Convert token to string in LaTeX3
While trying to answer another question on this site, I was experimenting with peek_after:Nw and l_peek_token.
I can set l_peek_token OK, but then I want to test if this token is one of several characters, rather than just one character. (Just one character is easy and I could use peek_meaning:NTF.)
I thought that I would be able to easily convert l_peek_token to a string and then use str_if_in:nnTF for the test. But, I don't know how to do this.
I know I could use a bunch of nested token_if_eq_meaning:NNTF, but I find this syntax clumsy.
How can I do this?
MWE
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new:Nn __dcp_test_punct:
{
% What goes here to convert l_peek_token to the right format?
str_if_in:nnTF {.,} { l_peek_token }
{ ~Punctuation~found:~ }
{ ~Punctionation~not~found~ }
---
% This works, but I find the syntax clumsy.
token_if_eq_meaning:NNTF l_peek_token .
{ ~Punctuation~found:~ }
{
token_if_eq_meaning:NNTF l_peek_token ,
{ ~Punctuation~found:~ }
{ ~Punctionation~not~found~ }
}
}
cs_new:Nn __dcp_test_punct:n
{
peek_after:Nw __dcp_test_punct:
}
DeclareDocumentCommand {testpunct} { m }
{
__dcp_test_punct:n {#1}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
testpunct{A}.
testpunct{A},
testpunct{A}
end{document}
expl3 strings token-lists
add a comment |
While trying to answer another question on this site, I was experimenting with peek_after:Nw and l_peek_token.
I can set l_peek_token OK, but then I want to test if this token is one of several characters, rather than just one character. (Just one character is easy and I could use peek_meaning:NTF.)
I thought that I would be able to easily convert l_peek_token to a string and then use str_if_in:nnTF for the test. But, I don't know how to do this.
I know I could use a bunch of nested token_if_eq_meaning:NNTF, but I find this syntax clumsy.
How can I do this?
MWE
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new:Nn __dcp_test_punct:
{
% What goes here to convert l_peek_token to the right format?
str_if_in:nnTF {.,} { l_peek_token }
{ ~Punctuation~found:~ }
{ ~Punctionation~not~found~ }
---
% This works, but I find the syntax clumsy.
token_if_eq_meaning:NNTF l_peek_token .
{ ~Punctuation~found:~ }
{
token_if_eq_meaning:NNTF l_peek_token ,
{ ~Punctuation~found:~ }
{ ~Punctionation~not~found~ }
}
}
cs_new:Nn __dcp_test_punct:n
{
peek_after:Nw __dcp_test_punct:
}
DeclareDocumentCommand {testpunct} { m }
{
__dcp_test_punct:n {#1}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
testpunct{A}.
testpunct{A},
testpunct{A}
end{document}
expl3 strings token-lists
add a comment |
While trying to answer another question on this site, I was experimenting with peek_after:Nw and l_peek_token.
I can set l_peek_token OK, but then I want to test if this token is one of several characters, rather than just one character. (Just one character is easy and I could use peek_meaning:NTF.)
I thought that I would be able to easily convert l_peek_token to a string and then use str_if_in:nnTF for the test. But, I don't know how to do this.
I know I could use a bunch of nested token_if_eq_meaning:NNTF, but I find this syntax clumsy.
How can I do this?
MWE
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new:Nn __dcp_test_punct:
{
% What goes here to convert l_peek_token to the right format?
str_if_in:nnTF {.,} { l_peek_token }
{ ~Punctuation~found:~ }
{ ~Punctionation~not~found~ }
---
% This works, but I find the syntax clumsy.
token_if_eq_meaning:NNTF l_peek_token .
{ ~Punctuation~found:~ }
{
token_if_eq_meaning:NNTF l_peek_token ,
{ ~Punctuation~found:~ }
{ ~Punctionation~not~found~ }
}
}
cs_new:Nn __dcp_test_punct:n
{
peek_after:Nw __dcp_test_punct:
}
DeclareDocumentCommand {testpunct} { m }
{
__dcp_test_punct:n {#1}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
testpunct{A}.
testpunct{A},
testpunct{A}
end{document}
expl3 strings token-lists
While trying to answer another question on this site, I was experimenting with peek_after:Nw and l_peek_token.
I can set l_peek_token OK, but then I want to test if this token is one of several characters, rather than just one character. (Just one character is easy and I could use peek_meaning:NTF.)
I thought that I would be able to easily convert l_peek_token to a string and then use str_if_in:nnTF for the test. But, I don't know how to do this.
I know I could use a bunch of nested token_if_eq_meaning:NNTF, but I find this syntax clumsy.
How can I do this?
MWE
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new:Nn __dcp_test_punct:
{
% What goes here to convert l_peek_token to the right format?
str_if_in:nnTF {.,} { l_peek_token }
{ ~Punctuation~found:~ }
{ ~Punctionation~not~found~ }
---
% This works, but I find the syntax clumsy.
token_if_eq_meaning:NNTF l_peek_token .
{ ~Punctuation~found:~ }
{
token_if_eq_meaning:NNTF l_peek_token ,
{ ~Punctuation~found:~ }
{ ~Punctionation~not~found~ }
}
}
cs_new:Nn __dcp_test_punct:n
{
peek_after:Nw __dcp_test_punct:
}
DeclareDocumentCommand {testpunct} { m }
{
__dcp_test_punct:n {#1}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
testpunct{A}.
testpunct{A},
testpunct{A}
end{document}
expl3 strings token-lists
expl3 strings token-lists
asked 12 mins ago
David PurtonDavid Purton
9,5551935
9,5551935
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474444%2fconvert-token-to-string-in-latex3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474444%2fconvert-token-to-string-in-latex3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown