Group binary operation symbol?
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I tried to write • as the binary operation for a group (G, •), but cdot
seems too small and bullet
seems too large, so what symbol is normally used?
symbols math-operators
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I tried to write • as the binary operation for a group (G, •), but cdot
seems too small and bullet
seems too large, so what symbol is normally used?
symbols math-operators
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I tried to write • as the binary operation for a group (G, •), but cdot
seems too small and bullet
seems too large, so what symbol is normally used?
symbols math-operators
I tried to write • as the binary operation for a group (G, •), but cdot
seems too small and bullet
seems too large, so what symbol is normally used?
symbols math-operators
symbols math-operators
asked Oct 17 '15 at 21:22
affinehat
1083
1083
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Normally, it's just cdot
, it's what people are used to and it doesn't look small in $(G,{cdot})$
to me.
Anyway, if you want a bigger dot, you can load the package usepackage{bm}
after any other font package, and then define newcommandbigcdot{bm{cdot}}
and use this.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This is a matter of topic, audience, and personal taste. For a group operation consider an asymmetric binary symbol like oslash, though perhaps not arrow-like symbols like triangleright which suggests a mapping. But if oslash is commonly associated with another operation in your field, then another asymmetric symbol could be used. For an abelian group operation consider a more symmetric symbol like cdot, ast, bullet, etc..
There is no right way unless you are working under house rules, but it can be helpful to have symbols that graphically suggest properties (e.g. asymmetry) or avoid suggesting properties not assumed (e.g. commutativity).
Consider including
newcommandgop{mathbin{oslash}}
Then you can use agop b and modify globally ad lib.
New contributor
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Normally, it's just cdot
, it's what people are used to and it doesn't look small in $(G,{cdot})$
to me.
Anyway, if you want a bigger dot, you can load the package usepackage{bm}
after any other font package, and then define newcommandbigcdot{bm{cdot}}
and use this.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Normally, it's just cdot
, it's what people are used to and it doesn't look small in $(G,{cdot})$
to me.
Anyway, if you want a bigger dot, you can load the package usepackage{bm}
after any other font package, and then define newcommandbigcdot{bm{cdot}}
and use this.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Normally, it's just cdot
, it's what people are used to and it doesn't look small in $(G,{cdot})$
to me.
Anyway, if you want a bigger dot, you can load the package usepackage{bm}
after any other font package, and then define newcommandbigcdot{bm{cdot}}
and use this.
Normally, it's just cdot
, it's what people are used to and it doesn't look small in $(G,{cdot})$
to me.
Anyway, if you want a bigger dot, you can load the package usepackage{bm}
after any other font package, and then define newcommandbigcdot{bm{cdot}}
and use this.
answered Oct 28 '15 at 10:08
boycott.se - yo'
39k8122231
39k8122231
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This is a matter of topic, audience, and personal taste. For a group operation consider an asymmetric binary symbol like oslash, though perhaps not arrow-like symbols like triangleright which suggests a mapping. But if oslash is commonly associated with another operation in your field, then another asymmetric symbol could be used. For an abelian group operation consider a more symmetric symbol like cdot, ast, bullet, etc..
There is no right way unless you are working under house rules, but it can be helpful to have symbols that graphically suggest properties (e.g. asymmetry) or avoid suggesting properties not assumed (e.g. commutativity).
Consider including
newcommandgop{mathbin{oslash}}
Then you can use agop b and modify globally ad lib.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This is a matter of topic, audience, and personal taste. For a group operation consider an asymmetric binary symbol like oslash, though perhaps not arrow-like symbols like triangleright which suggests a mapping. But if oslash is commonly associated with another operation in your field, then another asymmetric symbol could be used. For an abelian group operation consider a more symmetric symbol like cdot, ast, bullet, etc..
There is no right way unless you are working under house rules, but it can be helpful to have symbols that graphically suggest properties (e.g. asymmetry) or avoid suggesting properties not assumed (e.g. commutativity).
Consider including
newcommandgop{mathbin{oslash}}
Then you can use agop b and modify globally ad lib.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
This is a matter of topic, audience, and personal taste. For a group operation consider an asymmetric binary symbol like oslash, though perhaps not arrow-like symbols like triangleright which suggests a mapping. But if oslash is commonly associated with another operation in your field, then another asymmetric symbol could be used. For an abelian group operation consider a more symmetric symbol like cdot, ast, bullet, etc..
There is no right way unless you are working under house rules, but it can be helpful to have symbols that graphically suggest properties (e.g. asymmetry) or avoid suggesting properties not assumed (e.g. commutativity).
Consider including
newcommandgop{mathbin{oslash}}
Then you can use agop b and modify globally ad lib.
New contributor
This is a matter of topic, audience, and personal taste. For a group operation consider an asymmetric binary symbol like oslash, though perhaps not arrow-like symbols like triangleright which suggests a mapping. But if oslash is commonly associated with another operation in your field, then another asymmetric symbol could be used. For an abelian group operation consider a more symmetric symbol like cdot, ast, bullet, etc..
There is no right way unless you are working under house rules, but it can be helpful to have symbols that graphically suggest properties (e.g. asymmetry) or avoid suggesting properties not assumed (e.g. commutativity).
Consider including
newcommandgop{mathbin{oslash}}
Then you can use agop b and modify globally ad lib.
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
New contributor
answered 3 hours ago
agillator
12
12
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f273587%2fgroup-binary-operation-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown