Binding of a view variable to a UserControl ViewModel declared inside the view
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I am stuck in this problem since a few days, can't solve it :
I have some views V1
, V2
, ..., with view-models V1vm
, V2vm
,..., each using a UserControl
MyUC
, with view-model MyUCvm
. UserControl MyUC
depends on a bool
attached property myParam
. Let's say view V1
defines the value through a CheckBox. I can bind myParam
to the CheckBox.IsChecked
in V1
XAML :
<UserControl x:Class="V1" ...>
...
<CheckBox x:Name="cb" />
<MyUC local:MyUC.myParam="{Binding ElementName=cb, Path=IsChecked}" />
</UserControl>
In view-model MyUCvm
I declare a property :
public class MyUCvm : ViewModelBase
{
private bool _condition;
public bool Condition
{
get { return condition; }
set
{
_condition = value;
Notify("Condition");
}
}
...
}
I want Condition
to be bound to myParam
so that what is displayed by MyUC
in View V1
depends on the checkbox cb
(and other patterns for the other views).
Maybe I could code in V1vm
an update of MyUCvm
in C#. But I believe this is not the right way.
It seams to me that it is more "pure" to bind myParam
in MyUC
XAML to Condition
, with some kind of (not working) code :
<UserControl x:Class="MyUC" ...>
...
<WHAT_TO_PUT_HERE? local:MyUC.myParam="{Binding Condition, Mode=TwoWay}" />
...
</UserControl>
Am I targeting the right solution ?
How to acheive this ?
c# wpf xaml data-binding
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I am stuck in this problem since a few days, can't solve it :
I have some views V1
, V2
, ..., with view-models V1vm
, V2vm
,..., each using a UserControl
MyUC
, with view-model MyUCvm
. UserControl MyUC
depends on a bool
attached property myParam
. Let's say view V1
defines the value through a CheckBox. I can bind myParam
to the CheckBox.IsChecked
in V1
XAML :
<UserControl x:Class="V1" ...>
...
<CheckBox x:Name="cb" />
<MyUC local:MyUC.myParam="{Binding ElementName=cb, Path=IsChecked}" />
</UserControl>
In view-model MyUCvm
I declare a property :
public class MyUCvm : ViewModelBase
{
private bool _condition;
public bool Condition
{
get { return condition; }
set
{
_condition = value;
Notify("Condition");
}
}
...
}
I want Condition
to be bound to myParam
so that what is displayed by MyUC
in View V1
depends on the checkbox cb
(and other patterns for the other views).
Maybe I could code in V1vm
an update of MyUCvm
in C#. But I believe this is not the right way.
It seams to me that it is more "pure" to bind myParam
in MyUC
XAML to Condition
, with some kind of (not working) code :
<UserControl x:Class="MyUC" ...>
...
<WHAT_TO_PUT_HERE? local:MyUC.myParam="{Binding Condition, Mode=TwoWay}" />
...
</UserControl>
Am I targeting the right solution ?
How to acheive this ?
c# wpf xaml data-binding
Why don't you bind the CheckBox to Condition?
– mm8
Sep 28 at 11:33
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
I am stuck in this problem since a few days, can't solve it :
I have some views V1
, V2
, ..., with view-models V1vm
, V2vm
,..., each using a UserControl
MyUC
, with view-model MyUCvm
. UserControl MyUC
depends on a bool
attached property myParam
. Let's say view V1
defines the value through a CheckBox. I can bind myParam
to the CheckBox.IsChecked
in V1
XAML :
<UserControl x:Class="V1" ...>
...
<CheckBox x:Name="cb" />
<MyUC local:MyUC.myParam="{Binding ElementName=cb, Path=IsChecked}" />
</UserControl>
In view-model MyUCvm
I declare a property :
public class MyUCvm : ViewModelBase
{
private bool _condition;
public bool Condition
{
get { return condition; }
set
{
_condition = value;
Notify("Condition");
}
}
...
}
I want Condition
to be bound to myParam
so that what is displayed by MyUC
in View V1
depends on the checkbox cb
(and other patterns for the other views).
Maybe I could code in V1vm
an update of MyUCvm
in C#. But I believe this is not the right way.
It seams to me that it is more "pure" to bind myParam
in MyUC
XAML to Condition
, with some kind of (not working) code :
<UserControl x:Class="MyUC" ...>
...
<WHAT_TO_PUT_HERE? local:MyUC.myParam="{Binding Condition, Mode=TwoWay}" />
...
</UserControl>
Am I targeting the right solution ?
How to acheive this ?
c# wpf xaml data-binding
I am stuck in this problem since a few days, can't solve it :
I have some views V1
, V2
, ..., with view-models V1vm
, V2vm
,..., each using a UserControl
MyUC
, with view-model MyUCvm
. UserControl MyUC
depends on a bool
attached property myParam
. Let's say view V1
defines the value through a CheckBox. I can bind myParam
to the CheckBox.IsChecked
in V1
XAML :
<UserControl x:Class="V1" ...>
...
<CheckBox x:Name="cb" />
<MyUC local:MyUC.myParam="{Binding ElementName=cb, Path=IsChecked}" />
</UserControl>
In view-model MyUCvm
I declare a property :
public class MyUCvm : ViewModelBase
{
private bool _condition;
public bool Condition
{
get { return condition; }
set
{
_condition = value;
Notify("Condition");
}
}
...
}
I want Condition
to be bound to myParam
so that what is displayed by MyUC
in View V1
depends on the checkbox cb
(and other patterns for the other views).
Maybe I could code in V1vm
an update of MyUCvm
in C#. But I believe this is not the right way.
It seams to me that it is more "pure" to bind myParam
in MyUC
XAML to Condition
, with some kind of (not working) code :
<UserControl x:Class="MyUC" ...>
...
<WHAT_TO_PUT_HERE? local:MyUC.myParam="{Binding Condition, Mode=TwoWay}" />
...
</UserControl>
Am I targeting the right solution ?
How to acheive this ?
c# wpf xaml data-binding
c# wpf xaml data-binding
edited Sep 27 at 15:41
asked Sep 27 at 15:20
Sylvain B.
309214
309214
Why don't you bind the CheckBox to Condition?
– mm8
Sep 28 at 11:33
add a comment |
Why don't you bind the CheckBox to Condition?
– mm8
Sep 28 at 11:33
Why don't you bind the CheckBox to Condition?
– mm8
Sep 28 at 11:33
Why don't you bind the CheckBox to Condition?
– mm8
Sep 28 at 11:33
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
When you need one custom control to bind to the properties of another control, you best solution is going to be to register dependency properties in the code behind of the custom control who has bound properties that need exposed.
You can certainly still get and set your viewModel bindable properties from within the get and set of your registered dependency property. However, that is going to be your best bet.
So make a DependencyProperty for your type of controller, give it a name, and register the onChanged if you care to monitor it in code. Then create your get and set properties for it to point the dependency property to.
From their, compile and reopen the xaml file that is trying to utilize it, and the property will now be there in auto-fill intellisense for you to bind to.
Happy Coding.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Actually instead of twisting everything around, I have chosen to use simple ViewModel logic, which is much simpler.
In ViewModels V1vm
and V2vm
I define a property of type MyUCvm
that I use to define the DataContext
of the <local:MyUC DataContext={Binding RefToMyUCvm} ... />
xaml element in views V1
and V2
.
In V1vm
and V2vm
I use a bool property MyParam
to bind to the CheckBox.IsChecked
(or something else ...). And I do the work in getter/setter of the property.
public class V1vm : ViewModelBase
{
//...
public MyUCvm RefToUCvm { get; set; }
public bool MyParam
{
get { return MyUCvm?.MyParam ?? false; }
set
{
if (MyUCvm != null)
{
MyUCvm.MyParam = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("MyParam");
}
}
}
}
This is much straitforward and simple...
Thanks to Sam and mm8 for helping me to find a simple solution
– Sylvain B.
Nov 22 at 12:42
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f52540296%2fbinding-of-a-view-variable-to-a-usercontrol-viewmodel-declared-inside-the-view%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
When you need one custom control to bind to the properties of another control, you best solution is going to be to register dependency properties in the code behind of the custom control who has bound properties that need exposed.
You can certainly still get and set your viewModel bindable properties from within the get and set of your registered dependency property. However, that is going to be your best bet.
So make a DependencyProperty for your type of controller, give it a name, and register the onChanged if you care to monitor it in code. Then create your get and set properties for it to point the dependency property to.
From their, compile and reopen the xaml file that is trying to utilize it, and the property will now be there in auto-fill intellisense for you to bind to.
Happy Coding.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
When you need one custom control to bind to the properties of another control, you best solution is going to be to register dependency properties in the code behind of the custom control who has bound properties that need exposed.
You can certainly still get and set your viewModel bindable properties from within the get and set of your registered dependency property. However, that is going to be your best bet.
So make a DependencyProperty for your type of controller, give it a name, and register the onChanged if you care to monitor it in code. Then create your get and set properties for it to point the dependency property to.
From their, compile and reopen the xaml file that is trying to utilize it, and the property will now be there in auto-fill intellisense for you to bind to.
Happy Coding.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
When you need one custom control to bind to the properties of another control, you best solution is going to be to register dependency properties in the code behind of the custom control who has bound properties that need exposed.
You can certainly still get and set your viewModel bindable properties from within the get and set of your registered dependency property. However, that is going to be your best bet.
So make a DependencyProperty for your type of controller, give it a name, and register the onChanged if you care to monitor it in code. Then create your get and set properties for it to point the dependency property to.
From their, compile and reopen the xaml file that is trying to utilize it, and the property will now be there in auto-fill intellisense for you to bind to.
Happy Coding.
When you need one custom control to bind to the properties of another control, you best solution is going to be to register dependency properties in the code behind of the custom control who has bound properties that need exposed.
You can certainly still get and set your viewModel bindable properties from within the get and set of your registered dependency property. However, that is going to be your best bet.
So make a DependencyProperty for your type of controller, give it a name, and register the onChanged if you care to monitor it in code. Then create your get and set properties for it to point the dependency property to.
From their, compile and reopen the xaml file that is trying to utilize it, and the property will now be there in auto-fill intellisense for you to bind to.
Happy Coding.
answered Sep 27 at 16:55
Sam
2,93611022
2,93611022
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Actually instead of twisting everything around, I have chosen to use simple ViewModel logic, which is much simpler.
In ViewModels V1vm
and V2vm
I define a property of type MyUCvm
that I use to define the DataContext
of the <local:MyUC DataContext={Binding RefToMyUCvm} ... />
xaml element in views V1
and V2
.
In V1vm
and V2vm
I use a bool property MyParam
to bind to the CheckBox.IsChecked
(or something else ...). And I do the work in getter/setter of the property.
public class V1vm : ViewModelBase
{
//...
public MyUCvm RefToUCvm { get; set; }
public bool MyParam
{
get { return MyUCvm?.MyParam ?? false; }
set
{
if (MyUCvm != null)
{
MyUCvm.MyParam = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("MyParam");
}
}
}
}
This is much straitforward and simple...
Thanks to Sam and mm8 for helping me to find a simple solution
– Sylvain B.
Nov 22 at 12:42
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Actually instead of twisting everything around, I have chosen to use simple ViewModel logic, which is much simpler.
In ViewModels V1vm
and V2vm
I define a property of type MyUCvm
that I use to define the DataContext
of the <local:MyUC DataContext={Binding RefToMyUCvm} ... />
xaml element in views V1
and V2
.
In V1vm
and V2vm
I use a bool property MyParam
to bind to the CheckBox.IsChecked
(or something else ...). And I do the work in getter/setter of the property.
public class V1vm : ViewModelBase
{
//...
public MyUCvm RefToUCvm { get; set; }
public bool MyParam
{
get { return MyUCvm?.MyParam ?? false; }
set
{
if (MyUCvm != null)
{
MyUCvm.MyParam = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("MyParam");
}
}
}
}
This is much straitforward and simple...
Thanks to Sam and mm8 for helping me to find a simple solution
– Sylvain B.
Nov 22 at 12:42
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Actually instead of twisting everything around, I have chosen to use simple ViewModel logic, which is much simpler.
In ViewModels V1vm
and V2vm
I define a property of type MyUCvm
that I use to define the DataContext
of the <local:MyUC DataContext={Binding RefToMyUCvm} ... />
xaml element in views V1
and V2
.
In V1vm
and V2vm
I use a bool property MyParam
to bind to the CheckBox.IsChecked
(or something else ...). And I do the work in getter/setter of the property.
public class V1vm : ViewModelBase
{
//...
public MyUCvm RefToUCvm { get; set; }
public bool MyParam
{
get { return MyUCvm?.MyParam ?? false; }
set
{
if (MyUCvm != null)
{
MyUCvm.MyParam = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("MyParam");
}
}
}
}
This is much straitforward and simple...
Actually instead of twisting everything around, I have chosen to use simple ViewModel logic, which is much simpler.
In ViewModels V1vm
and V2vm
I define a property of type MyUCvm
that I use to define the DataContext
of the <local:MyUC DataContext={Binding RefToMyUCvm} ... />
xaml element in views V1
and V2
.
In V1vm
and V2vm
I use a bool property MyParam
to bind to the CheckBox.IsChecked
(or something else ...). And I do the work in getter/setter of the property.
public class V1vm : ViewModelBase
{
//...
public MyUCvm RefToUCvm { get; set; }
public bool MyParam
{
get { return MyUCvm?.MyParam ?? false; }
set
{
if (MyUCvm != null)
{
MyUCvm.MyParam = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("MyParam");
}
}
}
}
This is much straitforward and simple...
answered Nov 22 at 12:41
Sylvain B.
309214
309214
Thanks to Sam and mm8 for helping me to find a simple solution
– Sylvain B.
Nov 22 at 12:42
add a comment |
Thanks to Sam and mm8 for helping me to find a simple solution
– Sylvain B.
Nov 22 at 12:42
Thanks to Sam and mm8 for helping me to find a simple solution
– Sylvain B.
Nov 22 at 12:42
Thanks to Sam and mm8 for helping me to find a simple solution
– Sylvain B.
Nov 22 at 12:42
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f52540296%2fbinding-of-a-view-variable-to-a-usercontrol-viewmodel-declared-inside-the-view%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Why don't you bind the CheckBox to Condition?
– mm8
Sep 28 at 11:33