TSQL One sequence of characters must follow another












0















First time question but thought I would see if anyone has a clear idea how to do this. Thank you.



I have a view that contains information about procedures in a hospital. Usual name and date fields and then there is a field that contains all the associated procedures that are concatenated into a single field and pipe delimited. Procedure codes are usually 4 digits and represent each individual procedure completed.



E.g. Name, DateOfBirth,|W822|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



Procedure codes starting W833,W834,W835 should always be followed by a site code (where on the body the proc was carried out) Z00-Z93 or Z95-Z99



However, it may have a Y code in between (Y282,...) the W and the Z code



There may also be a Z94* following the Y* code



How could you construct a query to find incorrect procedures.



I assume the best way would be a rather convoluted CASE statement. Anyone have any other suggestions?



Thank you.










share|improve this question























  • Please try to set up a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example, at least provide a set of sample data with the expected output. Furthermore, it helps to show, what you've tried yourself.

    – Shnugo
    Nov 28 '18 at 8:02











  • Hi @distressednhs is there any chance of splitting that data structure in to 2 tables? One with the patient information and one with the procedure information? Then you can store each patient and procedure as a row rather than having concatenated columns which encourage complex case statements.

    – Dwight Reynoldson
    Nov 28 '18 at 8:06











  • Best option is not to use delimited strings in the first place....

    – Zohar Peled
    Nov 28 '18 at 10:01
















0















First time question but thought I would see if anyone has a clear idea how to do this. Thank you.



I have a view that contains information about procedures in a hospital. Usual name and date fields and then there is a field that contains all the associated procedures that are concatenated into a single field and pipe delimited. Procedure codes are usually 4 digits and represent each individual procedure completed.



E.g. Name, DateOfBirth,|W822|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



Procedure codes starting W833,W834,W835 should always be followed by a site code (where on the body the proc was carried out) Z00-Z93 or Z95-Z99



However, it may have a Y code in between (Y282,...) the W and the Z code



There may also be a Z94* following the Y* code



How could you construct a query to find incorrect procedures.



I assume the best way would be a rather convoluted CASE statement. Anyone have any other suggestions?



Thank you.










share|improve this question























  • Please try to set up a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example, at least provide a set of sample data with the expected output. Furthermore, it helps to show, what you've tried yourself.

    – Shnugo
    Nov 28 '18 at 8:02











  • Hi @distressednhs is there any chance of splitting that data structure in to 2 tables? One with the patient information and one with the procedure information? Then you can store each patient and procedure as a row rather than having concatenated columns which encourage complex case statements.

    – Dwight Reynoldson
    Nov 28 '18 at 8:06











  • Best option is not to use delimited strings in the first place....

    – Zohar Peled
    Nov 28 '18 at 10:01














0












0








0








First time question but thought I would see if anyone has a clear idea how to do this. Thank you.



I have a view that contains information about procedures in a hospital. Usual name and date fields and then there is a field that contains all the associated procedures that are concatenated into a single field and pipe delimited. Procedure codes are usually 4 digits and represent each individual procedure completed.



E.g. Name, DateOfBirth,|W822|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



Procedure codes starting W833,W834,W835 should always be followed by a site code (where on the body the proc was carried out) Z00-Z93 or Z95-Z99



However, it may have a Y code in between (Y282,...) the W and the Z code



There may also be a Z94* following the Y* code



How could you construct a query to find incorrect procedures.



I assume the best way would be a rather convoluted CASE statement. Anyone have any other suggestions?



Thank you.










share|improve this question














First time question but thought I would see if anyone has a clear idea how to do this. Thank you.



I have a view that contains information about procedures in a hospital. Usual name and date fields and then there is a field that contains all the associated procedures that are concatenated into a single field and pipe delimited. Procedure codes are usually 4 digits and represent each individual procedure completed.



E.g. Name, DateOfBirth,|W822|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



Procedure codes starting W833,W834,W835 should always be followed by a site code (where on the body the proc was carried out) Z00-Z93 or Z95-Z99



However, it may have a Y code in between (Y282,...) the W and the Z code



There may also be a Z94* following the Y* code



How could you construct a query to find incorrect procedures.



