Finding magnitude of a complex number











up vote
8
down vote

favorite













$$z = biggr(dfrac{2+2i}{4-2i}biggr)$$



$$|z| = ? $$




My attempt:



$$dfrac{(2+2i)(4+2i)}{(4-2i)(4+2i)} = dfrac{4+12i}{20} = dfrac{4}{20}+dfrac{12}{20}i = dfrac{1}{5} + dfrac{3}{5}i$$



Now taking its magnitude and we have that



$$|z| = sqrt{biggr (dfrac 1 5 biggr ) ^2 +biggr (dfrac 3 5 biggr )^2} = sqrt {dfrac 2 5 }$$



Am I right?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    8
    down vote

    favorite













    $$z = biggr(dfrac{2+2i}{4-2i}biggr)$$



    $$|z| = ? $$




    My attempt:



    $$dfrac{(2+2i)(4+2i)}{(4-2i)(4+2i)} = dfrac{4+12i}{20} = dfrac{4}{20}+dfrac{12}{20}i = dfrac{1}{5} + dfrac{3}{5}i$$



    Now taking its magnitude and we have that



    $$|z| = sqrt{biggr (dfrac 1 5 biggr ) ^2 +biggr (dfrac 3 5 biggr )^2} = sqrt {dfrac 2 5 }$$



    Am I right?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      8
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      8
      down vote

      favorite












      $$z = biggr(dfrac{2+2i}{4-2i}biggr)$$



      $$|z| = ? $$




      My attempt:



      $$dfrac{(2+2i)(4+2i)}{(4-2i)(4+2i)} = dfrac{4+12i}{20} = dfrac{4}{20}+dfrac{12}{20}i = dfrac{1}{5} + dfrac{3}{5}i$$



      Now taking its magnitude and we have that



      $$|z| = sqrt{biggr (dfrac 1 5 biggr ) ^2 +biggr (dfrac 3 5 biggr )^2} = sqrt {dfrac 2 5 }$$



      Am I right?










      share|cite|improve this question














      $$z = biggr(dfrac{2+2i}{4-2i}biggr)$$



      $$|z| = ? $$




      My attempt:



      $$dfrac{(2+2i)(4+2i)}{(4-2i)(4+2i)} = dfrac{4+12i}{20} = dfrac{4}{20}+dfrac{12}{20}i = dfrac{1}{5} + dfrac{3}{5}i$$



      Now taking its magnitude and we have that



      $$|z| = sqrt{biggr (dfrac 1 5 biggr ) ^2 +biggr (dfrac 3 5 biggr )^2} = sqrt {dfrac 2 5 }$$



      Am I right?







      complex-numbers






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      Hamilton

      1627




      1627






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          7
          down vote













          Yes, you are. You can do it also like this: $$Big|{2+2iover 4-2i}Big|=Big|{1+iover 2-i}Big|={|1+i|over |2-i|}= {sqrt{2}over sqrt{5}}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            3
            down vote













            It is better to use $$left|dfrac abright|=dfrac{|a|}{|b|}$$



            $|2+2i|=sqrt{2^2+2^2}=2sqrt2$






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • I first made the denominator real and then did my calculations to avoid any errors .
              – Hamilton
              8 hours ago












            • @Hamilton, At least for modulus, the formula I believe is more suitable
              – lab bhattacharjee
              8 hours ago










            • However, is it a bad way?
              – Hamilton
              8 hours ago










            • Rationalization may be costly in some cases
              – lab bhattacharjee
              8 hours ago










            • @Hamilton I'd say it depends whether you're interested in the actual value of $z$ or not. This way gets you straight to the magnitude and saves you the slightly more error-prone algebra of making a real denominator to get $z$.
              – timtfj
              6 hours ago











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024418%2ffinding-magnitude-of-a-complex-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            7
            down vote













            Yes, you are. You can do it also like this: $$Big|{2+2iover 4-2i}Big|=Big|{1+iover 2-i}Big|={|1+i|over |2-i|}= {sqrt{2}over sqrt{5}}$$






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              7
              down vote













              Yes, you are. You can do it also like this: $$Big|{2+2iover 4-2i}Big|=Big|{1+iover 2-i}Big|={|1+i|over |2-i|}= {sqrt{2}over sqrt{5}}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                7
                down vote










                up vote
                7
                down vote









                Yes, you are. You can do it also like this: $$Big|{2+2iover 4-2i}Big|=Big|{1+iover 2-i}Big|={|1+i|over |2-i|}= {sqrt{2}over sqrt{5}}$$






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Yes, you are. You can do it also like this: $$Big|{2+2iover 4-2i}Big|=Big|{1+iover 2-i}Big|={|1+i|over |2-i|}= {sqrt{2}over sqrt{5}}$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 8 hours ago









                greedoid

                35.6k114590




                35.6k114590






















                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote













                    It is better to use $$left|dfrac abright|=dfrac{|a|}{|b|}$$



                    $|2+2i|=sqrt{2^2+2^2}=2sqrt2$






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • I first made the denominator real and then did my calculations to avoid any errors .
                      – Hamilton
                      8 hours ago












                    • @Hamilton, At least for modulus, the formula I believe is more suitable
                      – lab bhattacharjee
                      8 hours ago










                    • However, is it a bad way?
                      – Hamilton
                      8 hours ago










                    • Rationalization may be costly in some cases
                      – lab bhattacharjee
                      8 hours ago










                    • @Hamilton I'd say it depends whether you're interested in the actual value of $z$ or not. This way gets you straight to the magnitude and saves you the slightly more error-prone algebra of making a real denominator to get $z$.
                      – timtfj
                      6 hours ago















                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote













                    It is better to use $$left|dfrac abright|=dfrac{|a|}{|b|}$$



                    $|2+2i|=sqrt{2^2+2^2}=2sqrt2$






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • I first made the denominator real and then did my calculations to avoid any errors .
                      – Hamilton
                      8 hours ago












                    • @Hamilton, At least for modulus, the formula I believe is more suitable
                      – lab bhattacharjee
                      8 hours ago










                    • However, is it a bad way?
                      – Hamilton
                      8 hours ago










                    • Rationalization may be costly in some cases
                      – lab bhattacharjee
                      8 hours ago










                    • @Hamilton I'd say it depends whether you're interested in the actual value of $z$ or not. This way gets you straight to the magnitude and saves you the slightly more error-prone algebra of making a real denominator to get $z$.
                      – timtfj
                      6 hours ago













                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote









                    It is better to use $$left|dfrac abright|=dfrac{|a|}{|b|}$$



                    $|2+2i|=sqrt{2^2+2^2}=2sqrt2$






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    It is better to use $$left|dfrac abright|=dfrac{|a|}{|b|}$$



                    $|2+2i|=sqrt{2^2+2^2}=2sqrt2$







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 8 hours ago









                    lab bhattacharjee

                    221k15154271




                    221k15154271












                    • I first made the denominator real and then did my calculations to avoid any errors .
                      – Hamilton
                      8 hours ago












                    • @Hamilton, At least for modulus, the formula I believe is more suitable
                      – lab bhattacharjee
                      8 hours ago










                    • However, is it a bad way?
                      – Hamilton
                      8 hours ago










                    • Rationalization may be costly in some cases
                      – lab bhattacharjee
                      8 hours ago










                    • @Hamilton I'd say it depends whether you're interested in the actual value of $z$ or not. This way gets you straight to the magnitude and saves you the slightly more error-prone algebra of making a real denominator to get $z$.
                      – timtfj
                      6 hours ago


















                    • I first made the denominator real and then did my calculations to avoid any errors .
                      – Hamilton
                      8 hours ago












                    • @Hamilton, At least for modulus, the formula I believe is more suitable
                      – lab bhattacharjee
                      8 hours ago










                    • However, is it a bad way?
                      – Hamilton
                      8 hours ago










                    • Rationalization may be costly in some cases
                      – lab bhattacharjee
                      8 hours ago










                    • @Hamilton I'd say it depends whether you're interested in the actual value of $z$ or not. This way gets you straight to the magnitude and saves you the slightly more error-prone algebra of making a real denominator to get $z$.
                      – timtfj
                      6 hours ago
















                    I first made the denominator real and then did my calculations to avoid any errors .
                    – Hamilton
                    8 hours ago






                    I first made the denominator real and then did my calculations to avoid any errors .
                    – Hamilton
                    8 hours ago














                    @Hamilton, At least for modulus, the formula I believe is more suitable
                    – lab bhattacharjee
                    8 hours ago




                    @Hamilton, At least for modulus, the formula I believe is more suitable
                    – lab bhattacharjee
                    8 hours ago












                    However, is it a bad way?
                    – Hamilton
                    8 hours ago




                    However, is it a bad way?
                    – Hamilton
                    8 hours ago












                    Rationalization may be costly in some cases
                    – lab bhattacharjee
                    8 hours ago




                    Rationalization may be costly in some cases
                    – lab bhattacharjee
                    8 hours ago












                    @Hamilton I'd say it depends whether you're interested in the actual value of $z$ or not. This way gets you straight to the magnitude and saves you the slightly more error-prone algebra of making a real denominator to get $z$.
                    – timtfj
                    6 hours ago




                    @Hamilton I'd say it depends whether you're interested in the actual value of $z$ or not. This way gets you straight to the magnitude and saves you the slightly more error-prone algebra of making a real denominator to get $z$.
                    – timtfj
                    6 hours ago


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024418%2ffinding-magnitude-of-a-complex-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

                    count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

                    A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks