JavaScript UTC to localtime conversion not working in IE & Firefox, but works fine for Chrome












0















I'm facing an issue.



I'm saving the UTC time in my server using Java code:



DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMMM-yy HH:mm:ss");


I persist the time with this ->



time = timeFormat.format(new Date()).toString()


This is persisted as the UTC time.



Now, while displaying it in a browser, I convert it into local time :



var date = new Date(time);

convertToLocal(date).toLocaleString();

function convertToLocal(date) {
var newDate = new Date(date.getTime() +date.getTimezoneOffset()*60*1000);

var offset = date.getTimezoneOffset() / 60;
var hours = date.getHours();

newDate.setHours(hours - offset);

return newDate;
}

console.log("Time : " + convertToLocal(date).toLocaleString())


This works fine in Chrome but in Firefox & IE , I get "Invalid Date" instead of the timestamp which I expect to see.



Please help.










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    Browsers are not consistent in the date formats they accept beyond ISO standard (which yours isn't).

    – Pointy
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:54






  • 2





    I guess the Java output as string does not contain the T between date and time parts. Also make sure the timezone is added, which can be a plain "Z" suffix for UTC. Make sure it has that so it complies with ISO standards. With that you wont need to add timezone offsets in JavaScript. Just use the appropriate rendering.

    – trincot
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:54













  • Also if send proper ISO UTC date string won't need to do local conversion

    – charlietfl
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:00











  • @trincot : Can you please explain with some snippets how I can modify the code?

    – pep8
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:01






  • 1





    See stackoverflow.com/questions/20238280/date-in-to-utc-format-java for the change in Java code. Once that is done you only need to do toLocaleString() in JavaScript which will take the local timezone into account in the stringification.

    – trincot
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:12


















0















I'm facing an issue.



I'm saving the UTC time in my server using Java code:



DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMMM-yy HH:mm:ss");


I persist the time with this ->



time = timeFormat.format(new Date()).toString()


This is persisted as the UTC time.



Now, while displaying it in a browser, I convert it into local time :



var date = new Date(time);

convertToLocal(date).toLocaleString();

function convertToLocal(date) {
var newDate = new Date(date.getTime() +date.getTimezoneOffset()*60*1000);

var offset = date.getTimezoneOffset() / 60;
var hours = date.getHours();

newDate.setHours(hours - offset);

return newDate;
}

console.log("Time : " + convertToLocal(date).toLocaleString())


This works fine in Chrome but in Firefox & IE , I get "Invalid Date" instead of the timestamp which I expect to see.



Please help.










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    Browsers are not consistent in the date formats they accept beyond ISO standard (which yours isn't).

    – Pointy
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:54






  • 2





    I guess the Java output as string does not contain the T between date and time parts. Also make sure the timezone is added, which can be a plain "Z" suffix for UTC. Make sure it has that so it complies with ISO standards. With that you wont need to add timezone offsets in JavaScript. Just use the appropriate rendering.

    – trincot
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:54













  • Also if send proper ISO UTC date string won't need to do local conversion

    – charlietfl
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:00











  • @trincot : Can you please explain with some snippets how I can modify the code?

    – pep8
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:01






  • 1





    See stackoverflow.com/questions/20238280/date-in-to-utc-format-java for the change in Java code. Once that is done you only need to do toLocaleString() in JavaScript which will take the local timezone into account in the stringification.

    – trincot
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:12
















0












0








0


1






I'm facing an issue.



I'm saving the UTC time in my server using Java code:



DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMMM-yy HH:mm:ss");


I persist the time with this ->



time = timeFormat.format(new Date()).toString()


This is persisted as the UTC time.



Now, while displaying it in a browser, I convert it into local time :



var date = new Date(time);

convertToLocal(date).toLocaleString();

function convertToLocal(date) {
var newDate = new Date(date.getTime() +date.getTimezoneOffset()*60*1000);

var offset = date.getTimezoneOffset() / 60;
var hours = date.getHours();

newDate.setHours(hours - offset);

return newDate;
}

console.log("Time : " + convertToLocal(date).toLocaleString())


This works fine in Chrome but in Firefox & IE , I get "Invalid Date" instead of the timestamp which I expect to see.



Please help.










share|improve this question














I'm facing an issue.



I'm saving the UTC time in my server using Java code:



DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMMM-yy HH:mm:ss");


I persist the time with this ->



time = timeFormat.format(new Date()).toString()


This is persisted as the UTC time.



Now, while displaying it in a browser, I convert it into local time :



var date = new Date(time);

convertToLocal(date).toLocaleString();

function convertToLocal(date) {
var newDate = new Date(date.getTime() +date.getTimezoneOffset()*60*1000);

var offset = date.getTimezoneOffset() / 60;
var hours = date.getHours();

newDate.setHours(hours - offset);

return newDate;
}

console.log("Time : " + convertToLocal(date).toLocaleString())


This works fine in Chrome but in Firefox & IE , I get "Invalid Date" instead of the timestamp which I expect to see.



Please help.







javascript






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 26 '18 at 14:49









pep8pep8

437




437








  • 2





    Browsers are not consistent in the date formats they accept beyond ISO standard (which yours isn't).

    – Pointy
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:54






  • 2





    I guess the Java output as string does not contain the T between date and time parts. Also make sure the timezone is added, which can be a plain "Z" suffix for UTC. Make sure it has that so it complies with ISO standards. With that you wont need to add timezone offsets in JavaScript. Just use the appropriate rendering.

    – trincot
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:54













  • Also if send proper ISO UTC date string won't need to do local conversion

    – charlietfl
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:00











  • @trincot : Can you please explain with some snippets how I can modify the code?

    – pep8
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:01






  • 1





    See stackoverflow.com/questions/20238280/date-in-to-utc-format-java for the change in Java code. Once that is done you only need to do toLocaleString() in JavaScript which will take the local timezone into account in the stringification.

    – trincot
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:12
















  • 2





    Browsers are not consistent in the date formats they accept beyond ISO standard (which yours isn't).

    – Pointy
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:54






  • 2





    I guess the Java output as string does not contain the T between date and time parts. Also make sure the timezone is added, which can be a plain "Z" suffix for UTC. Make sure it has that so it complies with ISO standards. With that you wont need to add timezone offsets in JavaScript. Just use the appropriate rendering.

    – trincot
    Nov 26 '18 at 14:54













  • Also if send proper ISO UTC date string won't need to do local conversion

    – charlietfl
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:00











  • @trincot : Can you please explain with some snippets how I can modify the code?

    – pep8
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:01






  • 1





    See stackoverflow.com/questions/20238280/date-in-to-utc-format-java for the change in Java code. Once that is done you only need to do toLocaleString() in JavaScript which will take the local timezone into account in the stringification.

    – trincot
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:12










2




2





Browsers are not consistent in the date formats they accept beyond ISO standard (which yours isn't).

– Pointy
Nov 26 '18 at 14:54





Browsers are not consistent in the date formats they accept beyond ISO standard (which yours isn't).

– Pointy
Nov 26 '18 at 14:54




2




2





I guess the Java output as string does not contain the T between date and time parts. Also make sure the timezone is added, which can be a plain "Z" suffix for UTC. Make sure it has that so it complies with ISO standards. With that you wont need to add timezone offsets in JavaScript. Just use the appropriate rendering.

– trincot
Nov 26 '18 at 14:54







I guess the Java output as string does not contain the T between date and time parts. Also make sure the timezone is added, which can be a plain "Z" suffix for UTC. Make sure it has that so it complies with ISO standards. With that you wont need to add timezone offsets in JavaScript. Just use the appropriate rendering.

– trincot
Nov 26 '18 at 14:54















Also if send proper ISO UTC date string won't need to do local conversion

– charlietfl
Nov 26 '18 at 15:00





Also if send proper ISO UTC date string won't need to do local conversion

– charlietfl
Nov 26 '18 at 15:00













@trincot : Can you please explain with some snippets how I can modify the code?

– pep8
Nov 26 '18 at 15:01





@trincot : Can you please explain with some snippets how I can modify the code?

– pep8
Nov 26 '18 at 15:01




1




1





See stackoverflow.com/questions/20238280/date-in-to-utc-format-java for the change in Java code. Once that is done you only need to do toLocaleString() in JavaScript which will take the local timezone into account in the stringification.

– trincot
Nov 26 '18 at 15:12







See stackoverflow.com/questions/20238280/date-in-to-utc-format-java for the change in Java code. Once that is done you only need to do toLocaleString() in JavaScript which will take the local timezone into account in the stringification.

– trincot
Nov 26 '18 at 15:12














2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














The problem is that your Java code produces a date/time string that does not adhere to the
ISO 8601 format. How a JavaScript engine must deal with that is not defined (and thus differs from one browser to another).



See How to get current moment in ISO 8601 format with date, hour, and minute? for how you can change the Java code to produce a date that uses the ISO format. You can just pass the desired format (ISO) to SimpleDateFormat and configure it to mean UTC:



DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z'");
timeFormat.setTimeZone(TimeZone.getTimeZone("UTC"));


That output should look like 2018-11-26T19:41:48Z (several variations of this are accepted). Notice the "T" and terminating "Z" (for UTC).



Once that is done, JavaScript will correctly interpret the date/time as being specified in UTC time zone, and then you only need to do the following in JavaScript, without any need of explicitly adding time zone differences:



console.log("Time : " + date.toLocaleString())


JavaScript which will take the local time zone into account in the stringification.






share|improve this answer


























  • After formatting the date as per the answer shared, and then doing toLocaleString() , everything works fine. But I didn't have any "T" or "Z" in my date when I persisted it through java code with that format. Is that expected? Do I need to be worried ?

    – pep8
    Nov 27 '18 at 7:00











  • For being 100% sure that JavaScript interprets the date string correctly, it would need to have that "T" and "Z". Just check the wikipedia page on what ISO 8601 specifies. If it complies with that, then every JavaScript engine will interpret it correctly. Other formats may work, but there is no language specification backing that up.

    – trincot
    Nov 27 '18 at 7:04











  • The answer you mentioned in the link , has this format in the accepted answer : "new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yyyy KK:mm:ss a Z").format(dateObj)". And this doesn't contain a "T" or "Z" when you print a date with that format.

    – pep8
    Nov 27 '18 at 7:10











  • Specify yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z' as argument to SimpleDateFormat. I replaced the reference with a better Q&A on StackOverflow.

    – trincot
    Nov 27 '18 at 7:36








  • 1





    Yes, that is an issue, because with a string formatted as MM/dd/yyyy, JS cannot always determine with certainty whether the format of the received date string was MM/dd/yyyy or dd/MM/yyyy. It is not documented how JS should deal with this. It is always the safest to have yyyy-MM-dd. JS also supports RFC 2822 compliant timestamps, but there the day should come before(!) the month.

    – trincot
    Nov 27 '18 at 13:09



















0














tl;dr



Use modern java.time classes, not terrible legacy classes.



Send a string in standard ISO 8601 format.



Instant
.now()
.truncatedTo(
ChronoUnit.SECONDS
)
.toString()



Instant.now().toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25Z




Flawed code




This is persisted as the UTC time.




Nope, incorrect. You are not recording a moment in UTC.



DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMMM-yy HH:mm:ss");
String time = timeFormat.format(new Date()).toString() ;


You did specify a time zone in your SimpleDateFormat class. By default that class implicitly applies the JVM’s current default time zone. So the string generated will vary at runtime.



For example, here in my current default time zone of America/Los_Angeles it is not quite 5 PM. When I run that code, I get:




26-November-18 16:57:25




That is not UTC. UTC is several hours later, after midnight tomorrow, as shown next:




Instant.now().toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849Z




If you want whole seconds, drop the fractional second by calling truncatedTo.




Instant.now().truncatedTo( ChronoUnit.SECONDS ).toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25Z




java.time



You are using terrible old date-time classes that were supplanted years ago by the modern java.time classes.



Instant



The Instant class represents a moment on the timeline in UTC with a resolution of nanoseconds (up to nine (9) digits of a decimal fraction).



Instant nowInUtc = Instant.now() ;  // Capture the current moment in UTC.


This Instant class is a basic building-block class of java.time. You can think of OffsetDateTime as an Instant plus a ZoneOffset. Likewise, you can think of ZonedDateTime as an Instant plus a ZoneId.



Never use LocalDateTime to track a moment, as it purposely lacks any concept of time zone or offset-from-UTC.



ISO 8601



As trincot stated in his correct Answer, date-time values are best exchanged as text in standard ISO 8601 format.



For a moment in UTC, that would be either:





  • 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849Z where the Z on the end means UTC, and is pronounced “Zulu”.


  • 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849+00:00 where the +00:00 means an offset from UTC of zero hours-minutes-seconds, or in other words, UTC itself.




About java.time



The java.time framework is built into Java 8 and later. These classes supplant the troublesome old legacy date-time classes such as java.util.Date, Calendar, & SimpleDateFormat.



The Joda-Time project, now in maintenance mode, advises migration to the java.time classes.



To learn more, see the Oracle Tutorial. And search Stack Overflow for many examples and explanations. Specification is JSR 310.



You may exchange java.time objects directly with your database. Use a JDBC driver compliant with JDBC 4.2 or later. No need for strings, no need for java.sql.* classes.



Where to obtain the java.time classes?





  • Java SE 8, Java SE 9, Java SE 10, Java SE 11, and later - Part of the standard Java API with a bundled implementation.


    • Java 9 adds some minor features and fixes.




  • Java SE 6 and Java SE 7


    • Most of the java.time functionality is back-ported to Java 6 & 7 in ThreeTen-Backport.




  • Android


    • Later versions of Android bundle implementations of the java.time classes.

    • For earlier Android (<26), the ThreeTenABP project adapts ThreeTen-Backport (mentioned above). See How to use ThreeTenABP….




The ThreeTen-Extra project extends java.time with additional classes. This project is a proving ground for possible future additions to java.time. You may find some useful classes here such as Interval, YearWeek, YearQuarter, and more.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53483634%2fjavascript-utc-to-localtime-conversion-not-working-in-ie-firefox-but-works-fi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    The problem is that your Java code produces a date/time string that does not adhere to the
    ISO 8601 format. How a JavaScript engine must deal with that is not defined (and thus differs from one browser to another).



    See How to get current moment in ISO 8601 format with date, hour, and minute? for how you can change the Java code to produce a date that uses the ISO format. You can just pass the desired format (ISO) to SimpleDateFormat and configure it to mean UTC:



    DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z'");
    timeFormat.setTimeZone(TimeZone.getTimeZone("UTC"));


    That output should look like 2018-11-26T19:41:48Z (several variations of this are accepted). Notice the "T" and terminating "Z" (for UTC).



    Once that is done, JavaScript will correctly interpret the date/time as being specified in UTC time zone, and then you only need to do the following in JavaScript, without any need of explicitly adding time zone differences:



    console.log("Time : " + date.toLocaleString())


    JavaScript which will take the local time zone into account in the stringification.






    share|improve this answer


























    • After formatting the date as per the answer shared, and then doing toLocaleString() , everything works fine. But I didn't have any "T" or "Z" in my date when I persisted it through java code with that format. Is that expected? Do I need to be worried ?

      – pep8
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:00











    • For being 100% sure that JavaScript interprets the date string correctly, it would need to have that "T" and "Z". Just check the wikipedia page on what ISO 8601 specifies. If it complies with that, then every JavaScript engine will interpret it correctly. Other formats may work, but there is no language specification backing that up.

      – trincot
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:04











    • The answer you mentioned in the link , has this format in the accepted answer : "new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yyyy KK:mm:ss a Z").format(dateObj)". And this doesn't contain a "T" or "Z" when you print a date with that format.

      – pep8
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:10











    • Specify yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z' as argument to SimpleDateFormat. I replaced the reference with a better Q&A on StackOverflow.

      – trincot
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:36








    • 1





      Yes, that is an issue, because with a string formatted as MM/dd/yyyy, JS cannot always determine with certainty whether the format of the received date string was MM/dd/yyyy or dd/MM/yyyy. It is not documented how JS should deal with this. It is always the safest to have yyyy-MM-dd. JS also supports RFC 2822 compliant timestamps, but there the day should come before(!) the month.

      – trincot
      Nov 27 '18 at 13:09
















    3














    The problem is that your Java code produces a date/time string that does not adhere to the
    ISO 8601 format. How a JavaScript engine must deal with that is not defined (and thus differs from one browser to another).



    See How to get current moment in ISO 8601 format with date, hour, and minute? for how you can change the Java code to produce a date that uses the ISO format. You can just pass the desired format (ISO) to SimpleDateFormat and configure it to mean UTC:



    DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z'");
    timeFormat.setTimeZone(TimeZone.getTimeZone("UTC"));


    That output should look like 2018-11-26T19:41:48Z (several variations of this are accepted). Notice the "T" and terminating "Z" (for UTC).



    Once that is done, JavaScript will correctly interpret the date/time as being specified in UTC time zone, and then you only need to do the following in JavaScript, without any need of explicitly adding time zone differences:



    console.log("Time : " + date.toLocaleString())


    JavaScript which will take the local time zone into account in the stringification.






    share|improve this answer


























    • After formatting the date as per the answer shared, and then doing toLocaleString() , everything works fine. But I didn't have any "T" or "Z" in my date when I persisted it through java code with that format. Is that expected? Do I need to be worried ?

      – pep8
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:00











    • For being 100% sure that JavaScript interprets the date string correctly, it would need to have that "T" and "Z". Just check the wikipedia page on what ISO 8601 specifies. If it complies with that, then every JavaScript engine will interpret it correctly. Other formats may work, but there is no language specification backing that up.

      – trincot
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:04











    • The answer you mentioned in the link , has this format in the accepted answer : "new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yyyy KK:mm:ss a Z").format(dateObj)". And this doesn't contain a "T" or "Z" when you print a date with that format.

      – pep8
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:10











    • Specify yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z' as argument to SimpleDateFormat. I replaced the reference with a better Q&A on StackOverflow.

      – trincot
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:36








    • 1





      Yes, that is an issue, because with a string formatted as MM/dd/yyyy, JS cannot always determine with certainty whether the format of the received date string was MM/dd/yyyy or dd/MM/yyyy. It is not documented how JS should deal with this. It is always the safest to have yyyy-MM-dd. JS also supports RFC 2822 compliant timestamps, but there the day should come before(!) the month.

      – trincot
      Nov 27 '18 at 13:09














    3












    3








    3







    The problem is that your Java code produces a date/time string that does not adhere to the
    ISO 8601 format. How a JavaScript engine must deal with that is not defined (and thus differs from one browser to another).



    See How to get current moment in ISO 8601 format with date, hour, and minute? for how you can change the Java code to produce a date that uses the ISO format. You can just pass the desired format (ISO) to SimpleDateFormat and configure it to mean UTC:



    DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z'");
    timeFormat.setTimeZone(TimeZone.getTimeZone("UTC"));


    That output should look like 2018-11-26T19:41:48Z (several variations of this are accepted). Notice the "T" and terminating "Z" (for UTC).



    Once that is done, JavaScript will correctly interpret the date/time as being specified in UTC time zone, and then you only need to do the following in JavaScript, without any need of explicitly adding time zone differences:



    console.log("Time : " + date.toLocaleString())


    JavaScript which will take the local time zone into account in the stringification.






    share|improve this answer















    The problem is that your Java code produces a date/time string that does not adhere to the
    ISO 8601 format. How a JavaScript engine must deal with that is not defined (and thus differs from one browser to another).



    See How to get current moment in ISO 8601 format with date, hour, and minute? for how you can change the Java code to produce a date that uses the ISO format. You can just pass the desired format (ISO) to SimpleDateFormat and configure it to mean UTC:



    DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z'");
    timeFormat.setTimeZone(TimeZone.getTimeZone("UTC"));


    That output should look like 2018-11-26T19:41:48Z (several variations of this are accepted). Notice the "T" and terminating "Z" (for UTC).



    Once that is done, JavaScript will correctly interpret the date/time as being specified in UTC time zone, and then you only need to do the following in JavaScript, without any need of explicitly adding time zone differences:



    console.log("Time : " + date.toLocaleString())


    JavaScript which will take the local time zone into account in the stringification.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 27 '18 at 13:34

























    answered Nov 26 '18 at 20:34









    trincottrincot

    123k1587121




    123k1587121













    • After formatting the date as per the answer shared, and then doing toLocaleString() , everything works fine. But I didn't have any "T" or "Z" in my date when I persisted it through java code with that format. Is that expected? Do I need to be worried ?

      – pep8
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:00











    • For being 100% sure that JavaScript interprets the date string correctly, it would need to have that "T" and "Z". Just check the wikipedia page on what ISO 8601 specifies. If it complies with that, then every JavaScript engine will interpret it correctly. Other formats may work, but there is no language specification backing that up.

      – trincot
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:04











    • The answer you mentioned in the link , has this format in the accepted answer : "new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yyyy KK:mm:ss a Z").format(dateObj)". And this doesn't contain a "T" or "Z" when you print a date with that format.

      – pep8
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:10











    • Specify yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z' as argument to SimpleDateFormat. I replaced the reference with a better Q&A on StackOverflow.

      – trincot
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:36








    • 1





      Yes, that is an issue, because with a string formatted as MM/dd/yyyy, JS cannot always determine with certainty whether the format of the received date string was MM/dd/yyyy or dd/MM/yyyy. It is not documented how JS should deal with this. It is always the safest to have yyyy-MM-dd. JS also supports RFC 2822 compliant timestamps, but there the day should come before(!) the month.

      – trincot
      Nov 27 '18 at 13:09



















    • After formatting the date as per the answer shared, and then doing toLocaleString() , everything works fine. But I didn't have any "T" or "Z" in my date when I persisted it through java code with that format. Is that expected? Do I need to be worried ?

      – pep8
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:00











    • For being 100% sure that JavaScript interprets the date string correctly, it would need to have that "T" and "Z". Just check the wikipedia page on what ISO 8601 specifies. If it complies with that, then every JavaScript engine will interpret it correctly. Other formats may work, but there is no language specification backing that up.

      – trincot
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:04











    • The answer you mentioned in the link , has this format in the accepted answer : "new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yyyy KK:mm:ss a Z").format(dateObj)". And this doesn't contain a "T" or "Z" when you print a date with that format.

      – pep8
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:10











    • Specify yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z' as argument to SimpleDateFormat. I replaced the reference with a better Q&A on StackOverflow.

      – trincot
      Nov 27 '18 at 7:36








    • 1





      Yes, that is an issue, because with a string formatted as MM/dd/yyyy, JS cannot always determine with certainty whether the format of the received date string was MM/dd/yyyy or dd/MM/yyyy. It is not documented how JS should deal with this. It is always the safest to have yyyy-MM-dd. JS also supports RFC 2822 compliant timestamps, but there the day should come before(!) the month.

      – trincot
      Nov 27 '18 at 13:09

















    After formatting the date as per the answer shared, and then doing toLocaleString() , everything works fine. But I didn't have any "T" or "Z" in my date when I persisted it through java code with that format. Is that expected? Do I need to be worried ?

    – pep8
    Nov 27 '18 at 7:00





    After formatting the date as per the answer shared, and then doing toLocaleString() , everything works fine. But I didn't have any "T" or "Z" in my date when I persisted it through java code with that format. Is that expected? Do I need to be worried ?

    – pep8
    Nov 27 '18 at 7:00













    For being 100% sure that JavaScript interprets the date string correctly, it would need to have that "T" and "Z". Just check the wikipedia page on what ISO 8601 specifies. If it complies with that, then every JavaScript engine will interpret it correctly. Other formats may work, but there is no language specification backing that up.

    – trincot
    Nov 27 '18 at 7:04





    For being 100% sure that JavaScript interprets the date string correctly, it would need to have that "T" and "Z". Just check the wikipedia page on what ISO 8601 specifies. If it complies with that, then every JavaScript engine will interpret it correctly. Other formats may work, but there is no language specification backing that up.

    – trincot
    Nov 27 '18 at 7:04













    The answer you mentioned in the link , has this format in the accepted answer : "new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yyyy KK:mm:ss a Z").format(dateObj)". And this doesn't contain a "T" or "Z" when you print a date with that format.

    – pep8
    Nov 27 '18 at 7:10





    The answer you mentioned in the link , has this format in the accepted answer : "new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yyyy KK:mm:ss a Z").format(dateObj)". And this doesn't contain a "T" or "Z" when you print a date with that format.

    – pep8
    Nov 27 '18 at 7:10













    Specify yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z' as argument to SimpleDateFormat. I replaced the reference with a better Q&A on StackOverflow.

    – trincot
    Nov 27 '18 at 7:36







    Specify yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z' as argument to SimpleDateFormat. I replaced the reference with a better Q&A on StackOverflow.

    – trincot
    Nov 27 '18 at 7:36






    1




    1





    Yes, that is an issue, because with a string formatted as MM/dd/yyyy, JS cannot always determine with certainty whether the format of the received date string was MM/dd/yyyy or dd/MM/yyyy. It is not documented how JS should deal with this. It is always the safest to have yyyy-MM-dd. JS also supports RFC 2822 compliant timestamps, but there the day should come before(!) the month.

    – trincot
    Nov 27 '18 at 13:09





    Yes, that is an issue, because with a string formatted as MM/dd/yyyy, JS cannot always determine with certainty whether the format of the received date string was MM/dd/yyyy or dd/MM/yyyy. It is not documented how JS should deal with this. It is always the safest to have yyyy-MM-dd. JS also supports RFC 2822 compliant timestamps, but there the day should come before(!) the month.

    – trincot
    Nov 27 '18 at 13:09













    0














    tl;dr



    Use modern java.time classes, not terrible legacy classes.



    Send a string in standard ISO 8601 format.



    Instant
    .now()
    .truncatedTo(
    ChronoUnit.SECONDS
    )
    .toString()



    Instant.now().toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25Z




    Flawed code




    This is persisted as the UTC time.




    Nope, incorrect. You are not recording a moment in UTC.



    DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMMM-yy HH:mm:ss");
    String time = timeFormat.format(new Date()).toString() ;


    You did specify a time zone in your SimpleDateFormat class. By default that class implicitly applies the JVM’s current default time zone. So the string generated will vary at runtime.



    For example, here in my current default time zone of America/Los_Angeles it is not quite 5 PM. When I run that code, I get:




    26-November-18 16:57:25




    That is not UTC. UTC is several hours later, after midnight tomorrow, as shown next:




    Instant.now().toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849Z




    If you want whole seconds, drop the fractional second by calling truncatedTo.




    Instant.now().truncatedTo( ChronoUnit.SECONDS ).toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25Z




    java.time



    You are using terrible old date-time classes that were supplanted years ago by the modern java.time classes.



    Instant



    The Instant class represents a moment on the timeline in UTC with a resolution of nanoseconds (up to nine (9) digits of a decimal fraction).



    Instant nowInUtc = Instant.now() ;  // Capture the current moment in UTC.


    This Instant class is a basic building-block class of java.time. You can think of OffsetDateTime as an Instant plus a ZoneOffset. Likewise, you can think of ZonedDateTime as an Instant plus a ZoneId.



    Never use LocalDateTime to track a moment, as it purposely lacks any concept of time zone or offset-from-UTC.



    ISO 8601



    As trincot stated in his correct Answer, date-time values are best exchanged as text in standard ISO 8601 format.



    For a moment in UTC, that would be either:





    • 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849Z where the Z on the end means UTC, and is pronounced “Zulu”.


    • 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849+00:00 where the +00:00 means an offset from UTC of zero hours-minutes-seconds, or in other words, UTC itself.




    About java.time



    The java.time framework is built into Java 8 and later. These classes supplant the troublesome old legacy date-time classes such as java.util.Date, Calendar, & SimpleDateFormat.



    The Joda-Time project, now in maintenance mode, advises migration to the java.time classes.



    To learn more, see the Oracle Tutorial. And search Stack Overflow for many examples and explanations. Specification is JSR 310.



    You may exchange java.time objects directly with your database. Use a JDBC driver compliant with JDBC 4.2 or later. No need for strings, no need for java.sql.* classes.



    Where to obtain the java.time classes?





    • Java SE 8, Java SE 9, Java SE 10, Java SE 11, and later - Part of the standard Java API with a bundled implementation.


      • Java 9 adds some minor features and fixes.




    • Java SE 6 and Java SE 7


      • Most of the java.time functionality is back-ported to Java 6 & 7 in ThreeTen-Backport.




    • Android


      • Later versions of Android bundle implementations of the java.time classes.

      • For earlier Android (<26), the ThreeTenABP project adapts ThreeTen-Backport (mentioned above). See How to use ThreeTenABP….




    The ThreeTen-Extra project extends java.time with additional classes. This project is a proving ground for possible future additions to java.time. You may find some useful classes here such as Interval, YearWeek, YearQuarter, and more.






    share|improve this answer






























      0














      tl;dr



      Use modern java.time classes, not terrible legacy classes.



      Send a string in standard ISO 8601 format.



      Instant
      .now()
      .truncatedTo(
      ChronoUnit.SECONDS
      )
      .toString()



      Instant.now().toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25Z




      Flawed code




      This is persisted as the UTC time.




      Nope, incorrect. You are not recording a moment in UTC.



      DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMMM-yy HH:mm:ss");
      String time = timeFormat.format(new Date()).toString() ;


      You did specify a time zone in your SimpleDateFormat class. By default that class implicitly applies the JVM’s current default time zone. So the string generated will vary at runtime.



      For example, here in my current default time zone of America/Los_Angeles it is not quite 5 PM. When I run that code, I get:




      26-November-18 16:57:25




      That is not UTC. UTC is several hours later, after midnight tomorrow, as shown next:




      Instant.now().toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849Z




      If you want whole seconds, drop the fractional second by calling truncatedTo.




      Instant.now().truncatedTo( ChronoUnit.SECONDS ).toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25Z




      java.time



      You are using terrible old date-time classes that were supplanted years ago by the modern java.time classes.



      Instant



      The Instant class represents a moment on the timeline in UTC with a resolution of nanoseconds (up to nine (9) digits of a decimal fraction).



      Instant nowInUtc = Instant.now() ;  // Capture the current moment in UTC.


      This Instant class is a basic building-block class of java.time. You can think of OffsetDateTime as an Instant plus a ZoneOffset. Likewise, you can think of ZonedDateTime as an Instant plus a ZoneId.



      Never use LocalDateTime to track a moment, as it purposely lacks any concept of time zone or offset-from-UTC.



      ISO 8601



      As trincot stated in his correct Answer, date-time values are best exchanged as text in standard ISO 8601 format.



      For a moment in UTC, that would be either:





      • 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849Z where the Z on the end means UTC, and is pronounced “Zulu”.


      • 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849+00:00 where the +00:00 means an offset from UTC of zero hours-minutes-seconds, or in other words, UTC itself.




      About java.time



      The java.time framework is built into Java 8 and later. These classes supplant the troublesome old legacy date-time classes such as java.util.Date, Calendar, & SimpleDateFormat.



      The Joda-Time project, now in maintenance mode, advises migration to the java.time classes.



      To learn more, see the Oracle Tutorial. And search Stack Overflow for many examples and explanations. Specification is JSR 310.



      You may exchange java.time objects directly with your database. Use a JDBC driver compliant with JDBC 4.2 or later. No need for strings, no need for java.sql.* classes.



      Where to obtain the java.time classes?





      • Java SE 8, Java SE 9, Java SE 10, Java SE 11, and later - Part of the standard Java API with a bundled implementation.


        • Java 9 adds some minor features and fixes.




      • Java SE 6 and Java SE 7


        • Most of the java.time functionality is back-ported to Java 6 & 7 in ThreeTen-Backport.




      • Android


        • Later versions of Android bundle implementations of the java.time classes.

        • For earlier Android (<26), the ThreeTenABP project adapts ThreeTen-Backport (mentioned above). See How to use ThreeTenABP….




      The ThreeTen-Extra project extends java.time with additional classes. This project is a proving ground for possible future additions to java.time. You may find some useful classes here such as Interval, YearWeek, YearQuarter, and more.






      share|improve this answer




























        0












        0








        0







        tl;dr



        Use modern java.time classes, not terrible legacy classes.



        Send a string in standard ISO 8601 format.



        Instant
        .now()
        .truncatedTo(
        ChronoUnit.SECONDS
        )
        .toString()



        Instant.now().toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25Z




        Flawed code




        This is persisted as the UTC time.




        Nope, incorrect. You are not recording a moment in UTC.



        DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMMM-yy HH:mm:ss");
        String time = timeFormat.format(new Date()).toString() ;


        You did specify a time zone in your SimpleDateFormat class. By default that class implicitly applies the JVM’s current default time zone. So the string generated will vary at runtime.



        For example, here in my current default time zone of America/Los_Angeles it is not quite 5 PM. When I run that code, I get:




        26-November-18 16:57:25




        That is not UTC. UTC is several hours later, after midnight tomorrow, as shown next:




        Instant.now().toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849Z




        If you want whole seconds, drop the fractional second by calling truncatedTo.




        Instant.now().truncatedTo( ChronoUnit.SECONDS ).toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25Z




        java.time



        You are using terrible old date-time classes that were supplanted years ago by the modern java.time classes.



        Instant



        The Instant class represents a moment on the timeline in UTC with a resolution of nanoseconds (up to nine (9) digits of a decimal fraction).



        Instant nowInUtc = Instant.now() ;  // Capture the current moment in UTC.


        This Instant class is a basic building-block class of java.time. You can think of OffsetDateTime as an Instant plus a ZoneOffset. Likewise, you can think of ZonedDateTime as an Instant plus a ZoneId.



        Never use LocalDateTime to track a moment, as it purposely lacks any concept of time zone or offset-from-UTC.



        ISO 8601



        As trincot stated in his correct Answer, date-time values are best exchanged as text in standard ISO 8601 format.



        For a moment in UTC, that would be either:





        • 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849Z where the Z on the end means UTC, and is pronounced “Zulu”.


        • 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849+00:00 where the +00:00 means an offset from UTC of zero hours-minutes-seconds, or in other words, UTC itself.




        About java.time



        The java.time framework is built into Java 8 and later. These classes supplant the troublesome old legacy date-time classes such as java.util.Date, Calendar, & SimpleDateFormat.



        The Joda-Time project, now in maintenance mode, advises migration to the java.time classes.



        To learn more, see the Oracle Tutorial. And search Stack Overflow for many examples and explanations. Specification is JSR 310.



        You may exchange java.time objects directly with your database. Use a JDBC driver compliant with JDBC 4.2 or later. No need for strings, no need for java.sql.* classes.



        Where to obtain the java.time classes?





        • Java SE 8, Java SE 9, Java SE 10, Java SE 11, and later - Part of the standard Java API with a bundled implementation.


          • Java 9 adds some minor features and fixes.




        • Java SE 6 and Java SE 7


          • Most of the java.time functionality is back-ported to Java 6 & 7 in ThreeTen-Backport.




        • Android


          • Later versions of Android bundle implementations of the java.time classes.

          • For earlier Android (<26), the ThreeTenABP project adapts ThreeTen-Backport (mentioned above). See How to use ThreeTenABP….




        The ThreeTen-Extra project extends java.time with additional classes. This project is a proving ground for possible future additions to java.time. You may find some useful classes here such as Interval, YearWeek, YearQuarter, and more.






        share|improve this answer















        tl;dr



        Use modern java.time classes, not terrible legacy classes.



        Send a string in standard ISO 8601 format.



        Instant
        .now()
        .truncatedTo(
        ChronoUnit.SECONDS
        )
        .toString()



        Instant.now().toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25Z




        Flawed code




        This is persisted as the UTC time.




        Nope, incorrect. You are not recording a moment in UTC.



        DateFormat timeFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMMM-yy HH:mm:ss");
        String time = timeFormat.format(new Date()).toString() ;


        You did specify a time zone in your SimpleDateFormat class. By default that class implicitly applies the JVM’s current default time zone. So the string generated will vary at runtime.



        For example, here in my current default time zone of America/Los_Angeles it is not quite 5 PM. When I run that code, I get:




        26-November-18 16:57:25




        That is not UTC. UTC is several hours later, after midnight tomorrow, as shown next:




        Instant.now().toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849Z




        If you want whole seconds, drop the fractional second by calling truncatedTo.




        Instant.now().truncatedTo( ChronoUnit.SECONDS ).toString(): 2018-11-27T00:57:25Z




        java.time



        You are using terrible old date-time classes that were supplanted years ago by the modern java.time classes.



        Instant



        The Instant class represents a moment on the timeline in UTC with a resolution of nanoseconds (up to nine (9) digits of a decimal fraction).



        Instant nowInUtc = Instant.now() ;  // Capture the current moment in UTC.


        This Instant class is a basic building-block class of java.time. You can think of OffsetDateTime as an Instant plus a ZoneOffset. Likewise, you can think of ZonedDateTime as an Instant plus a ZoneId.



        Never use LocalDateTime to track a moment, as it purposely lacks any concept of time zone or offset-from-UTC.



        ISO 8601



        As trincot stated in his correct Answer, date-time values are best exchanged as text in standard ISO 8601 format.



        For a moment in UTC, that would be either:





        • 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849Z where the Z on the end means UTC, and is pronounced “Zulu”.


        • 2018-11-27T00:57:25.389849+00:00 where the +00:00 means an offset from UTC of zero hours-minutes-seconds, or in other words, UTC itself.




        About java.time



        The java.time framework is built into Java 8 and later. These classes supplant the troublesome old legacy date-time classes such as java.util.Date, Calendar, & SimpleDateFormat.



        The Joda-Time project, now in maintenance mode, advises migration to the java.time classes.



        To learn more, see the Oracle Tutorial. And search Stack Overflow for many examples and explanations. Specification is JSR 310.



        You may exchange java.time objects directly with your database. Use a JDBC driver compliant with JDBC 4.2 or later. No need for strings, no need for java.sql.* classes.



        Where to obtain the java.time classes?





        • Java SE 8, Java SE 9, Java SE 10, Java SE 11, and later - Part of the standard Java API with a bundled implementation.


          • Java 9 adds some minor features and fixes.




        • Java SE 6 and Java SE 7


          • Most of the java.time functionality is back-ported to Java 6 & 7 in ThreeTen-Backport.




        • Android


          • Later versions of Android bundle implementations of the java.time classes.

          • For earlier Android (<26), the ThreeTenABP project adapts ThreeTen-Backport (mentioned above). See How to use ThreeTenABP….




        The ThreeTen-Extra project extends java.time with additional classes. This project is a proving ground for possible future additions to java.time. You may find some useful classes here such as Interval, YearWeek, YearQuarter, and more.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 27 '18 at 1:15

























        answered Nov 27 '18 at 1:00









        Basil BourqueBasil Bourque

        111k27378542




        111k27378542






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53483634%2fjavascript-utc-to-localtime-conversion-not-working-in-ie-firefox-but-works-fi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Contact image not getting when fetch all contact list from iPhone by CNContact

            count number of partitions of a set with n elements into k subsets

            A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks