IgniteInterruptedException: Got interrupted while waiting for future to complete
There are two server nodes, one (let's call it master) creating compute task and sending it to another (let's call it worker) via ignite.compute().runAsync(...) which produces some result and writes it into cache. If worker node fails (process is killed) Ignite FailoverSPI decides which node to select as new worker node and complete task on it. But when master node fails any Ignite operation inside worker (cache get or creating another task) task thread produces the following exception: IgniteInterruptedException: Got interrupted while waiting for future to complete.
This is not directly stated in the documentation but seems reasonable. Node that awaits result failed - no one is interested in result so there is no need to complete worker task. But what if I still want operation to complete, which API should I use instead? I want guarantees for the operation completeness in both cases: master node failure and worker node failure.
ignite gridgain
asked Nov 27 '18 at 12:23
AeterosAeteros
3331418
add a comment |
There are two server nodes, one (let's call it master) creating compute task and sending it to another (let's call it worker) via ignite.compute().runAsync(...) which produces some result and writes it into cache. If worker node fails (process is killed) Ignite FailoverSPI decides which node to select as new worker node and complete task on it. But when master node fails any Ignite operation inside worker (cache get or creating another task) task thread produces the following exception: IgniteInterruptedException: Got interrupted while waiting for future to complete.
This is not directly stated in the documentation but seems reasonable. Node that awaits result failed - no one is interested in result so there is no need to complete worker task. But what if I still want operation to complete, which API should I use instead? I want guarantees for the operation completeness in both cases: master node failure and worker node failure.
ignite gridgain
asked Nov 27 '18 at 12:23
AeterosAeteros
3331418
What do you mean by master node failure here? Can you provide logs from all affected nodes? Note that Ignite does not have concept of master nodes, there is discovery coordinator and there is cache partition primary, but that's it.
– alamar
Nov 28 '18 at 14:27
add a comment |
There are two server nodes, one (let's call it master) creating compute task and sending it to another (let's call it worker) via ignite.compute().runAsync(...) which produces some result and writes it into cache. If worker node fails (process is killed) Ignite FailoverSPI decides which node to select as new worker node and complete task on it. But when master node fails any Ignite operation inside worker (cache get or creating another task) task thread produces the following exception: IgniteInterruptedException: Got interrupted while waiting for future to complete.
This is not directly stated in the documentation but seems reasonable. Node that awaits result failed - no one is interested in result so there is no need to complete worker task. But what if I still want operation to complete, which API should I use instead? I want guarantees for the operation completeness in both cases: master node failure and worker node failure.
ignite gridgain
asked Nov 27 '18 at 12:23
AeterosAeteros
3331418
There are two server nodes, one (let's call it master) creating compute task and sending it to another (let's call it worker) via ignite.compute().runAsync(...) which produces some result and writes it into cache. If worker node fails (process is killed) Ignite FailoverSPI decides which node to select as new worker node and complete task on it. But when master node fails any Ignite operation inside worker (cache get or creating another task) task thread produces the following exception: IgniteInterruptedException: Got interrupted while waiting for future to complete.
This is not directly stated in the documentation but seems reasonable. Node that awaits result failed - no one is interested in result so there is no need to complete worker task. But what if I still want operation to complete, which API should I use instead? I want guarantees for the operation completeness in both cases: master node failure and worker node failure.
ignite gridgain
ignite gridgain
asked Nov 27 '18 at 12:23
AeterosAeteros
3331418
asked Nov 27 '18 at 12:23
AeterosAeteros
3331418
asked Nov 27 '18 at 12:23
AeterosAeteros
3331418
asked Nov 27 '18 at 12:23
AeterosAeteros
3331418
asked Nov 27 '18 at 12:23
AeterosAeteros
3331418
3331418
What do you mean by master node failure here? Can you provide logs from all affected nodes? Note that Ignite does not have concept of master nodes, there is discovery coordinator and there is cache partition primary, but that's it.
– alamar
Nov 28 '18 at 14:27
add a comment |
What do you mean by master node failure here? Can you provide logs from all affected nodes? Note that Ignite does not have concept of master nodes, there is discovery coordinator and there is cache partition primary, but that's it.
– alamar
Nov 28 '18 at 14:27
What do you mean by master node failure here? Can you provide logs from all affected nodes? Note that Ignite does not have concept of master nodes, there is discovery coordinator and there is cache partition primary, but that's it.
– alamar
Nov 28 '18 at 14:27
What do you mean by master node failure here? Can you provide logs from all affected nodes? Note that Ignite does not have concept of master nodes, there is discovery coordinator and there is cache partition primary, but that's it.
– alamar
Nov 28 '18 at 14:27
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53499636%2figniteinterruptedexception-got-interrupted-while-waiting-for-future-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53499636%2figniteinterruptedexception-got-interrupted-while-waiting-for-future-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What do you mean by master node failure here? Can you provide logs from all affected nodes? Note that Ignite does not have concept of master nodes, there is discovery coordinator and there is cache partition primary, but that's it.
– alamar
Nov 28 '18 at 14:27