Natural language into sentence logic












2















Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true




  1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


  2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.











share|improve this question



























    2















    Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



    D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true




    1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


    2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.











    share|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2


      1






      Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



      D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true




      1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


      2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.











      share|improve this question














      Need some help putting these two examples of natural language into sentence logic. For reference, use the transcription guide below:



      D = you think so; E = I think so; F = it is true




      1. If you think so, I think so. And if I think so, you think so. (is it possible to express this using just one connective?)


      2. Unless it isn’t true, you don’t think so.








      natural-language






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      A. DelargeA. Delarge

      563




      563






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3















          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:


          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E




          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:


          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            2 hours ago











          • Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

            – cenicero
            1 hour ago











          • @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

            – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
            1 hour ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "265"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61465%2fnatural-language-into-sentence-logic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3















          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:


          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E




          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:


          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            2 hours ago











          • Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

            – cenicero
            1 hour ago











          • @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

            – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
            1 hour ago
















          3















          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:


          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E




          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:


          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            2 hours ago











          • Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

            – cenicero
            1 hour ago











          • @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

            – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
            1 hour ago














          3












          3








          3








          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:


          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E




          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:


          ~F∨~D






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.











          1. This sentence is a conjunction of two conditionals:


          D→E∧E→D



          You can put it into a single connective by using CB: D↔E




          1. I was taught that "unless" is a flag for the "or" connective, so I will write my answer like that. If you rewrite the sentence to "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true", then the logic you get is:


          ~F∨~D







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 3 hours ago









          cenicerocenicero

          311




          311




          New contributor




          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          cenicero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.













          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            2 hours ago











          • Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

            – cenicero
            1 hour ago











          • @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

            – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
            1 hour ago



















          • Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

            – A. Delarge
            2 hours ago











          • Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

            – cenicero
            1 hour ago











          • @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

            – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
            1 hour ago

















          Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

          – A. Delarge
          2 hours ago





          Thank you so much for your response. For #2, however, I was recently taught that “X, unless Y” is the same (usually) as ~Y > X. Would it be possible to write it out then as ~~D > ~F, which would just be D > ~F?

          – A. Delarge
          2 hours ago













          Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

          – cenicero
          1 hour ago





          Hello, if you were taught that "X unless Y" meant X ∨ ~Y, then "You don’t think so unless it isn’t true" would be "You don’t think so" ∨ ~"it isn’t true" = ~D ∨ ~~F = ~D ∨ F

          – cenicero
          1 hour ago













          @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

          – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
          1 hour ago





          @A.Delarge You are correct, unless is a contrapositive. That is how it should be written.

          – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
          1 hour ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Philosophy Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61465%2fnatural-language-into-sentence-logic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          A CLEAN and SIMPLE way to add appendices to Table of Contents and bookmarks

          Calculate evaluation metrics using cross_val_predict sklearn

          Insert data from modal to MySQL (multiple modal on website)