San Martino Sannita




Coordenadas: 41° 4' N 14° 50' E


































































Itália San Martino Sannita  


  Comuna  


Map of comune of San Martino Sannita (province of Benevento, region Campania, Italy).svg



San Martino Sannita está localizado em: Itália


San Martino Sannita



Localização de San Martino Sannita na Itália
Coordenadas
41° 4' N 14° 50' E

Região
Flag of Campania.svg Campânia

Província
Benevento

Área
- Total
 6 km²

Altitude
 450 m

População
- Total
 1 184

    • Densidade
197 hab./km²
Outros dados
Comunas limítrofes
Montefusco (AV), San Giorgio del Sannio, San Nazzaro, San Nicola Manfredi, Sant'Angelo a Cupolo, Torrioni (AV)
Código ISTAT
 062065

Código postal
 82010
Prefixo telefônico
 0824
Sítio
www.comune.sanmartinosannita.bn.it

Procurar imagens disponíveis

San Martino Sannita é uma comuna italiana da região da Campania, província de Benevento, com cerca de 1.184 habitantes. Estende-se por uma área de 6 km², tendo uma densidade populacional de 197 hab/km². Faz fronteira com Montefusco (AV), San Giorgio del Sannio, San Nazzaro, San Nicola Manfredi, Sant'Angelo a Cupolo, Torrioni (AV).[1][2][3]



Demografia |






Variação demográfica do município entre 1861 e 2011[3]




Fonte: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT) - Elaboração gráfica da Wikipedia




Referências




  1. ↑ «Statistiche demografiche ISTAT» (em italiano). Dato istat 


  2. ↑ «Popolazione residente al 31 dicembre 2010» (em italiano). Dato istat 


  3. ↑ ab «Istituto Nazionale di Statistica» 🔗 (em italiano). Statistiche I.Stat 



  • Portal da geografia
  • Portal da Itália



















v • e
Província de Benevento

Capital Benevento
Comunas

Airola  •
Amorosi  •
Apice  •
Apollosa  •
Arpaia  •
Arpaise  •
Baselice  •
Benevento  •
Bonea  •
Bucciano  •
Buonalbergo  •
Calvi  •
Campolattaro  •
Campoli del Monte Taburno  •
Casalduni  •
Castelfranco in Miscano  •
Castelpagano  •
Castelpoto  •
Castelvenere  •
Castelvetere in Val Fortore  •
Cautano  •
Ceppaloni  •
Cerreto Sannita  •
Circello  •
Colle Sannita  •
Cusano Mutri  •
Dugenta  •
Durazzano  •
Faicchio  •
Foglianise  •
Foiano di Val Fortore  •
Forchia  •
Fragneto l'Abate  •
Fragneto Monforte  •
Frasso Telesino  •
Ginestra degli Schiavoni  •
Guardia Sanframondi  •
Limatola  •
Luzzano  •
Melizzano  •
Moiano  •
Molinara  •
Montefalcone di Val Fortore  •
Montesarchio  •
Morcone  •
Paduli  •
Pago Veiano  •
Pannarano  •
Paolisi  •
Paupisi  •
Pesco Sannita  •
Pietraroja  •
Pietrelcina  •
Ponte  •
Pontelandolfo  •
Puglianello  •
Reino  •
San Bartolomeo in Galdo  •
San Giorgio del Sannio  •
San Giorgio La Molara  •
San Leucio del Sannio  •
San Lorenzello  •
San Lorenzo Maggiore  •
San Lupo  •
San Marco dei Cavoti  •
San Martino Sannita  •
San Nazzaro  •
San Nicola Manfredi  •
San Salvatore Telesino  •
Santa Croce del Sannio  •
Sant'Agata de' Goti  •
Sant'Angelo a Cupolo  •
Sant'Arcangelo Trimonte  •
Sassinoro  •
Solopaca  •
Telese Terme  •
Tocco Caudio  •
Torrecuso  •
Vitulano  •



Província de Benevento

Lista de comunas de Benevento



-

Popular posts from this blog

A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

Image
0 I found a lot of questions abount appendices and ToC. Many users want appendices to be grouped in an Appendix part, however some problems arise with ToC, hyperref, PDF viewer bookmarks, and so on. There are different solutions which require extra packages, command patching and other extra code, however none of them satisfies me. I almost found an easy way to accomplish a good result, where appendices are added to bookmarks in the right way and hyperref links point to the right page. However, the number of the "Appendix" part page is wrong (it's the number of appendix A). Is there any EASY way to fix that? This is a MWE: documentclass{book} usepackage[nottoc,notlot,notlof]{tocbibind} usepackage{hyperref} begin{document} frontmatter tableofcontents mainmatter part{First} chapter{...
Read more

Why does System V / AMD64 ABI mandate a 16 byte stack alignment?

Image
2 I've read in different places that it is done for "performance reasons", but I still wonder what are the particular cases where performance get improved by this 16-byte alignment. Or, in any case, what were the reasons why this was chosen. edit : I'm thinking I wrote the question in a misleading way. I wasn't asking about why the processor does things faster with 16-byte aligned memory, this is explained everywhere in the docs. What I wanted to know instead, is how the enforced 16-byte alignment is better than just letting the programmers align the stack themselves when needed. I'm asking this because from my experience with assembly, the stack enforcement has two problems: it is only useful by less 1% percent of the code that is executed (so in the other 99% is actually overhead); and...
Read more

Firebase ML-Kit Barcode Scanning with Multiple Barcodes

Image
0 I'm working on an Android app where the user has to use a camera view to scan a barcode. I've been using Firebase's ML-Kit barcode scanning utility to achieve the actual barcode recognition bit and it's been fantastic. There's only one issue - if given a photo with multiple barcodes in it, it commonly misses at least one of the barcodes. That's problematic because a lot of the barcodes that my users have to scan are on boxes/containers with multiple barcodes. Here's an example Pixel 2 XL box that may need to be scanned: The IMEI barcode in this picture is never picked up by ML-Kit. However; if I crop out everything else and just send the IMEI barcode through ML-Kit picks it up fine. Is there anything I can do to help ML-Kit pick up on all of the barcodes? ...
Read more