Swagger/Swashbuckle: Ignore overloaded endpoint in base class
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
So I have a base controller class with a search(string query) method, with the path /search. And I have a child class with search(string query, string name), also with path /search.
The Swagger API generated by Swashbuckle contains both endpoints, and they have a conflict error. Now what I want is to ignore the parent class' search method, but only for the child that has a search() overload. (Since parameters are optional, the parent's search method would conforms to the child's anyway.)
Any way to do this?
.net api swagger method-overloading swashbuckle
asked Nov 22 at 12:42
user2154768
93118
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
So I have a base controller class with a search(string query) method, with the path /search. And I have a child class with search(string query, string name), also with path /search.
The Swagger API generated by Swashbuckle contains both endpoints, and they have a conflict error. Now what I want is to ignore the parent class' search method, but only for the child that has a search() overload. (Since parameters are optional, the parent's search method would conforms to the child's anyway.)
Any way to do this?
.net api swagger method-overloading swashbuckle
asked Nov 22 at 12:42
user2154768
93118
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
So I have a base controller class with a search(string query) method, with the path /search. And I have a child class with search(string query, string name), also with path /search.
The Swagger API generated by Swashbuckle contains both endpoints, and they have a conflict error. Now what I want is to ignore the parent class' search method, but only for the child that has a search() overload. (Since parameters are optional, the parent's search method would conforms to the child's anyway.)
Any way to do this?
.net api swagger method-overloading swashbuckle
asked Nov 22 at 12:42
user2154768
93118
So I have a base controller class with a search(string query) method, with the path /search. And I have a child class with search(string query, string name), also with path /search.
The Swagger API generated by Swashbuckle contains both endpoints, and they have a conflict error. Now what I want is to ignore the parent class' search method, but only for the child that has a search() overload. (Since parameters are optional, the parent's search method would conforms to the child's anyway.)
Any way to do this?
.net api swagger method-overloading swashbuckle
.net api swagger method-overloading swashbuckle
asked Nov 22 at 12:42
user2154768
93118
asked Nov 22 at 12:42
user2154768
93118
asked Nov 22 at 12:42
user2154768
93118
asked Nov 22 at 12:42
user2154768
93118
asked Nov 22 at 12:42
user2154768
93118
93118
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Try to add the [NonAction] attribute to parent's search method or make it protected
answered Nov 23 at 11:28
Roman Marusyk
11.7k123268
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53431303%2fswagger-swashbuckle-ignore-overloaded-endpoint-in-base-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Try to add the [NonAction] attribute to parent's search method or make it protected
answered Nov 23 at 11:28
Roman Marusyk
11.7k123268
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Try to add the [NonAction] attribute to parent's search method or make it protected
answered Nov 23 at 11:28
Roman Marusyk
11.7k123268
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Try to add the [NonAction] attribute to parent's search method or make it protected
answered Nov 23 at 11:28
Roman Marusyk
11.7k123268
Try to add the [NonAction] attribute to parent's search method or make it protected
answered Nov 23 at 11:28
Roman Marusyk
11.7k123268
edited Nov 23 at 12:09
answered Nov 23 at 11:28
Roman Marusyk
11.7k123268
answered Nov 23 at 11:28
Roman Marusyk
11.7k123268
answered Nov 23 at 11:28
Roman Marusyk
11.7k123268
11.7k123268
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53431303%2fswagger-swashbuckle-ignore-overloaded-endpoint-in-base-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
