Mysql unknown column in subquery works












2















There are three tables - mapping_hospital_procedure, master_hospital and master_procedure.



master_hospital contains an id column to identify each hospital.



master_procedure also contains an id column for the same purpose, i.e, to identify each procedure.



mapping_hospital_procedure is used to map hospitals to medical procedures and contains columns hid (hospital id) and pid(procedure id) besides other columns. Now, if I run this query :



SELECT hid FROM master_procedure



it doesn't work as you would because there is no hid column in master_procedure. But if I put this query in a sub-query, it works fine. Like this way, for example -



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)



But it shouldn't work as there is no column named hid in master_procedure. It should give the same Unknown column error as is the case with the previous query. Can anyone explain why or how this works?



Thank you.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    dba.stackexchange.com/questions/218871/…

    – Shadow
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:57
















2















There are three tables - mapping_hospital_procedure, master_hospital and master_procedure.



master_hospital contains an id column to identify each hospital.



master_procedure also contains an id column for the same purpose, i.e, to identify each procedure.



mapping_hospital_procedure is used to map hospitals to medical procedures and contains columns hid (hospital id) and pid(procedure id) besides other columns. Now, if I run this query :



SELECT hid FROM master_procedure



it doesn't work as you would because there is no hid column in master_procedure. But if I put this query in a sub-query, it works fine. Like this way, for example -



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)



But it shouldn't work as there is no column named hid in master_procedure. It should give the same Unknown column error as is the case with the previous query. Can anyone explain why or how this works?



Thank you.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    dba.stackexchange.com/questions/218871/…

    – Shadow
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:57














2












2








2








There are three tables - mapping_hospital_procedure, master_hospital and master_procedure.



master_hospital contains an id column to identify each hospital.



master_procedure also contains an id column for the same purpose, i.e, to identify each procedure.



mapping_hospital_procedure is used to map hospitals to medical procedures and contains columns hid (hospital id) and pid(procedure id) besides other columns. Now, if I run this query :



SELECT hid FROM master_procedure



it doesn't work as you would because there is no hid column in master_procedure. But if I put this query in a sub-query, it works fine. Like this way, for example -



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)



But it shouldn't work as there is no column named hid in master_procedure. It should give the same Unknown column error as is the case with the previous query. Can anyone explain why or how this works?



Thank you.










share|improve this question














There are three tables - mapping_hospital_procedure, master_hospital and master_procedure.



master_hospital contains an id column to identify each hospital.



master_procedure also contains an id column for the same purpose, i.e, to identify each procedure.



mapping_hospital_procedure is used to map hospitals to medical procedures and contains columns hid (hospital id) and pid(procedure id) besides other columns. Now, if I run this query :



SELECT hid FROM master_procedure



it doesn't work as you would because there is no hid column in master_procedure. But if I put this query in a sub-query, it works fine. Like this way, for example -



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)



But it shouldn't work as there is no column named hid in master_procedure. It should give the same Unknown column error as is the case with the previous query. Can anyone explain why or how this works?



Thank you.







mysql sql subquery






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 28 '18 at 6:28









Mayank KumarMayank Kumar

3973615




3973615








  • 1





    dba.stackexchange.com/questions/218871/…

    – Shadow
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:57














  • 1





    dba.stackexchange.com/questions/218871/…

    – Shadow
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:57








1




1





dba.stackexchange.com/questions/218871/…

– Shadow
Nov 28 '18 at 6:57





dba.stackexchange.com/questions/218871/…

– Shadow
Nov 28 '18 at 6:57












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Scope issue. You sub-query has access to the main-query's columns.



Since hid isn't found in the sub-query table, it will step out and look for it in the main query - there it's found in mapping_hospital_procedure table.



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure
WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)


Is the same as



SELECT mhp.hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure mhp
WHERE mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp)


Lesson now learned: Always qualify your columns!



EDIT: " This should at least be a logical error giving incorrect output, right?"



Yes, that query doesn't make much sense.



If the master_procedure table contains no rows at all, the mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp) will be false. No rows at all are returned.



If the master_procedure table contains 2 rows or more, the "Subquery returns more than 1 row" exception should be raised. (Since it's a = comparison. Use IN to avoid this problem.)



If the master_procedure table contains exactly 1 row, the mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp) condition evaluates to true if mhp.pid is not null, and the row is returned from mapping_hospital_procedure. If mhp.pid is null, the row isn't returned.





What you really want to do is probably:



SELECT mhp.hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure mhp
WHERE mhp.pid IN (SELECT mp.id FROM master_procedure mp)





share|improve this answer


























  • So, in the subquery here, how is mhp.hid being accessed from master_procedure since its values don't exist in that table. This should at least be a logical error giving incorrect output, right?

    – Mayank Kumar
    Nov 28 '18 at 7:16











  • Too long answer for a comment, will edit my answer.

    – jarlh
    Nov 28 '18 at 7:22



















1














With that query you are actually doing a natural join. https://www.w3resource.com/sql/joins/natural-join.php



The database parser is smart enough to translate your query into a join.
Your query:



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure 
WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)


Is basically the same as:



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure 
NATURAL JOIN master_procedure
WHERE pid = hid





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    I do not think that this is a good answer. First of all, any optimisation by the engine is done after checking the syntax, not before. Secondly, natural join requires identically named columns in both tables, which do not exists here. The answer from the dba site seems to be more accurate.

    – Shadow
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:59











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53513386%2fmysql-unknown-column-in-subquery-works%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














Scope issue. You sub-query has access to the main-query's columns.



Since hid isn't found in the sub-query table, it will step out and look for it in the main query - there it's found in mapping_hospital_procedure table.



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure
WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)


Is the same as



SELECT mhp.hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure mhp
WHERE mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp)


Lesson now learned: Always qualify your columns!



EDIT: " This should at least be a logical error giving incorrect output, right?"



Yes, that query doesn't make much sense.



If the master_procedure table contains no rows at all, the mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp) will be false. No rows at all are returned.



If the master_procedure table contains 2 rows or more, the "Subquery returns more than 1 row" exception should be raised. (Since it's a = comparison. Use IN to avoid this problem.)



If the master_procedure table contains exactly 1 row, the mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp) condition evaluates to true if mhp.pid is not null, and the row is returned from mapping_hospital_procedure. If mhp.pid is null, the row isn't returned.





What you really want to do is probably:



SELECT mhp.hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure mhp
WHERE mhp.pid IN (SELECT mp.id FROM master_procedure mp)





share|improve this answer


























  • So, in the subquery here, how is mhp.hid being accessed from master_procedure since its values don't exist in that table. This should at least be a logical error giving incorrect output, right?

    – Mayank Kumar
    Nov 28 '18 at 7:16











  • Too long answer for a comment, will edit my answer.

    – jarlh
    Nov 28 '18 at 7:22
















3














Scope issue. You sub-query has access to the main-query's columns.



Since hid isn't found in the sub-query table, it will step out and look for it in the main query - there it's found in mapping_hospital_procedure table.



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure
WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)


Is the same as



SELECT mhp.hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure mhp
WHERE mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp)


Lesson now learned: Always qualify your columns!



EDIT: " This should at least be a logical error giving incorrect output, right?"



Yes, that query doesn't make much sense.



If the master_procedure table contains no rows at all, the mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp) will be false. No rows at all are returned.



If the master_procedure table contains 2 rows or more, the "Subquery returns more than 1 row" exception should be raised. (Since it's a = comparison. Use IN to avoid this problem.)



If the master_procedure table contains exactly 1 row, the mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp) condition evaluates to true if mhp.pid is not null, and the row is returned from mapping_hospital_procedure. If mhp.pid is null, the row isn't returned.





What you really want to do is probably:



SELECT mhp.hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure mhp
WHERE mhp.pid IN (SELECT mp.id FROM master_procedure mp)





share|improve this answer


























  • So, in the subquery here, how is mhp.hid being accessed from master_procedure since its values don't exist in that table. This should at least be a logical error giving incorrect output, right?

    – Mayank Kumar
    Nov 28 '18 at 7:16











  • Too long answer for a comment, will edit my answer.

    – jarlh
    Nov 28 '18 at 7:22














3












3








3







Scope issue. You sub-query has access to the main-query's columns.



Since hid isn't found in the sub-query table, it will step out and look for it in the main query - there it's found in mapping_hospital_procedure table.



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure
WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)


Is the same as



SELECT mhp.hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure mhp
WHERE mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp)


Lesson now learned: Always qualify your columns!



EDIT: " This should at least be a logical error giving incorrect output, right?"



Yes, that query doesn't make much sense.



If the master_procedure table contains no rows at all, the mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp) will be false. No rows at all are returned.



If the master_procedure table contains 2 rows or more, the "Subquery returns more than 1 row" exception should be raised. (Since it's a = comparison. Use IN to avoid this problem.)



If the master_procedure table contains exactly 1 row, the mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp) condition evaluates to true if mhp.pid is not null, and the row is returned from mapping_hospital_procedure. If mhp.pid is null, the row isn't returned.





What you really want to do is probably:



SELECT mhp.hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure mhp
WHERE mhp.pid IN (SELECT mp.id FROM master_procedure mp)





share|improve this answer















Scope issue. You sub-query has access to the main-query's columns.



Since hid isn't found in the sub-query table, it will step out and look for it in the main query - there it's found in mapping_hospital_procedure table.



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure
WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)


Is the same as



SELECT mhp.hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure mhp
WHERE mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp)


Lesson now learned: Always qualify your columns!



EDIT: " This should at least be a logical error giving incorrect output, right?"



Yes, that query doesn't make much sense.



If the master_procedure table contains no rows at all, the mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp) will be false. No rows at all are returned.



If the master_procedure table contains 2 rows or more, the "Subquery returns more than 1 row" exception should be raised. (Since it's a = comparison. Use IN to avoid this problem.)



If the master_procedure table contains exactly 1 row, the mhp.pid = (SELECT mhp.hid FROM master_procedure mp) condition evaluates to true if mhp.pid is not null, and the row is returned from mapping_hospital_procedure. If mhp.pid is null, the row isn't returned.





What you really want to do is probably:



SELECT mhp.hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure mhp
WHERE mhp.pid IN (SELECT mp.id FROM master_procedure mp)






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 28 '18 at 7:31

























answered Nov 28 '18 at 6:58









jarlhjarlh

29.7k52138




29.7k52138













  • So, in the subquery here, how is mhp.hid being accessed from master_procedure since its values don't exist in that table. This should at least be a logical error giving incorrect output, right?

    – Mayank Kumar
    Nov 28 '18 at 7:16











  • Too long answer for a comment, will edit my answer.

    – jarlh
    Nov 28 '18 at 7:22



















  • So, in the subquery here, how is mhp.hid being accessed from master_procedure since its values don't exist in that table. This should at least be a logical error giving incorrect output, right?

    – Mayank Kumar
    Nov 28 '18 at 7:16











  • Too long answer for a comment, will edit my answer.

    – jarlh
    Nov 28 '18 at 7:22

















So, in the subquery here, how is mhp.hid being accessed from master_procedure since its values don't exist in that table. This should at least be a logical error giving incorrect output, right?

– Mayank Kumar
Nov 28 '18 at 7:16





So, in the subquery here, how is mhp.hid being accessed from master_procedure since its values don't exist in that table. This should at least be a logical error giving incorrect output, right?

– Mayank Kumar
Nov 28 '18 at 7:16













Too long answer for a comment, will edit my answer.

– jarlh
Nov 28 '18 at 7:22





Too long answer for a comment, will edit my answer.

– jarlh
Nov 28 '18 at 7:22













1














With that query you are actually doing a natural join. https://www.w3resource.com/sql/joins/natural-join.php



The database parser is smart enough to translate your query into a join.
Your query:



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure 
WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)


Is basically the same as:



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure 
NATURAL JOIN master_procedure
WHERE pid = hid





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    I do not think that this is a good answer. First of all, any optimisation by the engine is done after checking the syntax, not before. Secondly, natural join requires identically named columns in both tables, which do not exists here. The answer from the dba site seems to be more accurate.

    – Shadow
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:59
















1














With that query you are actually doing a natural join. https://www.w3resource.com/sql/joins/natural-join.php



The database parser is smart enough to translate your query into a join.
Your query:



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure 
WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)


Is basically the same as:



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure 
NATURAL JOIN master_procedure
WHERE pid = hid





share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    I do not think that this is a good answer. First of all, any optimisation by the engine is done after checking the syntax, not before. Secondly, natural join requires identically named columns in both tables, which do not exists here. The answer from the dba site seems to be more accurate.

    – Shadow
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:59














1












1








1







With that query you are actually doing a natural join. https://www.w3resource.com/sql/joins/natural-join.php



The database parser is smart enough to translate your query into a join.
Your query:



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure 
WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)


Is basically the same as:



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure 
NATURAL JOIN master_procedure
WHERE pid = hid





share|improve this answer













With that query you are actually doing a natural join. https://www.w3resource.com/sql/joins/natural-join.php



The database parser is smart enough to translate your query into a join.
Your query:



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure 
WHERE pid = (SELECT hid FROM master_procedure)


Is basically the same as:



SELECT hid FROM mapping_hospital_procedure 
NATURAL JOIN master_procedure
WHERE pid = hid






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 28 '18 at 6:38









Mr.TurtleMr.Turtle

1,13821328




1,13821328








  • 1





    I do not think that this is a good answer. First of all, any optimisation by the engine is done after checking the syntax, not before. Secondly, natural join requires identically named columns in both tables, which do not exists here. The answer from the dba site seems to be more accurate.

    – Shadow
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:59














  • 1





    I do not think that this is a good answer. First of all, any optimisation by the engine is done after checking the syntax, not before. Secondly, natural join requires identically named columns in both tables, which do not exists here. The answer from the dba site seems to be more accurate.

    – Shadow
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:59








1




1





I do not think that this is a good answer. First of all, any optimisation by the engine is done after checking the syntax, not before. Secondly, natural join requires identically named columns in both tables, which do not exists here. The answer from the dba site seems to be more accurate.

– Shadow
Nov 28 '18 at 6:59





I do not think that this is a good answer. First of all, any optimisation by the engine is done after checking the syntax, not before. Secondly, natural join requires identically named columns in both tables, which do not exists here. The answer from the dba site seems to be more accurate.

– Shadow
Nov 28 '18 at 6:59


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53513386%2fmysql-unknown-column-in-subquery-works%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks