Firestore security rules: How to validate that a field is undefined?
When a user signs up and they initialise their data in firestore, I want to validate that they aren't attempting to set their role (i.e. so they're not setting it to 'admin' for example).
I tried to write this:
match /users/{userId} {
allow create: if (signedInAs(userId) && !request.resource.data.role) || isAdmin();
...
...but I just see "Property role is undefined on object."
Is there a way to do this safely? Or does this mean I should always be initialising expected fields, even if it's just to the empty string? That doesn't seem to quite fit with the philosophy of NoSQL?
firebase google-cloud-firestore firebase-security-rules
add a comment |
When a user signs up and they initialise their data in firestore, I want to validate that they aren't attempting to set their role (i.e. so they're not setting it to 'admin' for example).
I tried to write this:
match /users/{userId} {
allow create: if (signedInAs(userId) && !request.resource.data.role) || isAdmin();
...
...but I just see "Property role is undefined on object."
Is there a way to do this safely? Or does this mean I should always be initialising expected fields, even if it's just to the empty string? That doesn't seem to quite fit with the philosophy of NoSQL?
firebase google-cloud-firestore firebase-security-rules
add a comment |
When a user signs up and they initialise their data in firestore, I want to validate that they aren't attempting to set their role (i.e. so they're not setting it to 'admin' for example).
I tried to write this:
match /users/{userId} {
allow create: if (signedInAs(userId) && !request.resource.data.role) || isAdmin();
...
...but I just see "Property role is undefined on object."
Is there a way to do this safely? Or does this mean I should always be initialising expected fields, even if it's just to the empty string? That doesn't seem to quite fit with the philosophy of NoSQL?
firebase google-cloud-firestore firebase-security-rules
When a user signs up and they initialise their data in firestore, I want to validate that they aren't attempting to set their role (i.e. so they're not setting it to 'admin' for example).
I tried to write this:
match /users/{userId} {
allow create: if (signedInAs(userId) && !request.resource.data.role) || isAdmin();
...
...but I just see "Property role is undefined on object."
Is there a way to do this safely? Or does this mean I should always be initialising expected fields, even if it's just to the empty string? That doesn't seem to quite fit with the philosophy of NoSQL?
firebase google-cloud-firestore firebase-security-rules
firebase google-cloud-firestore firebase-security-rules
edited Nov 24 '18 at 13:07
Joseph Humfrey
asked Nov 24 '18 at 13:02
Joseph HumfreyJoseph Humfrey
2,11411625
2,11411625
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Use the in
operator to find out if a property of an object doesn't exist.
!("role" in request.resource.data)
This yields a boolean. See it in the rules API docs for the Map type.
Perfect, thank you!
– Joseph Humfrey
Nov 24 '18 at 14:22
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53458413%2ffirestore-security-rules-how-to-validate-that-a-field-is-undefined%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Use the in
operator to find out if a property of an object doesn't exist.
!("role" in request.resource.data)
This yields a boolean. See it in the rules API docs for the Map type.
Perfect, thank you!
– Joseph Humfrey
Nov 24 '18 at 14:22
add a comment |
Use the in
operator to find out if a property of an object doesn't exist.
!("role" in request.resource.data)
This yields a boolean. See it in the rules API docs for the Map type.
Perfect, thank you!
– Joseph Humfrey
Nov 24 '18 at 14:22
add a comment |
Use the in
operator to find out if a property of an object doesn't exist.
!("role" in request.resource.data)
This yields a boolean. See it in the rules API docs for the Map type.
Use the in
operator to find out if a property of an object doesn't exist.
!("role" in request.resource.data)
This yields a boolean. See it in the rules API docs for the Map type.
answered Nov 24 '18 at 13:08
Doug StevensonDoug Stevenson
72.6k983104
72.6k983104
Perfect, thank you!
– Joseph Humfrey
Nov 24 '18 at 14:22
add a comment |
Perfect, thank you!
– Joseph Humfrey
Nov 24 '18 at 14:22
Perfect, thank you!
– Joseph Humfrey
Nov 24 '18 at 14:22
Perfect, thank you!
– Joseph Humfrey
Nov 24 '18 at 14:22
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53458413%2ffirestore-security-rules-how-to-validate-that-a-field-is-undefined%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown