Why is Python Pandas loc not returning a single item?












0















For an assignment I need to access entries in a CSV file by the column name and index.



I am using a for loop to get each index. Contrary to my expectations,



read.loc[[i], ["magType"]]


returns something like
this



instead of just "mb" which is what I would expect based on a pandas cheatsheet (linked below)
Why is this? And how can I get just the item (in this case "mb" without the magType and 0)?



import pandas as pd
read = pd.read_csv("earthquake_data.csv")
print(read.loc[[0], ["magType"]])



magType




0 mb





https://s3.amazonaws.com/assets.datacamp.com/blog_assets/PandasPythonForDataScience.pdf










share|improve this question



























    0















    For an assignment I need to access entries in a CSV file by the column name and index.



    I am using a for loop to get each index. Contrary to my expectations,



    read.loc[[i], ["magType"]]


    returns something like
    this



    instead of just "mb" which is what I would expect based on a pandas cheatsheet (linked below)
    Why is this? And how can I get just the item (in this case "mb" without the magType and 0)?



    import pandas as pd
    read = pd.read_csv("earthquake_data.csv")
    print(read.loc[[0], ["magType"]])



    magType




    0 mb





    https://s3.amazonaws.com/assets.datacamp.com/blog_assets/PandasPythonForDataScience.pdf










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      For an assignment I need to access entries in a CSV file by the column name and index.



      I am using a for loop to get each index. Contrary to my expectations,



      read.loc[[i], ["magType"]]


      returns something like
      this



      instead of just "mb" which is what I would expect based on a pandas cheatsheet (linked below)
      Why is this? And how can I get just the item (in this case "mb" without the magType and 0)?



      import pandas as pd
      read = pd.read_csv("earthquake_data.csv")
      print(read.loc[[0], ["magType"]])



      magType




      0 mb





      https://s3.amazonaws.com/assets.datacamp.com/blog_assets/PandasPythonForDataScience.pdf










      share|improve this question














      For an assignment I need to access entries in a CSV file by the column name and index.



      I am using a for loop to get each index. Contrary to my expectations,



      read.loc[[i], ["magType"]]


      returns something like
      this



      instead of just "mb" which is what I would expect based on a pandas cheatsheet (linked below)
      Why is this? And how can I get just the item (in this case "mb" without the magType and 0)?



      import pandas as pd
      read = pd.read_csv("earthquake_data.csv")
      print(read.loc[[0], ["magType"]])



      magType




      0 mb





      https://s3.amazonaws.com/assets.datacamp.com/blog_assets/PandasPythonForDataScience.pdf







      python pandas






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 25 '18 at 23:52









      L. ChenL. Chen

      32




      32
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          read.loc[0, "magType"] returns the element at 0-th row and magType column - presumably the result you desire.



          read.loc[[0], ["magType"]], on the other hand, returns a slice of the DataFrame, with columns from ["magType"], with all the rows whose indices are in [0]. (Compare read.loc[[1, 2, 3], ["magType", "magnitude"]] or read.loc[[0:10], ["magType", "magnitude"]] to see a general case of this.) Like any other DataFrame, it has indices and column names.






          share|improve this answer
























          • I'd also throw in that the canonical way to access a scalar by row/column labels is at, i.e. read.at[0, 'magType']. Be careful with the description "the 0th row", alignment between integer position and label is only true when your index is a regular pd.RangeIndex.

            – jpp
            Nov 26 '18 at 2:01













          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53473188%2fwhy-is-python-pandas-loc-not-returning-a-single-item%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          read.loc[0, "magType"] returns the element at 0-th row and magType column - presumably the result you desire.



          read.loc[[0], ["magType"]], on the other hand, returns a slice of the DataFrame, with columns from ["magType"], with all the rows whose indices are in [0]. (Compare read.loc[[1, 2, 3], ["magType", "magnitude"]] or read.loc[[0:10], ["magType", "magnitude"]] to see a general case of this.) Like any other DataFrame, it has indices and column names.






          share|improve this answer
























          • I'd also throw in that the canonical way to access a scalar by row/column labels is at, i.e. read.at[0, 'magType']. Be careful with the description "the 0th row", alignment between integer position and label is only true when your index is a regular pd.RangeIndex.

            – jpp
            Nov 26 '18 at 2:01


















          1














          read.loc[0, "magType"] returns the element at 0-th row and magType column - presumably the result you desire.



          read.loc[[0], ["magType"]], on the other hand, returns a slice of the DataFrame, with columns from ["magType"], with all the rows whose indices are in [0]. (Compare read.loc[[1, 2, 3], ["magType", "magnitude"]] or read.loc[[0:10], ["magType", "magnitude"]] to see a general case of this.) Like any other DataFrame, it has indices and column names.






          share|improve this answer
























          • I'd also throw in that the canonical way to access a scalar by row/column labels is at, i.e. read.at[0, 'magType']. Be careful with the description "the 0th row", alignment between integer position and label is only true when your index is a regular pd.RangeIndex.

            – jpp
            Nov 26 '18 at 2:01
















          1












          1








          1







          read.loc[0, "magType"] returns the element at 0-th row and magType column - presumably the result you desire.



          read.loc[[0], ["magType"]], on the other hand, returns a slice of the DataFrame, with columns from ["magType"], with all the rows whose indices are in [0]. (Compare read.loc[[1, 2, 3], ["magType", "magnitude"]] or read.loc[[0:10], ["magType", "magnitude"]] to see a general case of this.) Like any other DataFrame, it has indices and column names.






          share|improve this answer













          read.loc[0, "magType"] returns the element at 0-th row and magType column - presumably the result you desire.



          read.loc[[0], ["magType"]], on the other hand, returns a slice of the DataFrame, with columns from ["magType"], with all the rows whose indices are in [0]. (Compare read.loc[[1, 2, 3], ["magType", "magnitude"]] or read.loc[[0:10], ["magType", "magnitude"]] to see a general case of this.) Like any other DataFrame, it has indices and column names.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 25 '18 at 23:58









          AmadanAmadan

          130k13142193




          130k13142193













          • I'd also throw in that the canonical way to access a scalar by row/column labels is at, i.e. read.at[0, 'magType']. Be careful with the description "the 0th row", alignment between integer position and label is only true when your index is a regular pd.RangeIndex.

            – jpp
            Nov 26 '18 at 2:01





















          • I'd also throw in that the canonical way to access a scalar by row/column labels is at, i.e. read.at[0, 'magType']. Be careful with the description "the 0th row", alignment between integer position and label is only true when your index is a regular pd.RangeIndex.

            – jpp
            Nov 26 '18 at 2:01



















          I'd also throw in that the canonical way to access a scalar by row/column labels is at, i.e. read.at[0, 'magType']. Be careful with the description "the 0th row", alignment between integer position and label is only true when your index is a regular pd.RangeIndex.

          – jpp
          Nov 26 '18 at 2:01







          I'd also throw in that the canonical way to access a scalar by row/column labels is at, i.e. read.at[0, 'magType']. Be careful with the description "the 0th row", alignment between integer position and label is only true when your index is a regular pd.RangeIndex.

          – jpp
          Nov 26 '18 at 2:01




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53473188%2fwhy-is-python-pandas-loc-not-returning-a-single-item%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

          count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

          A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks