Is it a red flag when a company asks the same questions during different interviews?
A few months ago, a company contacted me about a 2-year data science contract.
I had 3 telephonic interviews with them, and during each of the interviews, I was, among other things, asked the exact same 3 technical questions.
The wording was identical. It was like they were all reading from the same script.
I was then invited to a final Skype interview - which would likely have featured the same questions, had I accepted it. They made no mention of a face-to-face interview.
All of the above happened in about a day-and-a-half.
I don't have much commercial experience, but this struck me as terribly odd.
Why would a company do this? Is it a red flag?
interviewing
New contributor
|
show 2 more comments
A few months ago, a company contacted me about a 2-year data science contract.
I had 3 telephonic interviews with them, and during each of the interviews, I was, among other things, asked the exact same 3 technical questions.
The wording was identical. It was like they were all reading from the same script.
I was then invited to a final Skype interview - which would likely have featured the same questions, had I accepted it. They made no mention of a face-to-face interview.
All of the above happened in about a day-and-a-half.
I don't have much commercial experience, but this struck me as terribly odd.
Why would a company do this? Is it a red flag?
interviewing
New contributor
If they had to ask three times, maybe they don't know the answers themselves... But in all seriousness, was it also the same person/people interviewing you each time?
– Kozaky
12 hours ago
69
Clearly, their interview questions were stored in a tuple, since it isn't mutable.
– Acccumulation
9 hours ago
13
"Why would a company do this?" - because they suck at interviewing. Might still be good company to work for though.
– Joe Strazzere
7 hours ago
1
It sounds like their interview process needs improving, but I'm not sure it reflects poorly on any other part of the company. You might want to bring this up with them.
– TheSoundDefense
7 hours ago
"The wording was identical. It was like they were all reading from the same script." Sure, but read the answers back from the script, and everybody goes crazy.
– Don Branson
5 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
A few months ago, a company contacted me about a 2-year data science contract.
I had 3 telephonic interviews with them, and during each of the interviews, I was, among other things, asked the exact same 3 technical questions.
The wording was identical. It was like they were all reading from the same script.
I was then invited to a final Skype interview - which would likely have featured the same questions, had I accepted it. They made no mention of a face-to-face interview.
All of the above happened in about a day-and-a-half.
I don't have much commercial experience, but this struck me as terribly odd.
Why would a company do this? Is it a red flag?
interviewing
New contributor
A few months ago, a company contacted me about a 2-year data science contract.
I had 3 telephonic interviews with them, and during each of the interviews, I was, among other things, asked the exact same 3 technical questions.
The wording was identical. It was like they were all reading from the same script.
I was then invited to a final Skype interview - which would likely have featured the same questions, had I accepted it. They made no mention of a face-to-face interview.
All of the above happened in about a day-and-a-half.
I don't have much commercial experience, but this struck me as terribly odd.
Why would a company do this? Is it a red flag?
interviewing
interviewing
New contributor
New contributor
edited 53 mins ago
Dukeling
9,57832549
9,57832549
New contributor
asked 13 hours ago
EuRBamarth
8713
8713
New contributor
New contributor
If they had to ask three times, maybe they don't know the answers themselves... But in all seriousness, was it also the same person/people interviewing you each time?
– Kozaky
12 hours ago
69
Clearly, their interview questions were stored in a tuple, since it isn't mutable.
– Acccumulation
9 hours ago
13
"Why would a company do this?" - because they suck at interviewing. Might still be good company to work for though.
– Joe Strazzere
7 hours ago
1
It sounds like their interview process needs improving, but I'm not sure it reflects poorly on any other part of the company. You might want to bring this up with them.
– TheSoundDefense
7 hours ago
"The wording was identical. It was like they were all reading from the same script." Sure, but read the answers back from the script, and everybody goes crazy.
– Don Branson
5 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
If they had to ask three times, maybe they don't know the answers themselves... But in all seriousness, was it also the same person/people interviewing you each time?
– Kozaky
12 hours ago
69
Clearly, their interview questions were stored in a tuple, since it isn't mutable.
– Acccumulation
9 hours ago
13
"Why would a company do this?" - because they suck at interviewing. Might still be good company to work for though.
– Joe Strazzere
7 hours ago
1
It sounds like their interview process needs improving, but I'm not sure it reflects poorly on any other part of the company. You might want to bring this up with them.
– TheSoundDefense
7 hours ago
"The wording was identical. It was like they were all reading from the same script." Sure, but read the answers back from the script, and everybody goes crazy.
– Don Branson
5 hours ago
If they had to ask three times, maybe they don't know the answers themselves... But in all seriousness, was it also the same person/people interviewing you each time?
– Kozaky
12 hours ago
If they had to ask three times, maybe they don't know the answers themselves... But in all seriousness, was it also the same person/people interviewing you each time?
– Kozaky
12 hours ago
69
69
Clearly, their interview questions were stored in a tuple, since it isn't mutable.
– Acccumulation
9 hours ago
Clearly, their interview questions were stored in a tuple, since it isn't mutable.
– Acccumulation
9 hours ago
13
13
"Why would a company do this?" - because they suck at interviewing. Might still be good company to work for though.
– Joe Strazzere
7 hours ago
"Why would a company do this?" - because they suck at interviewing. Might still be good company to work for though.
– Joe Strazzere
7 hours ago
1
1
It sounds like their interview process needs improving, but I'm not sure it reflects poorly on any other part of the company. You might want to bring this up with them.
– TheSoundDefense
7 hours ago
It sounds like their interview process needs improving, but I'm not sure it reflects poorly on any other part of the company. You might want to bring this up with them.
– TheSoundDefense
7 hours ago
"The wording was identical. It was like they were all reading from the same script." Sure, but read the answers back from the script, and everybody goes crazy.
– Don Branson
5 hours ago
"The wording was identical. It was like they were all reading from the same script." Sure, but read the answers back from the script, and everybody goes crazy.
– Don Branson
5 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
No, it's not a red flag, it's a sign that they're using the same script to ask questions for this role.
Clearly, the people running those stages of the interview don't talk to each other and just pick up their questions from a central depository.
You could have joked about this during your interview and seen what their response was.
35
Bonus points if they had been able to use the Bayes' theorem question to work the joke in (Probability of being asked these questions again if I have another interview etc)
– motosubatsu
13 hours ago
6
I'd argue that this is a red flag. At a minimum, it tells you something about the process that was likely used to select your potential future co-workers; they may well have also been hired on the basis of asking the same screening questions over and over again. That doesn't inherently mean they're incompetent, but it's at least some cause for concern about the company. And if the company is this uncoordinated in their interview process, they may be uncoordinated at other things.
– Zach Lipton
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Is it a red flag?
No.
Why would a company do this?
To give a uniform experience. I see maybe 50 people at mass interview events. The five other interviewers will do the same. There's a set of questions we're supposed to ask to enter into the computer, as in I can click "yes" or "no" because the actual question is already there.
Now they're mostly not engineering questions but the drive to uniformity is a thing.
Edit for this question: Your explanation makes sense, but it doesn't actually answer why they'd ask the same person the same questions thrice
Habit. Lack of communication on who is doing what. I'm sure we ask the big important questions at multiple stages (because when I've changed stages they're often the same), this is just taking that to another level.
I've been asked what they consider the big important question(s) by everyone in the interview process because they're that important and everyone wants to make darn sure the question is asked.
Your explanation makes sense, but it doesn't actually answer why they'd ask the same person the same questions thrice...
– marcelm
5 hours ago
@marcelm responded in post.
– Dark Matter
5 hours ago
add a comment |
It was like they were all reading from the same script ...
They likely were.
I had maintained a list of interview questions at 2 different companies I worked for. Starts out as questions for me. Ends up as questions different teams use. Then, people who are too busy/lazy to come up with original question, ONLY use that list.
Upside is, people ask (generally) good, useful Qs.
Downside is, people as predictable same set of questions.
In all honesty, 80% of value on the interview for me isn't whether you know the answers to those questions, but how you elaborate on follow-up nuances. The questions are just minor litmus test (to sieve off the really unskilled uneducated developers) and a useful jump off points for more interesting discussion with the candidate.
Why would a company do this?
A "company" probably didn't - as I note above, it's probably individual, less-prepared interviewers. Many of whom have a real job to do and (whether they are right or wrong) see having to go off and interview someone a bothersome waste of time, and having to prep for that interview even worse.
Is it a red flag?
Not necessarily. It's a flag that the company has less than perfect talent acquisition procedures. That in and out of itself is not indicative of too much and should not be used to draw meaningful conclusion, absent many other more meaningful red flags.
add a comment |
Given the (relatively) short time frame these all happened in there may not have been chance to fully debrief the different parties involved on what questions were or weren't asked. When a job requires a peculiar set of skills employers will want to make sure that the appropriate questions have been asked regarding those - and well if they get covered more than once there's no real harm vs them getting missed because every interviewer assumes that one of the others will have asked about it.
The wording being identical indicates that the questions probably are being taken from a template or script, which isn't unusual or anything to be concerned about.
add a comment |
It seems all answers are in agreement that it is a peculiar situation and no one seen/heard of it before. So, since you didn't ask them, we are left to guess. Here are my guesses:
Part of the work you will be doing is performing repetitive tasks and they want to test your response to repetition. They might want to rule out a candidate who would snap or respond in an uncomfortable way.
Catching an imposter. If you are unfamiliar with these concepts but you memorized them before the first interview, you might forget them or not answer them properly the second time.
The first interview might have been conducted by an non-technical who may have asked a technical guy what would you ask and used the same questions then the manager may have also done the same.
Like everyone else pointed out, poor communication among themselves.
New contributor
add a comment |
Why would a company do this?
A company would use the same questions to make sure the interview is consistent and fair across all interviewers. What you witnessed is an unfortunate issue when the interview is poorly coordinated.
Is it a red flag?
Yes to some degree. It indicates poor communication between interviewers and lack of organization of the interview process. No interview is absolutely perfect, but the companies I've worked at the hiring manager picks the onsite interviewers and should give the interview some area to evaluate (e.g. algorithms, systems design, team work, resume review, etc). You may get some overlap, but generally the programming questions are all different.
I've rarely seen interviewers repeat questions and if they do, I usually tell them. I did an interview for a consulting position once and I was given a duplicate question. I told the interviewer that the question was a duplicate from another interviewer in the same day and repeated the answer for him. He then thanked me and gave me a different question to answer. The duplicate question was actually a bit of a ruse to test my integrity (and memory).
add a comment |
I'm going to disagree with the other answers.
Of course it's a red flag! An interview process is meant to gauge the abilities of a potential future employee. If that process is faulty, then how can you have faith in the abilities of the employees of that company?
Another red flag is the quality of the questions asked.... I mean, you are interviewing for a data scientist position, and they are asking you stuff I learned in high school (basic Python data structures, Bayes theorem, and a bloody derivative???).
I mean, sure, sometimes questions like that are asked once initially to discard those that are clearly unfit, but since these questions were asked repeatedly, at different phases of the interview process, clearly that's not the case here.
Stay away from that company.
New contributor
1. Not everyone learns this stuff in HS. 2. In my experience interviewing, many people fail to correctly answer such questions including those whose resumes claim years of relevant experience in the exact subject matter the question is drawn from. It is so bad that simple questions can end up weeding out 50% of the initial applicants for a technical position.
– iheanyi
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: false,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
EuRBamarth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125837%2fis-it-a-red-flag-when-a-company-asks-the-same-questions-during-different-intervi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(function () {
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
var showEditor = function() {
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
};
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True') {
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup({
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup) {
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
}
})
} else{
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
showEditor();
}
}
});
});
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, it's not a red flag, it's a sign that they're using the same script to ask questions for this role.
Clearly, the people running those stages of the interview don't talk to each other and just pick up their questions from a central depository.
You could have joked about this during your interview and seen what their response was.
35
Bonus points if they had been able to use the Bayes' theorem question to work the joke in (Probability of being asked these questions again if I have another interview etc)
– motosubatsu
13 hours ago
6
I'd argue that this is a red flag. At a minimum, it tells you something about the process that was likely used to select your potential future co-workers; they may well have also been hired on the basis of asking the same screening questions over and over again. That doesn't inherently mean they're incompetent, but it's at least some cause for concern about the company. And if the company is this uncoordinated in their interview process, they may be uncoordinated at other things.
– Zach Lipton
6 hours ago
add a comment |
No, it's not a red flag, it's a sign that they're using the same script to ask questions for this role.
Clearly, the people running those stages of the interview don't talk to each other and just pick up their questions from a central depository.
You could have joked about this during your interview and seen what their response was.
35
Bonus points if they had been able to use the Bayes' theorem question to work the joke in (Probability of being asked these questions again if I have another interview etc)
– motosubatsu
13 hours ago
6
I'd argue that this is a red flag. At a minimum, it tells you something about the process that was likely used to select your potential future co-workers; they may well have also been hired on the basis of asking the same screening questions over and over again. That doesn't inherently mean they're incompetent, but it's at least some cause for concern about the company. And if the company is this uncoordinated in their interview process, they may be uncoordinated at other things.
– Zach Lipton
6 hours ago
add a comment |
No, it's not a red flag, it's a sign that they're using the same script to ask questions for this role.
Clearly, the people running those stages of the interview don't talk to each other and just pick up their questions from a central depository.
You could have joked about this during your interview and seen what their response was.
No, it's not a red flag, it's a sign that they're using the same script to ask questions for this role.
Clearly, the people running those stages of the interview don't talk to each other and just pick up their questions from a central depository.
You could have joked about this during your interview and seen what their response was.
answered 13 hours ago
Snow♦
58.2k51188236
58.2k51188236
35
Bonus points if they had been able to use the Bayes' theorem question to work the joke in (Probability of being asked these questions again if I have another interview etc)
– motosubatsu
13 hours ago
6
I'd argue that this is a red flag. At a minimum, it tells you something about the process that was likely used to select your potential future co-workers; they may well have also been hired on the basis of asking the same screening questions over and over again. That doesn't inherently mean they're incompetent, but it's at least some cause for concern about the company. And if the company is this uncoordinated in their interview process, they may be uncoordinated at other things.
– Zach Lipton
6 hours ago
add a comment |
35
Bonus points if they had been able to use the Bayes' theorem question to work the joke in (Probability of being asked these questions again if I have another interview etc)
– motosubatsu
13 hours ago
6
I'd argue that this is a red flag. At a minimum, it tells you something about the process that was likely used to select your potential future co-workers; they may well have also been hired on the basis of asking the same screening questions over and over again. That doesn't inherently mean they're incompetent, but it's at least some cause for concern about the company. And if the company is this uncoordinated in their interview process, they may be uncoordinated at other things.
– Zach Lipton
6 hours ago
35
35
Bonus points if they had been able to use the Bayes' theorem question to work the joke in (Probability of being asked these questions again if I have another interview etc)
– motosubatsu
13 hours ago
Bonus points if they had been able to use the Bayes' theorem question to work the joke in (Probability of being asked these questions again if I have another interview etc)
– motosubatsu
13 hours ago
6
6
I'd argue that this is a red flag. At a minimum, it tells you something about the process that was likely used to select your potential future co-workers; they may well have also been hired on the basis of asking the same screening questions over and over again. That doesn't inherently mean they're incompetent, but it's at least some cause for concern about the company. And if the company is this uncoordinated in their interview process, they may be uncoordinated at other things.
– Zach Lipton
6 hours ago
I'd argue that this is a red flag. At a minimum, it tells you something about the process that was likely used to select your potential future co-workers; they may well have also been hired on the basis of asking the same screening questions over and over again. That doesn't inherently mean they're incompetent, but it's at least some cause for concern about the company. And if the company is this uncoordinated in their interview process, they may be uncoordinated at other things.
– Zach Lipton
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Is it a red flag?
No.
Why would a company do this?
To give a uniform experience. I see maybe 50 people at mass interview events. The five other interviewers will do the same. There's a set of questions we're supposed to ask to enter into the computer, as in I can click "yes" or "no" because the actual question is already there.
Now they're mostly not engineering questions but the drive to uniformity is a thing.
Edit for this question: Your explanation makes sense, but it doesn't actually answer why they'd ask the same person the same questions thrice
Habit. Lack of communication on who is doing what. I'm sure we ask the big important questions at multiple stages (because when I've changed stages they're often the same), this is just taking that to another level.
I've been asked what they consider the big important question(s) by everyone in the interview process because they're that important and everyone wants to make darn sure the question is asked.
Your explanation makes sense, but it doesn't actually answer why they'd ask the same person the same questions thrice...
– marcelm
5 hours ago
@marcelm responded in post.
– Dark Matter
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Is it a red flag?
No.
Why would a company do this?
To give a uniform experience. I see maybe 50 people at mass interview events. The five other interviewers will do the same. There's a set of questions we're supposed to ask to enter into the computer, as in I can click "yes" or "no" because the actual question is already there.
Now they're mostly not engineering questions but the drive to uniformity is a thing.
Edit for this question: Your explanation makes sense, but it doesn't actually answer why they'd ask the same person the same questions thrice
Habit. Lack of communication on who is doing what. I'm sure we ask the big important questions at multiple stages (because when I've changed stages they're often the same), this is just taking that to another level.
I've been asked what they consider the big important question(s) by everyone in the interview process because they're that important and everyone wants to make darn sure the question is asked.
Your explanation makes sense, but it doesn't actually answer why they'd ask the same person the same questions thrice...
– marcelm
5 hours ago
@marcelm responded in post.
– Dark Matter
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Is it a red flag?
No.
Why would a company do this?
To give a uniform experience. I see maybe 50 people at mass interview events. The five other interviewers will do the same. There's a set of questions we're supposed to ask to enter into the computer, as in I can click "yes" or "no" because the actual question is already there.
Now they're mostly not engineering questions but the drive to uniformity is a thing.
Edit for this question: Your explanation makes sense, but it doesn't actually answer why they'd ask the same person the same questions thrice
Habit. Lack of communication on who is doing what. I'm sure we ask the big important questions at multiple stages (because when I've changed stages they're often the same), this is just taking that to another level.
I've been asked what they consider the big important question(s) by everyone in the interview process because they're that important and everyone wants to make darn sure the question is asked.
Is it a red flag?
No.
Why would a company do this?
To give a uniform experience. I see maybe 50 people at mass interview events. The five other interviewers will do the same. There's a set of questions we're supposed to ask to enter into the computer, as in I can click "yes" or "no" because the actual question is already there.
Now they're mostly not engineering questions but the drive to uniformity is a thing.
Edit for this question: Your explanation makes sense, but it doesn't actually answer why they'd ask the same person the same questions thrice
Habit. Lack of communication on who is doing what. I'm sure we ask the big important questions at multiple stages (because when I've changed stages they're often the same), this is just taking that to another level.
I've been asked what they consider the big important question(s) by everyone in the interview process because they're that important and everyone wants to make darn sure the question is asked.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 13 hours ago
Dark Matter
3,5811617
3,5811617
Your explanation makes sense, but it doesn't actually answer why they'd ask the same person the same questions thrice...
– marcelm
5 hours ago
@marcelm responded in post.
– Dark Matter
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Your explanation makes sense, but it doesn't actually answer why they'd ask the same person the same questions thrice...
– marcelm
5 hours ago
@marcelm responded in post.
– Dark Matter
5 hours ago
Your explanation makes sense, but it doesn't actually answer why they'd ask the same person the same questions thrice...
– marcelm
5 hours ago
Your explanation makes sense, but it doesn't actually answer why they'd ask the same person the same questions thrice...
– marcelm
5 hours ago
@marcelm responded in post.
– Dark Matter
5 hours ago
@marcelm responded in post.
– Dark Matter
5 hours ago
add a comment |
It was like they were all reading from the same script ...
They likely were.
I had maintained a list of interview questions at 2 different companies I worked for. Starts out as questions for me. Ends up as questions different teams use. Then, people who are too busy/lazy to come up with original question, ONLY use that list.
Upside is, people ask (generally) good, useful Qs.
Downside is, people as predictable same set of questions.
In all honesty, 80% of value on the interview for me isn't whether you know the answers to those questions, but how you elaborate on follow-up nuances. The questions are just minor litmus test (to sieve off the really unskilled uneducated developers) and a useful jump off points for more interesting discussion with the candidate.
Why would a company do this?
A "company" probably didn't - as I note above, it's probably individual, less-prepared interviewers. Many of whom have a real job to do and (whether they are right or wrong) see having to go off and interview someone a bothersome waste of time, and having to prep for that interview even worse.
Is it a red flag?
Not necessarily. It's a flag that the company has less than perfect talent acquisition procedures. That in and out of itself is not indicative of too much and should not be used to draw meaningful conclusion, absent many other more meaningful red flags.
add a comment |
It was like they were all reading from the same script ...
They likely were.
I had maintained a list of interview questions at 2 different companies I worked for. Starts out as questions for me. Ends up as questions different teams use. Then, people who are too busy/lazy to come up with original question, ONLY use that list.
Upside is, people ask (generally) good, useful Qs.
Downside is, people as predictable same set of questions.
In all honesty, 80% of value on the interview for me isn't whether you know the answers to those questions, but how you elaborate on follow-up nuances. The questions are just minor litmus test (to sieve off the really unskilled uneducated developers) and a useful jump off points for more interesting discussion with the candidate.
Why would a company do this?
A "company" probably didn't - as I note above, it's probably individual, less-prepared interviewers. Many of whom have a real job to do and (whether they are right or wrong) see having to go off and interview someone a bothersome waste of time, and having to prep for that interview even worse.
Is it a red flag?
Not necessarily. It's a flag that the company has less than perfect talent acquisition procedures. That in and out of itself is not indicative of too much and should not be used to draw meaningful conclusion, absent many other more meaningful red flags.
add a comment |
It was like they were all reading from the same script ...
They likely were.
I had maintained a list of interview questions at 2 different companies I worked for. Starts out as questions for me. Ends up as questions different teams use. Then, people who are too busy/lazy to come up with original question, ONLY use that list.
Upside is, people ask (generally) good, useful Qs.
Downside is, people as predictable same set of questions.
In all honesty, 80% of value on the interview for me isn't whether you know the answers to those questions, but how you elaborate on follow-up nuances. The questions are just minor litmus test (to sieve off the really unskilled uneducated developers) and a useful jump off points for more interesting discussion with the candidate.
Why would a company do this?
A "company" probably didn't - as I note above, it's probably individual, less-prepared interviewers. Many of whom have a real job to do and (whether they are right or wrong) see having to go off and interview someone a bothersome waste of time, and having to prep for that interview even worse.
Is it a red flag?
Not necessarily. It's a flag that the company has less than perfect talent acquisition procedures. That in and out of itself is not indicative of too much and should not be used to draw meaningful conclusion, absent many other more meaningful red flags.
It was like they were all reading from the same script ...
They likely were.
I had maintained a list of interview questions at 2 different companies I worked for. Starts out as questions for me. Ends up as questions different teams use. Then, people who are too busy/lazy to come up with original question, ONLY use that list.
Upside is, people ask (generally) good, useful Qs.
Downside is, people as predictable same set of questions.
In all honesty, 80% of value on the interview for me isn't whether you know the answers to those questions, but how you elaborate on follow-up nuances. The questions are just minor litmus test (to sieve off the really unskilled uneducated developers) and a useful jump off points for more interesting discussion with the candidate.
Why would a company do this?
A "company" probably didn't - as I note above, it's probably individual, less-prepared interviewers. Many of whom have a real job to do and (whether they are right or wrong) see having to go off and interview someone a bothersome waste of time, and having to prep for that interview even worse.
Is it a red flag?
Not necessarily. It's a flag that the company has less than perfect talent acquisition procedures. That in and out of itself is not indicative of too much and should not be used to draw meaningful conclusion, absent many other more meaningful red flags.
answered 9 hours ago
user13655
2,0881219
2,0881219
add a comment |
add a comment |
Given the (relatively) short time frame these all happened in there may not have been chance to fully debrief the different parties involved on what questions were or weren't asked. When a job requires a peculiar set of skills employers will want to make sure that the appropriate questions have been asked regarding those - and well if they get covered more than once there's no real harm vs them getting missed because every interviewer assumes that one of the others will have asked about it.
The wording being identical indicates that the questions probably are being taken from a template or script, which isn't unusual or anything to be concerned about.
add a comment |
Given the (relatively) short time frame these all happened in there may not have been chance to fully debrief the different parties involved on what questions were or weren't asked. When a job requires a peculiar set of skills employers will want to make sure that the appropriate questions have been asked regarding those - and well if they get covered more than once there's no real harm vs them getting missed because every interviewer assumes that one of the others will have asked about it.
The wording being identical indicates that the questions probably are being taken from a template or script, which isn't unusual or anything to be concerned about.
add a comment |
Given the (relatively) short time frame these all happened in there may not have been chance to fully debrief the different parties involved on what questions were or weren't asked. When a job requires a peculiar set of skills employers will want to make sure that the appropriate questions have been asked regarding those - and well if they get covered more than once there's no real harm vs them getting missed because every interviewer assumes that one of the others will have asked about it.
The wording being identical indicates that the questions probably are being taken from a template or script, which isn't unusual or anything to be concerned about.
Given the (relatively) short time frame these all happened in there may not have been chance to fully debrief the different parties involved on what questions were or weren't asked. When a job requires a peculiar set of skills employers will want to make sure that the appropriate questions have been asked regarding those - and well if they get covered more than once there's no real harm vs them getting missed because every interviewer assumes that one of the others will have asked about it.
The wording being identical indicates that the questions probably are being taken from a template or script, which isn't unusual or anything to be concerned about.
answered 11 hours ago
motosubatsu
43.1k22111174
43.1k22111174
add a comment |
add a comment |
It seems all answers are in agreement that it is a peculiar situation and no one seen/heard of it before. So, since you didn't ask them, we are left to guess. Here are my guesses:
Part of the work you will be doing is performing repetitive tasks and they want to test your response to repetition. They might want to rule out a candidate who would snap or respond in an uncomfortable way.
Catching an imposter. If you are unfamiliar with these concepts but you memorized them before the first interview, you might forget them or not answer them properly the second time.
The first interview might have been conducted by an non-technical who may have asked a technical guy what would you ask and used the same questions then the manager may have also done the same.
Like everyone else pointed out, poor communication among themselves.
New contributor
add a comment |
It seems all answers are in agreement that it is a peculiar situation and no one seen/heard of it before. So, since you didn't ask them, we are left to guess. Here are my guesses:
Part of the work you will be doing is performing repetitive tasks and they want to test your response to repetition. They might want to rule out a candidate who would snap or respond in an uncomfortable way.
Catching an imposter. If you are unfamiliar with these concepts but you memorized them before the first interview, you might forget them or not answer them properly the second time.
The first interview might have been conducted by an non-technical who may have asked a technical guy what would you ask and used the same questions then the manager may have also done the same.
Like everyone else pointed out, poor communication among themselves.
New contributor
add a comment |
It seems all answers are in agreement that it is a peculiar situation and no one seen/heard of it before. So, since you didn't ask them, we are left to guess. Here are my guesses:
Part of the work you will be doing is performing repetitive tasks and they want to test your response to repetition. They might want to rule out a candidate who would snap or respond in an uncomfortable way.
Catching an imposter. If you are unfamiliar with these concepts but you memorized them before the first interview, you might forget them or not answer them properly the second time.
The first interview might have been conducted by an non-technical who may have asked a technical guy what would you ask and used the same questions then the manager may have also done the same.
Like everyone else pointed out, poor communication among themselves.
New contributor
It seems all answers are in agreement that it is a peculiar situation and no one seen/heard of it before. So, since you didn't ask them, we are left to guess. Here are my guesses:
Part of the work you will be doing is performing repetitive tasks and they want to test your response to repetition. They might want to rule out a candidate who would snap or respond in an uncomfortable way.
Catching an imposter. If you are unfamiliar with these concepts but you memorized them before the first interview, you might forget them or not answer them properly the second time.
The first interview might have been conducted by an non-technical who may have asked a technical guy what would you ask and used the same questions then the manager may have also done the same.
Like everyone else pointed out, poor communication among themselves.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 4 hours ago
Ahmed Mansour
52926
52926
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Why would a company do this?
A company would use the same questions to make sure the interview is consistent and fair across all interviewers. What you witnessed is an unfortunate issue when the interview is poorly coordinated.
Is it a red flag?
Yes to some degree. It indicates poor communication between interviewers and lack of organization of the interview process. No interview is absolutely perfect, but the companies I've worked at the hiring manager picks the onsite interviewers and should give the interview some area to evaluate (e.g. algorithms, systems design, team work, resume review, etc). You may get some overlap, but generally the programming questions are all different.
I've rarely seen interviewers repeat questions and if they do, I usually tell them. I did an interview for a consulting position once and I was given a duplicate question. I told the interviewer that the question was a duplicate from another interviewer in the same day and repeated the answer for him. He then thanked me and gave me a different question to answer. The duplicate question was actually a bit of a ruse to test my integrity (and memory).
add a comment |
Why would a company do this?
A company would use the same questions to make sure the interview is consistent and fair across all interviewers. What you witnessed is an unfortunate issue when the interview is poorly coordinated.
Is it a red flag?
Yes to some degree. It indicates poor communication between interviewers and lack of organization of the interview process. No interview is absolutely perfect, but the companies I've worked at the hiring manager picks the onsite interviewers and should give the interview some area to evaluate (e.g. algorithms, systems design, team work, resume review, etc). You may get some overlap, but generally the programming questions are all different.
I've rarely seen interviewers repeat questions and if they do, I usually tell them. I did an interview for a consulting position once and I was given a duplicate question. I told the interviewer that the question was a duplicate from another interviewer in the same day and repeated the answer for him. He then thanked me and gave me a different question to answer. The duplicate question was actually a bit of a ruse to test my integrity (and memory).
add a comment |
Why would a company do this?
A company would use the same questions to make sure the interview is consistent and fair across all interviewers. What you witnessed is an unfortunate issue when the interview is poorly coordinated.
Is it a red flag?
Yes to some degree. It indicates poor communication between interviewers and lack of organization of the interview process. No interview is absolutely perfect, but the companies I've worked at the hiring manager picks the onsite interviewers and should give the interview some area to evaluate (e.g. algorithms, systems design, team work, resume review, etc). You may get some overlap, but generally the programming questions are all different.
I've rarely seen interviewers repeat questions and if they do, I usually tell them. I did an interview for a consulting position once and I was given a duplicate question. I told the interviewer that the question was a duplicate from another interviewer in the same day and repeated the answer for him. He then thanked me and gave me a different question to answer. The duplicate question was actually a bit of a ruse to test my integrity (and memory).
Why would a company do this?
A company would use the same questions to make sure the interview is consistent and fair across all interviewers. What you witnessed is an unfortunate issue when the interview is poorly coordinated.
Is it a red flag?
Yes to some degree. It indicates poor communication between interviewers and lack of organization of the interview process. No interview is absolutely perfect, but the companies I've worked at the hiring manager picks the onsite interviewers and should give the interview some area to evaluate (e.g. algorithms, systems design, team work, resume review, etc). You may get some overlap, but generally the programming questions are all different.
I've rarely seen interviewers repeat questions and if they do, I usually tell them. I did an interview for a consulting position once and I was given a duplicate question. I told the interviewer that the question was a duplicate from another interviewer in the same day and repeated the answer for him. He then thanked me and gave me a different question to answer. The duplicate question was actually a bit of a ruse to test my integrity (and memory).
edited 4 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
jcmack
7,61211741
7,61211741
add a comment |
add a comment |
I'm going to disagree with the other answers.
Of course it's a red flag! An interview process is meant to gauge the abilities of a potential future employee. If that process is faulty, then how can you have faith in the abilities of the employees of that company?
Another red flag is the quality of the questions asked.... I mean, you are interviewing for a data scientist position, and they are asking you stuff I learned in high school (basic Python data structures, Bayes theorem, and a bloody derivative???).
I mean, sure, sometimes questions like that are asked once initially to discard those that are clearly unfit, but since these questions were asked repeatedly, at different phases of the interview process, clearly that's not the case here.
Stay away from that company.
New contributor
1. Not everyone learns this stuff in HS. 2. In my experience interviewing, many people fail to correctly answer such questions including those whose resumes claim years of relevant experience in the exact subject matter the question is drawn from. It is so bad that simple questions can end up weeding out 50% of the initial applicants for a technical position.
– iheanyi
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I'm going to disagree with the other answers.
Of course it's a red flag! An interview process is meant to gauge the abilities of a potential future employee. If that process is faulty, then how can you have faith in the abilities of the employees of that company?
Another red flag is the quality of the questions asked.... I mean, you are interviewing for a data scientist position, and they are asking you stuff I learned in high school (basic Python data structures, Bayes theorem, and a bloody derivative???).
I mean, sure, sometimes questions like that are asked once initially to discard those that are clearly unfit, but since these questions were asked repeatedly, at different phases of the interview process, clearly that's not the case here.
Stay away from that company.
New contributor
1. Not everyone learns this stuff in HS. 2. In my experience interviewing, many people fail to correctly answer such questions including those whose resumes claim years of relevant experience in the exact subject matter the question is drawn from. It is so bad that simple questions can end up weeding out 50% of the initial applicants for a technical position.
– iheanyi
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I'm going to disagree with the other answers.
Of course it's a red flag! An interview process is meant to gauge the abilities of a potential future employee. If that process is faulty, then how can you have faith in the abilities of the employees of that company?
Another red flag is the quality of the questions asked.... I mean, you are interviewing for a data scientist position, and they are asking you stuff I learned in high school (basic Python data structures, Bayes theorem, and a bloody derivative???).
I mean, sure, sometimes questions like that are asked once initially to discard those that are clearly unfit, but since these questions were asked repeatedly, at different phases of the interview process, clearly that's not the case here.
Stay away from that company.
New contributor
I'm going to disagree with the other answers.
Of course it's a red flag! An interview process is meant to gauge the abilities of a potential future employee. If that process is faulty, then how can you have faith in the abilities of the employees of that company?
Another red flag is the quality of the questions asked.... I mean, you are interviewing for a data scientist position, and they are asking you stuff I learned in high school (basic Python data structures, Bayes theorem, and a bloody derivative???).
I mean, sure, sometimes questions like that are asked once initially to discard those that are clearly unfit, but since these questions were asked repeatedly, at different phases of the interview process, clearly that's not the case here.
Stay away from that company.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 6 hours ago
Marquee
91
91
New contributor
New contributor
1. Not everyone learns this stuff in HS. 2. In my experience interviewing, many people fail to correctly answer such questions including those whose resumes claim years of relevant experience in the exact subject matter the question is drawn from. It is so bad that simple questions can end up weeding out 50% of the initial applicants for a technical position.
– iheanyi
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1. Not everyone learns this stuff in HS. 2. In my experience interviewing, many people fail to correctly answer such questions including those whose resumes claim years of relevant experience in the exact subject matter the question is drawn from. It is so bad that simple questions can end up weeding out 50% of the initial applicants for a technical position.
– iheanyi
4 hours ago
1. Not everyone learns this stuff in HS. 2. In my experience interviewing, many people fail to correctly answer such questions including those whose resumes claim years of relevant experience in the exact subject matter the question is drawn from. It is so bad that simple questions can end up weeding out 50% of the initial applicants for a technical position.
– iheanyi
4 hours ago
1. Not everyone learns this stuff in HS. 2. In my experience interviewing, many people fail to correctly answer such questions including those whose resumes claim years of relevant experience in the exact subject matter the question is drawn from. It is so bad that simple questions can end up weeding out 50% of the initial applicants for a technical position.
– iheanyi
4 hours ago
add a comment |
EuRBamarth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
EuRBamarth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
EuRBamarth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
EuRBamarth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125837%2fis-it-a-red-flag-when-a-company-asks-the-same-questions-during-different-intervi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
If they had to ask three times, maybe they don't know the answers themselves... But in all seriousness, was it also the same person/people interviewing you each time?
– Kozaky
12 hours ago
69
Clearly, their interview questions were stored in a tuple, since it isn't mutable.
– Acccumulation
9 hours ago
13
"Why would a company do this?" - because they suck at interviewing. Might still be good company to work for though.
– Joe Strazzere
7 hours ago
1
It sounds like their interview process needs improving, but I'm not sure it reflects poorly on any other part of the company. You might want to bring this up with them.
– TheSoundDefense
7 hours ago
"The wording was identical. It was like they were all reading from the same script." Sure, but read the answers back from the script, and everybody goes crazy.
– Don Branson
5 hours ago