I assume the best way would be a rather convoluted CASE statement. Anyone have any other suggestions?



Thank you.







tsql case






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 28 '18 at 7:34









distressedinnhsdistressedinnhs

124




124













  • Please try to set up a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example, at least provide a set of sample data with the expected output. Furthermore, it helps to show, what you've tried yourself.

    – Shnugo
    Nov 28 '18 at 8:02











  • Hi @distressednhs is there any chance of splitting that data structure in to 2 tables? One with the patient information and one with the procedure information? Then you can store each patient and procedure as a row rather than having concatenated columns which encourage complex case statements.

    – Dwight Reynoldson
    Nov 28 '18 at 8:06











  • Best option is not to use delimited strings in the first place....

    – Zohar Peled
    Nov 28 '18 at 10:01



















  • Please try to set up a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example, at least provide a set of sample data with the expected output. Furthermore, it helps to show, what you've tried yourself.

    – Shnugo
    Nov 28 '18 at 8:02











  • Hi @distressednhs is there any chance of splitting that data structure in to 2 tables? One with the patient information and one with the procedure information? Then you can store each patient and procedure as a row rather than having concatenated columns which encourage complex case statements.

    – Dwight Reynoldson
    Nov 28 '18 at 8:06











  • Best option is not to use delimited strings in the first place....

    – Zohar Peled
    Nov 28 '18 at 10:01

















Please try to set up a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example, at least provide a set of sample data with the expected output. Furthermore, it helps to show, what you've tried yourself.

– Shnugo
Nov 28 '18 at 8:02





Please try to set up a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example, at least provide a set of sample data with the expected output. Furthermore, it helps to show, what you've tried yourself.

– Shnugo
Nov 28 '18 at 8:02













Hi @distressednhs is there any chance of splitting that data structure in to 2 tables? One with the patient information and one with the procedure information? Then you can store each patient and procedure as a row rather than having concatenated columns which encourage complex case statements.

– Dwight Reynoldson
Nov 28 '18 at 8:06





Hi @distressednhs is there any chance of splitting that data structure in to 2 tables? One with the patient information and one with the procedure information? Then you can store each patient and procedure as a row rather than having concatenated columns which encourage complex case statements.

– Dwight Reynoldson
Nov 28 '18 at 8:06













Best option is not to use delimited strings in the first place....

– Zohar Peled
Nov 28 '18 at 10:01





Best option is not to use delimited strings in the first place....

– Zohar Peled
Nov 28 '18 at 10:01












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














If you just want to get rows where the procedure codes are in the wrong order you could use a function to validate your procedure codes:



CREATE FUNCTION fn_ValidateOrder ( @InputString NVARCHAR(MAX), @Delimiter NCHAR(1))
RETURNS BIT
AS
BEGIN

DECLARE @Valid BIT = 0, @Errors INT
/* Table to hold splitt string */
DECLARE @T TABLE (id INT IDENTITY(1,1),Val NVARCHAR(128) NULL)
INSERT INTO @T
SELECT value FROM STRING_SPLIT(@InputString,@Delimiter) WHERE value != ''
/* Validated order */
;WITH rn AS (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY val) AS rn
,id,
val
FROM @T
)
/* Count errors */
SELECT @Errors=SUM(CASE WHEN id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) FROM rn WHERE id!=rn
/* Set return value */
IF @Errors>0
SET @Valid=0
ELSE
SET @Valid=1

RETURN @Valid
END


I used the following test data to validate:



/* Test Data*/
DECLARE @data TABLE (DateOfBirth VARCHAR(6),ProcedureCode VARCHAR(MAX))

INSERT INTO @data (DateOfBirth,ProcedureCode)
VALUES ('010176','|W822|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||'),
('120176','|W822|Z282|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||')

/* Validated test data */
SELECT
DateOfBirth,
dbo.fn_ValidateOrder(ProcedureCode,'|') AS ValidOrder,
ProcedureCode
FROM @data
WHERE dbo.fn_ValidateOrder(ProcedureCode,'|') = 0


Note that this will only work on SQL 2016 and newer, as the function use SPLIT_STRING.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you MariusE. Will try to digest this when I get time and apply it. Looks very promising.

    – distressedinnhs
    Nov 28 '18 at 15:15











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53514319%2ftsql-one-sequence-of-characters-must-follow-another%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














If you just want to get rows where the procedure codes are in the wrong order you could use a function to validate your procedure codes:



CREATE FUNCTION fn_ValidateOrder ( @InputString NVARCHAR(MAX), @Delimiter NCHAR(1))
RETURNS BIT
AS
BEGIN

DECLARE @Valid BIT = 0, @Errors INT
/* Table to hold splitt string */
DECLARE @T TABLE (id INT IDENTITY(1,1),Val NVARCHAR(128) NULL)
INSERT INTO @T
SELECT value FROM STRING_SPLIT(@InputString,@Delimiter) WHERE value != ''
/* Validated order */
;WITH rn AS (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY val) AS rn
,id,
val
FROM @T
)
/* Count errors */
SELECT @Errors=SUM(CASE WHEN id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) FROM rn WHERE id!=rn
/* Set return value */
IF @Errors>0
SET @Valid=0
ELSE
SET @Valid=1

RETURN @Valid
END


I used the following test data to validate:



/* Test Data*/
DECLARE @data TABLE (DateOfBirth VARCHAR(6),ProcedureCode VARCHAR(MAX))

INSERT INTO @data (DateOfBirth,ProcedureCode)
VALUES ('010176','|W822|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||'),
('120176','|W822|Z282|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||')

/* Validated test data */
SELECT
DateOfBirth,
dbo.fn_ValidateOrder(ProcedureCode,'|') AS ValidOrder,
ProcedureCode
FROM @data
WHERE dbo.fn_ValidateOrder(ProcedureCode,'|') = 0


Note that this will only work on SQL 2016 and newer, as the function use SPLIT_STRING.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you MariusE. Will try to digest this when I get time and apply it. Looks very promising.

    – distressedinnhs
    Nov 28 '18 at 15:15
















0














If you just want to get rows where the procedure codes are in the wrong order you could use a function to validate your procedure codes:



CREATE FUNCTION fn_ValidateOrder ( @InputString NVARCHAR(MAX), @Delimiter NCHAR(1))
RETURNS BIT
AS
BEGIN

DECLARE @Valid BIT = 0, @Errors INT
/* Table to hold splitt string */
DECLARE @T TABLE (id INT IDENTITY(1,1),Val NVARCHAR(128) NULL)
INSERT INTO @T
SELECT value FROM STRING_SPLIT(@InputString,@Delimiter) WHERE value != ''
/* Validated order */
;WITH rn AS (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY val) AS rn
,id,
val
FROM @T
)
/* Count errors */
SELECT @Errors=SUM(CASE WHEN id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) FROM rn WHERE id!=rn
/* Set return value */
IF @Errors>0
SET @Valid=0
ELSE
SET @Valid=1

RETURN @Valid
END


I used the following test data to validate:



/* Test Data*/
DECLARE @data TABLE (DateOfBirth VARCHAR(6),ProcedureCode VARCHAR(MAX))

INSERT INTO @data (DateOfBirth,ProcedureCode)
VALUES ('010176','|W822|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||'),
('120176','|W822|Z282|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||')

/* Validated test data */
SELECT
DateOfBirth,
dbo.fn_ValidateOrder(ProcedureCode,'|') AS ValidOrder,
ProcedureCode
FROM @data
WHERE dbo.fn_ValidateOrder(ProcedureCode,'|') = 0


Note that this will only work on SQL 2016 and newer, as the function use SPLIT_STRING.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you MariusE. Will try to digest this when I get time and apply it. Looks very promising.

    – distressedinnhs
    Nov 28 '18 at 15:15














0












0








0







If you just want to get rows where the procedure codes are in the wrong order you could use a function to validate your procedure codes:



CREATE FUNCTION fn_ValidateOrder ( @InputString NVARCHAR(MAX), @Delimiter NCHAR(1))
RETURNS BIT
AS
BEGIN

DECLARE @Valid BIT = 0, @Errors INT
/* Table to hold splitt string */
DECLARE @T TABLE (id INT IDENTITY(1,1),Val NVARCHAR(128) NULL)
INSERT INTO @T
SELECT value FROM STRING_SPLIT(@InputString,@Delimiter) WHERE value != ''
/* Validated order */
;WITH rn AS (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY val) AS rn
,id,
val
FROM @T
)
/* Count errors */
SELECT @Errors=SUM(CASE WHEN id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) FROM rn WHERE id!=rn
/* Set return value */
IF @Errors>0
SET @Valid=0
ELSE
SET @Valid=1

RETURN @Valid
END


I used the following test data to validate:



/* Test Data*/
DECLARE @data TABLE (DateOfBirth VARCHAR(6),ProcedureCode VARCHAR(MAX))

INSERT INTO @data (DateOfBirth,ProcedureCode)
VALUES ('010176','|W822|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||'),
('120176','|W822|Z282|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||')

/* Validated test data */
SELECT
DateOfBirth,
dbo.fn_ValidateOrder(ProcedureCode,'|') AS ValidOrder,
ProcedureCode
FROM @data
WHERE dbo.fn_ValidateOrder(ProcedureCode,'|') = 0


Note that this will only work on SQL 2016 and newer, as the function use SPLIT_STRING.






share|improve this answer













If you just want to get rows where the procedure codes are in the wrong order you could use a function to validate your procedure codes:



CREATE FUNCTION fn_ValidateOrder ( @InputString NVARCHAR(MAX), @Delimiter NCHAR(1))
RETURNS BIT
AS
BEGIN

DECLARE @Valid BIT = 0, @Errors INT
/* Table to hold splitt string */
DECLARE @T TABLE (id INT IDENTITY(1,1),Val NVARCHAR(128) NULL)
INSERT INTO @T
SELECT value FROM STRING_SPLIT(@InputString,@Delimiter) WHERE value != ''
/* Validated order */
;WITH rn AS (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY val) AS rn
,id,
val
FROM @T
)
/* Count errors */
SELECT @Errors=SUM(CASE WHEN id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) FROM rn WHERE id!=rn
/* Set return value */
IF @Errors>0
SET @Valid=0
ELSE
SET @Valid=1

RETURN @Valid
END


I used the following test data to validate:



/* Test Data*/
DECLARE @data TABLE (DateOfBirth VARCHAR(6),ProcedureCode VARCHAR(MAX))

INSERT INTO @data (DateOfBirth,ProcedureCode)
VALUES ('010176','|W822|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||'),
('120176','|W822|Z282|W833|Z846|Z942|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||')

/* Validated test data */
SELECT
DateOfBirth,
dbo.fn_ValidateOrder(ProcedureCode,'|') AS ValidOrder,
ProcedureCode
FROM @data
WHERE dbo.fn_ValidateOrder(ProcedureCode,'|') = 0


Note that this will only work on SQL 2016 and newer, as the function use SPLIT_STRING.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 28 '18 at 12:39









MariusEMariusE

463




463













  • Thank you MariusE. Will try to digest this when I get time and apply it. Looks very promising.

    – distressedinnhs
    Nov 28 '18 at 15:15



















  • Thank you MariusE. Will try to digest this when I get time and apply it. Looks very promising.

    – distressedinnhs
    Nov 28 '18 at 15:15

















Thank you MariusE. Will try to digest this when I get time and apply it. Looks very promising.

– distressedinnhs
Nov 28 '18 at 15:15





Thank you MariusE. Will try to digest this when I get time and apply it. Looks very promising.

– distressedinnhs
Nov 28 '18 at 15:15




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53514319%2ftsql-one-sequence-of-characters-must-follow-another%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks