Add values in independent dictionaries when the values are (2x2) numpy arrays












0















Suppose I have two dictionaries with the same keys and all the values are 2x2 numpy arrays. Assumptions:




  • dictionaries have the same keys

  • every value is a 2x2 numpy array for all dictionaries and keys.


x1 and x2 are sample dictionaries.



x1 =  {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}
x2 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}


I would like to add both x1 and x2 together by their keys and the result would be a new dictionary.



So if...



  x1[0] = [[1,2],[3,4]] 


and...



  x2[0] = [[10,20],[30,40]]


a new dictionary value when key = 0, would be...



  x_total[0] = [[11,22],[33,44]]


The next step would be to do this for many dictionaries with this structure. I was thinking of doing this in a for loop, but If there are more efficient solutions, I'd love to learn about them.



I've tried the approach below using the collections library



from collections import Counter
a = Counter(x1[0])
b = Counter(x2[0])
c = dict(a + b)


but I think this may not apply if the values are arrays.



I also know that np.add(x1[0], x2[0]) will result in the addition of the arrays but I'd like to do it across all keys at once.. if possible.










share|improve this question





























    0















    Suppose I have two dictionaries with the same keys and all the values are 2x2 numpy arrays. Assumptions:




    • dictionaries have the same keys

    • every value is a 2x2 numpy array for all dictionaries and keys.


    x1 and x2 are sample dictionaries.



    x1 =  {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}
    x2 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}


    I would like to add both x1 and x2 together by their keys and the result would be a new dictionary.



    So if...



      x1[0] = [[1,2],[3,4]] 


    and...



      x2[0] = [[10,20],[30,40]]


    a new dictionary value when key = 0, would be...



      x_total[0] = [[11,22],[33,44]]


    The next step would be to do this for many dictionaries with this structure. I was thinking of doing this in a for loop, but If there are more efficient solutions, I'd love to learn about them.



    I've tried the approach below using the collections library



    from collections import Counter
    a = Counter(x1[0])
    b = Counter(x2[0])
    c = dict(a + b)


    but I think this may not apply if the values are arrays.



    I also know that np.add(x1[0], x2[0]) will result in the addition of the arrays but I'd like to do it across all keys at once.. if possible.










    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      Suppose I have two dictionaries with the same keys and all the values are 2x2 numpy arrays. Assumptions:




      • dictionaries have the same keys

      • every value is a 2x2 numpy array for all dictionaries and keys.


      x1 and x2 are sample dictionaries.



      x1 =  {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}
      x2 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}


      I would like to add both x1 and x2 together by their keys and the result would be a new dictionary.



      So if...



        x1[0] = [[1,2],[3,4]] 


      and...



        x2[0] = [[10,20],[30,40]]


      a new dictionary value when key = 0, would be...



        x_total[0] = [[11,22],[33,44]]


      The next step would be to do this for many dictionaries with this structure. I was thinking of doing this in a for loop, but If there are more efficient solutions, I'd love to learn about them.



      I've tried the approach below using the collections library



      from collections import Counter
      a = Counter(x1[0])
      b = Counter(x2[0])
      c = dict(a + b)


      but I think this may not apply if the values are arrays.



      I also know that np.add(x1[0], x2[0]) will result in the addition of the arrays but I'd like to do it across all keys at once.. if possible.










      share|improve this question
















      Suppose I have two dictionaries with the same keys and all the values are 2x2 numpy arrays. Assumptions:




      • dictionaries have the same keys

      • every value is a 2x2 numpy array for all dictionaries and keys.


      x1 and x2 are sample dictionaries.



      x1 =  {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}
      x2 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}


      I would like to add both x1 and x2 together by their keys and the result would be a new dictionary.



      So if...



        x1[0] = [[1,2],[3,4]] 


      and...



        x2[0] = [[10,20],[30,40]]


      a new dictionary value when key = 0, would be...



        x_total[0] = [[11,22],[33,44]]


      The next step would be to do this for many dictionaries with this structure. I was thinking of doing this in a for loop, but If there are more efficient solutions, I'd love to learn about them.



      I've tried the approach below using the collections library



      from collections import Counter
      a = Counter(x1[0])
      b = Counter(x2[0])
      c = dict(a + b)


      but I think this may not apply if the values are arrays.



      I also know that np.add(x1[0], x2[0]) will result in the addition of the arrays but I'd like to do it across all keys at once.. if possible.







      python dictionary numpy-ndarray






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 28 '18 at 20:17







      Sheila

















      asked Nov 28 '18 at 19:56









      SheilaSheila

      86071329




      86071329
























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Simply use a dictionary comprehension:



          {k: x1.get(k,0) + x2.get(k,0) for k in set(x1)}


          For example:



          import numpy as np

          np.random.seed(0)

          x1 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}
          x2 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}


          Yields:



          {0: array([[12, 15],
          [ 0, 3]]), 1: array([[ 3, 7],
          [ 9, 19]]), 2: array([[18, 4],
          [ 6, 12]]), 3: array([[ 1, 6],
          [ 7, 14]]), 4: array([[17, 5],
          [13, 8]])}

          {0: array([[ 9, 19],
          [16, 19]]), 1: array([[ 5, 15],
          [15, 0]]), 2: array([[18, 3],
          [17, 19]]), 3: array([[19, 19],
          [14, 7]]), 4: array([[0, 1],
          [9, 0]])}


          Then applying our solution, we get:



          {0: array([[21, 34],
          [16, 22]]), 1: array([[ 8, 22],
          [24, 19]]), 2: array([[36, 7],
          [23, 31]]), 3: array([[20, 25],
          [21, 21]]), 4: array([[17, 6],
          [22, 8]])}





          share|improve this answer































            0














            Assuming all dictionaries are complete (they all have the same keys) a dict comprehension should be an efficient solution:



             x3 = {key: sum(x1[key] + x2[key]) for key in x1}





            share|improve this answer































              0














              I'm using shorter datastructures for readability and assume that x1 and x2 share the same keys.



              >>> x1 = {k:np.arange(k, k+2) for k in range(2)}
              >>> x2 = {k:np.arange(k+1, k+3) for k in range(2)}
              >>>
              >>> x1
              {0: array([0, 1]), 1: array([1, 2])}
              >>> x2
              {0: array([1, 2]), 1: array([2, 3])}
              >>>
              >>> x_total = {k: x1[k] + x2[k] for k in x1}
              >>> x_total
              {0: array([1, 3]), 1: array([3, 5])}


              Note that dictionaries with consecutive integer keys, especially when they start from zero, are a waste of memory (sparseness) and time (hashing). Why not use an array into which you can index with integers much more efficiently?






              share|improve this answer


























                Your Answer






                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
                StackExchange.snippets.init();
                });
                });
                }, "code-snippets");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "1"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53527149%2fadd-values-in-independent-dictionaries-when-the-values-are-2x2-numpy-arrays%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                2














                Simply use a dictionary comprehension:



                {k: x1.get(k,0) + x2.get(k,0) for k in set(x1)}


                For example:



                import numpy as np

                np.random.seed(0)

                x1 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}
                x2 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}


                Yields:



                {0: array([[12, 15],
                [ 0, 3]]), 1: array([[ 3, 7],
                [ 9, 19]]), 2: array([[18, 4],
                [ 6, 12]]), 3: array([[ 1, 6],
                [ 7, 14]]), 4: array([[17, 5],
                [13, 8]])}

                {0: array([[ 9, 19],
                [16, 19]]), 1: array([[ 5, 15],
                [15, 0]]), 2: array([[18, 3],
                [17, 19]]), 3: array([[19, 19],
                [14, 7]]), 4: array([[0, 1],
                [9, 0]])}


                Then applying our solution, we get:



                {0: array([[21, 34],
                [16, 22]]), 1: array([[ 8, 22],
                [24, 19]]), 2: array([[36, 7],
                [23, 31]]), 3: array([[20, 25],
                [21, 21]]), 4: array([[17, 6],
                [22, 8]])}





                share|improve this answer




























                  2














                  Simply use a dictionary comprehension:



                  {k: x1.get(k,0) + x2.get(k,0) for k in set(x1)}


                  For example:



                  import numpy as np

                  np.random.seed(0)

                  x1 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}
                  x2 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}


                  Yields:



                  {0: array([[12, 15],
                  [ 0, 3]]), 1: array([[ 3, 7],
                  [ 9, 19]]), 2: array([[18, 4],
                  [ 6, 12]]), 3: array([[ 1, 6],
                  [ 7, 14]]), 4: array([[17, 5],
                  [13, 8]])}

                  {0: array([[ 9, 19],
                  [16, 19]]), 1: array([[ 5, 15],
                  [15, 0]]), 2: array([[18, 3],
                  [17, 19]]), 3: array([[19, 19],
                  [14, 7]]), 4: array([[0, 1],
                  [9, 0]])}


                  Then applying our solution, we get:



                  {0: array([[21, 34],
                  [16, 22]]), 1: array([[ 8, 22],
                  [24, 19]]), 2: array([[36, 7],
                  [23, 31]]), 3: array([[20, 25],
                  [21, 21]]), 4: array([[17, 6],
                  [22, 8]])}





                  share|improve this answer


























                    2












                    2








                    2







                    Simply use a dictionary comprehension:



                    {k: x1.get(k,0) + x2.get(k,0) for k in set(x1)}


                    For example:



                    import numpy as np

                    np.random.seed(0)

                    x1 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}
                    x2 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}


                    Yields:



                    {0: array([[12, 15],
                    [ 0, 3]]), 1: array([[ 3, 7],
                    [ 9, 19]]), 2: array([[18, 4],
                    [ 6, 12]]), 3: array([[ 1, 6],
                    [ 7, 14]]), 4: array([[17, 5],
                    [13, 8]])}

                    {0: array([[ 9, 19],
                    [16, 19]]), 1: array([[ 5, 15],
                    [15, 0]]), 2: array([[18, 3],
                    [17, 19]]), 3: array([[19, 19],
                    [14, 7]]), 4: array([[0, 1],
                    [9, 0]])}


                    Then applying our solution, we get:



                    {0: array([[21, 34],
                    [16, 22]]), 1: array([[ 8, 22],
                    [24, 19]]), 2: array([[36, 7],
                    [23, 31]]), 3: array([[20, 25],
                    [21, 21]]), 4: array([[17, 6],
                    [22, 8]])}





                    share|improve this answer













                    Simply use a dictionary comprehension:



                    {k: x1.get(k,0) + x2.get(k,0) for k in set(x1)}


                    For example:



                    import numpy as np

                    np.random.seed(0)

                    x1 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}
                    x2 = {k: np.random.randint(20, size=(2, 2)) for k in range(5)}


                    Yields:



                    {0: array([[12, 15],
                    [ 0, 3]]), 1: array([[ 3, 7],
                    [ 9, 19]]), 2: array([[18, 4],
                    [ 6, 12]]), 3: array([[ 1, 6],
                    [ 7, 14]]), 4: array([[17, 5],
                    [13, 8]])}

                    {0: array([[ 9, 19],
                    [16, 19]]), 1: array([[ 5, 15],
                    [15, 0]]), 2: array([[18, 3],
                    [17, 19]]), 3: array([[19, 19],
                    [14, 7]]), 4: array([[0, 1],
                    [9, 0]])}


                    Then applying our solution, we get:



                    {0: array([[21, 34],
                    [16, 22]]), 1: array([[ 8, 22],
                    [24, 19]]), 2: array([[36, 7],
                    [23, 31]]), 3: array([[20, 25],
                    [21, 21]]), 4: array([[17, 6],
                    [22, 8]])}






                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 28 '18 at 20:01









                    rahlf23rahlf23

                    5,3363731




                    5,3363731

























                        0














                        Assuming all dictionaries are complete (they all have the same keys) a dict comprehension should be an efficient solution:



                         x3 = {key: sum(x1[key] + x2[key]) for key in x1}





                        share|improve this answer




























                          0














                          Assuming all dictionaries are complete (they all have the same keys) a dict comprehension should be an efficient solution:



                           x3 = {key: sum(x1[key] + x2[key]) for key in x1}





                          share|improve this answer


























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            Assuming all dictionaries are complete (they all have the same keys) a dict comprehension should be an efficient solution:



                             x3 = {key: sum(x1[key] + x2[key]) for key in x1}





                            share|improve this answer













                            Assuming all dictionaries are complete (they all have the same keys) a dict comprehension should be an efficient solution:



                             x3 = {key: sum(x1[key] + x2[key]) for key in x1}






                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 28 '18 at 20:01









                            artonaartona

                            71248




                            71248























                                0














                                I'm using shorter datastructures for readability and assume that x1 and x2 share the same keys.



                                >>> x1 = {k:np.arange(k, k+2) for k in range(2)}
                                >>> x2 = {k:np.arange(k+1, k+3) for k in range(2)}
                                >>>
                                >>> x1
                                {0: array([0, 1]), 1: array([1, 2])}
                                >>> x2
                                {0: array([1, 2]), 1: array([2, 3])}
                                >>>
                                >>> x_total = {k: x1[k] + x2[k] for k in x1}
                                >>> x_total
                                {0: array([1, 3]), 1: array([3, 5])}


                                Note that dictionaries with consecutive integer keys, especially when they start from zero, are a waste of memory (sparseness) and time (hashing). Why not use an array into which you can index with integers much more efficiently?






                                share|improve this answer






























                                  0














                                  I'm using shorter datastructures for readability and assume that x1 and x2 share the same keys.



                                  >>> x1 = {k:np.arange(k, k+2) for k in range(2)}
                                  >>> x2 = {k:np.arange(k+1, k+3) for k in range(2)}
                                  >>>
                                  >>> x1
                                  {0: array([0, 1]), 1: array([1, 2])}
                                  >>> x2
                                  {0: array([1, 2]), 1: array([2, 3])}
                                  >>>
                                  >>> x_total = {k: x1[k] + x2[k] for k in x1}
                                  >>> x_total
                                  {0: array([1, 3]), 1: array([3, 5])}


                                  Note that dictionaries with consecutive integer keys, especially when they start from zero, are a waste of memory (sparseness) and time (hashing). Why not use an array into which you can index with integers much more efficiently?






                                  share|improve this answer




























                                    0












                                    0








                                    0







                                    I'm using shorter datastructures for readability and assume that x1 and x2 share the same keys.



                                    >>> x1 = {k:np.arange(k, k+2) for k in range(2)}
                                    >>> x2 = {k:np.arange(k+1, k+3) for k in range(2)}
                                    >>>
                                    >>> x1
                                    {0: array([0, 1]), 1: array([1, 2])}
                                    >>> x2
                                    {0: array([1, 2]), 1: array([2, 3])}
                                    >>>
                                    >>> x_total = {k: x1[k] + x2[k] for k in x1}
                                    >>> x_total
                                    {0: array([1, 3]), 1: array([3, 5])}


                                    Note that dictionaries with consecutive integer keys, especially when they start from zero, are a waste of memory (sparseness) and time (hashing). Why not use an array into which you can index with integers much more efficiently?






                                    share|improve this answer















                                    I'm using shorter datastructures for readability and assume that x1 and x2 share the same keys.



                                    >>> x1 = {k:np.arange(k, k+2) for k in range(2)}
                                    >>> x2 = {k:np.arange(k+1, k+3) for k in range(2)}
                                    >>>
                                    >>> x1
                                    {0: array([0, 1]), 1: array([1, 2])}
                                    >>> x2
                                    {0: array([1, 2]), 1: array([2, 3])}
                                    >>>
                                    >>> x_total = {k: x1[k] + x2[k] for k in x1}
                                    >>> x_total
                                    {0: array([1, 3]), 1: array([3, 5])}


                                    Note that dictionaries with consecutive integer keys, especially when they start from zero, are a waste of memory (sparseness) and time (hashing). Why not use an array into which you can index with integers much more efficiently?







                                    share|improve this answer














                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer








                                    edited Nov 28 '18 at 20:16

























                                    answered Nov 28 '18 at 20:03









                                    timgebtimgeb

                                    51.3k126794




                                    51.3k126794






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53527149%2fadd-values-in-independent-dictionaries-when-the-values-are-2x2-numpy-arrays%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

                                        count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

                                        A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks