possible? Ideally, I would want to be able to do a 'double substitution' of sorts, obtaining the estimated time for the current sprint something like:



      add_field => {
      "estimatedTime" => "%{[velocityStatEntries][%{[sprints][id]}][estimated][value]}"
      }


      but this only seems to work with a hardcoded format such as "estimatedTime" => "%{[velocityStatEntries][1234][estimated][value]}"



      Do I have to use the Ruby format for this?







      printf logstash logstash-configuration






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 28 '18 at 16:22









      José MaiaJosé Maia

      124211




      124211
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          For what it's worth, the Ruby solution is very simple:



            ruby {
          code => "
          sprintId = event.get('[sprints][id]');
          estimated = event.get('[velocityStatEntries]['+(sprintId).to_s+'][estimated][value]');
          completed = event.get('[velocityStatEntries]['+(sprintId).to_s+'][completed][value]');
          event.set('[sprints][estimatedUnits]', estimated);
          event.set('[sprints][completedUnits]', completed);
          "
          }





          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53523897%2fuse-sprintf-syntax-inside-logstashs-sprintf-syntax%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            For what it's worth, the Ruby solution is very simple:



              ruby {
            code => "
            sprintId = event.get('[sprints][id]');
            estimated = event.get('[velocityStatEntries]['+(sprintId).to_s+'][estimated][value]');
            completed = event.get('[velocityStatEntries]['+(sprintId).to_s+'][completed][value]');
            event.set('[sprints][estimatedUnits]', estimated);
            event.set('[sprints][completedUnits]', completed);
            "
            }





            share|improve this answer




























              0














              For what it's worth, the Ruby solution is very simple:



                ruby {
              code => "
              sprintId = event.get('[sprints][id]');
              estimated = event.get('[velocityStatEntries]['+(sprintId).to_s+'][estimated][value]');
              completed = event.get('[velocityStatEntries]['+(sprintId).to_s+'][completed][value]');
              event.set('[sprints][estimatedUnits]', estimated);
              event.set('[sprints][completedUnits]', completed);
              "
              }





              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0







                For what it's worth, the Ruby solution is very simple:



                  ruby {
                code => "
                sprintId = event.get('[sprints][id]');
                estimated = event.get('[velocityStatEntries]['+(sprintId).to_s+'][estimated][value]');
                completed = event.get('[velocityStatEntries]['+(sprintId).to_s+'][completed][value]');
                event.set('[sprints][estimatedUnits]', estimated);
                event.set('[sprints][completedUnits]', completed);
                "
                }





                share|improve this answer













                For what it's worth, the Ruby solution is very simple:



                  ruby {
                code => "
                sprintId = event.get('[sprints][id]');
                estimated = event.get('[velocityStatEntries]['+(sprintId).to_s+'][estimated][value]');
                completed = event.get('[velocityStatEntries]['+(sprintId).to_s+'][completed][value]');
                event.set('[sprints][estimatedUnits]', estimated);
                event.set('[sprints][completedUnits]', completed);
                "
                }






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 28 '18 at 17:28









                José MaiaJosé Maia

                124211




                124211
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53523897%2fuse-sprintf-syntax-inside-logstashs-sprintf-syntax%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

                    count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

                    A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks